<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:46:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kid Handsome</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383760</link>
		<dc:creator>Kid Handsome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383760</guid>
		<description>I love Old Fasioneds (is that a proper usage), and I have never seen Mad Men, and doubt I ever will - though I have heard it&#039;s good.  I&#039;m just not very invested in &quot;good&quot; television.  Give me the crap on UPN, CW and the rest of the also rans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Old Fasioneds (is that a proper usage), and I have never seen Mad Men, and doubt I ever will &#8211; though I have heard it&#8217;s good.  I&#8217;m just not very invested in &#8220;good&#8221; television.  Give me the crap on UPN, CW and the rest of the also rans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlktoast</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383710</link>
		<dc:creator>mlktoast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383710</guid>
		<description>Radley, for the life of me I can&#039;t find anything in my comment regarding how long you have or have not been drinking bourbon. But thank you for the information.

As for the &quot;cocktail wave,&quot; no thank you. That&#039;s a bandwagon which I&#039;ll let pass me by. I&#039;ll stick to taking my whiskey neat and my lager cold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radley, for the life of me I can&#8217;t find anything in my comment regarding how long you have or have not been drinking bourbon. But thank you for the information.</p>
<p>As for the &#8220;cocktail wave,&#8221; no thank you. That&#8217;s a bandwagon which I&#8217;ll let pass me by. I&#8217;ll stick to taking my whiskey neat and my lager cold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radley Balko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383665</link>
		<dc:creator>Radley Balko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383665</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Gee, I wonder how people would be going on about the Old Fashioned were it not Don Draper’s drink of choice.
Sheesh…&lt;/em&gt;

Uh, I&#039;ve been drinking bourbon since I&#039;ve been drinking.

And the resurrection of the Old Fashioned is more about the cocktail wave, though Mad Men probably didn&#039;t hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Gee, I wonder how people would be going on about the Old Fashioned were it not Don Draper’s drink of choice.<br />
Sheesh…</em></p>
<p>Uh, I&#8217;ve been drinking bourbon since I&#8217;ve been drinking.</p>
<p>And the resurrection of the Old Fashioned is more about the cocktail wave, though Mad Men probably didn&#8217;t hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlktoast</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383643</link>
		<dc:creator>mlktoast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383643</guid>
		<description>Gee, I wonder how people would be going on about the Old Fashioned were it not Don Draper&#039;s drink of choice.
Sheesh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, I wonder how people would be going on about the Old Fashioned were it not Don Draper&#8217;s drink of choice.<br />
Sheesh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDub</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383564</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383564</guid>
		<description>I was in London recently and went to a bourbon blues bar that had waaaaay more of a bourbon selection than I&#039;ve ever seen before (of course, they&#039;d never even heard of Crown Royal.)  They made carefully crafted old-fashioneds (?) and used real absinthe in their sazeracs.  Man.  That was a bar.  Turned me on to the Mantini (tm).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in London recently and went to a bourbon blues bar that had waaaaay more of a bourbon selection than I&#8217;ve ever seen before (of course, they&#8217;d never even heard of Crown Royal.)  They made carefully crafted old-fashioneds (?) and used real absinthe in their sazeracs.  Man.  That was a bar.  Turned me on to the Mantini &#8482;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audrey the Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383556</link>
		<dc:creator>Audrey the Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383556</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I&#039;m just happy to see the Old Fashion making a comeback after far too many years of being the also-ran of cocktails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I&#8217;m just happy to see the Old Fashion making a comeback after far too many years of being the also-ran of cocktails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDub</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383534</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383534</guid>
		<description>I disagree.  It&#039;s not like we&#039;re talking about a whiskey sour here.  Old fashioned ingredients are designed to bring out the flavor of the bourbon.  Be a purist if you like, but scoff not.  It&#039;s unseemly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree.  It&#8217;s not like we&#8217;re talking about a whiskey sour here.  Old fashioned ingredients are designed to bring out the flavor of the bourbon.  Be a purist if you like, but scoff not.  It&#8217;s unseemly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Venlet</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383494</link>
		<dc:creator>John Venlet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383494</guid>
		<description>Radley, use some cheaper grade of bourbon, say a blend, rather than Woodford for your old fashioned.  Woodford is too good a single barrel to be spoiled by additives. Woodford should be enjoyed neat, on the rocks, or with a splash of spring water.  Preferably neat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radley, use some cheaper grade of bourbon, say a blend, rather than Woodford for your old fashioned.  Woodford is too good a single barrel to be spoiled by additives. Woodford should be enjoyed neat, on the rocks, or with a splash of spring water.  Preferably neat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlktoast</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383471</link>
		<dc:creator>mlktoast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383471</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; You would adulterate Woodford by using it in a mixed drink?

I&#039;d like to second that. 
That&#039;s like mixing 21-year Bowmore with Dr. Pepper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; You would adulterate Woodford by using it in a mixed drink?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to second that.<br />
That&#8217;s like mixing 21-year Bowmore with Dr. Pepper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kid Handsome</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383464</link>
		<dc:creator>Kid Handsome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383464</guid>
		<description>@#7 - the key is having a separate beer fridge.*

*Note, none of my dogs can do that.  Strangely, though, I&#039;m constantly getting up to let them out, give them food and water.  Heck, they&#039;ve trained me to give them treats just for coming back inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#7 &#8211; the key is having a separate beer fridge.*</p>
<p>*Note, none of my dogs can do that.  Strangely, though, I&#8217;m constantly getting up to let them out, give them food and water.  Heck, they&#8217;ve trained me to give them treats just for coming back inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383457</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383457</guid>
		<description>You would adulterate woodford by using it in a mixed drink?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would adulterate woodford by using it in a mixed drink?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chaney</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383455</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383455</guid>
		<description>Interesting story: cop kills black kid in LA with a taser.  Basically tasered the kid 14 times while he was handcuffed to a chair, while he and others taunted the kid and called him a nigger.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/02/louisiana.taser.death/index.html?hpt=T2

The story here is that the judge is sealing the videotape of the incident until after it&#039;s been shown in court at the cop&#039;s manslaughter trial.  You read that right: he was charged with manslaughter.  Wondering if LA has a felony-murder law, as that really sounds like felonious assault.

Of course, the standard question: why is only one of the cops being charged?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting story: cop kills black kid in LA with a taser.  Basically tasered the kid 14 times while he was handcuffed to a chair, while he and others taunted the kid and called him a nigger.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/02/louisiana.taser.death/index.html?hpt=T2" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/02/louisiana.taser.death/index.html?hpt=T2</a></p>
<p>The story here is that the judge is sealing the videotape of the incident until after it&#8217;s been shown in court at the cop&#8217;s manslaughter trial.  You read that right: he was charged with manslaughter.  Wondering if LA has a felony-murder law, as that really sounds like felonious assault.</p>
<p>Of course, the standard question: why is only one of the cops being charged?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383438</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383438</guid>
		<description>Big Deal!

As a previous poster mentioned, there are a lot of dogs out there that can do this.  They are dogs!  They live for this stuff!


Teach a cat to do that, and then I&#039;ll be impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Deal!</p>
<p>As a previous poster mentioned, there are a lot of dogs out there that can do this.  They are dogs!  They live for this stuff!</p>
<p>Teach a cat to do that, and then I&#8217;ll be impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClubMedSux</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383437</link>
		<dc:creator>ClubMedSux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383437</guid>
		<description>Not drinking much beer these days?  I bid you GOOD DAY, SIR. ;-)

Oh, and I&#039;m guessing our dogs would have a tough time with the tap handles on my kegerator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not drinking much beer these days?  I bid you GOOD DAY, SIR. ;-)</p>
<p>Oh, and I&#8217;m guessing our dogs would have a tough time with the tap handles on my kegerator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.G. Pym</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383429</link>
		<dc:creator>A.G. Pym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383429</guid>
		<description>Oh, and as for the old-fashioned, try Templeton&#039;s Prohibition Rye - even better in a Sazerac!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and as for the old-fashioned, try Templeton&#8217;s Prohibition Rye &#8211; even better in a Sazerac!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.G. Pym</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383427</link>
		<dc:creator>A.G. Pym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383427</guid>
		<description>Monkey butler/bartenders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monkey butler/bartenders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383426</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383426</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always wanted to teach my dog to do that as well, but I don&#039;t think it would be a good idea for him to know how to open the fridge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always wanted to teach my dog to do that as well, but I don&#8217;t think it would be a good idea for him to know how to open the fridge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy Dragon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383425</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383425</guid>
		<description>I thought Radley&#039;s dream was monkey butlers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Radley&#8217;s dream was monkey butlers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDub</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383419</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383419</guid>
		<description>Mmmmmmmmmm, Woodford old-fashioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmmmmmmmm, Woodford old-fashioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J sub D</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2010/02/02/this/comment-page-1/#comment-383418</link>
		<dc:creator>J sub D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15903#comment-383418</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhHD_5F1I7g</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhHD_5F1I7g" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhHD_5F1I7g</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

