<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Do You Want Me To Throw It on the Ground?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve H.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-2984439</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-2984439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What this is called in the law is a Prior Restraint. Let me explain this as if I was 2 years old. I was compiling a story for publication on Government activities. Government did not like the content of my story. Government restrained me from completing my story under the threat of imprisonment. This is called a Prior Restraint. This is the most serious transgression against the 1st Amendment. My historians and legal scholars will tell you that prior restraint was the reason for the 1st Amendment in the United States. 

In England, prior to the Declaration of Independence, the English government required all publishers to buy a license from the King. If you published something the government didn&#039;t like, you lost your license and government agents burned down the printing press. So, the founding fathers wanted to make sure that there would never be a prior restraint on publications in the US. In the history of the US, the SCOTUS has never upheld a prior restraint, even if the government said that publishing would amount to a clear and present danger to the US or even if the material was obtained illegally. 

This guy could file his own lawsuit in Federal court and win big bucks, just on the basis of the prior restraint argument.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this is called in the law is a Prior Restraint. Let me explain this as if I was 2 years old. I was compiling a story for publication on Government activities. Government did not like the content of my story. Government restrained me from completing my story under the threat of imprisonment. This is called a Prior Restraint. This is the most serious transgression against the 1st Amendment. My historians and legal scholars will tell you that prior restraint was the reason for the 1st Amendment in the United States. </p>
<p>In England, prior to the Declaration of Independence, the English government required all publishers to buy a license from the King. If you published something the government didn&#8217;t like, you lost your license and government agents burned down the printing press. So, the founding fathers wanted to make sure that there would never be a prior restraint on publications in the US. In the history of the US, the SCOTUS has never upheld a prior restraint, even if the government said that publishing would amount to a clear and present danger to the US or even if the material was obtained illegally. </p>
<p>This guy could file his own lawsuit in Federal court and win big bucks, just on the basis of the prior restraint argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-628430</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-628430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What ever happened to your follow up inquiries?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever happened to your follow up inquiries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-602546</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-602546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A strategy I&#039;ve used is to hold the phone/camera in such a way that it looks like you&#039;re doing something else with it (e.g., texting with your phone, or just hold the camera at your side if it is a DSLR that can record video).  The video portion isn&#039;t going to be framed as nicely, obviously.  But at least you manage the audio without drawing attention to yourself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A strategy I&#8217;ve used is to hold the phone/camera in such a way that it looks like you&#8217;re doing something else with it (e.g., texting with your phone, or just hold the camera at your side if it is a DSLR that can record video).  The video portion isn&#8217;t going to be framed as nicely, obviously.  But at least you manage the audio without drawing attention to yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-600278</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-600278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[is that Donkey Lips?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is that Donkey Lips?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derfel cadarn</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-599962</link>
		<dc:creator>derfel cadarn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-599962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe when Johnny Law Jr. and his playmates grows up and their brains develop they will realize that their actions are even stupider then they themselves appear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe when Johnny Law Jr. and his playmates grows up and their brains develop they will realize that their actions are even stupider then they themselves appear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Jersey&#8217;s &#8220;Finest&#8221; Terrorists &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-599039</link>
		<dc:creator>New Jersey&#8217;s &#8220;Finest&#8221; Terrorists &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 08:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-599039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Via The Agitator [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via The Agitator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyto</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-598760</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 06:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-598760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#39 &#124;  mcmillan &#124;  - I was going to comment on the same line.  This is so transparently false as to be insulting.  If they really were &quot;going to do everything we can to get to the truth”, they would already have the truth.  How long does it take to interview 4 people and look over the police statements?  A half-day?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#39 |  mcmillan |  &#8211; I was going to comment on the same line.  This is so transparently false as to be insulting.  If they really were &#8220;going to do everything we can to get to the truth”, they would already have the truth.  How long does it take to interview 4 people and look over the police statements?  A half-day?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcmillan</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-598509</link>
		<dc:creator>mcmillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 04:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-598509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gah, looks like I screwed up my second link 
http://atlantaeagleraid.com/police-raid-atlanta-eagle]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gah, looks like I screwed up my second link<br />
<a href="http://atlantaeagleraid.com/police-raid-atlanta-eagle" rel="nofollow">http://atlantaeagleraid.com/police-raid-atlanta-eagle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcmillan</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-598507</link>
		<dc:creator>mcmillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 04:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-598507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Other example of cops misbehaving, this time in Atlanta. They&#039;re accused of &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.wsbtv.com/news/26647035/detail.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sexually assaulting some people while looking for drugs that weren&#039;t there&lt;/a&gt;. But don&#039;t worry, the police chief says we &quot;can be assured that we&#039;re going to do everything we can to get to the truth&quot;

And apparently these same cops were involved in a &lt;a&gt;SWAT raid&lt;/a&gt; to stop a gay bar from having guys dancing in skimpy shorts that lead to everyone in the bar getting searched.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other example of cops misbehaving, this time in Atlanta. They&#8217;re accused of <a href='http://www.wsbtv.com/news/26647035/detail.html' rel="nofollow">sexually assaulting some people while looking for drugs that weren&#8217;t there</a>. But don&#8217;t worry, the police chief says we &#8220;can be assured that we&#8217;re going to do everything we can to get to the truth&#8221;</p>
<p>And apparently these same cops were involved in a <a>SWAT raid</a> to stop a gay bar from having guys dancing in skimpy shorts that lead to everyone in the bar getting searched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-598482</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 04:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-598482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@SJE: &quot;Far better to wait,...&quot;

 No way. Put it out there *immediately*. Let someone see it, download it, repost it, whatever; just get it out there. Start from the initial premise that it is the right and just thing to do, and let the response from the State stand as its own defense, or its own indictment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SJE: &#8220;Far better to wait,&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p> No way. Put it out there *immediately*. Let someone see it, download it, repost it, whatever; just get it out there. Start from the initial premise that it is the right and just thing to do, and let the response from the State stand as its own defense, or its own indictment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJE</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-598471</link>
		<dc:creator>SJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 04:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-598471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#31: Taking it out of the local jurisdiction should be fine most of the time, since most of the worst SWAT etc tactics are from local police.  If its hot, or state police, you want to get it out of state or at least to as many people as possible, because its very hard to confiscate from so many people.  Remember, however, that if they get your computer, they will be able to determine who got what information.

If you give it to a lawyer or a journalist with a strong media company or good reputation, the police will have a very hard time getting to it, as their are long recognized protections.

Sending it out of the country would be safe.  Of course, if its a federal matter, they might find some espionage statute!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#31: Taking it out of the local jurisdiction should be fine most of the time, since most of the worst SWAT etc tactics are from local police.  If its hot, or state police, you want to get it out of state or at least to as many people as possible, because its very hard to confiscate from so many people.  Remember, however, that if they get your computer, they will be able to determine who got what information.</p>
<p>If you give it to a lawyer or a journalist with a strong media company or good reputation, the police will have a very hard time getting to it, as their are long recognized protections.</p>
<p>Sending it out of the country would be safe.  Of course, if its a federal matter, they might find some espionage statute!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cApitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-598443</link>
		<dc:creator>cApitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-598443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s another useful app.  It displays a blank screen while you document the tax feeder&#039;s crimes:

http://www.appbrain.com/app/mobile-hidden-camera/com.mhc.android]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another useful app.  It displays a blank screen while you document the tax feeder&#8217;s crimes:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.appbrain.com/app/mobile-hidden-camera/com.mhc.android" rel="nofollow">http://www.appbrain.com/app/mobile-hidden-camera/com.mhc.android</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Yuma</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-598153</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Yuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-598153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;OK, I know it’s wrong to judge people on the basis of their appearance, but that poor cop is not helped by looking like Clancy Wiggam.&quot;

Good call on Wiggum. Here&#039;s who I thought of right away:

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=retarded+policeman&amp;aq=0]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;OK, I know it’s wrong to judge people on the basis of their appearance, but that poor cop is not helped by looking like Clancy Wiggam.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good call on Wiggum. Here&#8217;s who I thought of right away:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=retarded+policeman&#038;aq=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=retarded+policeman&#038;aq=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJE</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-598148</link>
		<dc:creator>SJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-598148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#32: yep.  How do you justify 4 cops arresting one man for wearing a T-shirt that says a bad word, and then intimidating a camera man.  Is this &quot;cost effective&quot; or &quot;professional&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#32: yep.  How do you justify 4 cops arresting one man for wearing a T-shirt that says a bad word, and then intimidating a camera man.  Is this &#8220;cost effective&#8221; or &#8220;professional&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadowguv</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-598132</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadowguv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 02:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-598132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[City of Wildwood Mission Statement

“To provide the highest quality of service to all persons equally in the most efficient, cost-effective and professional manner possible...&quot;

http://www.wildwoodnj.org/DEPARTMENTS/PoliceDepartment/tabid/1097/Default.aspx

Looks like these Officers need retraining on their mission statement. Exactly what rule of law do they think we live under? That just because a cop barks an illegal order that citizens must comply? This was pure and simple and act of intimidation, specifically designed to create fear and force the lawful party to withdraw.

Every single one of those cops should be fired. Their supervisors should be fired. The Chief should be fired.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>City of Wildwood Mission Statement</p>
<p>“To provide the highest quality of service to all persons equally in the most efficient, cost-effective and professional manner possible&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wildwoodnj.org/DEPARTMENTS/PoliceDepartment/tabid/1097/Default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.wildwoodnj.org/DEPARTMENTS/PoliceDepartment/tabid/1097/Default.aspx</a></p>
<p>Looks like these Officers need retraining on their mission statement. Exactly what rule of law do they think we live under? That just because a cop barks an illegal order that citizens must comply? This was pure and simple and act of intimidation, specifically designed to create fear and force the lawful party to withdraw.</p>
<p>Every single one of those cops should be fired. Their supervisors should be fired. The Chief should be fired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yizmo Gizmo</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-598109</link>
		<dc:creator>Yizmo Gizmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 02:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-598109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New TV  Show  idea:  New Jersey Shore Nazis

Wonder if  Snooki is  available  for  a cameo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New TV  Show  idea:  New Jersey Shore Nazis</p>
<p>Wonder if  Snooki is  available  for  a cameo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paranoiastrksdp</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-598061</link>
		<dc:creator>paranoiastrksdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 02:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-598061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#30 &#124;  SJE &#124;  January 29th, 2011 at 8:41 pm 

&quot;2. The cops might subpoena Qik etc and find ways to destroy the evidence, or “revise” their statements&quot;

You touch on something really important here - the need for offshore hosting services in countries that are apathetic to the aims of this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#30 |  SJE |  January 29th, 2011 at 8:41 pm </p>
<p>&#8220;2. The cops might subpoena Qik etc and find ways to destroy the evidence, or “revise” their statements&#8221;</p>
<p>You touch on something really important here &#8211; the need for offshore hosting services in countries that are apathetic to the aims of this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJE</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-597923</link>
		<dc:creator>SJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-597923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#28: &quot;Go ahead and smash the camera, the video is already on the internet.” Doughboy would shit purple Twinkies.

EH, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s a good idea.  
1.  There could be an error in recording or transmitting.
2.  The cops might subpoena Qik etc and find ways to destroy the evidence, or &quot;revise&quot; their statements
3.  The cop might put you in jail for recording, contempt of cop, etc, immediately.   If you are going to piss off a cop, you better have a plan B.

Far better to wait, and then see what the cops do and say.   Call your family, and make sure that copies of the confrontation are recorded, and are saved to multiple sites in different jurisdictions (e.g. not just on your computer, in your house).  If its bad, send to a journalist or lawyer, making it very hard for cops to get it.  

If the cops think there isnt evidence agains them, they will make all sorts of statements, including those in court.  If they do, they might fudge the facts, or find someone else to corroborate.

However, once they have MADE statements, it becomes very difficult to change the story, especially if it official records, or sworn in court.
When you pull out the video, contradicting their story, they are placed in a difficult situation.  More importantly, their commanders are placed in a difficult situation.  THAT is worth several boxes of purple twinkies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#28: &#8220;Go ahead and smash the camera, the video is already on the internet.” Doughboy would shit purple Twinkies.</p>
<p>EH, I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a good idea.<br />
1.  There could be an error in recording or transmitting.<br />
2.  The cops might subpoena Qik etc and find ways to destroy the evidence, or &#8220;revise&#8221; their statements<br />
3.  The cop might put you in jail for recording, contempt of cop, etc, immediately.   If you are going to piss off a cop, you better have a plan B.</p>
<p>Far better to wait, and then see what the cops do and say.   Call your family, and make sure that copies of the confrontation are recorded, and are saved to multiple sites in different jurisdictions (e.g. not just on your computer, in your house).  If its bad, send to a journalist or lawyer, making it very hard for cops to get it.  </p>
<p>If the cops think there isnt evidence agains them, they will make all sorts of statements, including those in court.  If they do, they might fudge the facts, or find someone else to corroborate.</p>
<p>However, once they have MADE statements, it becomes very difficult to change the story, especially if it official records, or sworn in court.<br />
When you pull out the video, contradicting their story, they are placed in a difficult situation.  More importantly, their commanders are placed in a difficult situation.  THAT is worth several boxes of purple twinkies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-597890</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-597890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In nj towns the cops show up at town council meetings in mass and in uniform when a vote concerning them comes up with arms crossed standing and hovering over the citezens who would not dare say boo about them 
Nj cops make and break mayors.
That being said, in this case No victim No crime if this immigrant chose not to make a complaint then thats his business.
The servant is not supposed to tell his master what his masters rights are. It is the masters duty to adress his servant and make clear his rights.
 This is the chain of comand, Me taxpayer,mayor ,cheif ,your supervisor
I have nothing to discuss with you the servant I will be making a complaint with your supervisor in fact get Him NOW.
But this guy chose to be a sheep.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In nj towns the cops show up at town council meetings in mass and in uniform when a vote concerning them comes up with arms crossed standing and hovering over the citezens who would not dare say boo about them<br />
Nj cops make and break mayors.<br />
That being said, in this case No victim No crime if this immigrant chose not to make a complaint then thats his business.<br />
The servant is not supposed to tell his master what his masters rights are. It is the masters duty to adress his servant and make clear his rights.<br />
 This is the chain of comand, Me taxpayer,mayor ,cheif ,your supervisor<br />
I have nothing to discuss with you the servant I will be making a complaint with your supervisor in fact get Him NOW.<br />
But this guy chose to be a sheep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2011/01/29/do-you-want-me-to-throw-it-on-the-ground/comment-page-1/#comment-597819</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 23:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=18972#comment-597819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Additionally, if one uses programs like Qik, which upload video to the net in real time, destroying the camera does not destroy the video. &lt;/em&gt;

My strategy is to always say that this is what&#039;s happening if someone has that much of a problem, regardless of whether I&#039;m using Qik at the time or not (and in this situation I would be sure to). &quot;Go ahead and smash the camera, the video is already on the internet.&quot; Doughboy would shit purple Twinkies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Additionally, if one uses programs like Qik, which upload video to the net in real time, destroying the camera does not destroy the video. </em></p>
<p>My strategy is to always say that this is what&#8217;s happening if someone has that much of a problem, regardless of whether I&#8217;m using Qik at the time or not (and in this situation I would be sure to). &#8220;Go ahead and smash the camera, the video is already on the internet.&#8221; Doughboy would shit purple Twinkies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
