<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kafka Surrenders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 01:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scab of a nation, driven insane : another week closer to the eschaton&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2437675</link>
		<dc:creator>Scab of a nation, driven insane : another week closer to the eschaton&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 17:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2437675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] too bad nobody&#8217;s listening, especially in the united states.  quite the opposite, actually: Kafka Surrenders &#8211; if the police illegally stop you, detain you, and beat you, you aren&#8217;t permitted to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] too bad nobody&#8217;s listening, especially in the united states.  quite the opposite, actually: Kafka Surrenders &#8211; if the police illegally stop you, detain you, and beat you, you aren&#8217;t permitted to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slacktivist &#187; &#8216;The animals are coming,&#8217; so drive up the price of Ron Paul&#8217;s investments in gold</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2431843</link>
		<dc:creator>slacktivist &#187; &#8216;The animals are coming,&#8217; so drive up the price of Ron Paul&#8217;s investments in gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2431843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday Reading &#171; zunguzungu</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2426403</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday Reading &#171; zunguzungu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2426403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Kafka Surrenders: [C]onsider what just happened here. The trial court, the appellate court, and the prosecution all concluded that these two cops broke the law, yet still, all three have deemed that the cops’ testimony is more credible than the testimony of Crossland, his cousin, and the other witnesses—none of whom was doing anything wrong before the confrontation. To be fair, the evidence has to be pretty overwhelming for an appeals court to overturn a trial court on witness credibility. But still. Only one party broke the law before the confrontation. But because that party sports a badge and works for the government, they still get the presumption of credibility over the guy who was minding his own business, his cousin, and the other witnesses. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kafka Surrenders: [C]onsider what just happened here. The trial court, the appellate court, and the prosecution all concluded that these two cops broke the law, yet still, all three have deemed that the cops’ testimony is more credible than the testimony of Crossland, his cousin, and the other witnesses—none of whom was doing anything wrong before the confrontation. To be fair, the evidence has to be pretty overwhelming for an appeals court to overturn a trial court on witness credibility. But still. Only one party broke the law before the confrontation. But because that party sports a badge and works for the government, they still get the presumption of credibility over the guy who was minding his own business, his cousin, and the other witnesses. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doing Kafka Proud &#124; Lawyers on Strike</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2411961</link>
		<dc:creator>Doing Kafka Proud &#124; Lawyers on Strike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2411961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] he often does, Radley Balko chronicles the latest and greatest outrage of police abusing their power.  This time, there is the additional [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he often does, Radley Balko chronicles the latest and greatest outrage of police abusing their power.  This time, there is the additional [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyto</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2408493</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2408493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The officers in question are not the problem.  They are the symptom.  The prosecutor who pursued the case knowing full well he had a couple of dirtbags on his hands is the problem.   The trial judge who knew full well that he was rubber stamp endorsing this &quot;contempt of cop&quot; beating with a criminal convictions is the problem.  The Appellate judges who know the real deal but pretend their hands are tied are the real problem.  

And most of all, we the people and the idiots we elect to represent us are the problem.  We tolerate this kind of crap and like anything bad, tolerating it allows it to spread.  Heck, we don&#039;t just tolerate it... we celebrate it!  Pogo was right.  We have met the enemy, and he is us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The officers in question are not the problem.  They are the symptom.  The prosecutor who pursued the case knowing full well he had a couple of dirtbags on his hands is the problem.   The trial judge who knew full well that he was rubber stamp endorsing this &#8220;contempt of cop&#8221; beating with a criminal convictions is the problem.  The Appellate judges who know the real deal but pretend their hands are tied are the real problem.  </p>
<p>And most of all, we the people and the idiots we elect to represent us are the problem.  We tolerate this kind of crap and like anything bad, tolerating it allows it to spread.  Heck, we don&#8217;t just tolerate it&#8230; we celebrate it!  Pogo was right.  We have met the enemy, and he is us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libarbarian</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2406358</link>
		<dc:creator>libarbarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2406358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@76,

&quot;Given the choice between 1) being put in a cage for years so some power-happy moron with a badge can get his jollies for the day, and 2) ridding the world of a power-happy thug, I would choose the latter.&quot;

False choice.  The choice is between possibly being put in a cage for years before being released and being put in a cage for years before having a needle put in your arm and coming out in a bag.

The situation is NOT going to be ended by killing the cop because you are NOT going to just &quot;disappear&quot; and get away with it.  You would then, of course, end up on death row (meaning many, many, years in a cage before the release of death) or just gunned down by whatever vengeful police were &quot;trying&quot; to arrest you.   Your mother &amp; family in general, whom I assume you love, would be heartbroken and have to deal with the aftermath.  

Revolutionary Violence has it&#039;s place but uncoordinated actions by lone individuals don&#039;t ever accomplish squat.  They all hope that their action will spark some general uprising by the masses etc. .... they are fools fooling themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@76,</p>
<p>&#8220;Given the choice between 1) being put in a cage for years so some power-happy moron with a badge can get his jollies for the day, and 2) ridding the world of a power-happy thug, I would choose the latter.&#8221;</p>
<p>False choice.  The choice is between possibly being put in a cage for years before being released and being put in a cage for years before having a needle put in your arm and coming out in a bag.</p>
<p>The situation is NOT going to be ended by killing the cop because you are NOT going to just &#8220;disappear&#8221; and get away with it.  You would then, of course, end up on death row (meaning many, many, years in a cage before the release of death) or just gunned down by whatever vengeful police were &#8220;trying&#8221; to arrest you.   Your mother &amp; family in general, whom I assume you love, would be heartbroken and have to deal with the aftermath.  </p>
<p>Revolutionary Violence has it&#8217;s place but uncoordinated actions by lone individuals don&#8217;t ever accomplish squat.  They all hope that their action will spark some general uprising by the masses etc. &#8230;. they are fools fooling themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shipwreckedcrew</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2404859</link>
		<dc:creator>shipwreckedcrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2404859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The defendant&#039;s can sue under Sec. 1983.  Judgments about witness credibility will be made by a jury, not judges.  

Constitutional violations by police such as alleged here are cognizable in civil actions, not as defenses to criminal charges.  

Whatever the police may have done unlawfully, the defendants were prosecuted for their conduct which followed.  

Had they not resisted, their civil case would have been pretty much &quot;open and shut&quot; against the police since their own biases and motivations to sue would not be impugned by their convictions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The defendant&#8217;s can sue under Sec. 1983.  Judgments about witness credibility will be made by a jury, not judges.  </p>
<p>Constitutional violations by police such as alleged here are cognizable in civil actions, not as defenses to criminal charges.  </p>
<p>Whatever the police may have done unlawfully, the defendants were prosecuted for their conduct which followed.  </p>
<p>Had they not resisted, their civil case would have been pretty much &#8220;open and shut&#8221; against the police since their own biases and motivations to sue would not be impugned by their convictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2404802</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2404802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the many reasons I left the country....there are too many other places where personal liberties are respected and that haven&#039;t resorted to a police state....I told my mama I love her, but I&#039;ll see her at Christmas, they can have this country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the many reasons I left the country&#8230;.there are too many other places where personal liberties are respected and that haven&#8217;t resorted to a police state&#8230;.I told my mama I love her, but I&#8217;ll see her at Christmas, they can have this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2404186</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2404186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and other people wonder why gangs exist and those 2 police will get shot when someone recognizes the watch and wait]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and other people wonder why gangs exist and those 2 police will get shot when someone recognizes the watch and wait</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larken Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2403563</link>
		<dc:creator>Larken Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2403563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allow me to make the most politically incorrect, but perfectly logical, conclusion. If you are being wrongfully detained, arrested, whatever, by a thug with a badge, there is only one way to resist that at least has a chance of you not getting arrested: killing the aggressor. Now, as a practical matter, I wouldn&#039;t suggest this, because his fellow jackboots will probably eventually hunt you down and do nasty things (very possibly including murdering you), but the point still stands: what this teaches is that resisting thugs with badges a little bit is in some cases MORE hazardous than just killing them outright. If a cop doesn&#039;t mind detaining or arresting you without any reason, you can bet he also won&#039;t mind planting something on you, or lying in court (which they do constantly), to get you caged for something you didn&#039;t do. Given the choice between 1) being put in a cage for years so some power-happy moron with a badge can get his jollies for the day, and 2) ridding the world of a power-happy thug, I would choose the latter.

As others have mentioned, that also appears to be the only deterrent that there is ever going to be against thugs with badges doing whatever they want. Hey, even JFK said that when you make peaceful change impossible, you make violent change inevitable. And that&#039;s all these fascist &quot;rulings&quot; are going to do in the end. The courts can say, &quot;Yeah, they can do whatever they want,&quot; right up until the people say, with bullets, &quot;no, they can&#039;t.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me to make the most politically incorrect, but perfectly logical, conclusion. If you are being wrongfully detained, arrested, whatever, by a thug with a badge, there is only one way to resist that at least has a chance of you not getting arrested: killing the aggressor. Now, as a practical matter, I wouldn&#8217;t suggest this, because his fellow jackboots will probably eventually hunt you down and do nasty things (very possibly including murdering you), but the point still stands: what this teaches is that resisting thugs with badges a little bit is in some cases MORE hazardous than just killing them outright. If a cop doesn&#8217;t mind detaining or arresting you without any reason, you can bet he also won&#8217;t mind planting something on you, or lying in court (which they do constantly), to get you caged for something you didn&#8217;t do. Given the choice between 1) being put in a cage for years so some power-happy moron with a badge can get his jollies for the day, and 2) ridding the world of a power-happy thug, I would choose the latter.</p>
<p>As others have mentioned, that also appears to be the only deterrent that there is ever going to be against thugs with badges doing whatever they want. Hey, even JFK said that when you make peaceful change impossible, you make violent change inevitable. And that&#8217;s all these fascist &#8220;rulings&#8221; are going to do in the end. The courts can say, &#8220;Yeah, they can do whatever they want,&#8221; right up until the people say, with bullets, &#8220;no, they can&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court upholds right of police to stop and search citizens for the flimsiest of reasons &#171; Against Dumb</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2403549</link>
		<dc:creator>Court upholds right of police to stop and search citizens for the flimsiest of reasons &#171; Against Dumb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2403549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 21, 2011     news culture et cetera        Court upholds right of police to stop and search citizens for the flimsiest of reasons     Hedge fund managers got inside information from Congress during the healthcare debate     Kim [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 21, 2011     news culture et cetera        Court upholds right of police to stop and search citizens for the flimsiest of reasons     Hedge fund managers got inside information from Congress during the healthcare debate     Kim [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2401496</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2401496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you were trying to avoid associating with terrorists and you had a choice of going to a party of 50 muslims or 50 cops, which would you choose?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were trying to avoid associating with terrorists and you had a choice of going to a party of 50 muslims or 50 cops, which would you choose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2400769</link>
		<dc:creator>Windy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2400769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Mike, #66 &quot;The American people proved a long time ago to lack the civic virtue to demand the government call them “master.” The average voter is no more qualified these days to wield that power than the average bureaucrat is to regulate them.&quot;

&quot;Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the forms of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question.&quot; — Thomas Jefferson

History HAS answered this question, clearly the answer is &quot;NO!&quot;

We, the People stopped enforcing the Constitution about the  time of Lincoln&#039;s presidency, which is why we are suffering under this police state today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mike, #66 &#8220;The American people proved a long time ago to lack the civic virtue to demand the government call them “master.” The average voter is no more qualified these days to wield that power than the average bureaucrat is to regulate them.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the forms of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question.&#8221; — Thomas Jefferson</p>
<p>History HAS answered this question, clearly the answer is &#8220;NO!&#8221;</p>
<p>We, the People stopped enforcing the Constitution about the  time of Lincoln&#8217;s presidency, which is why we are suffering under this police state today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deoxy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2396919</link>
		<dc:creator>Deoxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2396919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The policeman apologized when giving me the ticket. There had been complaints by the neighborhood that people didn’t do their stop properly (“think of the children!” etc.), so he had received orders to give tickets to everyone passing by that stop sign. Didn’t think it was fair, but orders are orders…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, that&#039;s just a way of dealing with inherent flaws in human nature that are extremely difficult to correct - that is, a problem is not dealt with until it applied evenly to EVERYONE, and then, when it hits someone who &quot;matters&quot; (that is, who has come clout and, generally is the type who likes to throw it around), the problem is resolved.

It sucks, but it does get things done.  I got a speeding ticket once for a similar situation - there was an area that had been changed quite a bit with construction, but the speed limit signs had never been changed (still 45 in an area that was now divided, limited access highway).  Everyone ignored the signs, since they were clearly just out-dated... then, a couple of officers started ticketing people for it, and the signs were changed in less than a month.

Yes, it&#039;s stupid, but it&#039;s not actually malicious - there&#039;s a big difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The policeman apologized when giving me the ticket. There had been complaints by the neighborhood that people didn’t do their stop properly (“think of the children!” etc.), so he had received orders to give tickets to everyone passing by that stop sign. Didn’t think it was fair, but orders are orders…</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, that&#8217;s just a way of dealing with inherent flaws in human nature that are extremely difficult to correct &#8211; that is, a problem is not dealt with until it applied evenly to EVERYONE, and then, when it hits someone who &#8220;matters&#8221; (that is, who has come clout and, generally is the type who likes to throw it around), the problem is resolved.</p>
<p>It sucks, but it does get things done.  I got a speeding ticket once for a similar situation &#8211; there was an area that had been changed quite a bit with construction, but the speed limit signs had never been changed (still 45 in an area that was now divided, limited access highway).  Everyone ignored the signs, since they were clearly just out-dated&#8230; then, a couple of officers started ticketing people for it, and the signs were changed in less than a month.</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s stupid, but it&#8217;s not actually malicious &#8211; there&#8217;s a big difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deoxy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2396903</link>
		<dc:creator>Deoxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2396903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This kind of thing only stops when extra-judicial measures are applied - that is, when either vigilante or mob justice is applied to the offending party the state refuses to discipline (the police).

In a case like this, the way to end stuff like this is to make sure you have cameras (with sound) rolling from a non-obvious vantage point, and then have someone off camera (and not directly involved) protect the victim (of the police brutality) with lethal force.

It would take a VERY FEW of such actions to make difference (especially if the actual offender is never caught - whether someone goes to jail or not, the police know when the just grab a scape goat).

I honestly hope it never comes to this, but if actions like these continue, eventually, it will.  Hey, officers!  FIX IT BEFORE THAT, for your own sake as well as ours - actions like that do lasting social damage, even when they are necessary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of thing only stops when extra-judicial measures are applied &#8211; that is, when either vigilante or mob justice is applied to the offending party the state refuses to discipline (the police).</p>
<p>In a case like this, the way to end stuff like this is to make sure you have cameras (with sound) rolling from a non-obvious vantage point, and then have someone off camera (and not directly involved) protect the victim (of the police brutality) with lethal force.</p>
<p>It would take a VERY FEW of such actions to make difference (especially if the actual offender is never caught &#8211; whether someone goes to jail or not, the police know when the just grab a scape goat).</p>
<p>I honestly hope it never comes to this, but if actions like these continue, eventually, it will.  Hey, officers!  FIX IT BEFORE THAT, for your own sake as well as ours &#8211; actions like that do lasting social damage, even when they are necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike T</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2395477</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2395477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
DO what they say, then make it your life’s mission to have their jobs, and own the local precinct as soon as possible afterwards. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If this were the norm, the government would just outlaw filing lawsuits against it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
DO what they say, then make it your life’s mission to have their jobs, and own the local precinct as soon as possible afterwards.
</p></blockquote>
<p>If this were the norm, the government would just outlaw filing lawsuits against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goober</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2395213</link>
		<dc:creator>Goober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2395213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey guys.  i know it sucks, but the smart thing to do here is to comply with what they are doing and call your lawyer afterwards.  When you are armed with a cigarette and a lawnmower and they have guns, tazers, and pepper spray, you lose the physical battle.  

DO what they say, then make it your life&#039;s mission to have their jobs, and own the local precinct as soon as possible afterwards.  

It is possible.  it has happened.  Remember, revenge is a dish best served cold.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys.  i know it sucks, but the smart thing to do here is to comply with what they are doing and call your lawyer afterwards.  When you are armed with a cigarette and a lawnmower and they have guns, tazers, and pepper spray, you lose the physical battle.  </p>
<p>DO what they say, then make it your life&#8217;s mission to have their jobs, and own the local precinct as soon as possible afterwards.  </p>
<p>It is possible.  it has happened.  Remember, revenge is a dish best served cold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barney</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2395033</link>
		<dc:creator>barney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2395033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[aren&#039;t the judges familar with the concept: innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?

seems there was a reasonable doubt as to whether he assaulted P.O.

maybe the judges (all of them) should repeat 1st year law school?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aren&#8217;t the judges familar with the concept: innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?</p>
<p>seems there was a reasonable doubt as to whether he assaulted P.O.</p>
<p>maybe the judges (all of them) should repeat 1st year law school?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News, links and random thoughts &#124; Code Monkey Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2394411</link>
		<dc:creator>News, links and random thoughts &#124; Code Monkey Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2394411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This is a good example of why the United States does not have anything that can be reasonably called the &#8220;rule of law.&#8221; Notice that the police officers were doing something which the courts acknowledged was an actual, actionable, even criminal violation of civil rights but the defendants still possessed no right of self-defense against the illegal actions of the police officers under the law. They could sue or plead with a district attorney, but actual self-defense&#8211;that is to say, the right to use force&#8211;was not a legal option. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is a good example of why the United States does not have anything that can be reasonably called the &#8220;rule of law.&#8221; Notice that the police officers were doing something which the courts acknowledged was an actual, actionable, even criminal violation of civil rights but the defendants still possessed no right of self-defense against the illegal actions of the police officers under the law. They could sue or plead with a district attorney, but actual self-defense&#8211;that is to say, the right to use force&#8211;was not a legal option. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike T</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/12/19/kafka-surrenders/comment-page-2/#comment-2394407</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=23175#comment-2394407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
Both of the officers their commanders and the entire appellate bench should go to prison for contempt of their superiors (citizens) and breach of oath of office. The American People can no longer put up with this kind of insubordination from their servants.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The American people proved a long time ago to lack the civic virtue to demand the government call them &quot;master.&quot; The average voter is no more qualified these days to wield that power than the average bureaucrat is to regulate them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Both of the officers their commanders and the entire appellate bench should go to prison for contempt of their superiors (citizens) and breach of oath of office. The American People can no longer put up with this kind of insubordination from their servants.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The American people proved a long time ago to lack the civic virtue to demand the government call them &#8220;master.&#8221; The average voter is no more qualified these days to wield that power than the average bureaucrat is to regulate them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
