<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Not Cut Military Spending?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:25:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJE</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384309</link>
		<dc:creator>SJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384309</guid>
		<description>Guido: you need to register in South Carolina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guido: you need to register in South Carolina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384285</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384285</guid>
		<description>&quot;Cutting or freezing military spending is unpatriotic and means you hate our troops.&quot; /end sarcasm right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cutting or freezing military spending is unpatriotic and means you hate our troops.&#8221; /end sarcasm right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paranoiastrksdp</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384280</link>
		<dc:creator>paranoiastrksdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384280</guid>
		<description>Mike T you&#039;ve convinced me. The military needs to get more of the money I earn. RIGHT FUCKING NOW. How can I sign my entire check over?

In fact I&#039;m going to start a letter campaign writing all of my representatives petitioning them to redirect all domestic funding to the military.

Once the military is getting 99% of the budget (gotta set aside 1% for overhead) we can finally go to war with EVERYBODY. We&#039;ll defeat them all and set up a one world government like star trek with replicators and shit.


Then we&#039;ll get around to patching the pot holes in the streets, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike T you&#8217;ve convinced me. The military needs to get more of the money I earn. RIGHT FUCKING NOW. How can I sign my entire check over?</p>
<p>In fact I&#8217;m going to start a letter campaign writing all of my representatives petitioning them to redirect all domestic funding to the military.</p>
<p>Once the military is getting 99% of the budget (gotta set aside 1% for overhead) we can finally go to war with EVERYBODY. We&#8217;ll defeat them all and set up a one world government like star trek with replicators and shit.</p>
<p>Then we&#8217;ll get around to patching the pot holes in the streets, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike T</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384189</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384189</guid>
		<description>#20

China is expected to have a blue water navy as powerful as ours by about 2020.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#20</p>
<p>China is expected to have a blue water navy as powerful as ours by about 2020.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike T</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384188</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384188</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Citation also needed.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Might be a little hard, since we&#039;re talking about predictions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Citation also needed.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Might be a little hard, since we&#8217;re talking about predictions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mallory</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384187</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mallory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384187</guid>
		<description>Mike @18
&quot;In 20 years, our debt will be bad enough that Congress will likely just “cancel it.” China will be angry at us, and our response will likely be “come and collect, assholes.”

And only a fool thinks that it would instantly go nuclear.&quot;

And how would they get their army over here?  And would they have enough ships to take the bodies back home?  Without going nuclear, no one has any chance of invading the US, unless we let them.   There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike @18<br />
&#8220;In 20 years, our debt will be bad enough that Congress will likely just “cancel it.” China will be angry at us, and our response will likely be “come and collect, assholes.”</p>
<p>And only a fool thinks that it would instantly go nuclear.&#8221;</p>
<p>And how would they get their army over here?  And would they have enough ships to take the bodies back home?  Without going nuclear, no one has any chance of invading the US, unless we let them.   There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattocracy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384183</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattocracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384183</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a lot of speculation to be so sure of.  Cancelling of debt, mutually assured destruction, etc.  Careful who you call a fool.

Citation also needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a lot of speculation to be so sure of.  Cancelling of debt, mutually assured destruction, etc.  Careful who you call a fool.</p>
<p>Citation also needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike T</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384180</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384180</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
It’s not going to happen.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, and that&#039;s what the capitalist theorists said right up until World War I happened. &quot;The Germans, French, British and Russians are too integrated and dependent on one another to go to war.&quot;

In 20 years, our debt will be bad enough that Congress will likely just &quot;cancel it.&quot; China will be angry at us, and our response will likely be &quot;come and collect, assholes.&quot;

And only a fool thinks that it would instantly go nuclear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
It’s not going to happen.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, and that&#8217;s what the capitalist theorists said right up until World War I happened. &#8220;The Germans, French, British and Russians are too integrated and dependent on one another to go to war.&#8221;</p>
<p>In 20 years, our debt will be bad enough that Congress will likely just &#8220;cancel it.&#8221; China will be angry at us, and our response will likely be &#8220;come and collect, assholes.&#8221;</p>
<p>And only a fool thinks that it would instantly go nuclear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saint Zero</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384178</link>
		<dc:creator>Saint Zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384178</guid>
		<description>The real reason there won&#039;t be a war with China is they own our debt.  If things get nasty, we won&#039;t have an economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real reason there won&#8217;t be a war with China is they own our debt.  If things get nasty, we won&#8217;t have an economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattocracy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384177</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattocracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384177</guid>
		<description>China is such an awesome boogy man.  Even better than the Russians since they are communists AND they look different than us.  I&#039;ll betchya the chances of us going to war with China is about as likely as going to war with the USSR in the 80&#039;s.  

It&#039;s not going to happen.  The only reason China has any economy is because we buy their shit.  War will immediately bring that to an end which is why I don&#039;t put a lot of stock in that scenario.  Industrialized countries don&#039;t wage war with other industrialized nations.  We wage war against 2nd and 3rd world nations that we&#039;re pretty sure we can defeat.

Fearing a war with China is as silly as fearing a martian invasion or an uprising of zombies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China is such an awesome boogy man.  Even better than the Russians since they are communists AND they look different than us.  I&#8217;ll betchya the chances of us going to war with China is about as likely as going to war with the USSR in the 80&#8242;s.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not going to happen.  The only reason China has any economy is because we buy their shit.  War will immediately bring that to an end which is why I don&#8217;t put a lot of stock in that scenario.  Industrialized countries don&#8217;t wage war with other industrialized nations.  We wage war against 2nd and 3rd world nations that we&#8217;re pretty sure we can defeat.</p>
<p>Fearing a war with China is as silly as fearing a martian invasion or an uprising of zombies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BamBam</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384153</link>
		<dc:creator>BamBam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384153</guid>
		<description>Spending money just to spend it so that you use up your budget so you get the same, or more, next year is wrong.  Anyone that carries out these actions, or agrees with them, is guilty of fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spending money just to spend it so that you use up your budget so you get the same, or more, next year is wrong.  Anyone that carries out these actions, or agrees with them, is guilty of fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BamBam</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384152</link>
		<dc:creator>BamBam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384152</guid>
		<description>Policing the globe isn&#039;t and shouldn&#039;t be the USA&#039;s responsibility (financial/moral/etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Policing the globe isn&#8217;t and shouldn&#8217;t be the USA&#8217;s responsibility (financial/moral/etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilburn</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384151</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384151</guid>
		<description>I remember back in 1976, an ET (Electronics Technician) on our ship was repairing the surface search radar repeater (the radar is like a TV camera; the repeater is like a TV set). He needed a resistor in order to finish the repair. The particular resistor he needed was priced at $50.00, thru the U.S. Navy supply system, but was unavailable and on back-order.

He went off-base to a civilian electronics store (Radio Shack) and purchased the particular resistor he needed for $3.00 and tax…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember back in 1976, an ET (Electronics Technician) on our ship was repairing the surface search radar repeater (the radar is like a TV camera; the repeater is like a TV set). He needed a resistor in order to finish the repair. The particular resistor he needed was priced at $50.00, thru the U.S. Navy supply system, but was unavailable and on back-order.</p>
<p>He went off-base to a civilian electronics store (Radio Shack) and purchased the particular resistor he needed for $3.00 and tax…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJE</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384150</link>
		<dc:creator>SJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384150</guid>
		<description>The military has the capability to pick, but it has a very big conflict of interest problem.  Government salaries for top civilian and military people are a fraction of the private sector.  A general earns about as much as a mid-level lawyer in a big law firm. Colonels etc earn even less.   The brass can make big wads of $ once they leave working for contractors, as commentators, etc.  Its a pretty big incentive to be generous to military contractors or Fox News as opposed to, say, the veteran&#039;s hospitals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The military has the capability to pick, but it has a very big conflict of interest problem.  Government salaries for top civilian and military people are a fraction of the private sector.  A general earns about as much as a mid-level lawyer in a big law firm. Colonels etc earn even less.   The brass can make big wads of $ once they leave working for contractors, as commentators, etc.  Its a pretty big incentive to be generous to military contractors or Fox News as opposed to, say, the veteran&#8217;s hospitals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384141</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384141</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

&quot;That spending spree at the end of the year is exactly what we did in the Navy when I was in back in the 70s.&quot;

It was still that way in the 90&#039;s. I bet there has been no change.  I was a junior officer and at first wanted to try and not waste money on stuff we didn&#039;t need until my chief and the command master chief bought me a few beers in the Philippines and explained to me how things really work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>&#8220;That spending spree at the end of the year is exactly what we did in the Navy when I was in back in the 70s.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was still that way in the 90&#8242;s. I bet there has been no change.  I was a junior officer and at first wanted to try and not waste money on stuff we didn&#8217;t need until my chief and the command master chief bought me a few beers in the Philippines and explained to me how things really work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384140</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384140</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d hesitate to pin it on corporate greed.  The government is an experienced buyer of goods and services.  If it hasn&#039;t developed the skills to procure military hardware without being screwed, then they need to do some serious housecleaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d hesitate to pin it on corporate greed.  The government is an experienced buyer of goods and services.  If it hasn&#8217;t developed the skills to procure military hardware without being screwed, then they need to do some serious housecleaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roho</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384139</link>
		<dc:creator>Roho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384139</guid>
		<description>The US Government is starting to sound more and more like the lazy friend crashing on your couch.

&quot;Dude, my card&#039;s maxed out...but I think I can get the bank to increase my limit, so party&#039;s still on for Saturday?&quot;

&quot;It&#039;s cool man - I have a special fund to pay back the money I owe you.  The PS3 I bought came from a totally different fund.&quot;

&quot;I don&#039;t see why utilities should count towards what I owe - they&#039;re like, unavoidable things you&#039;d be paying anyways.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Government is starting to sound more and more like the lazy friend crashing on your couch.</p>
<p>&#8220;Dude, my card&#8217;s maxed out&#8230;but I think I can get the bank to increase my limit, so party&#8217;s still on for Saturday?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s cool man &#8211; I have a special fund to pay back the money I owe you.  The PS3 I bought came from a totally different fund.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t see why utilities should count towards what I owe &#8211; they&#8217;re like, unavoidable things you&#8217;d be paying anyways.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattocracy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384137</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattocracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384137</guid>
		<description>The corporations of the military industrial complex are the real culprits.  They are the ones that over charge for the maintenance and repairs of equipment, billing congress for military grade nuts and bolts for everything whether they need it or not.  That&#039;s where the real waste is.

These corporations are taking advantage of American patriotism and exploiting the tax payer, which is remarkably unpatriotic.  But point out that they are receivers of corporate welfare and screwing taxpayers, and the fiscally responsible conservatives switch gears to defend them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The corporations of the military industrial complex are the real culprits.  They are the ones that over charge for the maintenance and repairs of equipment, billing congress for military grade nuts and bolts for everything whether they need it or not.  That&#8217;s where the real waste is.</p>
<p>These corporations are taking advantage of American patriotism and exploiting the tax payer, which is remarkably unpatriotic.  But point out that they are receivers of corporate welfare and screwing taxpayers, and the fiscally responsible conservatives switch gears to defend them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384135</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384135</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;#2    Stephen 

One simple thing could cut military spending.

It seems like there is always an “end of fiscal year” spending spree because they will not get as much money next year if they don’t spend all of this years allotment. Spend it all or we will not get as much next year.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That spending spree at the end of the year is exactly what we did in the Navy when I was in back in the 70s.  It absolutely defeats any likelihood of budget shrinkage and very typical of the difference between spending your own money and someone else&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#2    Stephen </p>
<p>One simple thing could cut military spending.</p>
<p>It seems like there is always an “end of fiscal year” spending spree because they will not get as much money next year if they don’t spend all of this years allotment. Spend it all or we will not get as much next year.</p></blockquote>
<p>That spending spree at the end of the year is exactly what we did in the Navy when I was in back in the 70s.  It absolutely defeats any likelihood of budget shrinkage and very typical of the difference between spending your own money and someone else&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJE</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/08/why-not-cut-military-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-384131</link>
		<dc:creator>SJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15971#comment-384131</guid>
		<description>If we agree with Radley, will we have to register in South Carolina as &quot;subversives&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we agree with Radley, will we have to register in South Carolina as &#8220;subversives&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

