<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morning Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowdog</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3258821</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 15:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3258821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[meant hot pursuit...but high works just as good]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meant hot pursuit&#8230;but high works just as good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowdog</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3258819</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 15:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3258819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simple reason why the cop roared through the intersection to the almost cleared accident scene. Someone there, possibly both drivers, could be cited, and Officer Friendly could meet his quota, raise some revenue, and still have time to make it to Krispy Kreme.  The pedestrian he almost hit was lucky he didn&#039;t get a ticket for contempt of cop for daring to walk while Officer Friendly was in high pursuit of revenue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple reason why the cop roared through the intersection to the almost cleared accident scene. Someone there, possibly both drivers, could be cited, and Officer Friendly could meet his quota, raise some revenue, and still have time to make it to Krispy Kreme.  The pedestrian he almost hit was lucky he didn&#8217;t get a ticket for contempt of cop for daring to walk while Officer Friendly was in high pursuit of revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jppatter</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3258814</link>
		<dc:creator>jppatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 15:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3258814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;She stressed that she and her family are &#039;big fans of the police. I feel a lot of compassion for the police officer who shot my dog.&#039;&quot;

Are you f-ing kidding me?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;She stressed that she and her family are &#8216;big fans of the police. I feel a lot of compassion for the police officer who shot my dog.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you f-ing kidding me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burgers Allday</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3257977</link>
		<dc:creator>Burgers Allday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 11:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3257977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;About the Vallejo puppycide, it’s pretty stupid that we’ve created a bunch of makework projects for cops running errands for insurance companies. Investigating accidents or recording fraud victim statements would be done better, cheaper, and more safely by non-cops.&lt;/i&gt;

my last comment was needlessly flip.  I withdraw it.

More serious response:

quite a few years ago I was walking to my work downtown early on a Saturday.

I walked up on a car accident.  The damage to the vehicles was bad, but apparently nobody was hurt.  There was an ambulance there and a firefighter.  The cars were off to the side of the road and the people from the cars were standing around casually with the firefighters and the ambulance guys.  I walked through the intersection on the other side of the street from where the cars and people were so as not to interfere or distract them.  It was no big deal.  I kept walking down the street.

A couple of minutes later, I am at the heart of downtown.  there are few people out because it is early.  This police car barrels through the main intersection toward the accident against a red light with no lights and sirens.  The vehicle almost hit a pedestrian in the crosswalk.  I thought maybe the police car was going to something more urgent than the accident scene.  So i turned arond and watched to see where the police car was going in such a hurry.  Yup, he was just speeding to the scene of the cleared, no-injury accident and he almost killed somebody doing it.

This was one of those moments that really change how I feel about police in general.

It is not a dramatic as Packratt&#039;s story (thank goodness), but I was definitely like &quot;what in the haitch ee double hockey sticks was that?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>About the Vallejo puppycide, it’s pretty stupid that we’ve created a bunch of makework projects for cops running errands for insurance companies. Investigating accidents or recording fraud victim statements would be done better, cheaper, and more safely by non-cops.</i></p>
<p>my last comment was needlessly flip.  I withdraw it.</p>
<p>More serious response:</p>
<p>quite a few years ago I was walking to my work downtown early on a Saturday.</p>
<p>I walked up on a car accident.  The damage to the vehicles was bad, but apparently nobody was hurt.  There was an ambulance there and a firefighter.  The cars were off to the side of the road and the people from the cars were standing around casually with the firefighters and the ambulance guys.  I walked through the intersection on the other side of the street from where the cars and people were so as not to interfere or distract them.  It was no big deal.  I kept walking down the street.</p>
<p>A couple of minutes later, I am at the heart of downtown.  there are few people out because it is early.  This police car barrels through the main intersection toward the accident against a red light with no lights and sirens.  The vehicle almost hit a pedestrian in the crosswalk.  I thought maybe the police car was going to something more urgent than the accident scene.  So i turned arond and watched to see where the police car was going in such a hurry.  Yup, he was just speeding to the scene of the cleared, no-injury accident and he almost killed somebody doing it.</p>
<p>This was one of those moments that really change how I feel about police in general.</p>
<p>It is not a dramatic as Packratt&#8217;s story (thank goodness), but I was definitely like &#8220;what in the haitch ee double hockey sticks was that?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burgers Allday</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3256237</link>
		<dc:creator>Burgers Allday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 01:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3256237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;About the Vallejo puppycide, it’s pretty stupid that we’ve created a bunch of makework projects for cops running errands for insurance companies. Investigating accidents or recording fraud victim statements would be done better, cheaper, and more safely by non-cops.&lt;/i&gt;

that iz not whot the Koch Bros. want 2 c posted here !!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>About the Vallejo puppycide, it’s pretty stupid that we’ve created a bunch of makework projects for cops running errands for insurance companies. Investigating accidents or recording fraud victim statements would be done better, cheaper, and more safely by non-cops.</i></p>
<p>that iz not whot the Koch Bros. want 2 c posted here !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnl</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3255904</link>
		<dc:creator>johnl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 00:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3255904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About the Vallejo puppycide, it&#039;s pretty stupid that we&#039;ve created a bunch of makework projects for cops running errands for insurance companies. Investigating accidents or recording fraud victim statements would be done better, cheaper, and more safely by non-cops.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the Vallejo puppycide, it&#8217;s pretty stupid that we&#8217;ve created a bunch of makework projects for cops running errands for insurance companies. Investigating accidents or recording fraud victim statements would be done better, cheaper, and more safely by non-cops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burgers Allday</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254926</link>
		<dc:creator>Burgers Allday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, started FOIA type inquiry on Vallejo Officer Chase Calhoun.  Sounds like this one could take longer than it did for Officer Thomas Griffin out of Austin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, started FOIA type inquiry on Vallejo Officer Chase Calhoun.  Sounds like this one could take longer than it did for Officer Thomas Griffin out of Austin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cycjec</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254912</link>
		<dc:creator>cycjec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suspect most of us suspect that there&#039;s more than incompetence 
involved given the frequency of these gratuitous dog-killlings. Just
what is involved, I&#039;m  not sure.
I&#039;m not positive it&#039;s this:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/10/jihad-against-dogs.htm
but it&#039;s certainly a candidate.
BTW, cruelty to animals *is* predictive of cruelty to humans.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect most of us suspect that there&#8217;s more than incompetence<br />
involved given the frequency of these gratuitous dog-killlings. Just<br />
what is involved, I&#8217;m  not sure.<br />
I&#8217;m not positive it&#8217;s this:<br />
<a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/10/jihad-against-dogs.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/10/jihad-against-dogs.htm</a><br />
but it&#8217;s certainly a candidate.<br />
BTW, cruelty to animals *is* predictive of cruelty to humans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Black</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254898</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If cops are so afraid of dogs...from Jack Russels to Labradors, then maybe they are too scared to be trusted with being a cop.
Sending people who are scared while armed is never a good idea. Scared of furtive movement, scared of puppies, scared of unarmed people, scared of everything that goes bump in the night. It&#039;s asking for tragedy.
Then don&#039;t be a cop. You are not fit for duty. Craven sociopaths with a shoot first, my union will get me off attitude are a danger to society.
GOP Butt Plugs is the most amazing start to a headline ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If cops are so afraid of dogs&#8230;from Jack Russels to Labradors, then maybe they are too scared to be trusted with being a cop.<br />
Sending people who are scared while armed is never a good idea. Scared of furtive movement, scared of puppies, scared of unarmed people, scared of everything that goes bump in the night. It&#8217;s asking for tragedy.<br />
Then don&#8217;t be a cop. You are not fit for duty. Craven sociopaths with a shoot first, my union will get me off attitude are a danger to society.<br />
GOP Butt Plugs is the most amazing start to a headline ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Personanongrata</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254837</link>
		<dc:creator>Personanongrata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;•Puppycide: Family reports identity theft. Cop shows up to take report, kills their 11-year-old lab mix.&lt;/em&gt;

What would any reasonable person have done if confronted with the same circumstances as the &quot;highly trained&quot; Officer Chase Calhoun?  

Would the reasonable person have retreated back through the gate and closed it or pull a pistol and gun the dog down? 

Are police officers in the US so poorly trained and/or caught up in a culture of uber machoism that they must resort to lethal violence as their first recourse?

&lt;em&gt;Calhoun approached the front gate and opened it after seeing there were no dogs in the yard, Weaver said.
 
But as the officer opened the gate, two dogs came around the corner and &quot;started snarling,&quot; Weaver said. Calhoun tried to back up, but &quot;they closed the gap on him almost immediately,&quot; Weaver said.
&lt;/em&gt;

Calhouns story doth reek like a month old pile of diaper fillings.  

It would be nice to see some video/photos that capture the size and layout of the front yard with the fence and gate.

&lt;em&gt;Calhoun told the family he was an animal lover and was sorry about what happened, Gregory said. &lt;/em&gt;

Such touching words.  I&#039;m sure the family was fully consoled.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>•Puppycide: Family reports identity theft. Cop shows up to take report, kills their 11-year-old lab mix.</em></p>
<p>What would any reasonable person have done if confronted with the same circumstances as the &#8220;highly trained&#8221; Officer Chase Calhoun?  </p>
<p>Would the reasonable person have retreated back through the gate and closed it or pull a pistol and gun the dog down? </p>
<p>Are police officers in the US so poorly trained and/or caught up in a culture of uber machoism that they must resort to lethal violence as their first recourse?</p>
<p><em>Calhoun approached the front gate and opened it after seeing there were no dogs in the yard, Weaver said.</p>
<p>But as the officer opened the gate, two dogs came around the corner and &#8220;started snarling,&#8221; Weaver said. Calhoun tried to back up, but &#8220;they closed the gap on him almost immediately,&#8221; Weaver said.<br />
</em></p>
<p>Calhouns story doth reek like a month old pile of diaper fillings.  </p>
<p>It would be nice to see some video/photos that capture the size and layout of the front yard with the fence and gate.</p>
<p><em>Calhoun told the family he was an animal lover and was sorry about what happened, Gregory said. </em></p>
<p>Such touching words.  I&#8217;m sure the family was fully consoled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Gower</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254827</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Gower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@#24
I don&#039;t know if this is legitimate or not. It&#039;s all I&#039;ve seen.

http://www.njfishing.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47235]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#24<br />
I don&#8217;t know if this is legitimate or not. It&#8217;s all I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.njfishing.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47235" rel="nofollow">http://www.njfishing.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47235</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254809</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: Why do so many sweet dogs get shot by police for being aggressive?
Answer: Because dogs are very good judges of character.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: Why do so many sweet dogs get shot by police for being aggressive?<br />
Answer: Because dogs are very good judges of character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254521</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: Puppycide

I read a story today about a bull moose in Utah that was running through town, scaring people.  Those guys can weigh almost a ton, and they can easily kill a human if they want to.

This was a very dangerous situation.  Naturally the police were called.

Guess what?  They tranquilized it, and are going to relocate it to a canyon somewhere.

So, apparently, the police don&#039;t hate all animals.  Just dogs.  Go figure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Puppycide</p>
<p>I read a story today about a bull moose in Utah that was running through town, scaring people.  Those guys can weigh almost a ton, and they can easily kill a human if they want to.</p>
<p>This was a very dangerous situation.  Naturally the police were called.</p>
<p>Guess what?  They tranquilized it, and are going to relocate it to a canyon somewhere.</p>
<p>So, apparently, the police don&#8217;t hate all animals.  Just dogs.  Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. S. P. Schofield</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254506</link>
		<dc:creator>C. S. P. Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leon,

The State has a stake in this because, way back when we were just figuring out how to bang rocks together to make fire, the Clan had a very significant stake in it. Marriage has been tied up with Societal approval since societal approval was crucial because the unity of the clan was one of the few things standing between the individual and getting eaten by bears.

The notion that the State does NOT stand in loco parentis is very new (as in, no older than the 18th century Age of Reason) and fairly radical even today. And disentangling the custom of marriage from the warp and woof of British Common Law (and thus from our own legal heritage) is probably impossible.

What I tell the Religiously Offended who want me to denounce Gay Marriage is &quot;What&#039;s wrong with our marriage customs has little or nothing to do with Gays. The problem isn&#039;t that we are considering allowing Gays to marry, The problem is that it is easier to get out of a marriage contract than it is to get out of a cell-phone contract.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leon,</p>
<p>The State has a stake in this because, way back when we were just figuring out how to bang rocks together to make fire, the Clan had a very significant stake in it. Marriage has been tied up with Societal approval since societal approval was crucial because the unity of the clan was one of the few things standing between the individual and getting eaten by bears.</p>
<p>The notion that the State does NOT stand in loco parentis is very new (as in, no older than the 18th century Age of Reason) and fairly radical even today. And disentangling the custom of marriage from the warp and woof of British Common Law (and thus from our own legal heritage) is probably impossible.</p>
<p>What I tell the Religiously Offended who want me to denounce Gay Marriage is &#8220;What&#8217;s wrong with our marriage customs has little or nothing to do with Gays. The problem isn&#8217;t that we are considering allowing Gays to marry, The problem is that it is easier to get out of a marriage contract than it is to get out of a cell-phone contract.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Hummel</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254486</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Hummel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Puppycide

The cops should talk to the people at Terminix. They have a canned voicemail msg they send  couple of days before they come over for the regular outside treatment. One of things they mention is to please secure your pets. I guess it&#039;s too hard for cops to do the same things. Maybe while they enjoy their free donut and coffee? OK, back to reality now...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Puppycide</p>
<p>The cops should talk to the people at Terminix. They have a canned voicemail msg they send  couple of days before they come over for the regular outside treatment. One of things they mention is to please secure your pets. I guess it&#8217;s too hard for cops to do the same things. Maybe while they enjoy their free donut and coffee? OK, back to reality now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EBL</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254458</link>
		<dc:creator>EBL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The passion play does not bother me at all.  Provided no one was coerced into participating or watching it.  Most prisoners at Angola are probably Christian and if the play resonates with them, good for them.  

I assume the prison drama department is not forced to only do Christian themes.  Obviously that is important.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The passion play does not bother me at all.  Provided no one was coerced into participating or watching it.  Most prisoners at Angola are probably Christian and if the play resonates with them, good for them.  </p>
<p>I assume the prison drama department is not forced to only do Christian themes.  Obviously that is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon Wolfeson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254433</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon Wolfeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@2 - Right. Small government - civil unions, and for that matter the &quot;between two people&quot; thing is in itself judgemental.

One of the areas I as a leftie use an example of Governments moralising where they have no business.

(I&#039;m also personally religious and would expect to be married in any long-term relationship, I just fail to see why the state has a stake in this)

For that matter, afaik the state (as in the Nordic counties) should consider each person&#039;s individual needs and not in pairs, making it hard for people to act as individuals via economic ties.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@2 &#8211; Right. Small government &#8211; civil unions, and for that matter the &#8220;between two people&#8221; thing is in itself judgemental.</p>
<p>One of the areas I as a leftie use an example of Governments moralising where they have no business.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;m also personally religious and would expect to be married in any long-term relationship, I just fail to see why the state has a stake in this)</p>
<p>For that matter, afaik the state (as in the Nordic counties) should consider each person&#8217;s individual needs and not in pairs, making it hard for people to act as individuals via economic ties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burgers Allday</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254425</link>
		<dc:creator>Burgers Allday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George Hitcho has been convicted of first degree murder when he killed a policeman to prevent the policeman from shooting his dogs.

The police witness (the one who wasn&#039;t killed) said that the dead policeman was only going to taser the dog.

This case not nearly enough coverage.  It is an outrage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Hitcho has been convicted of first degree murder when he killed a policeman to prevent the policeman from shooting his dogs.</p>
<p>The police witness (the one who wasn&#8217;t killed) said that the dead policeman was only going to taser the dog.</p>
<p>This case not nearly enough coverage.  It is an outrage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical in New York</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254381</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical in New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: False rape case

Got to love the couple who put this man through this living hell using &quot;for the children&quot; excuse. I expect this sick &quot;tactic&quot; to be used more if gay couples adopting children increases. The easiest way to ruin people is to accuse them of harming children in a sexual way. This couple has some nice karma coming their way.

There was a Law and Order: SVU episode on this (sort of). A family was in a car accident and one of the doctors discovered molest signs in the daughter which led to the police being notified. The police dug up something on the father that he was falsely accused of molesting students but even though the charge was a farce, the notion that he was accused caused him to lose his job and leave town. In the episode the father is a coach After local people heard about the daughter, all of a sudden random complaints about children being molested flooded the department. Which lead to the department trying to get the daughter to point out who did it via a drawing which somehow implicated the father. The family&#039;s house was raided and the father was arrested. Later on it&#039;s discovered that it was older jock boy at the school who actually did the molesting. The father was clear of all chargers but at the end of the episode he tells the detective that he has been fired from his new school job and might have to moved to a different town again.


RE: Baltimore PD

Yea the DOJ is doing the right thing but it is an election year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: False rape case</p>
<p>Got to love the couple who put this man through this living hell using &#8220;for the children&#8221; excuse. I expect this sick &#8220;tactic&#8221; to be used more if gay couples adopting children increases. The easiest way to ruin people is to accuse them of harming children in a sexual way. This couple has some nice karma coming their way.</p>
<p>There was a Law and Order: SVU episode on this (sort of). A family was in a car accident and one of the doctors discovered molest signs in the daughter which led to the police being notified. The police dug up something on the father that he was falsely accused of molesting students but even though the charge was a farce, the notion that he was accused caused him to lose his job and leave town. In the episode the father is a coach After local people heard about the daughter, all of a sudden random complaints about children being molested flooded the department. Which lead to the department trying to get the daughter to point out who did it via a drawing which somehow implicated the father. The family&#8217;s house was raided and the father was arrested. Later on it&#8217;s discovered that it was older jock boy at the school who actually did the molesting. The father was clear of all chargers but at the end of the episode he tells the detective that he has been fired from his new school job and might have to moved to a different town again.</p>
<p>RE: Baltimore PD</p>
<p>Yea the DOJ is doing the right thing but it is an election year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coises</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/05/18/morning-links-657/comment-page-1/#comment-3254372</link>
		<dc:creator>Coises</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24767#comment-3254372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does pepper spray not work on dogs?
Why is the gun the first/only option?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does pepper spray not work on dogs?<br />
Why is the gun the first/only option?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
