<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saturday Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-2/#comment-3177918</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3177918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
Sometimes a military buildup is the best way to avoid a war, its a common tactic that has been used from before recorded history – it is often effective.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Lol.  I need a best friend who is this good at being an apologist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Sometimes a military buildup is the best way to avoid a war, its a common tactic that has been used from before recorded history – it is often effective.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Lol.  I need a best friend who is this good at being an apologist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-2/#comment-3177901</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3177901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Porn producers in Simi valley should send over a few hundred gay porn vids first.  Then, shoot and send over a couple hundred more gay cop porn vids followed by a few hundred...you get the point.

Not that there is anything wrong with gay porn...not...at...all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Porn producers in Simi valley should send over a few hundred gay porn vids first.  Then, shoot and send over a couple hundred more gay cop porn vids followed by a few hundred&#8230;you get the point.</p>
<p>Not that there is anything wrong with gay porn&#8230;not&#8230;at&#8230;all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-2/#comment-3177884</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3177884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; And so it begins.

MUST protect Israel at all costs because...DON&#039;T YOU ASK WHY!

Not the only reason the criminally insane US will murder Iranians, just one of the biggest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; And so it begins.</p>
<p>MUST protect Israel at all costs because&#8230;DON&#8217;T YOU ASK WHY!</p>
<p>Not the only reason the criminally insane US will murder Iranians, just one of the biggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-2/#comment-3175887</link>
		<dc:creator>contrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 02:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3175887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Private schools spend much less money per pupil than public schools. Look it up. Washington D.C. spends more money per student than any big city in the country, and it’s one of the worst public school systems.&lt;/i&gt;

The DC budget is here: http://cfo.dc.gov/cfo/frames.asp?doc=/cfo/lib/cfo/budget/fy2013/FY2013_Volume_3_Chapters_Part_2.pdf

The DCPS budget for 2012-13 is $802 million. Projected enrollment is 47,174.  That works out to $17,000.89 per pupil.  A boatload of money, to be sure. Highest in the country. The DC charter school system is separate, they have a budget of $490 million for 31,768 students, or $15,424 per student.  Again, a lot of money.

But put that in perspective. I send my kids to private school in DC. Tuition is over $32,000 per year. Actual spending per student is around $37,000 per student, with the rest made up by fundraising and income from the endowment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Private schools spend much less money per pupil than public schools. Look it up. Washington D.C. spends more money per student than any big city in the country, and it’s one of the worst public school systems.</i></p>
<p>The DC budget is here: <a href="http://cfo.dc.gov/cfo/frames.asp?doc=/cfo/lib/cfo/budget/fy2013/FY2013_Volume_3_Chapters_Part_2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://cfo.dc.gov/cfo/frames.asp?doc=/cfo/lib/cfo/budget/fy2013/FY2013_Volume_3_Chapters_Part_2.pdf</a></p>
<p>The DCPS budget for 2012-13 is $802 million. Projected enrollment is 47,174.  That works out to $17,000.89 per pupil.  A boatload of money, to be sure. Highest in the country. The DC charter school system is separate, they have a budget of $490 million for 31,768 students, or $15,424 per student.  Again, a lot of money.</p>
<p>But put that in perspective. I send my kids to private school in DC. Tuition is over $32,000 per year. Actual spending per student is around $37,000 per student, with the rest made up by fundraising and income from the endowment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juice</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-2/#comment-3171209</link>
		<dc:creator>Juice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3171209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Yes, they do. And a huge part of the reason why is that the federal government has created a buyer’s market with college loan subsidies.&lt;/i&gt;

Seller&#039;s market?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yes, they do. And a huge part of the reason why is that the federal government has created a buyer’s market with college loan subsidies.</i></p>
<p>Seller&#8217;s market?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albatross</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3170239</link>
		<dc:creator>albatross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3170239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aresen:

Yeah, I think I&#039;ve seen some variant on the &quot;light at the end of the tunnel&quot; story about a dozen times now--what we were doing before was all wrong, but now we have the right general and strategy, and there are some (cherry picked, preliminary) signs of success.  And six months or a year later, the same story, but with new cherry-picked preliminary signs of success, new words used to decribe the new counterinsurgency strategy (inevitably some combination of buying off one set of bloodthirsty warlords while blowing up another set, along with a couple feel-good cosmetic stuff and an interview with a woman happy to emerge from the 13th century all the way into the mid-14th century, but with better weapons).  We&#039;re about due for another one of these rashes of stories soon, I think.  

If media organs had memory, they would point out that this is the Nth time we&#039;ve been within a couple Friedman units of success in Afghanistan.  But of course they don&#039;t, so we get the same damned story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aresen:</p>
<p>Yeah, I think I&#8217;ve seen some variant on the &#8220;light at the end of the tunnel&#8221; story about a dozen times now&#8211;what we were doing before was all wrong, but now we have the right general and strategy, and there are some (cherry picked, preliminary) signs of success.  And six months or a year later, the same story, but with new cherry-picked preliminary signs of success, new words used to decribe the new counterinsurgency strategy (inevitably some combination of buying off one set of bloodthirsty warlords while blowing up another set, along with a couple feel-good cosmetic stuff and an interview with a woman happy to emerge from the 13th century all the way into the mid-14th century, but with better weapons).  We&#8217;re about due for another one of these rashes of stories soon, I think.  </p>
<p>If media organs had memory, they would point out that this is the Nth time we&#8217;ve been within a couple Friedman units of success in Afghanistan.  But of course they don&#8217;t, so we get the same damned story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albatross</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3170218</link>
		<dc:creator>albatross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3170218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have every confidence that our bombing, invasion and occupation of Iran will be done with the same care and cleverness (and honesty with the American people about the costs and setbacks) that we have seen with our wars in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen, and Libya.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have every confidence that our bombing, invasion and occupation of Iran will be done with the same care and cleverness (and honesty with the American people about the costs and setbacks) that we have seen with our wars in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen, and Libya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KHH</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3169951</link>
		<dc:creator>KHH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3169951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: Iran 
It looks like the government has been helping fund and train groups inside Iran murder nuclear scientists, along with attacking facilities with the stuxnet worm.  While the US was busy with that the Iranians were supplying and helping shi&#039;a insurgents in Iraq kill American soldiers.  This is NOT how it begins, it has already started.  This is how it ends]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Iran<br />
It looks like the government has been helping fund and train groups inside Iran murder nuclear scientists, along with attacking facilities with the stuxnet worm.  While the US was busy with that the Iranians were supplying and helping shi&#8217;a insurgents in Iraq kill American soldiers.  This is NOT how it begins, it has already started.  This is how it ends</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radley Balko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3169903</link>
		<dc:creator>Radley Balko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3169903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;I know that he wrote “stop throwing money.” Its coded language for : “starve the beast.”&lt;/em&gt;

No, it isn&#039;t. It means stop thinking that money will solve these problems. The problem is that parents in these districts have no choice in where they send their kids to school. So there&#039;s no competition to provide a better education. Which is why administrators can spend a half million dollars on office renovations with no consequences.

&lt;em&gt;Look at the top educational institutions in the private sector. Exeter, Harvard, etc. Do they ever make wasteful expenditures?&lt;/em&gt;

Yes, they do. And a huge part of the reason why is that the federal government has created a buyer&#039;s market with college loan subsidies. It&#039;s also a little absurd to compare the spending habits of a private secondary school students attend voluntarily and a primary public school students are compelled to attend.

&lt;em&gt;Socialized schools don’t necessarily need more money in the aggregate, but there does need to be per pupil spending parity . . . &lt;/em&gt;

Private schools spend much less money per pupil than public schools. Look it up. Washington D.C. spends more money per student than any big city in the country, and it&#039;s one of the worst public school systems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I know that he wrote “stop throwing money.” Its coded language for : “starve the beast.”</em></p>
<p>No, it isn&#8217;t. It means stop thinking that money will solve these problems. The problem is that parents in these districts have no choice in where they send their kids to school. So there&#8217;s no competition to provide a better education. Which is why administrators can spend a half million dollars on office renovations with no consequences.</p>
<p><em>Look at the top educational institutions in the private sector. Exeter, Harvard, etc. Do they ever make wasteful expenditures?</em></p>
<p>Yes, they do. And a huge part of the reason why is that the federal government has created a buyer&#8217;s market with college loan subsidies. It&#8217;s also a little absurd to compare the spending habits of a private secondary school students attend voluntarily and a primary public school students are compelled to attend.</p>
<p><em>Socialized schools don’t necessarily need more money in the aggregate, but there does need to be per pupil spending parity . . . </em></p>
<p>Private schools spend much less money per pupil than public schools. Look it up. Washington D.C. spends more money per student than any big city in the country, and it&#8217;s one of the worst public school systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical in New York</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3169727</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical in New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3169727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#36

The &quot;small government&quot; right doesn&#039;t exist, it&#039;s nothing but a conservative myth. Their only &quot;small government&quot; when compared to the left but big conservative government is ok as long as it&#039;s in the name of &quot;safety. fighting terrorism, promoting christian values&quot; and other bullshit. Conservatives only complain about big government when they&#039;re not in charge. Like clockwork we hear &quot;conservatives have lost their way&quot; no it&#039;s that you lost your way conservatives, your just as statist scum as the left but like the left you get enough people to buy into your bullshit for enough time to get elected.

http://mises.org/Community/blogs/brainpolice/archive/2008/01/10/i-hate-conservatism.aspx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#36</p>
<p>The &#8220;small government&#8221; right doesn&#8217;t exist, it&#8217;s nothing but a conservative myth. Their only &#8220;small government&#8221; when compared to the left but big conservative government is ok as long as it&#8217;s in the name of &#8220;safety. fighting terrorism, promoting christian values&#8221; and other bullshit. Conservatives only complain about big government when they&#8217;re not in charge. Like clockwork we hear &#8220;conservatives have lost their way&#8221; no it&#8217;s that you lost your way conservatives, your just as statist scum as the left but like the left you get enough people to buy into your bullshit for enough time to get elected.</p>
<p><a href="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/brainpolice/archive/2008/01/10/i-hate-conservatism.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://mises.org/Community/blogs/brainpolice/archive/2008/01/10/i-hate-conservatism.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herb</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3169691</link>
		<dc:creator>Herb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3169691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#43 &#124;  Rick H.:

Simplistic thinking apparently leads to tired metaphors, too.  I&#039;m not talking apples and oranges.  I&#039;m just talking apples (cell phone bans) and a philosophy that would defend one (in theaters/to ensure silence) while deploring the other (on roads/to reduce accidents).  And hey, I get it.  Don&#039;t want to be coerced by the government....

But what&#039;s sad is that one must be &quot;coerced&quot; by &quot;the government&quot; into &lt;i&gt;responsibly operating a vehicle&lt;/i&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#43 |  Rick H.:</p>
<p>Simplistic thinking apparently leads to tired metaphors, too.  I&#8217;m not talking apples and oranges.  I&#8217;m just talking apples (cell phone bans) and a philosophy that would defend one (in theaters/to ensure silence) while deploring the other (on roads/to reduce accidents).  And hey, I get it.  Don&#8217;t want to be coerced by the government&#8230;.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s sad is that one must be &#8220;coerced&#8221; by &#8220;the government&#8221; into <i>responsibly operating a vehicle</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burgers Allday</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3169547</link>
		<dc:creator>Burgers Allday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3169547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CORRECTION:

--This redistribution of money would certainly involve giving a lot more money SPECIFICALLY to schools LIKE BALTIMORE SCHOOLS.--

Left out a couple important words.  No edit fcn = grrrrrrr.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CORRECTION:</p>
<p>&#8211;This redistribution of money would certainly involve giving a lot more money SPECIFICALLY to schools LIKE BALTIMORE SCHOOLS.&#8211;</p>
<p>Left out a couple important words.  No edit fcn = grrrrrrr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burgers Allday</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3169543</link>
		<dc:creator>Burgers Allday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3169543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CSP,

I know that he wrote &quot;stop throwing money.&quot;  Its coded language for :  &quot;starve the beast.&quot;

Socialized schools don&#039;t necessarily need more money in the aggregate, but there does need to be per pupil spending parity, at least within states if not nationally (and nationally is probably better -- that way the kids of Mississippi and places like that can actually be competitive at a national level when they grow up).

This redistribution of money would certainly involve giving a lot more money to schools.

Look at the top educational institutions in the private sector.  Exeter, Harvard, etc.  Do they ever make wasteful expenditures?  Engage in conspicuous consumption as a way of making school seem cooler thn it is?  Sure they do.  Way, way, way, way, way more than Baltimore ever did.

The message to the kids in the ghetto should be clear:  stay in school and you get nice stuff by doing that.  Part of that is making the schools nicer than they have to be.  This might sound like a pipe dream, but suburban soccer mom dollars go a long way in low income neighborhoods.  And this is exactly what should happen, instead of continuing to breed the permanent underclass that we have started to breed ever since the middle class moved away from the poor people in American cities.  They have a right to go, but their payments into the socialized education fund need to still go, primarily, to the neediest -- and that hasn&#039;t really been happening.

Unless one wants a more-and-more skewed division of wealth over time.  Because that is what is happening and has been happening.  It ain&#039;t a good state of affairs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSP,</p>
<p>I know that he wrote &#8220;stop throwing money.&#8221;  Its coded language for :  &#8220;starve the beast.&#8221;</p>
<p>Socialized schools don&#8217;t necessarily need more money in the aggregate, but there does need to be per pupil spending parity, at least within states if not nationally (and nationally is probably better &#8212; that way the kids of Mississippi and places like that can actually be competitive at a national level when they grow up).</p>
<p>This redistribution of money would certainly involve giving a lot more money to schools.</p>
<p>Look at the top educational institutions in the private sector.  Exeter, Harvard, etc.  Do they ever make wasteful expenditures?  Engage in conspicuous consumption as a way of making school seem cooler thn it is?  Sure they do.  Way, way, way, way, way more than Baltimore ever did.</p>
<p>The message to the kids in the ghetto should be clear:  stay in school and you get nice stuff by doing that.  Part of that is making the schools nicer than they have to be.  This might sound like a pipe dream, but suburban soccer mom dollars go a long way in low income neighborhoods.  And this is exactly what should happen, instead of continuing to breed the permanent underclass that we have started to breed ever since the middle class moved away from the poor people in American cities.  They have a right to go, but their payments into the socialized education fund need to still go, primarily, to the neediest &#8212; and that hasn&#8217;t really been happening.</p>
<p>Unless one wants a more-and-more skewed division of wealth over time.  Because that is what is happening and has been happening.  It ain&#8217;t a good state of affairs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick H.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3169528</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3169528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#42 Herb:

I fully expect the people who don&#039;t think a turnover made out of oranges sounds very tasty would have no problem whatsoever eating an apple turnover - mostly thanks to simplistic “apples vs oranges” type thinking.

And you&#039;re right, a driver&#039;s circumstances never change while they&#039;re en route. That&#039;s just a silly notion cooked up by non-politicians.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#42 Herb:</p>
<p>I fully expect the people who don&#8217;t think a turnover made out of oranges sounds very tasty would have no problem whatsoever eating an apple turnover &#8211; mostly thanks to simplistic “apples vs oranges” type thinking.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;re right, a driver&#8217;s circumstances never change while they&#8217;re en route. That&#8217;s just a silly notion cooked up by non-politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herb</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3169320</link>
		<dc:creator>Herb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3169320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I fully expect the people worried about the gov&#039;t banning cell phones to cut down on distracted driving would have no problem whatsoever if a movie theater did the same thing to ensure silence, mostly thanks to simplistic &quot;public vs private&quot; and &quot;choice vs coercion&quot; type thinking.    

As to the GPS example....why not figure out where you&#039;re going before hand?  They say technology is making us lazy.  It also apparently leads us to make poor choices.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully expect the people worried about the gov&#8217;t banning cell phones to cut down on distracted driving would have no problem whatsoever if a movie theater did the same thing to ensure silence, mostly thanks to simplistic &#8220;public vs private&#8221; and &#8220;choice vs coercion&#8221; type thinking.    </p>
<p>As to the GPS example&#8230;.why not figure out where you&#8217;re going before hand?  They say technology is making us lazy.  It also apparently leads us to make poor choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon Wolfeson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3169025</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon Wolfeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3169025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look up accident statistics for countries who use primarily road markings (most of the EU) versus primarily road signs (the US).

Yea, do that first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look up accident statistics for countries who use primarily road markings (most of the EU) versus primarily road signs (the US).</p>
<p>Yea, do that first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crzyb0b</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3168782</link>
		<dc:creator>crzyb0b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 05:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3168782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes a military buildup is the best way to avoid a war, its a common tactic that has been used from before recorded history - it is often effective.  
So claiming the buildup around iran is evidence of intention to make war, is false.  It is equally likely that is shows an intention to avoid war.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes a military buildup is the best way to avoid a war, its a common tactic that has been used from before recorded history &#8211; it is often effective.<br />
So claiming the buildup around iran is evidence of intention to make war, is false.  It is equally likely that is shows an intention to avoid war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crzyb0b</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3168773</link>
		<dc:creator>crzyb0b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 05:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3168773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; For those who don’t know by now, most of those Milk Carton kids
were involved in custody disputes, not dragged off to Never-Never
land by the Pied Piper.&quot;

False - while it is true that the vast majority of child &quot;abductions&quot; are related to custody disputes, the Milk Carton kids are generally cases of stranger abductions or cases where the abducting parent is considered a threat of somekind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; For those who don’t know by now, most of those Milk Carton kids<br />
were involved in custody disputes, not dragged off to Never-Never<br />
land by the Pied Piper.&#8221;</p>
<p>False &#8211; while it is true that the vast majority of child &#8220;abductions&#8221; are related to custody disputes, the Milk Carton kids are generally cases of stranger abductions or cases where the abducting parent is considered a threat of somekind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3168541</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3168541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m willing to bet that the number of people who are anti-war for pacifism&#039;s sake, instead of for partisan reasons, is about the same as the number of people who want an actual small government, and not just a government that&#039;s off their backs while taxing everybody else, or a government that&#039;s weak whenever their team loses an election.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m willing to bet that the number of people who are anti-war for pacifism&#8217;s sake, instead of for partisan reasons, is about the same as the number of people who want an actual small government, and not just a government that&#8217;s off their backs while taxing everybody else, or a government that&#8217;s weak whenever their team loses an election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. S. P. Schofield</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/04/28/saturday-links-70/comment-page-1/#comment-3168525</link>
		<dc:creator>C. S. P. Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24586#comment-3168525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[albatross,

All I&#039;m suggesting is that if Obama is prepared to ignore these people, maybe the next time they get paraded before us as examples of &quot;Mainstream opinion&quot;, we should do likewise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>albatross,</p>
<p>All I&#8217;m suggesting is that if Obama is prepared to ignore these people, maybe the next time they get paraded before us as examples of &#8220;Mainstream opinion&#8221;, we should do likewise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
