<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morning Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401663</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Invite 2 million Muslims to move into downtown Philly and take (by E.D.) all the land.

What did Philly do? I mean, we&#039;re annoying sure, but well, at least let me know first so I can move.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invite 2 million Muslims to move into downtown Philly and take (by E.D.) all the land.</p>
<p>What did Philly do? I mean, we&#8217;re annoying sure, but well, at least let me know first so I can move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark F.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401484</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Children of foreign diplomats born in this country have never been granted U.S. citizenship auttimatically (they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States), so there&#039;s no reason Congress can&#039;t change the law to end automatic citizenship for anchor babies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Children of foreign diplomats born in this country have never been granted U.S. citizenship auttimatically (they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States), so there&#8217;s no reason Congress can&#8217;t change the law to end automatic citizenship for anchor babies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401278</link>
		<dc:creator>buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;1) I didn’t know states could deny US citizenship.

They can’t. That is one of the enumerated powers expressly given to Congress by the Constitution. Which makes this new proposed AZ law even more ridiculous than the first one.&quot;

Perhaps they feel that since Congress has blown off being restricted by the enumerated powers in the Constitution, the states can ignore it also.  Why is either of them ridiculous?  What would you suggest the folks living on the border do, if the feds refuse to do anything?   And anyone who says this is part of anti-immigration, concedes the argument.  Anti ILLEGAL immigration, yes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;1) I didn’t know states could deny US citizenship.</p>
<p>They can’t. That is one of the enumerated powers expressly given to Congress by the Constitution. Which makes this new proposed AZ law even more ridiculous than the first one.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps they feel that since Congress has blown off being restricted by the enumerated powers in the Constitution, the states can ignore it also.  Why is either of them ridiculous?  What would you suggest the folks living on the border do, if the feds refuse to do anything?   And anyone who says this is part of anti-immigration, concedes the argument.  Anti ILLEGAL immigration, yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon Wolfeson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401178</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon Wolfeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JS@64 - I wasn&#039;t really commenting on security theatre, I was commenting specifically on the impossibility of protecting a modern country&#039;s basic infrastructure directly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JS@64 &#8211; I wasn&#8217;t really commenting on security theatre, I was commenting specifically on the impossibility of protecting a modern country&#8217;s basic infrastructure directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401137</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My only criticism of the Arizona legislation is that it doesn&#039;t go far enough.

If being the children of migrants makes your citizenship unconstitutional then, to ensure consistently, the bill should retrospectively strip citizenship from anyone in Arizona whose ancestors entered the US after indepedence. Those people were migrants (and almost all of whose legal status would be questionable if explored in the detail Arizona are going into) and so their children, grandchildren etc. are illegal aliens.

The sad downside is that that would mean a good proportion of the Arizona state legislature needing to be marched out and deported immediately the bill is signed, but it&#039;s a small price to pay for constitutional consistency.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only criticism of the Arizona legislation is that it doesn&#8217;t go far enough.</p>
<p>If being the children of migrants makes your citizenship unconstitutional then, to ensure consistently, the bill should retrospectively strip citizenship from anyone in Arizona whose ancestors entered the US after indepedence. Those people were migrants (and almost all of whose legal status would be questionable if explored in the detail Arizona are going into) and so their children, grandchildren etc. are illegal aliens.</p>
<p>The sad downside is that that would mean a good proportion of the Arizona state legislature needing to be marched out and deported immediately the bill is signed, but it&#8217;s a small price to pay for constitutional consistency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401121</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[all good points, you!... 

I&#039;ve seen breakdowns in ics and great incident commanders incorporate bystanders and non-standard resources into rescues. I try not to monday morning quarterback and second guess people, but this doesn&#039;t sound good...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all good points, you!&#8230; </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen breakdowns in ics and great incident commanders incorporate bystanders and non-standard resources into rescues. I try not to monday morning quarterback and second guess people, but this doesn&#8217;t sound good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You! Slow Down!</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401120</link>
		<dc:creator>You! Slow Down!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sorry...hit the wrong button too soon :)  ICS seems to work for emergency management in general but if somebody is already on the scene who is already more familiar with the river than any cop will ever be, but the police take control over the scene and want to spend half an hour setting up ropes while a river guide is already there and knows what to do, I don&#039;t see where they have any business taking over the chain of command.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry&#8230;hit the wrong button too soon :)  ICS seems to work for emergency management in general but if somebody is already on the scene who is already more familiar with the river than any cop will ever be, but the police take control over the scene and want to spend half an hour setting up ropes while a river guide is already there and knows what to do, I don&#8217;t see where they have any business taking over the chain of command.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You! Slow Down!</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401117</link>
		<dc:creator>You! Slow Down!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marty - briefly, (and hopefully less flippant than the comment I posted last night before going to bed), cops have a tendency to want to &quot;own&quot; rescues and not share the glory with anyone else.  This is simply a function of the authoritarian nature of their job.  They are also not particularly qualified in that field. I mean we are talking about people here whose regular job is to arrest innocent pot smokers, and raise money for the State by extorting money out of motorists for minor traffic violations.

As for where to find professionals for urban flood rescues the fire department is the most likely place, as rescue is part of their job to begin with, and CERT volunteers and others could certainly be trained in various rescue skills except there are too many entrenched powers that be who won&#039;t allow it.

In wilderness environments, most river guides I know of are trained in wilderness EMT, swiftwater rescue and other skills they may need.  ICS (or whatever it is known as now) came out of western wildland fire management a]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marty &#8211; briefly, (and hopefully less flippant than the comment I posted last night before going to bed), cops have a tendency to want to &#8220;own&#8221; rescues and not share the glory with anyone else.  This is simply a function of the authoritarian nature of their job.  They are also not particularly qualified in that field. I mean we are talking about people here whose regular job is to arrest innocent pot smokers, and raise money for the State by extorting money out of motorists for minor traffic violations.</p>
<p>As for where to find professionals for urban flood rescues the fire department is the most likely place, as rescue is part of their job to begin with, and CERT volunteers and others could certainly be trained in various rescue skills except there are too many entrenched powers that be who won&#8217;t allow it.</p>
<p>In wilderness environments, most river guides I know of are trained in wilderness EMT, swiftwater rescue and other skills they may need.  ICS (or whatever it is known as now) came out of western wildland fire management a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401095</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As for the Scientology story, does being a church somehow exempt them from the law? I&#039;m pretty sure a private employer that fired employees for becoming pregnant (or transferred them to a much less desirable job in a remote location) would violate at least the FMLA. The Sea Org is a monastic order in some ways, but celibacy is not a requirement of the organization, so I don&#039;t see how they could claim a religious exemption for their ban on parenthood.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the Scientology story, does being a church somehow exempt them from the law? I&#8217;m pretty sure a private employer that fired employees for becoming pregnant (or transferred them to a much less desirable job in a remote location) would violate at least the FMLA. The Sea Org is a monastic order in some ways, but celibacy is not a requirement of the organization, so I don&#8217;t see how they could claim a religious exemption for their ban on parenthood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401092</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They should have just re-printed &quot;Very Proper Charlies&quot;, with an afterword about such ineptness as the underwear bomber and suicide bombers who set themselves off with a group hug. For those unfamiliar with Dean Ing&#039;s 1978 short story, his theory was that terrorism is publicity-seeking, therefore see that the only public recognition accorded to them is cruel laughter. One part of this plan was a new primetime TV show, with one of the great comedians playing an inept terrorist named &quot;Charlie&quot;. The other part was that the FCC commissioner persuaded the network news services to:

1.  Never name a terrorist or terrorist organization. They would all be called &quot;Charlies&quot;.

2.  Never give publicity to their goals.

3.  Always give a comic twist to reporting on terrorism. Example, a news report on an operation in which a terrorist shot a very young witness: &quot;Why did the Charlie shoot a baby girl?&quot; &quot;She was almost three, she knew too much.&quot;

In the 70&#039;s the funniest terrorism ever got was when Squeaky Fromm smuggled a pistol within easy range of the President, but apparently didn&#039;t know how to release the safety. It&#039;s so much easier to make fun of the underwear bomber. &quot;Nah, he just wanted to try a wienie roast. With his own wienie.&quot;

But getting the media to cooperate these days???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should have just re-printed &#8220;Very Proper Charlies&#8221;, with an afterword about such ineptness as the underwear bomber and suicide bombers who set themselves off with a group hug. For those unfamiliar with Dean Ing&#8217;s 1978 short story, his theory was that terrorism is publicity-seeking, therefore see that the only public recognition accorded to them is cruel laughter. One part of this plan was a new primetime TV show, with one of the great comedians playing an inept terrorist named &#8220;Charlie&#8221;. The other part was that the FCC commissioner persuaded the network news services to:</p>
<p>1.  Never name a terrorist or terrorist organization. They would all be called &#8220;Charlies&#8221;.</p>
<p>2.  Never give publicity to their goals.</p>
<p>3.  Always give a comic twist to reporting on terrorism. Example, a news report on an operation in which a terrorist shot a very young witness: &#8220;Why did the Charlie shoot a baby girl?&#8221; &#8220;She was almost three, she knew too much.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the 70&#8242;s the funniest terrorism ever got was when Squeaky Fromm smuggled a pistol within easy range of the President, but apparently didn&#8217;t know how to release the safety. It&#8217;s so much easier to make fun of the underwear bomber. &#8220;Nah, he just wanted to try a wienie roast. With his own wienie.&#8221;</p>
<p>But getting the media to cooperate these days???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401089</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marty: It sounds like the police tried to interfere with a rescue that was already in progress, for a half hour before they arrived.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marty: It sounds like the police tried to interfere with a rescue that was already in progress, for a half hour before they arrived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marta Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401024</link>
		<dc:creator>Marta Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[btw, am loving all the gay ads. or can only gay people see the gay ads? very colorful. ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw, am loving all the gay ads. or can only gay people see the gay ads? very colorful. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marta Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-401022</link>
		<dc:creator>Marta Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-401022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but GT, how do you really feel? ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but GT, how do you really feel? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-400969</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-400969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
•The case for calling terrorists nitwits.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No way.  We&#039;ve spent a trillion dollars, killed hundreds of thousands of people, and taken away a long list of freedoms fighting these terrorists.  If they aren&#039;t brilliant, then our government has lied to us for their own gain.

(cricket noise)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
•The case for calling terrorists nitwits.
</p></blockquote>
<p>No way.  We&#8217;ve spent a trillion dollars, killed hundreds of thousands of people, and taken away a long list of freedoms fighting these terrorists.  If they aren&#8217;t brilliant, then our government has lied to us for their own gain.</p>
<p>(cricket noise)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-400964</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-400964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@#29 Dave,
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Although, I have to admit, since the U.S. apparently feels compelled to make enemies out of as many foreign powers as it possibly can, protecting Israel certainly makes that easier.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Dave,
I cannot believe you have anything less than unquestioning support for Israel.  Surely, they will be kicking you out of America.

It is time for Israel to stand on its own as a viable country.  If it cannot, then everyone needs to do one of two things:
1.  Accept that the Brittish Mandate was moronic (it was) and move out.
2.  Make Israel the 51st state of America (because nothing makes sense these days, so why the hell not).

Here&#039;s a recipe for disaster: Invite 2 million Muslims to move into downtown Philly and take (by E.D.) all the land.   No, this isn&#039;t an exact analogy because how Israel was formed was even more offensive.

Love Jews.  Hate Israel.  Not a hard concept.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#29 Dave,</p>
<blockquote><p>
Although, I have to admit, since the U.S. apparently feels compelled to make enemies out of as many foreign powers as it possibly can, protecting Israel certainly makes that easier.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Dave,<br />
I cannot believe you have anything less than unquestioning support for Israel.  Surely, they will be kicking you out of America.</p>
<p>It is time for Israel to stand on its own as a viable country.  If it cannot, then everyone needs to do one of two things:<br />
1.  Accept that the Brittish Mandate was moronic (it was) and move out.<br />
2.  Make Israel the 51st state of America (because nothing makes sense these days, so why the hell not).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a recipe for disaster: Invite 2 million Muslims to move into downtown Philly and take (by E.D.) all the land.   No, this isn&#8217;t an exact analogy because how Israel was formed was even more offensive.</p>
<p>Love Jews.  Hate Israel.  Not a hard concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-400961</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-400961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#63 &#124;  You! Slow Down!

&#039;Police have no business being involved in swiftwater rescue in the first place. They should leave it to professionals like river guides who actually know what they are doing on the water.&#039;

so... &#039;where do you find &#039;professionals&#039; in subdivision flash floods? mass casualty incidents? 

I&#039;m a rescue tech with a fire department- most water rescues resolve themselves before govt rescue ever arrives, BUT competent chains of command are what makes rescues run smoothly. Bystanders bust the chain of command. You create multiple victims, distractions, etc. 

Having said that, if I was on vacation and the rescuing entity wasn&#039;t competent, I&#039;d grab the girl.

So, I&#039;m a bit mixed on this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#63 |  You! Slow Down!</p>
<p>&#8216;Police have no business being involved in swiftwater rescue in the first place. They should leave it to professionals like river guides who actually know what they are doing on the water.&#8217;</p>
<p>so&#8230; &#8216;where do you find &#8216;professionals&#8217; in subdivision flash floods? mass casualty incidents? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a rescue tech with a fire department- most water rescues resolve themselves before govt rescue ever arrives, BUT competent chains of command are what makes rescues run smoothly. Bystanders bust the chain of command. You create multiple victims, distractions, etc. </p>
<p>Having said that, if I was on vacation and the rescuing entity wasn&#8217;t competent, I&#8217;d grab the girl.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m a bit mixed on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-400957</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-400957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Radley! That was about a 3 day tour de force of titling at straw men. 



Now, where the hell&#039;s Fluffy?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Radley! That was about a 3 day tour de force of titling at straw men. </p>
<p>Now, where the hell&#8217;s Fluffy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radley Balko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-400921</link>
		<dc:creator>Radley Balko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-400921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goodbye, Paul Vail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodbye, Paul Vail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MassHole</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-400919</link>
		<dc:creator>MassHole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-400919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Vail:  The Stupid.  You haz it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Vail:  The Stupid.  You haz it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Vail</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/06/15/morning-links-357/comment-page-2/#comment-400918</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Vail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=16946#comment-400918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Kristol is in his 50&#039;s, is he suppose to join the army?  The failed war talk after 18 months of Obama is wearing a little thin.  It&#039;s talk like that, that makes me wonder about this sites orientation, is this a liberal site disguised as a libertarian site?  Hope not, but it sounds like it might.  You said it was Kristol&#039;s war?  Kristol is a writer/publisher he wasn&#039;t Secretary of ...OH WAIT, I get it... Kristol is a Jew, and is part of the Jewish plot to get American to bomb Iran, and the Mosad set up 9/11.  Over educated younger gentiles hate Jews because they are jealous of the power they imagine they have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Kristol is in his 50&#8242;s, is he suppose to join the army?  The failed war talk after 18 months of Obama is wearing a little thin.  It&#8217;s talk like that, that makes me wonder about this sites orientation, is this a liberal site disguised as a libertarian site?  Hope not, but it sounds like it might.  You said it was Kristol&#8217;s war?  Kristol is a writer/publisher he wasn&#8217;t Secretary of &#8230;OH WAIT, I get it&#8230; Kristol is a Jew, and is part of the Jewish plot to get American to bomb Iran, and the Mosad set up 9/11.  Over educated younger gentiles hate Jews because they are jealous of the power they imagine they have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
