<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Constructive Critique of Today&#8217;s Comment of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radley Balko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-428122</link>
		<dc:creator>Radley Balko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 23:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-428122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mercy --

My &quot;beef&quot; with the Republicans has nothing to do with being &quot;socially cool.&quot; Dear God. Have you been to an LP convention lately?

The reason I don&#039;t call myself Republican is because I outright disagree with half of their platform, and even on the stuff where I&#039;m supposed to agree with them, they&#039;re too cowardly and/or corrupt to actually do what they&#039;re supposed to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mercy &#8211;</p>
<p>My &#8220;beef&#8221; with the Republicans has nothing to do with being &#8220;socially cool.&#8221; Dear God. Have you been to an LP convention lately?</p>
<p>The reason I don&#8217;t call myself Republican is because I outright disagree with half of their platform, and even on the stuff where I&#8217;m supposed to agree with them, they&#8217;re too cowardly and/or corrupt to actually do what they&#8217;re supposed to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mercy Vetsel</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-428111</link>
		<dc:creator>Mercy Vetsel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-428111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;you are a fucking Republican who just wants to smoke dope&quot;

I think Humbolt Blue is on to something here.  In our two-party system third parties almost exclusively advance the opposite of their own beliefs. That&#039;s why there are no socialist, fascist or progressive parties to speak of -- the smart people in these movements have recognized that their best approach for achieving policy goals is to tilt the Democratic Party in their direction.

So why then do otherwise intelligent people advocate and vote for the Libertarian Party?

I&#039;ll offer one major and one minor reason.

Major reason -- Republicans aren&#039;t politically cool.  Somehow despite the Grand Imperial Wizard KKK leaders, the slick corporatists/fascists and the thuggish labor cartels in the Democrat Party, the label that really sticks to Republicans for young, hip urbanites is &quot;prude&quot;.  Sure there are a lot other nasty slurs that roll of the lips of the fashionable left, but prudishness is the key.  Sexuality is the one area where Democrats arguably offer greater freedom than Republicans and certain fashionable enclaves -- education, media, the easy-money billionaire club -- set the trend.

That so many hard-core Republicans insist on pretending to have a third choice shows just how effective the left&#039;s argument by social ostracism actually is.

Minor reason -- The right to bitch.  The other big advantage of voting for say Bob Barr is that it allows one to bear no responsibility for the bad outcomes inevitable for any electable candidate.  I&#039;m not sure why Losertarians think this is morally superior to simply not voting at all, but they clearly do.  It&#039;s a statement, a message.  Unfortunately, the way I read the message is &quot;I  Big Government&quot;.

The solution to this nonsense is simple.  To distinguish true libertarians, like myself, with the cojones to admit being a Republican despite the negative fashion connotations, from the Losertarians, I simply refer to all avowed Libertarians as &quot;hard-core Republicans&quot;.

This both accurately describes their position and neatly punctures their aspirations to be politically fashionable or to stay above the fray.

-Mercy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;you are a fucking Republican who just wants to smoke dope&#8221;</p>
<p>I think Humbolt Blue is on to something here.  In our two-party system third parties almost exclusively advance the opposite of their own beliefs. That&#8217;s why there are no socialist, fascist or progressive parties to speak of &#8212; the smart people in these movements have recognized that their best approach for achieving policy goals is to tilt the Democratic Party in their direction.</p>
<p>So why then do otherwise intelligent people advocate and vote for the Libertarian Party?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll offer one major and one minor reason.</p>
<p>Major reason &#8212; Republicans aren&#8217;t politically cool.  Somehow despite the Grand Imperial Wizard KKK leaders, the slick corporatists/fascists and the thuggish labor cartels in the Democrat Party, the label that really sticks to Republicans for young, hip urbanites is &#8220;prude&#8221;.  Sure there are a lot other nasty slurs that roll of the lips of the fashionable left, but prudishness is the key.  Sexuality is the one area where Democrats arguably offer greater freedom than Republicans and certain fashionable enclaves &#8212; education, media, the easy-money billionaire club &#8212; set the trend.</p>
<p>That so many hard-core Republicans insist on pretending to have a third choice shows just how effective the left&#8217;s argument by social ostracism actually is.</p>
<p>Minor reason &#8212; The right to bitch.  The other big advantage of voting for say Bob Barr is that it allows one to bear no responsibility for the bad outcomes inevitable for any electable candidate.  I&#8217;m not sure why Losertarians think this is morally superior to simply not voting at all, but they clearly do.  It&#8217;s a statement, a message.  Unfortunately, the way I read the message is &#8220;I  Big Government&#8221;.</p>
<p>The solution to this nonsense is simple.  To distinguish true libertarians, like myself, with the cojones to admit being a Republican despite the negative fashion connotations, from the Losertarians, I simply refer to all avowed Libertarians as &#8220;hard-core Republicans&#8221;.</p>
<p>This both accurately describes their position and neatly punctures their aspirations to be politically fashionable or to stay above the fray.</p>
<p>-Mercy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chsw</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427621</link>
		<dc:creator>chsw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL!

Radley de Bergerac!

chsw]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!</p>
<p>Radley de Bergerac!</p>
<p>chsw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justthisguy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427572</link>
		<dc:creator>Justthisguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only that, but Barr doesn&#039;t know how to work a pistol. He had a negligent discharge, in public, because he removed the magazine and failed to check the chamber for emptyness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only that, but Barr doesn&#8217;t know how to work a pistol. He had a negligent discharge, in public, because he removed the magazine and failed to check the chamber for emptyness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427520</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Of all the good comments that ask thoughtful questions of you that go unanswered, and you spend so much time responding to the ad hominem troll? Uhh… guess what Radley – you are never going to convince the likes of this guy that you aren’t what he thinks. Save your time and attention.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m not sure what Radley was thinking, but this was by far his most entertaining post.  Not a waste of his time or attention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of all the good comments that ask thoughtful questions of you that go unanswered, and you spend so much time responding to the ad hominem troll? Uhh… guess what Radley – you are never going to convince the likes of this guy that you aren’t what he thinks. Save your time and attention.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what Radley was thinking, but this was by far his most entertaining post.  Not a waste of his time or attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IgotBupkis, President, United Anarchist Society</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427504</link>
		<dc:creator>IgotBupkis, President, United Anarchist Society</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;See, saying &lt;b&gt;you&lt;/b&gt; can run your own life is egotistical. Saying &lt;b&gt;I&lt;/b&gt; can run your life is just realistic pragmatic fairness.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, that &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; nice.... LOL 

I do think it works better with the emphasis I added, though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>See, saying <b>you</b> can run your own life is egotistical. Saying <b>I</b> can run your life is just realistic pragmatic fairness.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, that <i>is</i> nice&#8230;. LOL </p>
<p>I do think it works better with the emphasis I added, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427491</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barr, eh? A vote for him from Balko really demonstrates what a complete waste of time voting is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barr, eh? A vote for him from Balko really demonstrates what a complete waste of time voting is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ima Wurdibitsch</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427483</link>
		<dc:creator>Ima Wurdibitsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ comment #10:  Hey, watch who you&#039;re calling a wordy bitch, okay??

I must defend my &#039;08 vote for Bob Barr. My state was not going to be a state that mattered in the election. I wanted to show support for a candidate from another (any) party so the powers-and-political-funders-that-be would realize that a lot of Americans want a choice other than R or D.  I wrote about it at http://bit.ly/do9gNx when I talked about Electile Dysfunction.

Here I am: Fiscal conservative and mostly but not completely social liberal who has no candidate in any election. I do the best I can.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ comment #10:  Hey, watch who you&#8217;re calling a wordy bitch, okay??</p>
<p>I must defend my &#8217;08 vote for Bob Barr. My state was not going to be a state that mattered in the election. I wanted to show support for a candidate from another (any) party so the powers-and-political-funders-that-be would realize that a lot of Americans want a choice other than R or D.  I wrote about it at <a href="http://bit.ly/do9gNx" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/do9gNx</a> when I talked about Electile Dysfunction.</p>
<p>Here I am: Fiscal conservative and mostly but not completely social liberal who has no candidate in any election. I do the best I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mutant</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427478</link>
		<dc:creator>Mutant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 05:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really enjoyed reading that eloquent and helpful response. I thought the advice on writing was at once both concise and thorough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed reading that eloquent and helpful response. I thought the advice on writing was at once both concise and thorough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Feed a Troll &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427472</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Feed a Troll &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Trolls&#8221; is impeccable advice.  Ordinary standards, however, do not apply to Radley Balko, whose course on Advanced Troll Feeding should be a prerequisite for graduation from Blogger [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trolls&#8221; is impeccable advice.  Ordinary standards, however, do not apply to Radley Balko, whose course on Advanced Troll Feeding should be a prerequisite for graduation from Blogger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juice</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427470</link>
		<dc:creator>Juice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 03:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;John C. Randolph &#124;  October 28th, 2010 at 3:26 pm

Barr was a terrible mistake by the LP. I guess they needed to learn that taking an allegedly repentant drug warrior who proved to be an arrogant jackass, instead of nominating a man of principal, isn’t a way to increase their support.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or a woman of principle, like Mary Ruwart, who was &quot;supposed&quot; to be the nominee until Barr and Root showed up. Barr was a &quot;mistake&quot; by barely half of the national LP convention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>John C. Randolph |  October 28th, 2010 at 3:26 pm</p>
<p>Barr was a terrible mistake by the LP. I guess they needed to learn that taking an allegedly repentant drug warrior who proved to be an arrogant jackass, instead of nominating a man of principal, isn’t a way to increase their support.</p></blockquote>
<p>Or a woman of principle, like Mary Ruwart, who was &#8220;supposed&#8221; to be the nominee until Barr and Root showed up. Barr was a &#8220;mistake&#8221; by barely half of the national LP convention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim A.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427462</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My first visit to your site, and already I&#039;m smitten with your approach to this flamer. Bravo sir, Bravo!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first visit to your site, and already I&#8217;m smitten with your approach to this flamer. Bravo sir, Bravo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elemenope</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427413</link>
		<dc:creator>Elemenope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;I assume Radley’s brilliant response was born out of frustration and disappointment about the lack of hate mail from MADD about his drunk driving article.&lt;/em&gt;

You know, you might be on to something there!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I assume Radley’s brilliant response was born out of frustration and disappointment about the lack of hate mail from MADD about his drunk driving article.</em></p>
<p>You know, you might be on to something there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A masterpiece of the genre &#171; Blunt Object</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427412</link>
		<dc:creator>A masterpiece of the genre &#171; Blunt Object</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Radley Balko gives a comment-flamer a bit of helpful advice. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Radley Balko gives a comment-flamer a bit of helpful advice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SusanK</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427410</link>
		<dc:creator>SusanK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I assume Radley&#039;s brilliant response was born out of frustration and disappointment about the lack of hate mail from MADD about his drunk driving article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume Radley&#8217;s brilliant response was born out of frustration and disappointment about the lack of hate mail from MADD about his drunk driving article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elemenope</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427406</link>
		<dc:creator>Elemenope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Pet peeve: pretentious pseudo-intellectual fuckers. Really bright people don’t need to show it off.&lt;/em&gt;

The more intelligent you are, the more you realize that intelligence doesn&#039;t matter as much as is assumed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Pet peeve: pretentious pseudo-intellectual fuckers. Really bright people don’t need to show it off.</em></p>
<p>The more intelligent you are, the more you realize that intelligence doesn&#8217;t matter as much as is assumed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sometimes There&#8217;s A Man &#124; Popehat</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427404</link>
		<dc:creator>Sometimes There&#8217;s A Man &#124; Popehat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This reply, to something calling itself HumboldtBlue, is a masterpiece of the genre. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This reply, to something calling itself HumboldtBlue, is a masterpiece of the genre. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KristenS</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427399</link>
		<dc:creator>KristenS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pet peeve: pretentious pseudo-intellectual fuckers. Really bright people don&#039;t need to show it off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pet peeve: pretentious pseudo-intellectual fuckers. Really bright people don&#8217;t need to show it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427394</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lmao]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lmao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmmwright</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/10/28/comment-of-the-day-a-constructive-critique/comment-page-2/#comment-427393</link>
		<dc:creator>mmmwright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17964#comment-427393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was really excellent.  Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was really excellent.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
