<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Afternoon Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 01:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeal_The_Va_Radar_Detector_Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-420144</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeal_The_Va_Radar_Detector_Ban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-420144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The states have no right to govern the airwaves, the is the for the FCC. Baning Radar Detectors and now trying to ban Scanners. Whats next AM/FM radios, CB&#039;s and any other receivers they don&#039;t like. People need to fight for their rights. I live in Virginia and own Scanners, CB&#039;s and Radar Detectors, I also use them. I like listening to the scanner, I find interesting.


Repeal The Va Radar Detector Ban!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The states have no right to govern the airwaves, the is the for the FCC. Baning Radar Detectors and now trying to ban Scanners. Whats next AM/FM radios, CB&#8217;s and any other receivers they don&#8217;t like. People need to fight for their rights. I live in Virginia and own Scanners, CB&#8217;s and Radar Detectors, I also use them. I like listening to the scanner, I find interesting.</p>
<p>Repeal The Va Radar Detector Ban!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415616</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You just lost me. Your link goes off my fav&#039;s. Stupid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just lost me. Your link goes off my fav&#8217;s. Stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415465</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Henry Bowman &quot;With respect to the proposed Virginia ban on police scanners, I note that the FCC Act of 1934(?) gives anyone in the U.S. the right to listen to any radio broadcasts. That said, Virginia is one of the few states that bans (or used to ban?) radar detectors.&quot;

The problem with that is that you&#039;re assuming the police have to abide by the law, which of course has always been true but no longer is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry Bowman &#8220;With respect to the proposed Virginia ban on police scanners, I note that the FCC Act of 1934(?) gives anyone in the U.S. the right to listen to any radio broadcasts. That said, Virginia is one of the few states that bans (or used to ban?) radar detectors.&#8221;</p>
<p>The problem with that is that you&#8217;re assuming the police have to abide by the law, which of course has always been true but no longer is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Bowman</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415401</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With respect to the proposed Virginia ban on police scanners, I note that the FCC Act of 1934(?) gives anyone in the U.S. the right to listen to any radio broadcasts. That said, Virginia is one of the few states that bans (or used to ban?) radar detectors. I have long regarded the state as infected with far too many police.

If the police don&#039;t want people listening to their radio broadcasts, then they should cough up the dough and provide for encryption. But, that would be a true waste of money, as they really do not need to stop people from listening -- they just don&#039;t want anyone hearing something that might be embarrassing to the cops.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect to the proposed Virginia ban on police scanners, I note that the FCC Act of 1934(?) gives anyone in the U.S. the right to listen to any radio broadcasts. That said, Virginia is one of the few states that bans (or used to ban?) radar detectors. I have long regarded the state as infected with far too many police.</p>
<p>If the police don&#8217;t want people listening to their radio broadcasts, then they should cough up the dough and provide for encryption. But, that would be a true waste of money, as they really do not need to stop people from listening &#8212; they just don&#8217;t want anyone hearing something that might be embarrassing to the cops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RWW</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415303</link>
		<dc:creator>RWW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 02:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;I&gt;But there has to be enforcement on illegal immigration.&lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s funny how many bald assertions one sees from anti-freedom-of-movement types.

&lt;I&gt;The place to enforce illegal status is on employers, with civil fines that discourage employers hiring illegals.&lt;/I&gt;

Or, you know, you could try staying the hell out of other people&#039;s business.

&lt;I&gt;I owe nothing to the rest of the world, other than to respect them enough to leave them alone.&lt;/I&gt;

Oh, the irony.

&lt;I&gt;We do not have to open our borders to all.&lt;/I&gt;

&quot;We&quot; do not own the borders. Your collectivism is showing.

&lt;I&gt;That said, I welcome legal immigration to the United States, with the goal of assimilation...&lt;/I&gt;

What is &quot;assimilation&quot; in this context?

&lt;I&gt;But hey, if you have better ideas, say so.&lt;/I&gt;

How about basic respect for property rights?

&lt;I&gt;We put ourselves first too, don’t we? But at the same time we treat our neighbors with respect.&lt;/I&gt;

More irony.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But there has to be enforcement on illegal immigration.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny how many bald assertions one sees from anti-freedom-of-movement types.</p>
<p><i>The place to enforce illegal status is on employers, with civil fines that discourage employers hiring illegals.</i></p>
<p>Or, you know, you could try staying the hell out of other people&#8217;s business.</p>
<p><i>I owe nothing to the rest of the world, other than to respect them enough to leave them alone.</i></p>
<p>Oh, the irony.</p>
<p><i>We do not have to open our borders to all.</i></p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8221; do not own the borders. Your collectivism is showing.</p>
<p><i>That said, I welcome legal immigration to the United States, with the goal of assimilation&#8230;</i></p>
<p>What is &#8220;assimilation&#8221; in this context?</p>
<p><i>But hey, if you have better ideas, say so.</i></p>
<p>How about basic respect for property rights?</p>
<p><i>We put ourselves first too, don’t we? But at the same time we treat our neighbors with respect.</i></p>
<p>More irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOR</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415296</link>
		<dc:creator>JOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#42,

The cases don&#039;t seem comparable at all. The ranchers aren&#039;t trying to keep the monks out because OMGTHEY&#039;RECATHOLIC, they&#039;re just being stubborn (perhaps reasonably or perhaps not, I&#039;d have to know more details) over purely practical (utility, resource, and easement) issues. But sure, if the monks peaceably purchase their property fair and square then nobody has any business either legally harrassing them or trying to shame or pressure them into leaving, especially for some especially stupid reason (like anti-Catholic sentiment).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#42,</p>
<p>The cases don&#8217;t seem comparable at all. The ranchers aren&#8217;t trying to keep the monks out because OMGTHEY&#8217;RECATHOLIC, they&#8217;re just being stubborn (perhaps reasonably or perhaps not, I&#8217;d have to know more details) over purely practical (utility, resource, and easement) issues. But sure, if the monks peaceably purchase their property fair and square then nobody has any business either legally harrassing them or trying to shame or pressure them into leaving, especially for some especially stupid reason (like anti-Catholic sentiment).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Hummel</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415283</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Hummel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#23 &#124; Boyd Durkin  &quot;I say the cop skates with less than 6 months.&quot;

You mean 6 months paid leave, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#23 | Boyd Durkin  &#8220;I say the cop skates with less than 6 months.&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean 6 months paid leave, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PW</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415231</link>
		<dc:creator>PW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 19:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m curious to see if those who weighed in on the &quot;Ground Zero Mosque&quot; will direct similar enthusiasm into making this story a cause celebre of property rights.

http://www.codyenterprise.com/news/local/article_f0be418c-ab14-11df-b3fd-001cc4c002e0.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious to see if those who weighed in on the &#8220;Ground Zero Mosque&#8221; will direct similar enthusiasm into making this story a cause celebre of property rights.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.codyenterprise.com/news/local/article_f0be418c-ab14-11df-b3fd-001cc4c002e0.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.codyenterprise.com/news/local/article_f0be418c-ab14-11df-b3fd-001cc4c002e0.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical in CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415219</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical in CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#23 &#124;  Boyd Durkin -- &quot;Anyone want to place bets on what penalty (if any) the cop will face after blowing away the whittler?&quot;

Most likely scenario is paid administrative leave followed by a 10% chance that he&#039;s brought up on some misdemeanor charge, which will bring probation.  He may or may not be fired by the PD, but he&#039;ll be back in law enforcement with another PD within a few months.

I don&#039;t even see a civil lawsuit in this case as the victim was homeless.

If there were a God in heaven, he would envy the power of U.S. police.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#23 |  Boyd Durkin &#8212; &#8220;Anyone want to place bets on what penalty (if any) the cop will face after blowing away the whittler?&#8221;</p>
<p>Most likely scenario is paid administrative leave followed by a 10% chance that he&#8217;s brought up on some misdemeanor charge, which will bring probation.  He may or may not be fired by the PD, but he&#8217;ll be back in law enforcement with another PD within a few months.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even see a civil lawsuit in this case as the victim was homeless.</p>
<p>If there were a God in heaven, he would envy the power of U.S. police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StrongStyle81</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415134</link>
		<dc:creator>StrongStyle81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 06:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our economy sucks so bad not even the Mexicans want any part of it. If it gets any worse soon we&#039;ll be sneaking into their country looking for work. Oh, sweet sweet irony.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our economy sucks so bad not even the Mexicans want any part of it. If it gets any worse soon we&#8217;ll be sneaking into their country looking for work. Oh, sweet sweet irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415067</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excuse me, you can put your own country first and still be libertarian.  I miswrote above.  

That is honest.  We put ourselves first too, don&#039;t we?  But at the same time we treat our neighbors with respect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me, you can put your own country first and still be libertarian.  I miswrote above.  </p>
<p>That is honest.  We put ourselves first too, don&#8217;t we?  But at the same time we treat our neighbors with respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415064</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 02:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;“Apparently God doesn’t like immigrants, either.”

I am a big proponent of greatly expanded legal immigration Radley. I think our current immigration policy sucks. I also support some sort of path to legal status for those who are here. 

But there has to be enforcement on illegal immigration. A quasi legal (or illegal) system is not the answer, so the status quo has to change. Arizona’s law is focused on the wrong target. The place to enforce illegal status is on employers, with civil fines that discourage employers hiring illegals.

   --2&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Libertarian does not mean putting your own country first.  I owe nothing to the rest of the world, other than to respect them enough to leave them alone.  We do not have to open our borders to all.  

That said, I welcome legal immigration to the United States, with the goal of assimilation and equal protection and respect to all.  Our country benefits from smart immigration.  The current system sucks.  It creates a quasi serf class with little hope of legality. 

And there is nothing wrong with taking the best and the brightest.  That increases wealth to all.  

But hey, if you have better ideas, say so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Apparently God doesn’t like immigrants, either.”</p>
<p>I am a big proponent of greatly expanded legal immigration Radley. I think our current immigration policy sucks. I also support some sort of path to legal status for those who are here. </p>
<p>But there has to be enforcement on illegal immigration. A quasi legal (or illegal) system is not the answer, so the status quo has to change. Arizona’s law is focused on the wrong target. The place to enforce illegal status is on employers, with civil fines that discourage employers hiring illegals.</p>
<p>   &#8211;2</p></blockquote>
<p>Libertarian does not mean putting your own country first.  I owe nothing to the rest of the world, other than to respect them enough to leave them alone.  We do not have to open our borders to all.  </p>
<p>That said, I welcome legal immigration to the United States, with the goal of assimilation and equal protection and respect to all.  Our country benefits from smart immigration.  The current system sucks.  It creates a quasi serf class with little hope of legality. </p>
<p>And there is nothing wrong with taking the best and the brightest.  That increases wealth to all.  </p>
<p>But hey, if you have better ideas, say so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helmut O' Hooligan</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415059</link>
		<dc:creator>Helmut O' Hooligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#35 derfel cadarn: &quot;the police as supposed professionals can NEVER fire the first shots in any altercation&quot;

Never?  What? Well, no, that doesn&#039;t make any sense.  I understand that the SPD shooting does not appear to be justified, but think about what you just said.  They can &quot;NEVER fire first shots in any altercation.&quot; So they have to wait until a suspect armed with a firearm gets a shot off before they can return fire? Or if they are jumped by a suspect who purposely slashes at them with a blade or swings a metal pipe they would not be justified in firing &quot;first shots.&quot;  

Come on, this kind of poor, ill informed argumentation doesn&#039;t get us anywhere.  It only empowers police unions and those in law enforcement who want to say, &quot;see the public doesn&#039;t know what they are talking about, so let us do our jobs.&quot;  With all due respect, you don&#039;t know what you are talking about in this case, and you might consider learning a thing or two about responses to armed attacks before you make a blanket statement like you did above.  Restraint is important for police, but suicide missions are not part of the job description.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#35 derfel cadarn: &#8220;the police as supposed professionals can NEVER fire the first shots in any altercation&#8221;</p>
<p>Never?  What? Well, no, that doesn&#8217;t make any sense.  I understand that the SPD shooting does not appear to be justified, but think about what you just said.  They can &#8220;NEVER fire first shots in any altercation.&#8221; So they have to wait until a suspect armed with a firearm gets a shot off before they can return fire? Or if they are jumped by a suspect who purposely slashes at them with a blade or swings a metal pipe they would not be justified in firing &#8220;first shots.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Come on, this kind of poor, ill informed argumentation doesn&#8217;t get us anywhere.  It only empowers police unions and those in law enforcement who want to say, &#8220;see the public doesn&#8217;t know what they are talking about, so let us do our jobs.&#8221;  With all due respect, you don&#8217;t know what you are talking about in this case, and you might consider learning a thing or two about responses to armed attacks before you make a blanket statement like you did above.  Restraint is important for police, but suicide missions are not part of the job description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salt</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415055</link>
		<dc:creator>Salt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[re: prison guards

The fact that this news got outside of the prison walls is extremely rare....People would NEVER believe what goes on inside of prisons. This story is not by any stretch of the imagination uncommon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: prison guards</p>
<p>The fact that this news got outside of the prison walls is extremely rare&#8230;.People would NEVER believe what goes on inside of prisons. This story is not by any stretch of the imagination uncommon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derfel cadarn</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415046</link>
		<dc:creator>derfel cadarn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any police officer who is armed and is scared to the point of murder by a 3inch  blade should  be fired ,tarred feathered and if found to have any testicles they should be cut off and tossed in the gutter. the police as supposed professionals can NEVER fire the first shots in any altercation .And if you are that frightened of the risk Get Out of the game.

                                                    Man up dudes]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any police officer who is armed and is scared to the point of murder by a 3inch  blade should  be fired ,tarred feathered and if found to have any testicles they should be cut off and tossed in the gutter. the police as supposed professionals can NEVER fire the first shots in any altercation .And if you are that frightened of the risk Get Out of the game.</p>
<p>                                                    Man up dudes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415039</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[prison guards are the lowest scum I&#039;ve ever come across. they&#039;ve always paid prisoners to beat other prisoners- many times for entertainment. 

the best solution: only send people to prison who need to be in prison. no drug users. nobody guilty of a victimless crime should ever be in prison. no non-violent offenders need to be in a maximum security prison. this will dramatically reduce the burden on all of us. plus, it&#039;ll reduce the number of slimeballs given the power to be prison guards. it&#039;ll also reduce the slimeball healthcare workers. google &#039;cms prison abuse or death or lawsuit or...&#039; many of the doctors are slime who&#039;ve been barred from practicing elsewhere. many of the nurses are slime who&#039;ve been fired from respectable jobs.

the prison industry and the military industrial complex are two of my biggest fears in this country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prison guards are the lowest scum I&#8217;ve ever come across. they&#8217;ve always paid prisoners to beat other prisoners- many times for entertainment. </p>
<p>the best solution: only send people to prison who need to be in prison. no drug users. nobody guilty of a victimless crime should ever be in prison. no non-violent offenders need to be in a maximum security prison. this will dramatically reduce the burden on all of us. plus, it&#8217;ll reduce the number of slimeballs given the power to be prison guards. it&#8217;ll also reduce the slimeball healthcare workers. google &#8216;cms prison abuse or death or lawsuit or&#8230;&#8217; many of the doctors are slime who&#8217;ve been barred from practicing elsewhere. many of the nurses are slime who&#8217;ve been fired from respectable jobs.</p>
<p>the prison industry and the military industrial complex are two of my biggest fears in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415024</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MC, it&#039;s not meaningless, it means &quot;if not for my more fortunate circumstances.&quot; A perfectly cromulent turn of phrase, if used in proper context, and not simply spouted by an empty-headed twit who thinks it sounds pretty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MC, it&#8217;s not meaningless, it means &#8220;if not for my more fortunate circumstances.&#8221; A perfectly cromulent turn of phrase, if used in proper context, and not simply spouted by an empty-headed twit who thinks it sounds pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415023</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;So, you know, there but for the grace of God I arrived.&quot;

That doesn&#039;t even make any fucking sense. Maybe she meant &quot;By the grace of God,&quot; but what actually came out of her mouth is simply moronic, and even in different context it would mean the opposite of what she was seemingly going for. Just another conceited brainless corrupt mouthpiece.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So, you know, there but for the grace of God I arrived.&#8221;</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t even make any fucking sense. Maybe she meant &#8220;By the grace of God,&#8221; but what actually came out of her mouth is simply moronic, and even in different context it would mean the opposite of what she was seemingly going for. Just another conceited brainless corrupt mouthpiece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Leatherwood</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415020</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Leatherwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ian Birk....murderer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian Birk&#8230;.murderer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chaney</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/09/03/friday-afternoon-links-2/comment-page-1/#comment-415019</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=17570#comment-415019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Janet &amp; God - &quot;but for the grace of God&quot; is an idiomatic expression that is pretty meaningless.  She surely didn&#039;t mean that God put her in office or she would have used stronger language.  Note that some politicians have actually made that claim.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Janet &amp; God &#8211; &#8220;but for the grace of God&#8221; is an idiomatic expression that is pretty meaningless.  She surely didn&#8217;t mean that God put her in office or she would have used stronger language.  Note that some politicians have actually made that claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
