Mike Mermel, DNA Fabulist

Thursday, December 1st, 2011

In my “rogue’s gallery” of bad prosecutors for the criminal justice issue of Reason, I included Mike Mermel, an Assistant State’s Attorney in Lake County, Illinois. Mermel has taken prosecutorial tunnel vision to new depths, by concocting bizarre theories to explain why the guy he convicted is still guilty of rape and murder, despite the presence of another man’s semen in the victim. On Sunday, Mermel and the Lake County State’s Attorney’s Office were profiled in the New York Times Magazine. It’s really an amazing article, for a number of reasons.

Some highlights:

The first time I contacted him and said that I was from The New York Times, Mermel immediately announced that he was conservative. He agreed to speak with me on the phone, and later in the lobby of the state’s attorney’s office, but he refused requests for subsequent interviews and sought to retract all statements from our previous conversation.

Defense lawyers described Mermel’s office to me, with a photo of Charlton Heston and a book by Ann Coulter on display. “The first time I was in his office, he played me a videotape of Rush Limbaugh,” Stone said. “It was a diatribe on Bill Clinton.”

While some of Mermel’s tactics have drawn the ire of defense lawyers, others give him grudging respect for his skill in the courtroom. “He’s a very effective trial lawyer,” Stone said. “But his view of the world is very narrow.” In the case of Juan Rivera, Lake County prosecutors have been able to convince juries, not once but three times, that he was the murderer, despite DNA evidence in the last trial that powerfully suggested otherwise. (Mermel was the lead lawyer on the third trial and assisted in the second.)

“We don’t fold our tents and run,” Mermel told me when we spoke this spring. “We don’t quaver because somebody holds up three letters: DNA.”

When I asked him specifically about the Rivera case, Mermel said that sometimes post-conviction evidence is irrelevant. “The example I like to give people is next time you go to a motel room, bring a plastic bag, because the dirtiest thing in that room is the remote control. Everybody has sex and then rolls over and goes, ‘I wonder what’s on?’ ” he said. “O.K., so you can find DNA in the form of sperm from 10 different people in that room from that remote control or even on a person who has touched it. And that woman gets murdered in that room tonight, and you are going to have a lot of DNA. Is it all going to be forensically significant?”

His theory for why there was sperm that did not come from Juan Rivera inside 11-year-old Holly Staker on the day she was murdered is, to his mind, simple and straightforward. She and her twin sister, Heather, were sexually active, Mermel argues, and Holly must have had sex with someone else before Rivera came along and raped (but didn’t ejaculate) and murdered her. There was scant evidence to support this sexual-activity theory, but Mermel dismissed that objection. “Nobody is going to admit to having sex with an 11-year-old girl, even if the statute of limitations has run out,” he told me. “But there was a lot of evidence that came to our office that these two girls were sexually active.”

Actually, there wasn’t. But this is Mermel’s M.O. From my own piece on Mermel:

When a DNA test in 2003 showed that the semen in the underwear of a 68-year-old woman didn’t belong to Bernie Starks, a man convicted in 1986 of raping and murdering her, Mermel dismissed the results because the semen came from the victim’s clothing. Had it come from the woman’s vagina, Mermel said, “I would be standing over there advocating the side that the defense has in the case.”

Three years later, defense attorneys found the rape kit and tested semen recovered from the woman’s vagina. Again, there was no match. Mermel again wouldn’t budge, this time arguing that the woman must have had sex with someone else just before the rape.

Mermel’s biggest blunder was Jerry Hobbs, who was arrested in 2005 on charges of raping and stabbing to death his 8-year-old daughter and her 9-year-old friend. Hobbs confessed to the killings, but only after 16 straight hours of questioning that began after he’d spent the previous night looking for the girls….

When Hobbs’ attorneys revealed in court in 2008 that DNA tests showed the semen found in the mouth, rectum, and vagina of Hobbs’ daughter didn’t belong to Hobbs, Mermel postulated that the foreign semen must have found its way into the girl’s body while she was playing in a patch of woods where teenagers were known to have sex. The girl had been found fully clothed.

Let’s get back to the Times piece. Meet the cop who extracted the confession from the latest person Mermel  insists is guilty, despite DNA evidence.

When Lou Tessmann retired from the Waukegan police in 2005, the Illinois House of Representatives passed a resolution praising his two decades of service. The resolution noted that Tessmann, a former Marine, is “well known for his interrogation techniques on suspects of crimes.”

Since then, Tessmann has traveled the country offering seminars to police officers on how to investigate homicides and interrogate potential suspects. “Mr. Tessmann has obtained over 80 homicide confessions during his career with only three instances where he was unable to obtain a confession from a homicide suspect” — a 96 percent success rate — according to the Web site of his employer, Wicklander-Zulawski & Associates.

It was Tessmann who was sent in to interrogate Rivera around 11:30 a.m. on Oct. 30, along with Sgt. Michael Maley of the Illinois State Police. In the hour or two before the interview began, Rivera was hitting his head against a glass window and was then on the floor with his wrists and ankles cuffed behind him. Tessmann, however, described Rivera as “very comfortable, very relaxed” during the interview.

Though Tessmann arrived at the police station roughly seven hours before the interview, he testified that he wasn’t aware of Rivera’s previous confession. (One of his colleagues testified that he gave Tessmann the statement that morning.) He said that Rivera willingly recounted the crime, which then cleared up many of the issues that prosecutors considered problematic.

How convenient. Also convenient: The interrogation wasn’t recorded. Now watch how Mermel uses Tessmann in the courtroom:

In his closing argument in the third trial, Mermel told jurors that the case basically came down to whom they believed: the police or the DNA evidence? “Is there anything in the makeup of any of those men that would lead you to believe that they were the kind of people who had dedicated their lives to this profession, yet just decided to just frame this poor innocent Juan Rivera because they were tired of investigating and wanted to go home?” he said.

What the jury didn’t know was that Mermel had already successfully argued against the admissibility of any evidence that might cast doubt on Tessmann’s credibility. For instance, Tessmann said in a 1990 deposition and in an official biography that he earned an English degree from the University of Wisconsin. But the school’s 13 four-year colleges have no record of him ever attending. (In fact, he graduated from Northeastern Illinois University.) In 1989, Tessmann and four other police officers were sued for allegedly breaking into the wrong home during a police raid and injuring a woman who was seven months pregnant. The woman’s lawyer accused the police of writing reports to cover up their conduct and charged that Tessmann “took the lead in creative drama.”

According to documents provided by defense lawyers, a judgment was entered against Tessmann and the other officers for $48,500 in that case, and two years later, another judgment of $71,500 was entered against Tessmann in a case brought against him by a man who was wrongfully arrested for robbery.

A decade later, in 2001, a woman named Colleen Blue was charged with murder after she confessed to killing her newborn. Tessmann, then a commander, said to a reporter for The Chicago Daily Herald, “She told us she had six kids already and just did not want to deal with another one.” He added: “She said she gave birth to the baby when she was all alone, put him in the bag and walked off. She told us she could hear the baby crying until she got close enough to the street that the passing cars drowned out the sound.”

Charges against Blue were dropped when DNA testing revealed it wasn’t her baby.

Incredible, isn’t it? Mermel tells the jury that if they acquit because of the DNA evidence, they’ll be insulting the sterling reputation of this honorable cop . . . just after he has successfully argued to prevent the jury from hearing about the cop’s shady past.

A couple more choice quotes from Mermel:

  • Mermel opposed a new trial for a man convicted of killing an unidentified woman. When her identity became known years later, it turned out that her former husband once admitted that he killed her. Mermel dismissed statements from the husband, who is mentally disturbed, as the rants of a “one-armed Cuban feces-covered masturbator.”…
  • …Mermel said he still suspected that Hobbs was the killer and that the sperm was not related to the crime. One plausible scenario, he says, is that Torrez masturbated while visiting Krystal’s brother, and then Laura got it on her hands and unknowingly transferred it elsewhere. “They have popcorn-movie night, and the little girl is in the same bed where this guy did it,” Mermel said by way of explanation….“How do we get colds? We touch our mouths, we touch our nose. What does a woman do after she urinates?” We were in the lobby of the prosecutor’s office, and Mermel answered his own question by standing and pulling his hand between his legs, as if wiping himself. “Front to back, O.K.?”….

But this quote Mermel gave the Chicago Tribune last year is probably the only one that matters:

“The taxpayers don’t pay us for intellectual curiosity. They pay us to get convictions.”

That really says it all, doesn’t it?

Mermel isn’t alone, of course. The article lists other cases in which prosecutors have come up with alternate explanations for the presence of DNA. (Don’t forget Colorado DA Carrol Chambers, who attempted to explain away the DNA found in an 8-year-old victim’s underwear by pointing out how slutty children tend to dress these days.) The article notes that the problem is common enough that defense lawyers have come up with a term for the strategy: the unindicted co-ejaculator.

Competition for the 2011 Worst Prosecutor of the Year award looks to be fierce.

Digg it |  reddit |  del.icio.us |  Fark

27 Responses to “Mike Mermel, DNA Fabulist”

  1. #1 |  Mario | 

    Funny that the reaction some people have when hearing that someone is a defense attorney is: “How could you?” Prosecutors get a free ride — you know, because they’re on the side of the angels.

  2. #2 |  Should Prosecutors Who Knowingly Falsely Convict an Innocent Individual Be Prosecuted? (And other good news…) » Scott Lazarowitz's Blog | 

    […] Radley Balko on corrupt prosecutors and DNA […]

  3. #3 |  Boyd Durkin | 

    Had to throw up a couple times while reading about Mermel. So, I guess he’s a good candidate.

    These are truly horrible people.

  4. #4 |  Jerry | 

    Many prosecutors seem to operate on the belief that if they can obtain a conviction, well then that person is guilty. As I recall, Janet Reno was well noted for this.

  5. #5 |  Stick | 

    Sometimes I wish there was a serial killer – or two – whose ‘specialty’ was dealing with arseholes like this.

  6. #6 |  OBTC | 

    Holy Fucking Fuck!

    I don’t know what else to say.

  7. #7 |  OBTC | 

    Competition for the 2011 Worst Prosecutor of the Year award looks to be fierce.

    Truer words Radley, have not been spoken.


  8. #8 |  jb | 

    What always shocks me is how detailed people like him’s speculations are about how semen can get into/onto children’s bodies. It’s never “well, we have evidence for this guy, so there must be some explanation for the DNA, but I don’t know what it is,” it’s “here are 3 graphic explanations for the DNA that I’ve spent hours working out in minute detail.”

    The hotel room and other such quotes are far-fetched, sure, but who but a pedophile would spend that much time thinking about weird ways to get sperm into girls’ orifices?

  9. #9 |  David | 

    The hotel room and other such quotes are far-fetched, sure, but who but a pedophile would spend that much time thinking about weird ways to get sperm into girls’ orifices?

    A federal prosecutor?

    Another question. Who’s worse: The person who rapes and murders an 11-year-old girl or the person who dedicates himself to throwing an innocent person in jail for that crime, guaranteeing that, barring an unrelated lucky break for society, the guilty party still walks free?

  10. #10 |  Tim P | 

    Let’s not forget, there are juries involved in these convictions. I imagine there being a very bad defense lawyer involved also.

  11. #11 |  Bob | 

    #8: Tim P

    Let’s not forget, there are juries involved in these convictions. I imagine there being a very bad defense lawyer involved also.

    Or an overworked / underpaid Public Defender.

    The Prosecutor and the Public Defender both get paid by the same branch of Government. It doesn’t take a Rocket Scientist to figure out which will be as underfunded as possible.

  12. #12 |  CyniCAl | 

    If only we had the right people in office. /ubersarcasm

    Why is it you suppose that psychopaths like Mermel are attracted to these offices?

    Every day that one can avoid the “justice” system is a day to be supremely thankful for. One has a better chance at beating cancer.

  13. #13 |  Afternoon Reading « decliNATIONblog | 

    […] Balko is doing a great job of keeping our “public servants” accountable.  This guy is a real piece of work.  Probably about time to give Mike Mermel a lifetime achievement award.  Or the Nobel Peace […]

  14. #14 |  Bulucanagria | 

    grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr…(I’ll spare you the crescendo)

  15. #15 |  the innominate one | 

    Mermel sits around and imagines different scenarios by which 8 – 11 year old girls are slutty enough to voluntarily have semen in their vaginas, then presents this in court without a whiff of evidence. What a sick fuck. How do judges let this shit go on?

    Do you think Mermel keeps his office door locked while he, um, “writes his closing arguments”, if you know what I mean?

  16. #16 |  John Regan | 

    The real power in a courtroom belongs to the judge. Mermel is their creature.

  17. #17 |  Escher | 


    You might like the book Molon Labe! by Boston T. Party.
    A similar serial killer that you talked about is in the novel.

  18. #18 |  notjenna | 

    Mermel is the kind of person that Andrew Shirvell, former Michigan Asst. AG and closet queen, would’ve grown up to be had he not been fired for his extremely creepy behavior. Damn, how many of these assholes are there in the ranks of prosecutors around the country?

    Question about Mermel… can’t find much info about him on the google so I wonder what law school he went to. Ave Maria? Regent? Liberty? is what I’m guessing.

  19. #19 |  Dominican Phil | 

    I hardly think that prosecutors get a good rap in society. I think the general consensus in popular culture is that they make up the omnipotent being known as “the man.” More often then not, the only times prosecutors get good press is when they put nutjobs like this woman behind bars: http://lawblog.legalmatch.com/2011/11/29/black-friday-walmart-pepper-spray-battery-jail/

    Otherwise they’re pretty bashed on a lot.

  20. #20 |  Warped System, Warped Minds | Lawyers on Strike | 

    […] to and favored the way prosecutors are might warp anyone’s perspective.  The result is that we create monsters. LD_AddCustomAttr("AdOpt", "1"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Origin", "other"); […]

  21. #21 |  Lake County, Illinois Sheriff Calls for Michael Mermel’s Resignation | The Agitator | 

    […] would have been preferable to go after Mermel for what he’s done instead of what he said to the New York Times, but hey, it’s a start. Lake County Sheriff […]

  22. #22 |  Pam | 

    He thinks the same way as Rush Limbaugh, he just makes things up. Except people’s lives are in his hands.

  23. #23 |  Peter Parker | 

    CyniCal said “Every day that one can avoid the “justice” system is a day to be supremely thankful for. One has a better chance at beating cancer.”

    Sad but true……in Lake County where law enforcement is a joke, where the victims are prosecuted, and where criminals are protected.

    What a sick, demented, and fraudulent State’s Attorney’s Office we have in Lake County!

  24. #24 |  Raj | 

    On this evidence, I’m afraid he’s just a crap lawyer.

    Either he should be disbarred, or he should get whichever law school he went to to give him a refund – again, on this evidence.

    In my mind though, this just reinforces the case for an independent bar – as they have in England. It makes this sort of thing somewhat less likely as those prosecuting could also have to defend at any given time.

    Prosecutors are paid to prosecute. Juries convict.

    I don’t think the judges or defense lawyers are immune from scrutiny here – if he was allowed to get away with this, and the state bar association really ought to be more proactive in safeguarding their standards.

    Depressing. Perhaps we the people need to do something about it.

    Oh by the way, he can theorize all he wants but his speculation isn’t evidence – and he’s the one that has to disprove reasonable doubt with evidence. His opinion isn’t evidence. Sperm is evidence. Reasonable doubt it was someone else? Yes on the face of it. Mermel’s explanation? Nothing – it’s as meaningless as me saying “meep, meep, meep.” because it’s speculation. Reasonable doubt uncontroverted by evidence remains reasonable doubt.

    Where did he go to Law School? Perhaps someone should ask them what they think.

    Deeply depressing. Keep up the good work though.

  25. #25 |  "The taxpayers don’t pay us for intellectual curiosity. They pay us to get convictions.” » Gator In The Desert | 

    […] read Radley Balko’s write-up about this […]

  26. #26 |  Updates Galore (Part Two) « The Honest Courtesan | 

    […] December 1st Radley Balko discussed a New York Times Magazine profile of Illinois prosecutor Mike Mermel, a man who seems to have discovered the perfect job for a sadistic, misogynistic pervert:  Mermel […]

  27. #27 |  Bite Mark News | The Agitator | 

    […] Mike Mermel, who was recently forced to resign for comments he made in an unflattering profile in the New York Times. When a DNA test in 2003 showed that the semen in the underwear of a 68-year-old woman didn’t […]