You immediately call anyone who disagrees with you disabled or mentally ill like all good totalitarians, and when I use 10% of your hyperbole (as above), you copy/paste the same crap over and over to try and cover everything up.

Of course you need to speak ABOUT anyone who’s not a good stateist peon like yourself.

Which again proves that Leon is a sexually frustrated Stalinist ; )

Take ‘er easy and have a nice weekend.

Thanks for the heads-up. I was a bit slow figuring it out. I’ll remember next time, DNFTT.

Leon’s reading comprehension skills are limited, but his real M.O. is making fantastic claims about other commenters and then repeating them over and over again. When you try to debate him or correct him, he just repeats the prior claim without providing any evidence. In my professional opinion, he is likely a sexually frustrated Stalinist. See, I can play this game too. Leon is a sexually frustrated Stalinist. Ooh I did it again. Now I’m cool like Leon.

Anyway, El Passant, I won’t address Leon directly anymore, since he has shown himself to be a worthless little troll. He can’t have a legit argument. So, like a child, he should be spoken ABOUT, not spoken to. Just FYI.

And furthermore, Leon is a sexually frustrated Stalinist.

Which again proves that Leon is a sexually frustrated Stalinist.

@11 -I see, you’re a ZOG believer. Well, next!

Actually I am a retired lawyer in the USA, and I’ve represented criminal defendants who demonstrated better reasoning skills than those which you have demonstrated here.

Regina can do whatever she wants about this “play centre” that advertises itself for all children and parents, but discriminates against some children and some parents based upon combinations of gender and age.

But here in the USA such public accommodations are subject to various anti-discrimination laws regardless of whether their discrimination is “tailored to the community”. As I pointed out above, the racial discrimination of Ollie’s Barbecue was “tailored to the community” in which it operated, and Ollie’s lost its case almost fifty years ago.

However, your reading comprehension appears limited to jumping to bizarre conclusions, so I see no point in explicating further details or varieties of American anti-discrimination statutes.

Okay, when women pushed, protested, worked, and laboured to gain equality, is this what they were hoping to get. Because by banning men, from places such as this, are they not freely admitting that raising kids is women’s work?

Things are getting way out of hand. Next male paramedics won’t be allowed to do CPR on female victims, as it will be misread as the pervert copping a feel.
How bout this, round up all the men, and exile us to the far reaches. Only release us to mate under strict controls. It is the only way to be completely safe.
Or once a male reaches a certain age, harvest some DNA for breeding purposes, and the execute him. Better safe than sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I wonder what LS says to her son about situations like this. The fact is that adult women tend to congregate into groups and then shun men and boys. Do you tell him it’s unfair and he should protest? Or that he should not let it bother him too much when women pretend not to like him?

Yes, I realize the British shariah courts in Birmingham, Bradford, et al, preside by voluntary subscription. Guess which option Muslim women and children tend to “vote” for at every stage, even if it means rather rough religious discipline for them? Meanwhile, Birmingham authorities as a practical matter won’t even enter Muslim residential areas for much less than overt proof of riot, arson, or murder.

A “conspiracy” is a meeting of the minds between two or more folks to do something illicit. Britain’s simply making more of this quite licit indeed, and the transfer of creeping precedents to the States is certain and already underway. The point isn’t “takeover”, as the avoidant ad hominem arguments assert, but ever-burgeoning enclaves of “cultural accomodations” in a variety of spheres, from dom rel to footbaths.

@12 – You mean civil issues? Well, let me tell you something absolutely shocking. In UK civil law, if two people decide to use the Flying Spagetti Demon’s laws to settle a case…they can! Or if they’re Jewish and want to use Beis Din, or Muslim and want to use a Sharia court…they can!

BUT. If the result isn’t within the range of options found in British law? It’s unenforceable. Period.

Why precisely are you spinning a conspiracy theory (which will require the state to intervene in civil cases?)

As soon as we see it in Dearborn, and elsewhere, proggie Muslim apologists will segue immediately from “Impossible: that’s wacko conspiracy thinking!” to “Gosh, why shouldn’t we all be culturally accomodating?.

@9 – No, it’s a direct link to the same of conspiracy theory.

Let’s see:

A. #2 Gill pointed out that the Kids Go Wild play centre has instituted gender discrimination consistent with extreme Islamists’ interpretation of Sharia, but not desired by many ordinary Muslims who live nearby the centre and would be its clientele; and

B. You consider his pointing out that fact to be a recital of conspiracy theory about Zionist Occupied Government.

You have enlightened all of us who didn’t realize that real flesh-and-blood current radical Islamists are actually fictitious 19th century Jewish Elders.

And yes, it’s caused bemusement in the local Islamic community. It’s quite amusing from my POV.

How DARE services be tailored to the community!

Riiiight. Just like Ollie’s Barbecue was “tailored to the community” of Birmingham, Alabama.

@2 – Right after the ZOG stage a takeover via the UN.

That’s not even a stupid distortion of what #1 Gill wrote. According to the linked article, even some Muslims joined in opposition to the play centre’s policy. At best, the owners of Kids Go Wild have presumed far more extreme “cultural reasons” than the locals themselves consider in their interest:

Bosses at the centre, which opened less than a fortnight ago, claim the policy was instigated for ‘cultural reasons’ and was in the interests of the ‘predominantly Asian’ local community.

Even so, yesterday Muslims in the Sparkhill suburb of Birmingham were among those who condemned the restrictions, which were advertised on a poster outside the centre.

It reads: ‘Ladies and children only. No boys over nine allowed.’

Councillor Habib Rehman, a Muslim father-of-four, said it was a ‘worrying situation’.

He added: ‘There’s something wrong when a dad can’t take his kids to a play centre.’

Ruksana Ayub, a Muslim mother-of-one, said while Muslim women may feel ‘more able to relax’ in a setting where they don’t ‘feel they have to cover up’, she thought it ‘quite shocking in this day and age that men aren’t allowed in’.

The location of this travesty is all I needed to see. As f***ed up and sick as the USSA is, Britain is orders of magnitude more diseased.

Remember it’s for the safety of the children.

@2 – Right after the ZOG stage a takeover via the UN.

The comedian Bill Burr has a funny bit about the presumption that all men are predators.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zc–FjGgAig