Comments on: Disobey

By: | Popehat

| Popehat — Mon, 16 May 2011 18:48:49 +0000

[...] May 16, 2011 By David. Life var addthis_product = 'wpp-257'; var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};HEH: Freewalling [...]

By: Bee

Bee — Mon, 16 May 2011 17:19:15 +0000

Anecdotally, Matt Goldey, the poor make disproportionate use of public parks. The rich have their own back yards, BBQs and picnic tables, you know.

The homeless people move into the bathrooms.

The dogs have been crowded out, forcing them to use your front lawn.

By: Joe

Joe — Mon, 16 May 2011 16:56:15 +0000

That dog is funny.

Unfortunately, this not so much:

http://www.examiner.com/libertarian-in-national/indiana-supreme-court-citizens-have-no-right-to-resist-unlawful-police-entry

By: Johnny Clamboat

Johnny Clamboat — Mon, 16 May 2011 15:58:13 +0000

Awesome, reminds me of the background on my computer:

http://27.media.tumblr.com/x9JGCu6o8qumh2z0yLAfup4go1_500.jpg

By: RomanCandle

RomanCandle — Mon, 16 May 2011 15:18:28 +0000

Gangsta.

Respect.

By: Greg

Greg — Mon, 16 May 2011 14:49:57 +0000

See, dogs don’t really have the mental capacity to hold politi . . .

So you went to a TeaParty rally on vaca?

By: Marty

Marty — Mon, 16 May 2011 11:45:50 +0000

my dogs are pumped up and want to join the movement.

By: doomas

doomas — Mon, 16 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000

Maybe the sign means that specific bread of dog.

By: Matt Goldey

Matt Goldey — Mon, 16 May 2011 09:58:24 +0000

Let me append that bit above with the caveat that dogs have better manners than some who use public parks.
And they’re cuter.

By: Matt Goldey

Matt Goldey — Mon, 16 May 2011 09:52:46 +0000

Obligatory tragedy of the commons reference–
If public parks just become toilets for the dogs of the rich and the homeless, isn’t that disenfranchising the poor of a scarce resource? The poor don’t necessarily have access to many parks, and a lot of them function solely as dog parks and hobo huts, which cause a public good to only benefit portions of the population.

By: Radley Balko

Radley Balko — Mon, 16 May 2011 08:56:12 +0000

Surely the right to property includes the right to exclude dogs from urinating on one’s property?

This was a public park.

And the point of posting the photo wasn’t to make a political statement. It was to make a joke about the possibility of a dog making a political statement in where he chooses to pee. See, dogs don’t really have the mental capacity to hold politi . . .

Oh, never mind.

By: hilzoy fangirl

hilzoy fangirl — Mon, 16 May 2011 05:36:12 +0000

Surely the right to property includes the right to exclude dogs from urinating on one’s property?