But for Audio

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

An incidental recording taken while a Florida woman was on the phone with her insurance company shows that the police who arrested her and charged her with a felony for resisting arrest lied in their reports, and then again under questioning.

Here is the cops’ story:

The . . . ordeal began late-afternoon on Oct. 4, when Fernandes, a four-year CSPD veteran with no previous internal affairs complaints on his record, noticed Mait’s Lexus SUV stopped in the left lane of Royal Palm Boulevard.

Fernandes, 35, pulled up behind her vehicle to see what was wrong. Mait approached his car and told him that two of her tires had blown out, and she needed a tow . . .
According to police reports and the officers’ sworn depositions, Mait told Fernandes and later Stasnek, who arrived as backup, that she was on Xanax, and that she couldn’t move the car out of traffic — but that she did want to drive it the two miles to her home.

Before Stasnek pulled up, Fernandes told Mait to call for a tow, which she did from her passenger seat. But as she waited for a GEICO roadside assistance representative to dispatch a wrecker, things unraveled.

When Stasnek, a four-year member of the force with a clean prior record, approached Mait’s SUV, she repeatedly asked for a driver’s license, the tape shows. Mait refused. In her deposition, Stasnek said she warned the driver repeatedly she “would be disobeying my lawful command and would be arrested for resisting my lawful command.”

At some point, Mait put a hand in the officer’s face to dismiss the request, according to police accounts, which was apparently one insult too many.

The officers hauled her out of her car and tried to arrest her, which they claim she resisted by tensing her body and slamming into Stasnek.

The alleged Xanax didn’t show up in toxicology tests. And then Mait’s attorney got the recording:

The 17-minute recording features a series of exchanges that Catalano says contradict the officers’ sworn testimony, including this back-and-forth between Mait and Stasnek after the female officer asked for ID:

Mait: “Did you not see me on the phone?”

Stasnek: “Did you not see this uniform I have on? Don’t give me any s— right now. Give me your f—ing driver’s license.”

During her deposition, Stasnek was asked by Catalano — who did not tell the officers the encounter had been recorded — if she had used those words. She twice said no.

Catalano also pressed both officers under oath on whether Stasnek had given Mait notice that the driver was disobeying a lawful command. Both officers testified she had — at least twice. The recording catches no such exchange, although it is possible she did during a short stretch when GEICO had Mait on hold.

Late in the recording, while Mait can be heard sobbing in the distance, the officers say the following:

Fernandes: “I didn’t hear anything you said. I was in the back of the car.”

Stasnek: “I did drop the F-bomb.”

Fernandes, laughing: “I didn’t hear that. In my [internal affairs] statement, I’ll say I didn’t hear that. … Don’t worry, I will put everything I heard beforehand.”

If you live in Illinois, you might consider sending this story to those of your state legislators who last week voted down an amendment that would have allowed citizens to record on-duty police officers.


Digg it |  reddit |  del.icio.us |  Fark

57 Responses to “But for Audio”

  1. #1 |  CyniCAl | 

    Will Grigg is one of my favorite writers. So is Butler Shaffer, both are regulars at Lew Rockwell.

    Before there were paleocons, there were classical liberals. What’s in a name? It’s ideas I care about.

  2. #2 |  Vince | 

    Police lying doesn’t shock me at all anymore.

  3. #3 |  dave | 

    Just more crooked cops,in a corrupt system. The Police and politicians in this country are rapidly creating a police state based on 9/11. As occupy Oakland showed they are more than willing to treat their own citizens the same way as the Syrians and Egyptians do. Don’t think for a second they will hesitate to shoot you dead if you don’t follow their game plan. With unlimited surveillance powers and an excess of firepower our government is set to show the world what “freedom” means now.

  4. #4 |  EBL | 

    It is like Rashomon!

  5. #5 |  citizen | 

    people don’t need a state’s permission to record police.
    The court’s already ruled on that. It’s protected under the us constitution.

  6. #6 |  swampdood | 

    Only a few weeks earlier a nineteen year old girl was shot in the back with a taser by an obese Florida State Trooper while she tried to run from a misdemeanor charge? He left the girl brain dead and then bragged before an FHP review board that he did nothing wrong and that he would do it again under similar circumstances. Of course they cleared him of all wrong doing. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2L85M287gk&context=C435984dADvjVQa1PpcFPlZYC8kFxpOuYGGJL3S8fJL7SjAdUn2YU=

  7. #7 |  Jamessir Bensonmum | 

    Thank you for posting this article. We need to know every time a law enforcement person lies. I’ve never had the privilege of serving on a jury, but if I do I will not just take for granted that the police are telling the truth.

    The driver is lucky she wasn’t killed either by the arresting officer or by intake personnel at the jail who love to get rough with anyone who exhibits contempt of cop.