allow them to prove whether extra-dimensions exist.

Isn’t this where John Smallberries and John Big Booty came from?

Please tell me people have seen that magnificent movie.

Oh hell yeah! I even made an all Warlock guild in “World of Warcraft” called “The Hongkong Cavaloors” with only 5 Gnome Warlocks in it named after the members of the band.

I was trying to multi-box 5 accounts at once in dungeons. That was a lot of fun for a while.

Those that can, do.
Those that can’t, teach.
Those that can’t teach, administrate.
Those that can’t administrate, major in journalism.

Isn’t this where John Smallberries and John Big Booty came from?

“BIG-BOO-TAY! TAY! TAY!”

allow them to prove whether extra-dimensions exist.

Isn’t this where John Smallberries and John Big Booty came from?

Please tell me people have seen that magnificent movie.

Boyd Dunkin (#4): “I take relief in knowing Morgan Freeman doesn’t understand everything he says on that show either.“

He knows more about this science than he does about politics, apparently.

I love the man’s skills as an actor and narrator.

Yeah, that’s right, let’s just see if we can open the door to Thirdspace; we’re ready for whatever comes through.

Maybe we’ll have to build thousands of these things…just to be safe.

They do (I’ve offered to review articles for accuracy every time I’ve talked to a journalist), but standard journalistic practice does not permit the subject of an interview to vet the article for accuracy.

While perhaps understandable when covering politics or crime, this practice doesn’t serve science reporting well.

I’m pretty sure the German professor said, or meant, pairs of particles not molecules. Isn’t it the journalist’s job to catch or correct that? How about a brief paragraph describing virtual particles? Fucking dead tree “science” journalists. Things like virtual particles and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle are way beyond their meager knowledge of the science they make ghastly attempts to report on.

Outer space is an even higher-quality vacuum, with the equivalent of just a few hydrogen atoms per cubic meter on average.[4] However, even if every single atom and particle could be removed from a volume, it would still not be “empty” due to vacuum fluctuations, dark energy, and other phenomena in quantum physics. In modern Particle Physics, the vacuum is considered as the ground state of matter.

Furthermore, we have observed them at least in part. We can observe the effects of virtual particles and we have even observed Hawkings radiation. Finally, just because something has not been empirically observed is not the equivalent of it not existing. Inferential information, such as mathematics in the related theories, holding up under observations in nearly all parts are strong indicators for the remaining unobserved phenomenon.

Contrary to popular belief, a vacuum is not devoid of material but in fact fizzles with tiny mysterious particles that pop in and out of existence, but at speeds so fast that no one has been able to prove they exist.

If a vacuum is filled with tiny particles no one has proved exist yet, one might say that it is…empty, at least until the existence particles is empirically validated.