<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liberals Lovin&#8217; on Corporate Welfare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher’s Council Nominations…Pharaoh, Let Our People Go!!! Edition &#124; Independent Sentinel</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3253584</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher’s Council Nominations…Pharaoh, Let Our People Go!!! Edition &#124; Independent Sentinel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3253584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Agitator –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare submitted by The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Agitator –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare submitted by The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookworm Room &#187; I&#8217;d be vibrating with exhaustion right now if I had the energy to vibrate</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3108818</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookworm Room &#187; I&#8217;d be vibrating with exhaustion right now if I had the energy to vibrate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3108818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] place *t* with 1/3 vote -The Agitator –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare  submitted by The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] place *t* with 1/3 vote -The Agitator –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare  submitted by The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookworm Room &#187; Fine stuff this week at the Watcher&#8217;s Council</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3065198</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookworm Room &#187; Fine stuff this week at the Watcher&#8217;s Council</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 08:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3065198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Agitator  –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare  submitted by The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Agitator  –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare  submitted by The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathanael</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3057637</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 02:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3057637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding PPACA .&quot;...Now every Dem/liberal is out defending it and singing its praises &quot;

...not true at all.  Go Google &quot;single-payer&quot;.  You&#039;ll find a lot of the liberals with integrity never approved of PPACA, certainly not of the mandates or propping up the private insurance companies (though it had some good stuff thrown in as &quot;sweeteners&quot;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding PPACA .&#8221;&#8230;Now every Dem/liberal is out defending it and singing its praises &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;not true at all.  Go Google &#8220;single-payer&#8221;.  You&#8217;ll find a lot of the liberals with integrity never approved of PPACA, certainly not of the mandates or propping up the private insurance companies (though it had some good stuff thrown in as &#8220;sweeteners&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathanael</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3057631</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 02:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3057631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correct, JOR.  And correct, hilzoy fangirl -- though you only describe *some* of us liberals (the ones with integrity...).

As for Radley, he really should ditch his corporate-whore buddies; he&#039;d be happier as an independent.  He&#039;s really showing the Team Red behavior which JOR describes on every issue except civil liberties (where thank goodness he gets it).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct, JOR.  And correct, hilzoy fangirl &#8212; though you only describe *some* of us liberals (the ones with integrity&#8230;).</p>
<p>As for Radley, he really should ditch his corporate-whore buddies; he&#8217;d be happier as an independent.  He&#8217;s really showing the Team Red behavior which JOR describes on every issue except civil liberties (where thank goodness he gets it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Watcher of Weasels Results&#8211;Passover/Easter Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3050524</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Watcher of Weasels Results&#8211;Passover/Easter Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3050524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] place *t* with 1/3 vote -The Agitator –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare submitted by The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] place *t* with 1/3 vote -The Agitator –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare submitted by The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Loudon&#039;s New Zeal Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3050466</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Loudon&#039;s New Zeal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3050466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] place *t* with 1/3 vote &#8211; The Agitator – Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare submitted by The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] place *t* with 1/3 vote &#8211; The Agitator – Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare submitted by The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week&#8217;s Watcher&#8217;s Council Results &#124; therightplanet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3048411</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week&#8217;s Watcher&#8217;s Council Results &#124; therightplanet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3048411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] place *t* with 1/3 vote -The Agitator –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare  submitted by The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] place *t* with 1/3 vote -The Agitator –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare  submitted by The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Loudon&#039;s New Zeal Blog &#187; Watcher’s Council Nominations…Pharaoh, Let Our People Go!!! Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3040692</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Loudon&#039;s New Zeal Blog &#187; Watcher’s Council Nominations…Pharaoh, Let Our People Go!!! Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 21:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3040692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Agitator – Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare submitted by The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Agitator – Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare submitted by The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher&#8217;s Council Nominations&#8230;Pharaoh, Let Our People Go!!! Edition &#124; askmarion</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3040114</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher&#8217;s Council Nominations&#8230;Pharaoh, Let Our People Go!!! Edition &#124; askmarion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3040114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Agitator –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare submitted by The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Agitator –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare submitted by The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels Council: New Nominations are out in the Pharoah, Let Our People Go Edition &#124; Maggie&#039;s Notebook</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3039615</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels Council: New Nominations are out in the Pharoah, Let Our People Go Edition &#124; Maggie&#039;s Notebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3039615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Agitator –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare submitted by The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Agitator –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare submitted by The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week&#8217;s Watcher’s Council Nominations &#124; therightplanet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3039124</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week&#8217;s Watcher’s Council Nominations &#124; therightplanet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3039124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Agitator  –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare  submitted by The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Agitator  –Liberals Lovin’ on Corporate Welfare  submitted by The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOR</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3011583</link>
		<dc:creator>JOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3011583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If TEAM RED became 100% pro-abortion tomorrow, TEAM BLUE would immediately oppose it, because opposition is what the tribes do.&quot;

I don&#039;t expect a reversal like that but it&#039;s possible. Pro-abortion ideological seeds are already pretty deep in many segments of what we call The Right, even if they&#039;re buried under the surface at the moment (obsession with parental authority and familial sovereignty being the biggest ones; abortion and outright infanticide are long-standing practices in traditional families). And of course the &quot;bleeding-heart&quot; morality or egalitarianism on many parts of what we call The Left, and always shaky relationship between mainstream liberals and serious feminism, could kick off leftist opposition to the Anti-Child Right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If TEAM RED became 100% pro-abortion tomorrow, TEAM BLUE would immediately oppose it, because opposition is what the tribes do.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t expect a reversal like that but it&#8217;s possible. Pro-abortion ideological seeds are already pretty deep in many segments of what we call The Right, even if they&#8217;re buried under the surface at the moment (obsession with parental authority and familial sovereignty being the biggest ones; abortion and outright infanticide are long-standing practices in traditional families). And of course the &#8220;bleeding-heart&#8221; morality or egalitarianism on many parts of what we call The Left, and always shaky relationship between mainstream liberals and serious feminism, could kick off leftist opposition to the Anti-Child Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Business Liberals &#187; Right Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3007025</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Business Liberals &#187; Right Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3007025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Radley Balko points out, The Nation has come out swinging in favor of the Ex-Im bank, a New Deal relic that was [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Radley Balko points out, The Nation has come out swinging in favor of the Ex-Im bank, a New Deal relic that was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerryskids</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3007001</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerryskids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3007001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fun facts - Boeing is unionized. The International Association of Machinists &amp; Aerospace Workers in Seattle, Washington gave $148,367 to Democrat campaigns (and $2400 to Republican campaigns). Not that this has anything to do with whether or not liberals would support the Ex-Im giving low-cost loans to Boeing. 

And a quick glance at the Ex-Im&#039;s financial statement shows &quot;Borrowings from the U.S. Treasury (Note 11) $8,279.3&quot; (figures in millions). That would be over $8 billion they borrowed from the Treasury while their total net profits for the year were ($207.4). That would be a negative $207 million dollars. Not sure how you can manage to lose money if your business is giving away government money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun facts &#8211; Boeing is unionized. The International Association of Machinists &amp; Aerospace Workers in Seattle, Washington gave $148,367 to Democrat campaigns (and $2400 to Republican campaigns). Not that this has anything to do with whether or not liberals would support the Ex-Im giving low-cost loans to Boeing. </p>
<p>And a quick glance at the Ex-Im&#8217;s financial statement shows &#8220;Borrowings from the U.S. Treasury (Note 11) $8,279.3&#8243; (figures in millions). That would be over $8 billion they borrowed from the Treasury while their total net profits for the year were ($207.4). That would be a negative $207 million dollars. Not sure how you can manage to lose money if your business is giving away government money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon Wolfeson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3006664</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon Wolfeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3006664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@21 -

Iceland screwed themselves over with their bank fiasco. Ask one of them about it - they&#039;ll admit quite readily they managed to inflate a huge bubble which promptly burst on them. It was the only nordic to get into banking in a major one and the only one to be screwed by it.

As to the Nordic nations - their system is &quot;Folkesocialisme&quot;  (there are no &quot;pure&quot; political systems in this world outside North Korea)

They have a highly redistributional tax system, a strong welfare net and a policy of individual help which enables individuals to be in free association.

They absolutely have a very strong free market and associated tax policies. Folkesocialisme doesn&#039;t rule that out, and there&#039;s a strong mutual and cooperative movement within the Nordic nations which actively encourage free markets (and opposes, in many aspects, capitalism).

Trying to slap a single label on something as diverse as socialism is a mistake.


America? It isn&#039;t capitalist. It&#039;s corporatist. Capitalism&#039;s flaws are magnified by corporatism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@21 -</p>
<p>Iceland screwed themselves over with their bank fiasco. Ask one of them about it &#8211; they&#8217;ll admit quite readily they managed to inflate a huge bubble which promptly burst on them. It was the only nordic to get into banking in a major one and the only one to be screwed by it.</p>
<p>As to the Nordic nations &#8211; their system is &#8220;Folkesocialisme&#8221;  (there are no &#8220;pure&#8221; political systems in this world outside North Korea)</p>
<p>They have a highly redistributional tax system, a strong welfare net and a policy of individual help which enables individuals to be in free association.</p>
<p>They absolutely have a very strong free market and associated tax policies. Folkesocialisme doesn&#8217;t rule that out, and there&#8217;s a strong mutual and cooperative movement within the Nordic nations which actively encourage free markets (and opposes, in many aspects, capitalism).</p>
<p>Trying to slap a single label on something as diverse as socialism is a mistake.</p>
<p>America? It isn&#8217;t capitalist. It&#8217;s corporatist. Capitalism&#8217;s flaws are magnified by corporatism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSD</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3006556</link>
		<dc:creator>CSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3006556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the Boeing high level of subsidies are a result of a battle with Airbus.  It has become trade war of sorts between the US and Europe. Before you know you get all patriotic and there goes a few billion bucks. 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3722888.stm

&quot;The US claims Airbus has received the equivalent of $40bn (£22.4bn; 32bn euros) in subsidies since its inception in 1967, mostly in the form of government loans with advantageous repayment terms.

The EU says Boeing has pocketed some $18bn in direct and indirect subsidies since 1992, including a $3.2bn tax break from the authorities in Washington state, where the firm has assembly operations. &quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Boeing high level of subsidies are a result of a battle with Airbus.  It has become trade war of sorts between the US and Europe. Before you know you get all patriotic and there goes a few billion bucks. </p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3722888.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3722888.stm</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The US claims Airbus has received the equivalent of $40bn (£22.4bn; 32bn euros) in subsidies since its inception in 1967, mostly in the form of government loans with advantageous repayment terms.</p>
<p>The EU says Boeing has pocketed some $18bn in direct and indirect subsidies since 1992, including a $3.2bn tax break from the authorities in Washington state, where the firm has assembly operations. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3006406</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3006406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
Oh yes, the long term damage in the Nordic…oh, wait, healthy, happy, prosperous.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The myth of Scandinavian socialism.

1.  Iceland success?

2.  Scandinavian countries are not nearly as socialist as leftist claim them to be.  Most all have greater business freedom, monetary freedom, and property rights enforcement than the US currently &quot;enjoys&quot;.

3.  Most importantly?  Scandinavian countries have much less corruption than the US at local, state, national levels in police, justice, and politics.

There&#039;s more, but I just included the easy-to-understand points.  As usual, it is folly to declare socialism or &quot;leftism&quot; clearly superior (and therefore declare any number of inane ideas and policies superior) based on over-simplification of complex economic and societal interactions.

The only way you can use Scandinavian &quot;successes&quot; as proof that socialism is superior to (USA) capitalism is if you promote the premise that all Scandinavian countries are purely socialist and the USA is purely capitalist.  Neither of these is true and such a claim would mark you as a fool.  A fool, I say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Oh yes, the long term damage in the Nordic…oh, wait, healthy, happy, prosperous.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The myth of Scandinavian socialism.</p>
<p>1.  Iceland success?</p>
<p>2.  Scandinavian countries are not nearly as socialist as leftist claim them to be.  Most all have greater business freedom, monetary freedom, and property rights enforcement than the US currently &#8220;enjoys&#8221;.</p>
<p>3.  Most importantly?  Scandinavian countries have much less corruption than the US at local, state, national levels in police, justice, and politics.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more, but I just included the easy-to-understand points.  As usual, it is folly to declare socialism or &#8220;leftism&#8221; clearly superior (and therefore declare any number of inane ideas and policies superior) based on over-simplification of complex economic and societal interactions.</p>
<p>The only way you can use Scandinavian &#8220;successes&#8221; as proof that socialism is superior to (USA) capitalism is if you promote the premise that all Scandinavian countries are purely socialist and the USA is purely capitalist.  Neither of these is true and such a claim would mark you as a fool.  A fool, I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmv</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3006370</link>
		<dc:creator>rmv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3006370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@19 Mantooth

Liberals, like conservatives, love corporate welfare.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/125124570

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/29/1078814/-Bipolar-Schadenfreude-No-ROI-for-electing-Republicans-or-Democrats

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/03/16/446179/delta-cantor-export-bank/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@19 Mantooth</p>
<p>Liberals, like conservatives, love corporate welfare.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/125124570" rel="nofollow">http://www.democraticunderground.com/125124570</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/29/1078814/-Bipolar-Schadenfreude-No-ROI-for-electing-Republicans-or-Democrats" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/29/1078814/-Bipolar-Schadenfreude-No-ROI-for-electing-Republicans-or-Democrats</a></p>
<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/03/16/446179/delta-cantor-export-bank/" rel="nofollow">http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/03/16/446179/delta-cantor-export-bank/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon Wolfeson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2012/03/29/liberals-lovin-on-corporate-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-3006330</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon Wolfeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=24347#comment-3006330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@14 - Bob Dole campaigned for it back in 1996. Things have moved THAT far right since then. And hardly, it&#039;s still better than the current situation.

And hey, you could pass a sensible insurance-based system like the one in the Netherlands... (but no, better to bicker and ensure you get an expensive mess as a &quot;compromise&quot;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@14 &#8211; Bob Dole campaigned for it back in 1996. Things have moved THAT far right since then. And hardly, it&#8217;s still better than the current situation.</p>
<p>And hey, you could pass a sensible insurance-based system like the one in the Netherlands&#8230; (but no, better to bicker and ensure you get an expensive mess as a &#8220;compromise&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
