This entry was posted
on Thursday, November 1st, 2012 at 8:28 pm by Radley Balko
and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
if he would’ve had a paper with all the questionable policies (and backgrounds) to hand them at the end, I think this would’ve been even better. or, maybe hand the twits a copy of the video of them waffling.
The saddest part is how few of them, if any, would change their vote as a result of this information. As they say, politics isn’t so much about policy as it is mood affiliation. People mostly vote for the candidate that it gives them fuzzy, positive feelings to vote for.
The Late Andy Rooney |
November 1st, 2012 at 10:33 pm
It’s always good to show the folly of the “Team Blue vs. Team Red” mentality, but I think these folks conducted themselves far better than they’re being given credit for.
The goateed black man conceded he doesn’t agree with Obama on everything, but likes him overall. The Belizean in the superhero costume admitted he was shocked, and that the claims, if true, are “really messed up.” The bearded Yankees fan said he disagreed with Obama’s policies on indefinite detention and drones, but would vote for him for other reasons. The glasses-wearing brunette lost her enthusiasm and admitted she didn’t like Obama’s policies. The guy with glasses said he would rethink his support for Obama.The blonde on the left (who looks a lot like the young woman in “Goodfellas” who refuses to fly without her lucky hat) said she’ll vote for him, despite disagreeing on indefinite detention, drones, etc., while the blonde on the right seemed to show surprise and disappointment (via her hand gestures) upon hearing Obama supported those policies. The only one who remained in complete denial was the black man with the earring, who stated that “those are not facts.”
Of course, all this confusion could have been avoided if they’d read this blog and/or Glenn Greenwald.
damaged justice |
November 1st, 2012 at 10:57 pm
This is amusing, but in fairness, one could go to Branson or SLC or some other busy flyover spot and get the exact same result with Romney policies described as Obama policies.
Yes, one could. You should get right on that.
Judas Peckerwood |
November 2nd, 2012 at 2:10 am
Why aren’t voters required to pass the basic civics test that foreigners applying for U.S. citizenship have to pass? It would certainly weed out a lot of the deadwood losers who have no business selecting our elected leaders. I’m fine with letting the failures continue choosing the winners of Dancing with the Stars and American Idol, but keep their ignorant paws off of our government.
First off: this idea that people should vote on the issues is pathetic, boring, and naive. People don’t get a checklist of policies to vote for which are fed into a robot which controls the world for four years, they get one vote for one of two candidates, based on campaign speeches over six months or a year — what are people supposed to do? All they can do is vote for whoever they think will handle the next four years most capably, and they have to base that on the candidates’ personality, nothing more.
Yes, these people are ignorant, but it doesn’t matter — if they had known what Romney’s positions were, they would also have known what Obama’s positions were, and that they were the same. But they didn’t know either because neither matters. All they get is one lousy feeble vote, which is the most pathetic feedback possible. Imagine all your shopping, for food, clothes, cars, house, everything, came down to one vote every four years for either WalMart or Kmart, with Target an outlier because it is too radical a difference. Would it matter that both had the exact same rayon/cotton/spandex blend in their underwear?
And as for requiring a civics test, what a load of ignorance there too! By all means, add a test which is as subjective as hell, far more open to corruption than literacy tests. The Citizens United haters are model free speech proponents in comparison to the idea of limiting voting by some arbitrary test administered by the very bureaucrats who would be affected by the vote.
Wait….have I got this right? Some of y’all are *defending* the dumbshits brigade marching across that video?? Or, as in comment #8, trying to spin their jawdropping stupidity into a Ringing Indictment of All That’s Wrong With America?? Interesting….Now why would anyone feel a (dare we say ‘pavlovian’) need to do that, I wonder.
“I dunno….maybe you should conclude the popularity of your agenda has been vastly overstated.”
I don’t think most folks reading here would argue their preferred policy agenda is popular – they’re more prone to arguing that everyone who disagrees with them is stupid or evil. I think most understand that radical libertarianism has a very limited audience in the US.
Nick: maybe so but at the end of the video a few of them rushed in to throw out other policies they did support (such as the PPACA) and that’s why they still support Obama any ways even though his record on foreign policy and civil rights is absolutely abysmal. I think the cognitive dissonance is telling.
Would love to see various PPACA regulations thrown at them as well to find out if they actually support those too or if it’s just the feel-goodness of the law (that some say won’t even significantly expand insurance coverage to the current uninsured).
It would have been better to hit Romney supporters with a similar interview at the same time, just taking whoever you got, and hitting them with questions for them. Hey, Libertarians, what so you think about putting every resident of the country on an allowance from the federal government? Because that’s what your nominee wants to do.
Having a super majority of civil right despising conservatives on the supreme court worries me more than either Romney or Obama do, they are going to do whatever the military industrial complex tells them to do regardless, therefore I voted against Romney, not for Obama, otherwise I would have wasted my vote on Gary Johnson.
Johnny, morally…. whether I like the candidates or not I’m voting because I believe that it’s the right thing to do, the right to vote didn’t come easy. Besides, future supreme court appointments are too important to sit this one out. I’d like my grandkids to have a few civil rights left by the time they reach adulthood. Plus, our family pays lots of taxes, I at least like to imagine for one day that I have a say in my cruddy government.
November 3rd, 2012 at 8:44 am
Ignorance is bliss.
Gary Berg-Cross |
November 3rd, 2012 at 8:55 am
Free talk Sat, 03-Nov-12 Wheaton Library Maryland (2-4) Margaret Flowers and Kevin Zeese, co-directors of ItsOurEconomy.us “Shifting Economic and Political Power to the People”
We live in a time of tremendous wealth disparity. Bill Moyers calls our economy a Plutonomy. Wealth inequality creates an imbalance of political power such that public policy is designed to funnel wealth to a few while the many struggle to afford an education, a home and health care. We will describe strategy and tactics to shift economic power, and thereby political power, to the people. The movement to democratize the economy is happening around the world and is growing in the U.S.