<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jerry Brown Vetoes Bill That Would Require a Warrant for Cell Phone Searches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Gov. Jerry Brown - 10/14/2011 &#124; Douche of the Day</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1852303</link>
		<dc:creator>California Gov. Jerry Brown - 10/14/2011 &#124; Douche of the Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1852303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Behaving Badly    Warrant? We don&#039;t need no steenkin&#039; warrants!  California Gov. Jerry Brown is vetoing legislation requiring police to obtain a court warrant to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Behaving Badly    Warrant? We don&#039;t need no steenkin&#039; warrants!  California Gov. Jerry Brown is vetoing legislation requiring police to obtain a court warrant to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lyman</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1839094</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1839094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, you retain privilege as long as you&#039;re taking reasonable steps to maintain confidentiality.  Having your phone taken from you forcibly and searched without your consent won&#039;t destroy privilege, but on the other hand, giving it up voluntarily might, depending on the circumstances.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you retain privilege as long as you&#8217;re taking reasonable steps to maintain confidentiality.  Having your phone taken from you forcibly and searched without your consent won&#8217;t destroy privilege, but on the other hand, giving it up voluntarily might, depending on the circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discarted</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1836004</link>
		<dc:creator>discarted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1836004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m curious to know how this effects attorney-client privilege.  Personally, I use my phone regularly to communicate with my lawyer.  Especially in the last two weeks since a deadline is approaching.

So is attorney-client privilege non-existent if we use our smart phones to communicate with our lawyers?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious to know how this effects attorney-client privilege.  Personally, I use my phone regularly to communicate with my lawyer.  Especially in the last two weeks since a deadline is approaching.</p>
<p>So is attorney-client privilege non-existent if we use our smart phones to communicate with our lawyers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1834163</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1834163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Jerry Brown is following Obama’s path to becoming a Republican.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Darwin, et. al.

If you guys think Obama, Brown and Democrats were in some way better than Republicans and going to protect your rights....suckers.

But keep voting anyways, it is clearly working.

Sailor,

&lt;blockquote&gt;Difster, sorry. Or did you mean that my lack of a smart phone would be something to use against me?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Duh, of course.  If you don&#039;t have e-mail on your phone or text messages that is a sign that you are a smart criminal.  See, even the lack of evidence is evidence.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is anyone still living in California? Take your guns and smartphones and get out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because California is on the leading edge, what we do the rest of the country soon follows.  So, it will be happening in your area soon enough.

Regarding this,

&lt;blockquote&gt;“a phone that stores all data remotely would be easier.”

That makes it worse. Data in 3rd party hands aren’t subject to 4th Amendment protection.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And chances are they&#039;d still search it on your phone since your phone would allow them access.

albatross,

&lt;blockquote&gt;Why care if you dont have blackmail material on your phone? For the same reason you should care if I manage to change a million votes in next year’s oresidential election, but leave yours alone–that power subverts the institutions you count on for this society to keep working. Give the local cops, the FBI, the NSA, etc. blackmail material on enough local politicians, journalists, activists, gadflies, bureaucrats, etc., and you will find that you have given them unlimited power to avoid accountability for anything they do, to force any politician to back down in a conflict with them, to silence any critic, to guarantee favorable local media coverage.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh stop being a poopy head.  If they aren&#039;t doing anything wrong, nothing bad will ever happen to them.  Only bad people have bad things happen to them.

Now, who wants a magic pony?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jerry Brown is following Obama’s path to becoming a Republican.</p></blockquote>
<p>Darwin, et. al.</p>
<p>If you guys think Obama, Brown and Democrats were in some way better than Republicans and going to protect your rights&#8230;.suckers.</p>
<p>But keep voting anyways, it is clearly working.</p>
<p>Sailor,</p>
<blockquote><p>Difster, sorry. Or did you mean that my lack of a smart phone would be something to use against me?</p></blockquote>
<p>Duh, of course.  If you don&#8217;t have e-mail on your phone or text messages that is a sign that you are a smart criminal.  See, even the lack of evidence is evidence.</p>
<blockquote><p>Why is anyone still living in California? Take your guns and smartphones and get out.</p></blockquote>
<p>Because California is on the leading edge, what we do the rest of the country soon follows.  So, it will be happening in your area soon enough.</p>
<p>Regarding this,</p>
<blockquote><p>“a phone that stores all data remotely would be easier.”</p>
<p>That makes it worse. Data in 3rd party hands aren’t subject to 4th Amendment protection.</p></blockquote>
<p>And chances are they&#8217;d still search it on your phone since your phone would allow them access.</p>
<p>albatross,</p>
<blockquote><p>Why care if you dont have blackmail material on your phone? For the same reason you should care if I manage to change a million votes in next year’s oresidential election, but leave yours alone–that power subverts the institutions you count on for this society to keep working. Give the local cops, the FBI, the NSA, etc. blackmail material on enough local politicians, journalists, activists, gadflies, bureaucrats, etc., and you will find that you have given them unlimited power to avoid accountability for anything they do, to force any politician to back down in a conflict with them, to silence any critic, to guarantee favorable local media coverage.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh stop being a poopy head.  If they aren&#8217;t doing anything wrong, nothing bad will ever happen to them.  Only bad people have bad things happen to them.</p>
<p>Now, who wants a magic pony?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albatross</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1832563</link>
		<dc:creator>albatross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1832563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consider how valuable all that stored-forever information is when, years later, you are involved in some annoying protest, or are running for office, or have insider access to some information some powerful person might like to have.

Why care if you dont have blackmail material on your phone?  For the same reason you should care if I manage to change a million votes in next year&#039;s oresidential election, but leave yours alone--that power subverts the institutions you count on for this society to keep working.  Give the local cops, the FBI, the NSA, etc. blackmail material on enough local politicians, journalists, activists, gadflies, bureaucrats, etc., and you will find that you have given them unlimited power to avoid accountability for anything they do, to force any politician to back down in a conflict with them, to silence any critic, to guarantee favorable local media coverage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider how valuable all that stored-forever information is when, years later, you are involved in some annoying protest, or are running for office, or have insider access to some information some powerful person might like to have.</p>
<p>Why care if you dont have blackmail material on your phone?  For the same reason you should care if I manage to change a million votes in next year&#8217;s oresidential election, but leave yours alone&#8211;that power subverts the institutions you count on for this society to keep working.  Give the local cops, the FBI, the NSA, etc. blackmail material on enough local politicians, journalists, activists, gadflies, bureaucrats, etc., and you will find that you have given them unlimited power to avoid accountability for anything they do, to force any politician to back down in a conflict with them, to silence any critic, to guarantee favorable local media coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yizmo Gizmo</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1832339</link>
		<dc:creator>Yizmo Gizmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1832339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;But as a matter of practical reality, I don’t see why I would especially care. My personal emails are boring and mostly about what my kids did today or what we’re going to do for dinner. All these elaborate security schemes, phone-wiping plans, etc.: why?&quot;

Come on,  spying, whether Murdoch- or govt-derived, is a big voyeuristic jerkoff.
Imagine the thrill, for petty tyrants, of being to be able to play God and
browse through everyone&#039;s personal photos, videos and e-mails with impunity,
under the guise of fighting crime.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But as a matter of practical reality, I don’t see why I would especially care. My personal emails are boring and mostly about what my kids did today or what we’re going to do for dinner. All these elaborate security schemes, phone-wiping plans, etc.: why?&#8221;</p>
<p>Come on,  spying, whether Murdoch- or govt-derived, is a big voyeuristic jerkoff.<br />
Imagine the thrill, for petty tyrants, of being to be able to play God and<br />
browse through everyone&#8217;s personal photos, videos and e-mails with impunity,<br />
under the guise of fighting crime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albatross</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1831919</link>
		<dc:creator>albatross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1831919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, is there any good explanation for why Gov. Moonbeam decided to veto this?  Did the local cops/prosecutors offer to post that video of him and the sixteen year old hooker in the governor&#039;s mansion to Youtube?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, is there any good explanation for why Gov. Moonbeam decided to veto this?  Did the local cops/prosecutors offer to post that video of him and the sixteen year old hooker in the governor&#8217;s mansion to Youtube?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lyman</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1831729</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1831729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a legal matter, I think the CA courts got it wrong.  As a matter of principle, I think cops shouldn&#039;t search phones without warrants unless there&#039;s some very compelling reason why they can&#039;t wait.  And as a lawyer, I would claim privilege for a lot of my emails.

But as a matter of practical reality, I don&#039;t see why I would especially care.  My personal emails are boring and mostly about what my kids did today or what we&#039;re going to do for dinner.  All these elaborate security schemes, phone-wiping plans, etc.: why?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a legal matter, I think the CA courts got it wrong.  As a matter of principle, I think cops shouldn&#8217;t search phones without warrants unless there&#8217;s some very compelling reason why they can&#8217;t wait.  And as a lawyer, I would claim privilege for a lot of my emails.</p>
<p>But as a matter of practical reality, I don&#8217;t see why I would especially care.  My personal emails are boring and mostly about what my kids did today or what we&#8217;re going to do for dinner.  All these elaborate security schemes, phone-wiping plans, etc.: why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rune</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1831682</link>
		<dc:creator>Rune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1831682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dognabbit, messed up the html in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIqESwzCGg4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link above&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dognabbit, messed up the html in <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIqESwzCGg4" rel="nofollow">link above</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rune</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1831677</link>
		<dc:creator>Rune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1831677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a&gt;♫♪California! Über Alles!
♪♫California! Über Alles!
♫♪Über Alles! California!
♪♫Über Alles! California!&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a>♫♪California! Über Alles!<br />
♪♫California! Über Alles!<br />
♫♪Über Alles! California!<br />
♪♫Über Alles! California!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimBob</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1830057</link>
		<dc:creator>JimBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1830057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@44 Stormy:

&quot;Of course, this raises the question of why cell phone manufacturers are making devices with such easily bypassable security?&quot;

This is a difficult question to answer, but the basic response is &quot;feature, not bug&quot;.

The ability to act as a USB mass storage device is nearly a REQUIRED feature these days.  Nobody encrypts their SD cards or internal memory, and the demand for it isn&#039;t huge (imagine having to re-enter a PGP-style passphrase using an on-screen keyboard every couple of hours).

There are other useful features make it easy to access data on the phone-- most Android phones support USB debugging (don&#039;t know which phones have it turned on by default), which gives a smart user or program access to a LOT of nifty information that&#039;s useful for programmers and attackers alike.  I know that my phone has debugging access enabled; I use it as a test device for some research software I&#039;m writing.  A smart cop could use that to my disadvantage, I suppose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@44 Stormy:</p>
<p>&#8220;Of course, this raises the question of why cell phone manufacturers are making devices with such easily bypassable security?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a difficult question to answer, but the basic response is &#8220;feature, not bug&#8221;.</p>
<p>The ability to act as a USB mass storage device is nearly a REQUIRED feature these days.  Nobody encrypts their SD cards or internal memory, and the demand for it isn&#8217;t huge (imagine having to re-enter a PGP-style passphrase using an on-screen keyboard every couple of hours).</p>
<p>There are other useful features make it easy to access data on the phone&#8211; most Android phones support USB debugging (don&#8217;t know which phones have it turned on by default), which gives a smart user or program access to a LOT of nifty information that&#8217;s useful for programmers and attackers alike.  I know that my phone has debugging access enabled; I use it as a test device for some research software I&#8217;m writing.  A smart cop could use that to my disadvantage, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1829643</link>
		<dc:creator>Coyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1829643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I just read there hasn&#039;t been a veto override in California since 1979. Wow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I just read there hasn&#8217;t been a veto override in California since 1979. Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1829529</link>
		<dc:creator>Coyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1829529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They should be able to override it with two-thirds in both houses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should be able to override it with two-thirds in both houses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1828865</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1828865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And to think I was actually thinking of re-celling.  

Fark dat chit!  

I&#039;m land lining it and will stick to such till I need a burner.  :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to think I was actually thinking of re-celling.  </p>
<p>Fark dat chit!  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m land lining it and will stick to such till I need a burner.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreginOz</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1828747</link>
		<dc:creator>GreginOz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1828747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read a while ago about Egypt making Blackberry create a &quot;backdoor&quot; so that the Sickurity Forces could do the same thing, just prior to the so-called revolution. Does this mean that US citizens are under the same appariti as when Egypt was run by MuBARAK? 

&quot;A republic, if you can keep it&quot; How prophetic of Mr Franklin...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read a while ago about Egypt making Blackberry create a &#8220;backdoor&#8221; so that the Sickurity Forces could do the same thing, just prior to the so-called revolution. Does this mean that US citizens are under the same appariti as when Egypt was run by MuBARAK? </p>
<p>&#8220;A republic, if you can keep it&#8221; How prophetic of Mr Franklin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1828687</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1828687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So here&#039;s a product idea.  A small smart phone, fire safe-type deposit box to keep in your car/house.  With a small one-way door to slide it in, but not get it out.  If the box is in the car, and the key at home it&#039;s fairly inaccessible. If it&#039;s a false alarm, your data is still intact for when you go home and get the key. If not, you can wipe remote. (I know police are starting to store confiscated phones in Faraday cages to prevent this now). A better model would have the box installed to the body of the car to make confiscation even more difficult. It&#039;d be useful against any would be thief, not just police.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here&#8217;s a product idea.  A small smart phone, fire safe-type deposit box to keep in your car/house.  With a small one-way door to slide it in, but not get it out.  If the box is in the car, and the key at home it&#8217;s fairly inaccessible. If it&#8217;s a false alarm, your data is still intact for when you go home and get the key. If not, you can wipe remote. (I know police are starting to store confiscated phones in Faraday cages to prevent this now). A better model would have the box installed to the body of the car to make confiscation even more difficult. It&#8217;d be useful against any would be thief, not just police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steamed McQueen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1828555</link>
		<dc:creator>Steamed McQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1828555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@#49:  Nice idea but that sounds like the sort of thing that would bring a charge of destroying evidence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#49:  Nice idea but that sounds like the sort of thing that would bring a charge of destroying evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil D</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-2/#comment-1828477</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1828477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know how the CA legislature works, but can&#039;t this veto be overridden? The bill passed the Assembly 70-0 and the Senate 32-4.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how the CA legislature works, but can&#8217;t this veto be overridden? The bill passed the Assembly 70-0 and the Senate 32-4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie McNeill</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-1/#comment-1827759</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie McNeill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1827759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#23:  Oh, dear, Brian, that&#039;s not what I meant at all!  I don&#039;t use any recreational drugs, either, nor do I smoke, yet I&#039;m strongly against criminalization of those substances.  All I meant was I&#039;m glad I needn&#039;t add this one to my list of paranoias.  My list of outrages, on the other hand, keeps growing by the day. :-(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#23:  Oh, dear, Brian, that&#8217;s not what I meant at all!  I don&#8217;t use any recreational drugs, either, nor do I smoke, yet I&#8217;m strongly against criminalization of those substances.  All I meant was I&#8217;m glad I needn&#8217;t add this one to my list of paranoias.  My list of outrages, on the other hand, keeps growing by the day. :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyniCAl</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/10/10/jerry-brown-vetoes-bill-that-would-require-a-warrant-for-cell-phone-searches/comment-page-1/#comment-1827571</link>
		<dc:creator>CyniCAl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=22353#comment-1827571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Self-destructing cell phones is the way to go.  Phones are so damn cheap now anyway, if you got a free phone that could self-destruct in a way to render it useless, you could always get another one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self-destructing cell phones is the way to go.  Phones are so damn cheap now anyway, if you got a free phone that could self-destruct in a way to render it useless, you could always get another one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
