I’m a Little Late to This…
Friday, June 11th, 2010…but it’s clever.
…but it’s clever.
This article from the animal rights section of the Change.org ring of websites has been making the rounds on dog-related blogs and Twitter feeds. Arguing that many dogs are mistaken for pit bulls in jurisdictions that have banned the much-maligned “breed,” the author calls for state officials to DNA test dogs before euthanizing them.
The argument is that city officials shouldn’t be able to euthanize a dog simply because it “looks like a pit bull,” whatever that means. But the real aim is to undermine breed-specific legislation altogether by imposing what would sound to most like a common-sense requirement that most cities can’t afford to follow.
It’s a cute idea, and I support the ultimate goal, but the scheme requires too much concession to the misguided thinking behind put bull prohibitions. I’ve written about breed-specific bans before, so I’ll save some time with a cut-and-paste:
Bad owners create bad dogs, regardless of the dog’s lineage. Bans on pit bulls don’t prevent dog fighting, nor do they prevent people from raising vicious dogs. They just ensure that dogs fitting the pit bull description will be vicious, because the well-bred lines will be discontinued and good owners will stop raising them. Meanwhile, people who raise dogs for fighting will simply move on to another breed.
Moreover, the term pit bull isn’t really a breed at all. It’s a generic term that can and has been applied to just about any dog with bulldog and/or terrier traits (take the pit bull test here). The American Kennel Club-recognized breed that’s generally associated with the term is the American Staffordshire Terrier. And the vast, vast majority of staffies are harmless (they’re actually considered a child-friendly breed).
In fact, most fighting dogs commonly called pit bulls aren’t bloodlined staffies. Fighting dogs are bred for attributes conducive to fighting, not for pedigree.
Better to impose strict liability on dog owners for any damage their pets do to others or their property.
In a unified display of bipartisan dimwittery, Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and John Cornyn (R-Texas) are joining together to ban prepaid cell phones. Because an inept terrorist once used one in a failed plot.
If only we could get a terrorist to employ a reactionary, grandstanding politician in some future plot. Maybe Congress would finally ban those, too. Or at least no longer allow them on airplanes.
Alfred Hitchcock with an early version of “that’s what she said.”
(Via BuzzFeed.)
Protesters gathered at Ground Zero Sunday to object to plans for a mosque a few blocks north of where the World Trade Center towers stood. From North Jersey Record columnist Mike Kelly:
At one point, a portion of the crowd menacingly surrounded two Egyptian men who were speaking Arabic and were thought to be Muslims.
“Go home,” several shouted from the crowd.
“Get out,” others shouted.
In fact, the two men – Joseph Nassralla and Karam El Masry — were not Muslims at all. They turned out to be Egyptian Coptic Christians who work for a California-based Christian satellite TV station called “The Way.” Both said they had come to protest the mosque.
“I’m a Christian,” Nassralla shouted to the crowd, his eyes bulging and beads of sweat rolling down his face.
But it was no use. The protesters had become so angry at what they thought were Muslims that New York City police officers had to rush in and pull Nassralla and El Masry to safety.
“I flew nine hours in an airplane to come here,” a frustrated Nassralla said afterward.
I have a piece up at Slate using the Hank Skinner case to argue that in rape and murder cases, investigators should err on the side of conducting DNA tests on all biological material collected at the crime scene.
A friendly reminder as Californians go to the polls today: Included on GOP gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman’s “public safety” advisory committee is Kern County, California DA Ed Jagels, the man who put 25 (at least) innocent people in prison. This presumably is the sort of person Whitman would have advising her on criminal justice issues should she become governor.
Oh, and while she was head of eBay, the company formally advocated throwing people who play online poker in jail.
I don’t know that her opponent today is any better. But those are two pretty good reasons not to vote for Whitman.
Blogging will remain light as I’m getting settled in. Hoping my remaining furniture will arrive in the next few days. So far, Nashville is great. I’m in a pretty great location, close to just about everything from downtown to the west side of the city. Lots more coffee shops to work from than D.C. I hope to have the Nashville blog fired up in a few weeks. I’ve decided to go with a cheap Bob Dylan pun for the title: Nashville Byline.
Here are your morning links:
I don’t know if it’s the “greatest ad I’ve ever seen,” but it’s pretty darned good.
Obama’s commission to reduce the federal budget deficit . . . says it needs more money.
The arrest of Maryland motorcyclist Anthony Graber is generating some considerable backlash against the state’s law enforcement officials. Graber was arrested and is being charged with felonies for posting video to YouTube of a cop who pulled his gun on Graber during a traffic stop. I’ve written about Graber here and here, and I discussed the case on WBAL’s Ron Smith show yesterday.
Cato’s David Rittgers has posted his own analysis of how officials are misinterpreting the state’s wiretapping law here. Rittgers also discussed the issue on D.C. NPR affiliate WAMU’s Kojo Nnamdi show.
And in a somewhat odd pairing, anarchist writer Wendy McElroy’s write-up of the issue was picked up by Gizmodo. That triggered a link and discussion thread at Slashdot.
It’s good to see this issue picking up steam. As I said on Smith’s show yesterday, there seems to be a big disconnect here between the generalpublic’s attitude on recording cops (the feedback I’ve received has been almost unanimous in support of ensuring that the practice is legal) and the attitudes of law enforcement officials (on-duty cops have a right to privacy) and politicians (generally a position of deference to law enforcement).
The issue is important not just in order to keep law enforcement transparent and accountable, but in that it raises fundamental questions about the nature of individual rights in a free society. The way Marylandofficials are interpreting the state’s wiretapping law, government agents—in this case on-duty cops— have privacy rights in public spaces that ordinary citizens don’t. But state employees acting as state employees don’t have rights. Citizens have rights. Governments and their employees have powers, and only to the extent that those powers have been delegated to them by the people they’re governing.
…by not treating them like public bathrooms.

I’m still getting settled in my new place, so blogging will be light for a couple days.
The place is great. It’s in an old hotel that has been converted into lofts. It’s right on Music Row, so it’s where the big acts would stay in the 1950s and 60s when they were in town to record a new record. The building’s maintenance man is a retired long-time roadie for Kenny Rogers. My loft is apparently the suite where Jerry Lee Lewis usually stayed. So I am of course teaching myself “Great Balls of Fire” on the piano.
Daisy isn’t crazy about the hardwood floors, so I guess I’ll be getting some rugs. We’ll have to scope out some dog parks this weekend, too. The building includes a wonderfully ostentatious guitar-shaped swimming pool designed by honky tonk legend Webb Pierce. The first floor includes the old hotel room service kitchen. There’s a baker who uses the facility each morning to make bread for restaurants across the city. I am told if you’re nice to him he’ll give you a loaf. So that’s pretty great.
The location is really nice, too. I’m surrounded by studios, so it’s quiet. But it’s also just a few blocks (“stumbling distance,” you might say) from some great bars, restaurants, and live music.
I really had no particular reason for choosing Nashville, other than I’m a music lover and I’ve heard great things about the city. It was just time to get out of D.C. Nice thing about having a portable job. But so far, I’m pretty happy with the choice. I’m thinking about starting a little side blog about the town and my process of discovering it. The general content would be a mix of photos, interviews, reviews, and a little digging into interesting stories around the city. So here’s a list of blegs for Nasvhillians, current and former: Suggestions on what to call the blog? People I should interview? Places to visit and write up? Must-do, but not as well known events in the city?
Should be back to regular blogging in a couple days.