<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Santa Clara DA Boycotts Judge Who Ruled Against Her</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:25:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vote for the Worst Prosecutor of 2010 &#124; The Agitator</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-497011</link>
		<dc:creator>Vote for the Worst Prosecutor of 2010 &#124; The Agitator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 06:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-497011</guid>
		<description>[...] of misdeeds: See here. Summary: Santa Clara County, California&#8217;s district attorney ran for the office in 2006 on a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of misdeeds: See here. Summary: Santa Clara County, California&#8217;s district attorney ran for the office in 2006 on a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-400422</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-400422</guid>
		<description>This is neither a mistake, not an anomaly. Santa Clara County District Attorney&#039;s have a long recorded, and well documented history of denying criminal and civil litigants the due process of law required under the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14 amendments, as well as denying people in Juvenile Dependency or Family Lw courts basic assumed priveliges such as the PRESUMPTION OF INNONCENCE. Delores Carr is only the latest example of this incredibly corrupt, and illegal agency acting under the full knowledge of the Board of Supervisors such as Jim Beall, Don Gage, Blanca Alvarado et al of denial of due process of law. The abuses by the DA include but are not limited to, hiding exculpatory evidence, fabricating evidence, abuse of color of authority, violation of civil rights freedoms such as free speech, the right to confront one&#039;s accusers, and the use of Hearsay without corroborating evidence as is required under the findings of the US Supreme Court under Crawford V Washington, to name but a few. Delores Carr, Ben Fields, and Jamie Stringfield all belong in PRISON for what they engaged in on a daily basis, and for any of them to assert they &quot;uphold the law&quot; is a flat out farce. The abuse they have subjected innocent parties to is intolerable, and is a legal outrage in every sense of the word. The judiciary in these courts is no better. As agents of the county, they are part and parcel of the problem. Perhaps if we removed Judicial and Prosecutorial immunity, and required them stand for independent citizen review, and opened the courts of Family Law and Juvenile dependency courts, there would be a small glimmer of hope for the wrongly accused, but I for one can tell you, there is NO JUSTICE in Santa Clara County, and these agents bound by law, throw out their oaths of office before they ever sit down in the morning. Each Judge should be required to carry a liability bond, paid for entirely by him, and should also be required to pass a basic test acknowledging the adherence to the Judicial Guide Handbook Same for social workers. Instead, when it was discovered that a rampant trail of abuse existed inside the entire system, instead of reforming the processes, and opening them up to public scrutiny, the California Legislature voted them retroactive immunity. They cause immeasurable harm every day in the name of &quot;best interests of the child&quot;, and use unconstitutional burdens and rules of evidence such as unfounded hearsay placed on the accused to prove their case. Even Terrorists have more rights than a family member in Family Law of Juvenile Dependency cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is neither a mistake, not an anomaly. Santa Clara County District Attorney&#8217;s have a long recorded, and well documented history of denying criminal and civil litigants the due process of law required under the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14 amendments, as well as denying people in Juvenile Dependency or Family Lw courts basic assumed priveliges such as the PRESUMPTION OF INNONCENCE. Delores Carr is only the latest example of this incredibly corrupt, and illegal agency acting under the full knowledge of the Board of Supervisors such as Jim Beall, Don Gage, Blanca Alvarado et al of denial of due process of law. The abuses by the DA include but are not limited to, hiding exculpatory evidence, fabricating evidence, abuse of color of authority, violation of civil rights freedoms such as free speech, the right to confront one&#8217;s accusers, and the use of Hearsay without corroborating evidence as is required under the findings of the US Supreme Court under Crawford V Washington, to name but a few. Delores Carr, Ben Fields, and Jamie Stringfield all belong in PRISON for what they engaged in on a daily basis, and for any of them to assert they &#8220;uphold the law&#8221; is a flat out farce. The abuse they have subjected innocent parties to is intolerable, and is a legal outrage in every sense of the word. The judiciary in these courts is no better. As agents of the county, they are part and parcel of the problem. Perhaps if we removed Judicial and Prosecutorial immunity, and required them stand for independent citizen review, and opened the courts of Family Law and Juvenile dependency courts, there would be a small glimmer of hope for the wrongly accused, but I for one can tell you, there is NO JUSTICE in Santa Clara County, and these agents bound by law, throw out their oaths of office before they ever sit down in the morning. Each Judge should be required to carry a liability bond, paid for entirely by him, and should also be required to pass a basic test acknowledging the adherence to the Judicial Guide Handbook Same for social workers. Instead, when it was discovered that a rampant trail of abuse existed inside the entire system, instead of reforming the processes, and opening them up to public scrutiny, the California Legislature voted them retroactive immunity. They cause immeasurable harm every day in the name of &#8220;best interests of the child&#8221;, and use unconstitutional burdens and rules of evidence such as unfounded hearsay placed on the accused to prove their case. Even Terrorists have more rights than a family member in Family Law of Juvenile Dependency cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie1954</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384467</link>
		<dc:creator>Archie1954</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384467</guid>
		<description>The DA&#039;s actions are obstruction of justice and also in contempt of court either of which should result in a prison sentence for her. There needs to be a brave and incorruptable judge though to take on such egregious activity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DA&#8217;s actions are obstruction of justice and also in contempt of court either of which should result in a prison sentence for her. There needs to be a brave and incorruptable judge though to take on such egregious activity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384455</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384455</guid>
		<description>Actually, Carr has backtracked a little. She now says she will &quot;allow&quot; the judge to preside over misdemeanor cases (how generous of her).

Unfortunately, when the words child molester are included in ANY discussion or article, many people blank out any other words and blame &quot;the system&quot; for not locking the person up and throwing away the key, in this case the judge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Carr has backtracked a little. She now says she will &#8220;allow&#8221; the judge to preside over misdemeanor cases (how generous of her).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, when the words child molester are included in ANY discussion or article, many people blank out any other words and blame &#8220;the system&#8221; for not locking the person up and throwing away the key, in this case the judge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: God's Own Drunk</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384435</link>
		<dc:creator>God's Own Drunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384435</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a story of a prosecutor not being a total dick, although the cops still seem to be.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011027810_medicalpot10m.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a story of a prosecutor not being a total dick, although the cops still seem to be.</p>
<p><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011027810_medicalpot10m.html" rel="nofollow">http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011027810_medicalpot10m.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wavemancali</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384434</link>
		<dc:creator>Wavemancali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384434</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Last month, California Superior Court Judge Andrea Bryan  ordered the release of convicted child molester Augustin Uribe&lt;/i&gt;

If he has been released and the conviction has been overturned, this should read:

Last month, California Superior Court Judge Andrea Bryan  ordered the release of Augustin Uribe formerly convicted of child molestation.

The way it reads now, it seems the guy is a child molester that happens to also have been convicted, rather than some innocent guy that got railroaded which seems to be the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Last month, California Superior Court Judge Andrea Bryan  ordered the release of convicted child molester Augustin Uribe</i></p>
<p>If he has been released and the conviction has been overturned, this should read:</p>
<p>Last month, California Superior Court Judge Andrea Bryan  ordered the release of Augustin Uribe formerly convicted of child molestation.</p>
<p>The way it reads now, it seems the guy is a child molester that happens to also have been convicted, rather than some innocent guy that got railroaded which seems to be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Scorcho</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384431</link>
		<dc:creator>El Scorcho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384431</guid>
		<description>The court system should just assign every trial to the boycotted judges.  Default rulings should teach the prosecuters who is really in charge.  I don&#039;t mind letting a few guilty people go, if it means stopping government corruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The court system should just assign every trial to the boycotted judges.  Default rulings should teach the prosecuters who is really in charge.  I don&#8217;t mind letting a few guilty people go, if it means stopping government corruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384422</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384422</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Unfortunately, the political process doesn’t appear capable of holding Carr acountable, either. She’s favored to win reelection this year.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Unlike all those other times when incumbents ARE held accountable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Unfortunately, the political process doesn’t appear capable of holding Carr acountable, either. She’s favored to win reelection this year.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Unlike all those other times when incumbents ARE held accountable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev. "Suds" Pshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384404</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. "Suds" Pshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384404</guid>
		<description>This joker sounds like he took a page straight out a Scientology handbook</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This joker sounds like he took a page straight out a Scientology handbook</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Victoria</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384403</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384403</guid>
		<description>#4, I&#039;&#039;m sure if she just showed her DA credentials at the stop, Joe and his pal Dave Thomas would let her off.  Come to think about it, she and Thomas sound like twins separated at birth.

On the &quot;mistake&quot; issue, my experience is that it is we on the defense all the time discovering things through investigation that were withheld.  The DA claim is always the same.  Just a mistake, inadvertance, making it sound to the former/DA judge as if the defense is paranoid.

Lots of times, stuff comes out during trial for the very first time.  So, lucky defendant gets a mistrial and gets to go through the whole process again, after DA is given a sneak preview. In Colorado, if the court dismissed with prejudice the DA would likely appeal and win. 

Judges and attorneys are supposed to report misconduct to the bar, even basic ethical violations such as misrepresenting things to the court.  The judges never report it, even when big time stuff like violation of witness sequestration orders happen, the DAs coordinated the witness conference, and the DA lies to the judge about it.  Because the reporting requirement was being ignored, the Colorado Office of Attorney Regulation liberalized the requirement of reporting only if the offense displayed a pattern of misconduct of a serious nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4, I&#8221;m sure if she just showed her DA credentials at the stop, Joe and his pal Dave Thomas would let her off.  Come to think about it, she and Thomas sound like twins separated at birth.</p>
<p>On the &#8220;mistake&#8221; issue, my experience is that it is we on the defense all the time discovering things through investigation that were withheld.  The DA claim is always the same.  Just a mistake, inadvertance, making it sound to the former/DA judge as if the defense is paranoid.</p>
<p>Lots of times, stuff comes out during trial for the very first time.  So, lucky defendant gets a mistrial and gets to go through the whole process again, after DA is given a sneak preview. In Colorado, if the court dismissed with prejudice the DA would likely appeal and win. </p>
<p>Judges and attorneys are supposed to report misconduct to the bar, even basic ethical violations such as misrepresenting things to the court.  The judges never report it, even when big time stuff like violation of witness sequestration orders happen, the DAs coordinated the witness conference, and the DA lies to the judge about it.  Because the reporting requirement was being ignored, the Colorado Office of Attorney Regulation liberalized the requirement of reporting only if the offense displayed a pattern of misconduct of a serious nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike H</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384394</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384394</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m missing something here... If Uribe&#039;s conviction was overturned in 2008, why was he only granted release from prison last month?  

Was he serving time for separate crimes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m missing something here&#8230; If Uribe&#8217;s conviction was overturned in 2008, why was he only granted release from prison last month?  </p>
<p>Was he serving time for separate crimes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384393</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384393</guid>
		<description>is Jim Bell one of those enlightened men who do not discriminate based on gender?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is Jim Bell one of those enlightened men who do not discriminate based on gender?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical in CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384391</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical in CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384391</guid>
		<description>&quot;Unfortunately, the political process doesn’t appear capable of holding Carr acountable, either. She’s favored to win reelection this year.&quot;

Really, no!  I&#039;m shocked, shocked I tell you.

And if she lost the election, there&#039;d just be another fascist champing at the bit to take her place.

Democracy, the notion that the common folk know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard. [h/t HLM]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unfortunately, the political process doesn’t appear capable of holding Carr acountable, either. She’s favored to win reelection this year.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really, no!  I&#8217;m shocked, shocked I tell you.</p>
<p>And if she lost the election, there&#8217;d just be another fascist champing at the bit to take her place.</p>
<p>Democracy, the notion that the common folk know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard. [h/t HLM]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical in CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384389</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical in CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384389</guid>
		<description>This will not end well for Carr.

The State is patient, but the State will not tolerate a direct challenge to its authority.

I expect that the AG of CA will drop her a line, get her back on the reservation or she&#039;s toast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will not end well for Carr.</p>
<p>The State is patient, but the State will not tolerate a direct challenge to its authority.</p>
<p>I expect that the AG of CA will drop her a line, get her back on the reservation or she&#8217;s toast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384379</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384379</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I don&#039;t know if I should laugh or cry when I read these.  No one is held accountable for their actions anymore and too many are held accountable for actions that aren&#039;t even theirs.  Sad state our country has gotten itself into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I don&#8217;t know if I should laugh or cry when I read these.  No one is held accountable for their actions anymore and too many are held accountable for actions that aren&#8217;t even theirs.  Sad state our country has gotten itself into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384378</link>
		<dc:creator>gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384378</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Unfortunately, the political process doesn’t appear capable of holding Carr acountable, either.  She’s favored to win reelection this year.&lt;/i&gt;

Although she&#039;s the incumbent, it sounds like her opponent has a shot.

Donations to Carr&#039;s challenger Jeff Rosen can be made &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rosen4da.com/home.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Unfortunately, the political process doesn’t appear capable of holding Carr acountable, either.  She’s favored to win reelection this year.</i></p>
<p>Although she&#8217;s the incumbent, it sounds like her opponent has a shot.</p>
<p>Donations to Carr&#8217;s challenger Jeff Rosen can be made <a href="http://www.rosen4da.com/home.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick H.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384376</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384376</guid>
		<description>What an inhuman POS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an inhuman POS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chaney</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384371</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384371</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve written before about how rarely bad prosecutors are disciplined for their mistakes, even when those mistakes send innocent people to prison.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Please be careful with the word &quot;mistake&quot;, as that word suggests an accident or oversight.  In this case, it seems that they were acting intentionally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’ve written before about how rarely bad prosecutors are disciplined for their mistakes, even when those mistakes send innocent people to prison.</p></blockquote>
<p>Please be careful with the word &#8220;mistake&#8221;, as that word suggests an accident or oversight.  In this case, it seems that they were acting intentionally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384368</link>
		<dc:creator>coyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384368</guid>
		<description>Great.  Don&#039;t give our boys Thomas and Arpaio here in Arizona any ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great.  Don&#8217;t give our boys Thomas and Arpaio here in Arizona any ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/09/santa-clara-da-boycotts-judge-who-ruled-against-her/comment-page-1/#comment-384367</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15994#comment-384367</guid>
		<description>Judges usually decide where cases are sent for trial, not prosecutors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judges usually decide where cases are sent for trial, not prosecutors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

