<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dumb Partisan Outrage of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 01:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petty controversy: Paul Ryan&#8217;s &#8216;outrageous&#8217; $350 bottles of wine (The Week) &#124; NewsPeruse.com Latest and Breaking News</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1289279</link>
		<dc:creator>Petty controversy: Paul Ryan&#8217;s &#8216;outrageous&#8217; $350 bottles of wine (The Week) &#124; NewsPeruse.com Latest and Breaking News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1289279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] hard to see how anyone could mistakenly order two $350 bottles of wine.&#8221; Still, counters The Agitator, there&#8217;s no rule that politicians &#8220;aren&#8217;t allowed to spend their own money on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hard to see how anyone could mistakenly order two $350 bottles of wine.&#8221; Still, counters The Agitator, there&#8217;s no rule that politicians &#8220;aren&#8217;t allowed to spend their own money on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orange</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1288107</link>
		<dc:creator>orange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1288107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that this is a silly story.  However, your post is kind of silly, too.

Why did you feel the need to refer to Feinberg as being &quot;drunk&quot; three separate times in this post when that is an assumption not in evidence?  Ryan described her as &quot;possibly drunk&quot; and she described herself as &quot;not drunk&quot;.  So why are you jumping to conclusions?

Oh, because you&#039;re taking sides.  And, sure, you&#039;re allowed to take sides.  But you&#039;re not allowed to invent your own reality.  Your post didn&#039;t benefit from the multiple accusations of her inebriation, so you really didn&#039;t need to include that dubious assertion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this is a silly story.  However, your post is kind of silly, too.</p>
<p>Why did you feel the need to refer to Feinberg as being &#8220;drunk&#8221; three separate times in this post when that is an assumption not in evidence?  Ryan described her as &#8220;possibly drunk&#8221; and she described herself as &#8220;not drunk&#8221;.  So why are you jumping to conclusions?</p>
<p>Oh, because you&#8217;re taking sides.  And, sure, you&#8217;re allowed to take sides.  But you&#8217;re not allowed to invent your own reality.  Your post didn&#8217;t benefit from the multiple accusations of her inebriation, so you really didn&#8217;t need to include that dubious assertion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1286969</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1286969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susan Feinberg gave an 8 minute interview about her &quot;outing&quot; of Paul Ryan.  She is clearly extremely pleased with herself. 

http://www.thomhartmann.com/bigpicture/thom-hartmann-talks-susan-feinberg-who-caught-paul-ryan-act]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan Feinberg gave an 8 minute interview about her &#8220;outing&#8221; of Paul Ryan.  She is clearly extremely pleased with herself. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.thomhartmann.com/bigpicture/thom-hartmann-talks-susan-feinberg-who-caught-paul-ryan-act" rel="nofollow">http://www.thomhartmann.com/bigpicture/thom-hartmann-talks-susan-feinberg-who-caught-paul-ryan-act</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOR</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1278179</link>
		<dc:creator>JOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1278179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who says the problem with people they disagree with is that &quot;they don&#039;t think, they feel&quot; probably isn&#039;t worth paying attention to (except to note their willful stupidity), and that includes Sowell. Hypocrisy and compartmentalization of moral standards are an incredibly common human habit; we&#039;ve all done it before, sometimes while &quot;emotional&quot; and sometimes in cold blood, and it takes no special talent for empathy to understand how or why someone might make such an intellectual error without being addled or insane or &quot;emotional&quot;.

But then, imagining that proponents of some belief one thinks to be wrong must be addled or insane or &quot;emotional&quot; is another common human habit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who says the problem with people they disagree with is that &#8220;they don&#8217;t think, they feel&#8221; probably isn&#8217;t worth paying attention to (except to note their willful stupidity), and that includes Sowell. Hypocrisy and compartmentalization of moral standards are an incredibly common human habit; we&#8217;ve all done it before, sometimes while &#8220;emotional&#8221; and sometimes in cold blood, and it takes no special talent for empathy to understand how or why someone might make such an intellectual error without being addled or insane or &#8220;emotional&#8221;.</p>
<p>But then, imagining that proponents of some belief one thinks to be wrong must be addled or insane or &#8220;emotional&#8221; is another common human habit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Q. Galt</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1276702</link>
		<dc:creator>John Q. Galt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1276702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, when can we expect some stalker pics of miss biz professor?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, when can we expect some stalker pics of miss biz professor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claude</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1274537</link>
		<dc:creator>claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1274537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Yeah, pretty much. If someone did this to someone with a (D) behind their name, or FSM forbid, Obama, Claude would be frothing mad calling for criminal or libel charges.&quot;

U obviously dont know me very well at all. At least put some effort into it. Sheesh. Maybe u can support Paul Ryan by shopping at his next job... Paul Ryans Used Cars. ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yeah, pretty much. If someone did this to someone with a (D) behind their name, or FSM forbid, Obama, Claude would be frothing mad calling for criminal or libel charges.&#8221;</p>
<p>U obviously dont know me very well at all. At least put some effort into it. Sheesh. Maybe u can support Paul Ryan by shopping at his next job&#8230; Paul Ryans Used Cars. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claude</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1274525</link>
		<dc:creator>claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1274525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Well claude’s argument has certainly clarified the issue for me: if claude doesn’t like somebody, one must never defend said individual from any attacks, no matter how trivial. Please remove this blog entry post-haste, Radley!&quot;

We could probably apply that to u as well, now couldnt we? Did anyone tell Radley not to post or defend him? No, they didnt. People should ride that little ineffectual nothing all day every day. Im sorry that opinion is such a problem for u. Actually, not really.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well claude’s argument has certainly clarified the issue for me: if claude doesn’t like somebody, one must never defend said individual from any attacks, no matter how trivial. Please remove this blog entry post-haste, Radley!&#8221;</p>
<p>We could probably apply that to u as well, now couldnt we? Did anyone tell Radley not to post or defend him? No, they didnt. People should ride that little ineffectual nothing all day every day. Im sorry that opinion is such a problem for u. Actually, not really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MPH</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1274306</link>
		<dc:creator>MPH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 15:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1274306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following seems to apply to Feinberg (paraphrased from a quote by Thomas Sowell):  &quot;The problem isn&#039;t that Feinberg can&#039;t read. The problem isn&#039;t even that Feinberg can&#039;t think. The problem is that Feinberg doesn&#039;t know what thinking is; she confuses it with feeling.&quot;  And as others have already noted, the idea that what Ryan was doing was reprehensible while what she was doing wasn&#039;t, even though she was doing the same thing, is a hypocrisy typical of a fanatic.

And for those of you who are wondering about what makes a bottle of wine worth $350, I have the following observation from my personal experience.  My most expensive personal purchase of a bottle of wine is $220, although my usual purchase runs under $10 per bottle.  What makes a $220 bottle of wine cost 10 times a $22 bottle of wine?  It is NOT 10 times better.  It comes from a winery with a consistently good product from year to year.  They use the most expensive form of harvesting, where each individual grape is picked at the peak of ripeness.  But most importantly, what makes it that expensive is that it is RARE, and is currently in fashion (or &quot;trendy&quot;).  There are plenty of small, family run wineries that are both consistent, and use the best quality practices, but that aren&#039;t either fashionable enough, or rare enough to command such prices (and the appearance of rarity is something that a winery can artificially increase).  Look at MI wines for lots of examples of this.  Many excellent wineries (117 last I knew), a lot of really good wine, still mostly unknown, and so still reasonably priced.  So don&#039;t lament that you can&#039;t afford a $350 bottle of Pinot Noir.  Go out and buy a $35 bottle (from a store, rather than a restaurant) and you&#039;ll be 99% there.  Trust me, you won&#039;t miss, or probably even notice, the missing 1%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following seems to apply to Feinberg (paraphrased from a quote by Thomas Sowell):  &#8220;The problem isn&#8217;t that Feinberg can&#8217;t read. The problem isn&#8217;t even that Feinberg can&#8217;t think. The problem is that Feinberg doesn&#8217;t know what thinking is; she confuses it with feeling.&#8221;  And as others have already noted, the idea that what Ryan was doing was reprehensible while what she was doing wasn&#8217;t, even though she was doing the same thing, is a hypocrisy typical of a fanatic.</p>
<p>And for those of you who are wondering about what makes a bottle of wine worth $350, I have the following observation from my personal experience.  My most expensive personal purchase of a bottle of wine is $220, although my usual purchase runs under $10 per bottle.  What makes a $220 bottle of wine cost 10 times a $22 bottle of wine?  It is NOT 10 times better.  It comes from a winery with a consistently good product from year to year.  They use the most expensive form of harvesting, where each individual grape is picked at the peak of ripeness.  But most importantly, what makes it that expensive is that it is RARE, and is currently in fashion (or &#8220;trendy&#8221;).  There are plenty of small, family run wineries that are both consistent, and use the best quality practices, but that aren&#8217;t either fashionable enough, or rare enough to command such prices (and the appearance of rarity is something that a winery can artificially increase).  Look at MI wines for lots of examples of this.  Many excellent wineries (117 last I knew), a lot of really good wine, still mostly unknown, and so still reasonably priced.  So don&#8217;t lament that you can&#8217;t afford a $350 bottle of Pinot Noir.  Go out and buy a $35 bottle (from a store, rather than a restaurant) and you&#8217;ll be 99% there.  Trust me, you won&#8217;t miss, or probably even notice, the missing 1%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NY Cynic</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1274281</link>
		<dc:creator>NY Cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 15:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1274281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a such a non story, in addition the left fear of Ryan is funny at best. Rockwell and Co have shown that Ryan is another empty conservative suit, using Libertarian rhetoric.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a such a non story, in addition the left fear of Ryan is funny at best. Rockwell and Co have shown that Ryan is another empty conservative suit, using Libertarian rhetoric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinchy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1273555</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 12:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1273555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The busybody should have quietly snapped a picture of the people at Ryan&#039;s table and tried to find out if they were lobbyists, then when it came out that Ryan didn&#039;t pay for the wine, which he probably wouldn&#039;t have done (it&#039;s human nature) she could have exacted some real damage to her political enemy.
Instead she gave Ryan a lesson on the optics of the class divide.  Now whenever Ryan is out for dinner he might order a Budweiser.
He is allowed to enjoy whatever he wants, but the fact that he and his friends, and fellow politicians are enjoying these luxuries while asking working people to sacrifice should be illuminating to those who think he can be working for all of us, rich or poor.  The fact is most of the ruling class has no clue what working people&#039;s lives are like.  It&#039;s all theory for Ryan and no reality.  That&#039;s the story.
I would love to try a $350 Pinot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The busybody should have quietly snapped a picture of the people at Ryan&#8217;s table and tried to find out if they were lobbyists, then when it came out that Ryan didn&#8217;t pay for the wine, which he probably wouldn&#8217;t have done (it&#8217;s human nature) she could have exacted some real damage to her political enemy.<br />
Instead she gave Ryan a lesson on the optics of the class divide.  Now whenever Ryan is out for dinner he might order a Budweiser.<br />
He is allowed to enjoy whatever he wants, but the fact that he and his friends, and fellow politicians are enjoying these luxuries while asking working people to sacrifice should be illuminating to those who think he can be working for all of us, rich or poor.  The fact is most of the ruling class has no clue what working people&#8217;s lives are like.  It&#8217;s all theory for Ryan and no reality.  That&#8217;s the story.<br />
I would love to try a $350 Pinot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phelps</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1270903</link>
		<dc:creator>Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1270903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In all fairness, this would be beneath Breitbart.  Unless Ryan was sticking his dick in the wine, even Breitbart would have passed.

They &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; fear Ryan to try this hard to smear him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all fairness, this would be beneath Breitbart.  Unless Ryan was sticking his dick in the wine, even Breitbart would have passed.</p>
<p>They <i>really</i> fear Ryan to try this hard to smear him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1270732</link>
		<dc:creator>c andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1270732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to say that the orgy wasn’t bipartisan with Bush and McCain pushing the original TARP

Should read...

Not to say that the orgy wasn’t bipartisan with Bush and McCain AND OBAMA  pushing the original TARP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to say that the orgy wasn’t bipartisan with Bush and McCain pushing the original TARP</p>
<p>Should read&#8230;</p>
<p>Not to say that the orgy wasn’t bipartisan with Bush and McCain AND OBAMA  pushing the original TARP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1270723</link>
		<dc:creator>c andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1270723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;This “controversy” is about as dumb as when Republicans complain about the Obamas going on vacation while America is in a recession!&quot;

Hmmm.

Didn&#039;t Obama&#039;s mouthpiece complain about the Republicans leaving DC to go back to their constituencies as scheduled because they weren&#039;t working on raising the debt ceiling? 

I&#039;m a bit amused by Obama&#039;s latecoming insistence on fiscal rectitude given his and the democrats&#039; spending orgy in the last 2 years. Not to say that the orgy wasn&#039;t bipartisan with Bush and McCain pushing the original TARP. I just find it tiresome that Obama will attack them for lacking fiscal rectitude at the same time he attacks them for attempting to cut entitlements. Talk about having cake and eating it too. 

(This is not to say that the current Republicans are actually being fiscally responsible. C&#039;mon. 2 Trillion in &quot;cuts&quot; of &quot;projected spending&quot; over ten years? That means at least 4 years before we offset the first stimulus. Not to mention that CATO has shown that projected spending will still rise by 1.8 Trillion.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This “controversy” is about as dumb as when Republicans complain about the Obamas going on vacation while America is in a recession!&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmmm.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t Obama&#8217;s mouthpiece complain about the Republicans leaving DC to go back to their constituencies as scheduled because they weren&#8217;t working on raising the debt ceiling? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit amused by Obama&#8217;s latecoming insistence on fiscal rectitude given his and the democrats&#8217; spending orgy in the last 2 years. Not to say that the orgy wasn&#8217;t bipartisan with Bush and McCain pushing the original TARP. I just find it tiresome that Obama will attack them for lacking fiscal rectitude at the same time he attacks them for attempting to cut entitlements. Talk about having cake and eating it too. </p>
<p>(This is not to say that the current Republicans are actually being fiscally responsible. C&#8217;mon. 2 Trillion in &#8220;cuts&#8221; of &#8220;projected spending&#8221; over ten years? That means at least 4 years before we offset the first stimulus. Not to mention that CATO has shown that projected spending will still rise by 1.8 Trillion.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted S.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1270617</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1270617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Money might be vulgar but spending [one&#039;s own] should be fun.

(Paraphrased from http://www.searcys.co.uk/gherkin-club/membership-benefits/ )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money might be vulgar but spending [one's own] should be fun.</p>
<p>(Paraphrased from <a href="http://www.searcys.co.uk/gherkin-club/membership-benefits/" rel="nofollow">http://www.searcys.co.uk/gherkin-club/membership-benefits/</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1270412</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1270412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a pretty dedicated liberal, and I don&#039;t know why the hell anyone thinks Mr. Ryan&#039;s drinking preferences matter one single goddamn.  His ideas are stupid, they&#039;d cause plenty of harm and do little good, and he&#039;s lied through every orifice of his body in promoting them, but none of that has anything to do with him liking pricey wine.  This implication that there&#039;s something unseemly or hypocritical about drinking expensive booze when you&#039;re the type who wants to dismantle SS and Medicare is just silly.  Ryan&#039;s exactly the sort of person you&#039;d expect to find doing such a thing; I&#039;m just surprised he wasn&#039;t smoking a cigar at the same time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a pretty dedicated liberal, and I don&#8217;t know why the hell anyone thinks Mr. Ryan&#8217;s drinking preferences matter one single goddamn.  His ideas are stupid, they&#8217;d cause plenty of harm and do little good, and he&#8217;s lied through every orifice of his body in promoting them, but none of that has anything to do with him liking pricey wine.  This implication that there&#8217;s something unseemly or hypocritical about drinking expensive booze when you&#8217;re the type who wants to dismantle SS and Medicare is just silly.  Ryan&#8217;s exactly the sort of person you&#8217;d expect to find doing such a thing; I&#8217;m just surprised he wasn&#8217;t smoking a cigar at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hooglyboogly</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1270067</link>
		<dc:creator>hooglyboogly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1270067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ #12 Carl Weetabix 

&quot;few, if any, even literal “middle class”, can represent the vast majority of us, the unwashed masses as it were.&quot;

Stop voting for them then.

&quot;Moreover, since the unwashed masses are unlikely to be invited to their tables, much less their offices, &quot;

One doesn&#039;t need an invitation to visit the office of their representatives. One just needs to get off their ass.

&quot;So whether Ryan is particularly “egregious” I don’t know – but I do know the whole thing just stinks.&quot;

Why? Because someone enjoyed a bottle of wine you can&#039;t afford? Poor, poor Carl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #12 Carl Weetabix </p>
<p>&#8220;few, if any, even literal “middle class”, can represent the vast majority of us, the unwashed masses as it were.&#8221;</p>
<p>Stop voting for them then.</p>
<p>&#8220;Moreover, since the unwashed masses are unlikely to be invited to their tables, much less their offices, &#8221;</p>
<p>One doesn&#8217;t need an invitation to visit the office of their representatives. One just needs to get off their ass.</p>
<p>&#8220;So whether Ryan is particularly “egregious” I don’t know – but I do know the whole thing just stinks.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why? Because someone enjoyed a bottle of wine you can&#8217;t afford? Poor, poor Carl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FridayNext</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1269917</link>
		<dc:creator>FridayNext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1269917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to agree it is a none story. But then I didn&#039;t think the price of John Edwards&#039; haircut was a story either, but that went on for fricking weeks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree it is a none story. But then I didn&#8217;t think the price of John Edwards&#8217; haircut was a story either, but that went on for fricking weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1269875</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1269875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like a lot of those 500k who came for the front yard garden story have some trouble getting past the team blue blinders.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a lot of those 500k who came for the front yard garden story have some trouble getting past the team blue blinders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie McNeill</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1269780</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie McNeill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1269780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Did Ryan’s monocle also pop out and splash down into his glass of expensive wine? Did he check his top hat with the maitre d’, or did he set it on the table next to his plate? Did he brush off with the back of his hand orphan children who begged him merely for scraps of house bread that otherwise would have been thrown in the trash?&quot;

As one who hates partisan nonsense I was predisposed to like this article, Radley, but you surpassed yourself; I literally LOLed.  Excellent!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Did Ryan’s monocle also pop out and splash down into his glass of expensive wine? Did he check his top hat with the maitre d’, or did he set it on the table next to his plate? Did he brush off with the back of his hand orphan children who begged him merely for scraps of house bread that otherwise would have been thrown in the trash?&#8221;</p>
<p>As one who hates partisan nonsense I was predisposed to like this article, Radley, but you surpassed yourself; I literally LOLed.  Excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Weetabix</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/09/dumb-partisan-outrage-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1269557</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Weetabix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=21297#comment-1269557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget Ryan, but it is hard to believe that our representatives, most of which are &quot;rich&quot; by any standard and probably few, if any, even literal &quot;middle class&quot;, can represent the vast majority of us, the unwashed masses as it were.

Moreover, since the unwashed masses are unlikely to be invited to their tables, much less their offices, it&#039;s hard to believe they don&#039;t live in an echo chamber of viewpoints that reflect a very different picture than the reality most of us live in. Whether they can transcend that is another question, but I would not bet on it.

This is regardless of political persuasion.

So whether Ryan is particularly &quot;egregious&quot; I don&#039;t know - but I do know the whole thing just stinks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget Ryan, but it is hard to believe that our representatives, most of which are &#8220;rich&#8221; by any standard and probably few, if any, even literal &#8220;middle class&#8221;, can represent the vast majority of us, the unwashed masses as it were.</p>
<p>Moreover, since the unwashed masses are unlikely to be invited to their tables, much less their offices, it&#8217;s hard to believe they don&#8217;t live in an echo chamber of viewpoints that reflect a very different picture than the reality most of us live in. Whether they can transcend that is another question, but I would not bet on it.</p>
<p>This is regardless of political persuasion.</p>
<p>So whether Ryan is particularly &#8220;egregious&#8221; I don&#8217;t know &#8211; but I do know the whole thing just stinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
