One of Washington’s Wise Old Davids, in this case Broder, just wants you to know:
I am not suggesting, of course, that the president incite a war to get reelected.
Phew! Exept that he kind of is. After running down a list of things Obama can’t control to save his presidency, Broder comes upon the one thing he can.
What else might affect the economy? The answer is obvious, but its implications are frightening. War and peace influence the economy.
Look back at FDR and the Great Depression. What finally resolved that economic crisis? World War II.
Here is where Obama is likely to prevail. With strong Republican support in Congress for challenging Iran’s ambition to become a nuclear power, he can spend much of 2011 and 2012 orchestrating a showdown with the mullahs. This will help him politically because the opposition party will be urging him on. And as tensions rise and we accelerate preparations for war, the economy will improve.
….the nation will rally around Obama because Iran is the greatest threat to the world in the young century. If he can confront this threat and contain Iran’s nuclear ambitions, he will have made the world safer and may be regarded as one of the most successful presidents in history.
But just so we’re clear, Broder is not advocating that Obama start a war with Iran. He’s just saying that if Obama did, it would probably help the economy. This is a very obvious point, as evidenced by the age of milk and honey ushered in by the last decade of war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Also, Broder might add, as an aside really, that Iran is also “the greatest threat to the world.” And one more thing. Eradicating that threat would make Obama, like, one of the best presidents ever.
So Iran is evil. And dispelling that evil through war would make us richer, safer, and make Obama a great man. But Broder is not suggesting that any of this happen. Of course not. Because that would be crass.
If Broder is one of the wise old men of Washington, the city could stand to be a bit dumber.