<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Carrying Water</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberranter</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3737425</link>
		<dc:creator>liberranter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3737425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;I&gt;...if I could convince anyone of my sincerely nonpartisan alignment. And then maybe we could commiserate. I really am nonpartisan, in that I dislike both parties about equally.&lt;/I&gt;

Unfortunately, Boobus Americanus has been indoctrinated for so long, across so many generations, to accept partisan politics as a fact of life that no amount of reason can change his mind.  Then again, arguing or trying to reason with Boobus is a violation of the Confucian principle that says, essentially, that the only person who tries to reason with Boobus is an even bigger Boobus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8230;if I could convince anyone of my sincerely nonpartisan alignment. And then maybe we could commiserate. I really am nonpartisan, in that I dislike both parties about equally.</i></p>
<p>Unfortunately, Boobus Americanus has been indoctrinated for so long, across so many generations, to accept partisan politics as a fact of life that no amount of reason can change his mind.  Then again, arguing or trying to reason with Boobus is a violation of the Confucian principle that says, essentially, that the only person who tries to reason with Boobus is an even bigger Boobus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLS</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3731386</link>
		<dc:creator>JLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3731386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#24 Brandon, I wasn&#039;t talking about whether it is an effective form of government or whether they were &quot;working&quot; whatever that might mean. I was talking about Americans seemingly inablitiy to see anything in terms other than stark black and white. It seems like Europeans and others don&#039;t classify every single thing in the world as either liberal or conservative but recognize that many people overlap or don&#039;t fit neatly into this dichotomy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#24 Brandon, I wasn&#8217;t talking about whether it is an effective form of government or whether they were &#8220;working&#8221; whatever that might mean. I was talking about Americans seemingly inablitiy to see anything in terms other than stark black and white. It seems like Europeans and others don&#8217;t classify every single thing in the world as either liberal or conservative but recognize that many people overlap or don&#8217;t fit neatly into this dichotomy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3731104</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3731104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(try number three)

#28: 

The bottom line is.....that book was written many years ago yet the government is far worse than it was when Heinlein wrote it.  That, if nothing else, demonstrates that the book simply doesn&#039;t have what it takes to effect any real change.

No, the parasites *do* *not* want you to give up hope.  Your hope chains you to the political process, where you are rendered impotent.  They know this *because they control the political process*.  This is why the incessant propaganda to vote.

To quote a forgotten someone, &quot;Hope is not a plan&quot;.  And, &quot;If only everyone did....&quot; is an exercise in opium smoking....  That&#039;s all that I&#039;ve seen from anyone who has suggested using the political process to try to reverse America&#039;s plunge into the abyss.  If you have something better than that, do tell.  But otherwise, I can&#039;t respect your view, not even if it comes from Heinlein.

(No, I don&#039;t see the Tea Partiers and Occupiers as significant change.  They are, for the most part, mere exaggerations of the evil moralities that got America here in the first place.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(try number three)</p>
<p>#28: </p>
<p>The bottom line is&#8230;..that book was written many years ago yet the government is far worse than it was when Heinlein wrote it.  That, if nothing else, demonstrates that the book simply doesn&#8217;t have what it takes to effect any real change.</p>
<p>No, the parasites *do* *not* want you to give up hope.  Your hope chains you to the political process, where you are rendered impotent.  They know this *because they control the political process*.  This is why the incessant propaganda to vote.</p>
<p>To quote a forgotten someone, &#8220;Hope is not a plan&#8221;.  And, &#8220;If only everyone did&#8230;.&#8221; is an exercise in opium smoking&#8230;.  That&#8217;s all that I&#8217;ve seen from anyone who has suggested using the political process to try to reverse America&#8217;s plunge into the abyss.  If you have something better than that, do tell.  But otherwise, I can&#8217;t respect your view, not even if it comes from Heinlein.</p>
<p>(No, I don&#8217;t see the Tea Partiers and Occupiers as significant change.  They are, for the most part, mere exaggerations of the evil moralities that got America here in the first place.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. S. P. Schofield</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3731010</link>
		<dc:creator>C. S. P. Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3731010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Wells,

I don&#039;t believe that. I think if you read Mr. Heinlein&#039;s book you might not either. That said, it would be a lot of work and take a long time. After all, it took a long time for things to get into their present revolting state.

Most people don&#039;t want to be bothered. Some have too much on their plates already. Some wouldn&#039;t be able to do the tedious part, and would get in the way of the exciting bits. But I think there is change in the works; The Republican &quot;business as usual&quot; operators are already feeling some cold breeze. I even see some sign of revolt in the Democrat ranks, although it is being obscured by the usual Liberal Left Street Theatre (Occupy Whatever, and so forth). 

I see some of the political theatre, like the squawks about &#039;for profit&#039; colleges and the &#039;eating healthy&#039; efforts being paraded in the public schools as attempts to distract from fundamental failures of the Political Class, and I not that a heartening number of people are declining to be much distracted.

Maybe the change will just be one group of professional parasites ousting another, but I don&#039;t give up hope.

After all, giving up hope is just what the parasites want me to do, and I decline to oblige them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Wells,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe that. I think if you read Mr. Heinlein&#8217;s book you might not either. That said, it would be a lot of work and take a long time. After all, it took a long time for things to get into their present revolting state.</p>
<p>Most people don&#8217;t want to be bothered. Some have too much on their plates already. Some wouldn&#8217;t be able to do the tedious part, and would get in the way of the exciting bits. But I think there is change in the works; The Republican &#8220;business as usual&#8221; operators are already feeling some cold breeze. I even see some sign of revolt in the Democrat ranks, although it is being obscured by the usual Liberal Left Street Theatre (Occupy Whatever, and so forth). </p>
<p>I see some of the political theatre, like the squawks about &#8216;for profit&#8217; colleges and the &#8216;eating healthy&#8217; efforts being paraded in the public schools as attempts to distract from fundamental failures of the Political Class, and I not that a heartening number of people are declining to be much distracted.</p>
<p>Maybe the change will just be one group of professional parasites ousting another, but I don&#8217;t give up hope.</p>
<p>After all, giving up hope is just what the parasites want me to do, and I decline to oblige them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crazybob</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730918</link>
		<dc:creator>crazybob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;as long as there are strict limits on what the government can do, things will turn out all right. &quot;

That&#039;s an opinion, and one without basis.  Canada, for example, has many fewer limits on government than the US, and much more involvement in the economy (health care, for example).  And yet they largely escaped the financial meltdown that happened in the US.  Why?  Government limited the dangerous banking practices.  

Facts are that government involvement underpins most sectors of the US economy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;as long as there are strict limits on what the government can do, things will turn out all right. &#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an opinion, and one without basis.  Canada, for example, has many fewer limits on government than the US, and much more involvement in the economy (health care, for example).  And yet they largely escaped the financial meltdown that happened in the US.  Why?  Government limited the dangerous banking practices.  </p>
<p>Facts are that government involvement underpins most sectors of the US economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730881</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#19:

It&#039;s not possible to take back this government.  In this nation of 300+ million people and some huge number of jurisdictions....how many jurisdictions are there where the government understands and respects individual rights?  If that number is not zero, how much effort did it take to get there and how many people would it take to do the same in a majority of states.....and what are the chances that a constitutional convention--because that&#039;s what it will take to fix this government--won&#039;t be coopted by special interest groups who will turn the American Constitution into a gimme-gimme charter?

America has stopped being a nation of people who believe in individual rights and has become, instead, a nation of whiny children, all demanding their turn at the public teat.  American politics cannot change so long as that is true. And America cannot solve any of its real problems so long as its politics remains based on deciding who will be stolen from and who will receive the stolen goods.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#19:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not possible to take back this government.  In this nation of 300+ million people and some huge number of jurisdictions&#8230;.how many jurisdictions are there where the government understands and respects individual rights?  If that number is not zero, how much effort did it take to get there and how many people would it take to do the same in a majority of states&#8230;..and what are the chances that a constitutional convention&#8211;because that&#8217;s what it will take to fix this government&#8211;won&#8217;t be coopted by special interest groups who will turn the American Constitution into a gimme-gimme charter?</p>
<p>America has stopped being a nation of people who believe in individual rights and has become, instead, a nation of whiny children, all demanding their turn at the public teat.  American politics cannot change so long as that is true. And America cannot solve any of its real problems so long as its politics remains based on deciding who will be stolen from and who will receive the stolen goods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730836</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Isn’t it funny how some countries in Europe have like 16 parties sharing power reflecting every view from Marxists to Nationalists?”

Isn&#039;t it funny how those same countries are circling the drain just like we are? The problem isn&#039;t the binary system, it&#039;s the nature of government. That&#039;s why the system of government is almost irrelevant; as long as there are strict limits on what the government can do, things will turn out all right. The partisan bickering is just a distraction from the total failures of government.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Isn’t it funny how some countries in Europe have like 16 parties sharing power reflecting every view from Marxists to Nationalists?”</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it funny how those same countries are circling the drain just like we are? The problem isn&#8217;t the binary system, it&#8217;s the nature of government. That&#8217;s why the system of government is almost irrelevant; as long as there are strict limits on what the government can do, things will turn out all right. The partisan bickering is just a distraction from the total failures of government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crazybob</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730665</link>
		<dc:creator>crazybob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Isn’t it funny how some countries in Europe have like 16 parties sharing power reflecting every view from Marxists to Nationalists?&quot;

It is one of the numerous advantages of the parliamentary system, which the US should rewrite the constitution to adopt.  After WWII when we went around the world setting up democracies in other countries - the US universally pushed parliamentary forms on them, instead of modelling them on the US constitution.  Why?  Because they work better, and everyone recognized it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Isn’t it funny how some countries in Europe have like 16 parties sharing power reflecting every view from Marxists to Nationalists?&#8221;</p>
<p>It is one of the numerous advantages of the parliamentary system, which the US should rewrite the constitution to adopt.  After WWII when we went around the world setting up democracies in other countries &#8211; the US universally pushed parliamentary forms on them, instead of modelling them on the US constitution.  Why?  Because they work better, and everyone recognized it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLS</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730645</link>
		<dc:creator>JLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AnonymousCoward &quot;North Korea too.&quot;

lol&#039;ed for real.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AnonymousCoward &#8220;North Korea too.&#8221;</p>
<p>lol&#8217;ed for real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730627</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Jason...

Unfortunately, anytime that you express some kind of disapproval of Party A, you are very clearly indicating your support of Party B.  Disapproval of Party A is the #1 item on Party B&#039;s platform.  It is the only thing that Party B&#039;s supporters can actually agree on.  It is the primary concern that will motivate them to get out and vote.

This is why the supporters of Party B don&#039;t give a crap that their politicians don&#039;t actually represent any of the values/policies that they claim.  Only their opposition of Party A is relevant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jason&#8230;</p>
<p>Unfortunately, anytime that you express some kind of disapproval of Party A, you are very clearly indicating your support of Party B.  Disapproval of Party A is the #1 item on Party B&#8217;s platform.  It is the only thing that Party B&#8217;s supporters can actually agree on.  It is the primary concern that will motivate them to get out and vote.</p>
<p>This is why the supporters of Party B don&#8217;t give a crap that their politicians don&#8217;t actually represent any of the values/policies that they claim.  Only their opposition of Party A is relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730585</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given a choice between being punched in the face or kicked in the junk... I have a stronger dislike for getting kicked in the jewels.

Please do not construe this as a sign that I approve of being punched in the face.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given a choice between being punched in the face or kicked in the junk&#8230; I have a stronger dislike for getting kicked in the jewels.</p>
<p>Please do not construe this as a sign that I approve of being punched in the face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. S. P. Schofield</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730442</link>
		<dc:creator>C. S. P. Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real answer to the problem od D vs R is to get involved inthe party of your preference on a local level and follow Robert Heinein&#039;s advice (TAKE BACK YOUR GOVERNMENT Baen books; out of print, but still available as an e-book) on defeating the professional politicians, who are as devoid of principles as the moon is of cheese.

But that is one hell of a lot easier to write than it is to do. It would involve actually working at the thing, and I am just as guilty of laziness and procrastination on that point as any of the rest of y&#039;all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real answer to the problem od D vs R is to get involved inthe party of your preference on a local level and follow Robert Heinein&#8217;s advice (TAKE BACK YOUR GOVERNMENT Baen books; out of print, but still available as an e-book) on defeating the professional politicians, who are as devoid of principles as the moon is of cheese.</p>
<p>But that is one hell of a lot easier to write than it is to do. It would involve actually working at the thing, and I am just as guilty of laziness and procrastination on that point as any of the rest of y&#8217;all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonymousCoward</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730360</link>
		<dc:creator>AnonymousCoward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[North Korea too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North Korea too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLS</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730290</link>
		<dc:creator>JLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t it funny how some countries in Europe have like 16 parties shariing power reflecting every view from Marxists to Nationalists? 

Is it just Americans who are so blinded by this &quot;it has to be either one or the other&quot; outlook? Is it just Americans who can&#039;t see anything besides black and white with no shades in between?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it funny how some countries in Europe have like 16 parties shariing power reflecting every view from Marxists to Nationalists? </p>
<p>Is it just Americans who are so blinded by this &#8220;it has to be either one or the other&#8221; outlook? Is it just Americans who can&#8217;t see anything besides black and white with no shades in between?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bergman</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730242</link>
		<dc:creator>Bergman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as one party or another makes a kernel of truth part of their party line, and the other denies that truth, anyone speaking truth will be seen as favoring that party.
 
It simply does not matter that one side is wrong on a facet of reality, it&#039;s a political matter now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as one party or another makes a kernel of truth part of their party line, and the other denies that truth, anyone speaking truth will be seen as favoring that party.</p>
<p>It simply does not matter that one side is wrong on a facet of reality, it&#8217;s a political matter now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasquin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730231</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasquin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You used thirty-three words to describe Dems and forty-two for GOP.

Clear case of bias. You can&#039;t argue with science. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You used thirty-three words to describe Dems and forty-two for GOP.</p>
<p>Clear case of bias. You can&#8217;t argue with science. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a leap at the wheel</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730201</link>
		<dc:creator>a leap at the wheel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#13 - none of my friends come out and say it as such, but I do get a few instances of liberal friends who symbolically pat me on the head and say &quot;yeah sure&quot; when I try to point out the difference libertarianism and conservative.  Of course, one of these friends argues to a standstill that there is no difference between progressive and liberal, so I don&#039;t take their opinion as gospel.  More funny than annoying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#13 &#8211; none of my friends come out and say it as such, but I do get a few instances of liberal friends who symbolically pat me on the head and say &#8220;yeah sure&#8221; when I try to point out the difference libertarianism and conservative.  Of course, one of these friends argues to a standstill that there is no difference between progressive and liberal, so I don&#8217;t take their opinion as gospel.  More funny than annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClubMedSux</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730182</link>
		<dc:creator>ClubMedSux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I actually had a liberal/Democrat acquaintance post on Facebook that I was an example of a conservative who he felt actually had thoughtful, principled opinions. When I responded by noting that I&#039;m not actually conservative, he essentially told me I was wrong, and that while I may call myself libertarian, I&#039;m really conservative. Some people are just incapable of seeing the world as anything but binary, and to them, if you&#039;re not a Democratic, you&#039;re a Republican.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually had a liberal/Democrat acquaintance post on Facebook that I was an example of a conservative who he felt actually had thoughtful, principled opinions. When I responded by noting that I&#8217;m not actually conservative, he essentially told me I was wrong, and that while I may call myself libertarian, I&#8217;m really conservative. Some people are just incapable of seeing the world as anything but binary, and to them, if you&#8217;re not a Democratic, you&#8217;re a Republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Kuznicki</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kuznicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I&#039;m still around for about a week yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m still around for about a week yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James D</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/08/23/on-carrying-water/comment-page-1/#comment-3730139</link>
		<dc:creator>James D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=26246#comment-3730139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, Jason, just realized this was your post and not Radley&#039;s but I&#039;m sure the point is the same if he&#039;s letting you post ....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Jason, just realized this was your post and not Radley&#8217;s but I&#8217;m sure the point is the same if he&#8217;s letting you post &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
