<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dem Thievin&#8217; Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Jameson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-450466</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Jameson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-450466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with your point that investigative journalism doesn&#039;t need to be owned by the large corporate entities like the NYT or others like CNN, and also add to it this: If the news organizations aren&#039;t willing to do real investigative journalism they should shut their yappers. I see more fluffy junk content from places like CNN than insight into things that places like Wikileaks bring to the table.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your point that investigative journalism doesn&#8217;t need to be owned by the large corporate entities like the NYT or others like CNN, and also add to it this: If the news organizations aren&#8217;t willing to do real investigative journalism they should shut their yappers. I see more fluffy junk content from places like CNN than insight into things that places like Wikileaks bring to the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Noisy and Prolonged Death of Journalism &#124; JetLib News</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376818</link>
		<dc:creator>The Noisy and Prolonged Death of Journalism &#124; JetLib News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] journo to bemoan the death of journalism at the hands of the Internet; and investigative blogger Radley Balko quickly called B.S. on Gershon&#8217;s claim that (all?) bloggers simply steal from (all?) hard-working, honest, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] journo to bemoan the death of journalism at the hands of the Internet; and investigative blogger Radley Balko quickly called B.S. on Gershon&#8217;s claim that (all?) bloggers simply steal from (all?) hard-working, honest, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bellweather</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376799</link>
		<dc:creator>Bellweather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Muahaha, all you Internet weenies out there will rue the day you killed the dead tree pubs!  You&#039;ll eventually run out of fossil fuel and all your power-hungry data centers will go dark!!!  Everyone knows that newsprint is a sustainable renewable resource that&#039;ll outlive coal and oil...

Seriously tho, I think everyone needs to seriously get a grip about the &quot;demise&quot; of newsprint as a medium and worry about more pressing issues huh?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muahaha, all you Internet weenies out there will rue the day you killed the dead tree pubs!  You&#8217;ll eventually run out of fossil fuel and all your power-hungry data centers will go dark!!!  Everyone knows that newsprint is a sustainable renewable resource that&#8217;ll outlive coal and oil&#8230;</p>
<p>Seriously tho, I think everyone needs to seriously get a grip about the &#8220;demise&#8221; of newsprint as a medium and worry about more pressing issues huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ptpoo</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376778</link>
		<dc:creator>ptpoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes its the independant blogger with no important press ties that is &lt;i&gt;needed to break a politically charged story...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes its the independant blogger with no important press ties that is <i>needed to break a politically charged story&#8230;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376775</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, Mark Glaser was compiling a list of examples of online investigative journalism that rivaled the best that print journalism could offer.  The list mentioned pieces on everything from shady military contracts to chocolate scams.  In most cases, the subject matter was there for the print journalists, had they taken an interest and tried to look into it.  But they didn&#039;t.

http://tinyurl.com/qo2all]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, Mark Glaser was compiling a list of examples of online investigative journalism that rivaled the best that print journalism could offer.  The list mentioned pieces on everything from shady military contracts to chocolate scams.  In most cases, the subject matter was there for the print journalists, had they taken an interest and tried to look into it.  But they didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/qo2all" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/qo2all</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376770</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, let me get this straight: They complain about bloggers re-publishing their stories, when 90%-95% of the stories in the newspaper are re-published AP stories. Hmm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, let me get this straight: They complain about bloggers re-publishing their stories, when 90%-95% of the stories in the newspaper are re-published AP stories. Hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haapi</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376740</link>
		<dc:creator>Haapi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I about spit out my coffee reading Gerson saying, &quot;I dislike media bias as much as the next conservative.&quot;  He must not dislike it very much, then.

For an good example of non-traditional-media news gathering and beat reporting, we in Minnesota have The Uptake, whose comprehensive video coverage of the Franken-Coleman recount and trial was the main reason Coleman could not allege recount fraud.  It was all on tape.  All the rest of the media reported was sound-bites and decisions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I about spit out my coffee reading Gerson saying, &#8220;I dislike media bias as much as the next conservative.&#8221;  He must not dislike it very much, then.</p>
<p>For an good example of non-traditional-media news gathering and beat reporting, we in Minnesota have The Uptake, whose comprehensive video coverage of the Franken-Coleman recount and trial was the main reason Coleman could not allege recount fraud.  It was all on tape.  All the rest of the media reported was sound-bites and decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Petersen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376732</link>
		<dc:creator>John Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article. I operate a local political blog - most out of necessity because our local news outlets are not that good when it comes to reporting on what our local governments are doing. In a strange twist, the local news site actually comes to my blog to poach material. I wrote about it here: http://tredyffrinpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/main-line-media-news-needs-to-start.html.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I operate a local political blog &#8211; most out of necessity because our local news outlets are not that good when it comes to reporting on what our local governments are doing. In a strange twist, the local news site actually comes to my blog to poach material. I wrote about it here: <a href="http://tredyffrinpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/main-line-media-news-needs-to-start.html" rel="nofollow">http://tredyffrinpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/12/main-line-media-news-needs-to-start.html</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Free Press Only Counts if It’s on Dead Trees &#124; Cato @ Liberty &#124; The Red Monkey</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376686</link>
		<dc:creator>A Free Press Only Counts if It’s on Dead Trees &#124; Cato @ Liberty &#124; The Red Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and independent. Often, the very best journalism comes from complete outsiders. I’m reminded of Radley Balko’s recent (and excellent) takedown of the claim that Internet journalists are basically parasites: In 20 years, the Gannett-owned [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and independent. Often, the very best journalism comes from complete outsiders. I’m reminded of Radley Balko’s recent (and excellent) takedown of the claim that Internet journalists are basically parasites: In 20 years, the Gannett-owned [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Free Press Only Counts if It’s on Dead Trees &#124; Think Tank West</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376468</link>
		<dc:creator>A Free Press Only Counts if It’s on Dead Trees &#124; Think Tank West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] independent. Often, the very best journalism comes from complete outsiders. I&#8217;m reminded of Radley Balko&#8217;s recent (and excellent) takedown of the claim that Internet journalists are basically parasites: In 20 years, the Gannett-owned [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] independent. Often, the very best journalism comes from complete outsiders. I&rsquo;m reminded of Radley Balko&rsquo;s recent (and excellent) takedown of the claim that Internet journalists are basically parasites: In 20 years, the Gannett-owned [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376153</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was still in school about 10 years ago, I spent a week in DC at a seminar that was tied in to a school project.  One of the speakers was the Washington reporter for I think the Boston paper.  He was speaking about the difficulties of the newspaper business, and he made the comment &quot;that if you get on an elevator in Boston, Washington, or New York you assume that the other people in the elevator have read at least one and probably two newspapers that morning, in College Station, Texas and Lansing, Michigan you assume that they haven&#039;t looked at the news at all.&quot;  The room was filled mostly with Texas A&amp;M and Michigan State students which is why I guess he decided to take a pot shot at those towns.  The pure disdain in this guys voice for us poor uneducated Middle America State School students was unbelievable.  

I raised my hand and told him that I had a copy of his paper right here and the leading item was last nights lottery numbers so I thought he might be overstating his importance to society.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was still in school about 10 years ago, I spent a week in DC at a seminar that was tied in to a school project.  One of the speakers was the Washington reporter for I think the Boston paper.  He was speaking about the difficulties of the newspaper business, and he made the comment &#8220;that if you get on an elevator in Boston, Washington, or New York you assume that the other people in the elevator have read at least one and probably two newspapers that morning, in College Station, Texas and Lansing, Michigan you assume that they haven&#8217;t looked at the news at all.&#8221;  The room was filled mostly with Texas A&amp;M and Michigan State students which is why I guess he decided to take a pot shot at those towns.  The pure disdain in this guys voice for us poor uneducated Middle America State School students was unbelievable.  </p>
<p>I raised my hand and told him that I had a copy of his paper right here and the leading item was last nights lottery numbers so I thought he might be overstating his importance to society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeZ</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376150</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;You obviously do your reporting with a biased against government and police and all of that&quot; 

Technically speaking I&#039;d say the reporting is done with a bias against police tactics and a certain authoritarian government mindset.  Not against Government and Police.  


John A states: &quot;...But I would (indeed, as noted by an earlier commentor, indirectly do in buying access to the Web)...&quot;

This actuallly doesn&#039;t seem quite right to me.  I don&#039;t want to see the NYTimes starting to recieve a share of the money I spend for Internet Connectivity.  Leading down this road seems like it would either raise my rates substantially or screw up net neutrality.   On the other hand I wouldn&#039;t be adverse to paying reasonable rates directly to the NYTimes for online access, but the content has to fit the media.   I probably wouldn&#039;t pay for reprints of their print stories.  With the internet the possibilites are so much greater than that.  Something more interactive though and ad free would be interesting.   Even the simple embedded linking to sources is something that adds a lot of value for little effort.  I&#039;d be willing to pay if they uploaded thier full data/interview notes as well as the analysis they ended up writing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You obviously do your reporting with a biased against government and police and all of that&#8221; </p>
<p>Technically speaking I&#8217;d say the reporting is done with a bias against police tactics and a certain authoritarian government mindset.  Not against Government and Police.  </p>
<p>John A states: &#8220;&#8230;But I would (indeed, as noted by an earlier commentor, indirectly do in buying access to the Web)&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>This actuallly doesn&#8217;t seem quite right to me.  I don&#8217;t want to see the NYTimes starting to recieve a share of the money I spend for Internet Connectivity.  Leading down this road seems like it would either raise my rates substantially or screw up net neutrality.   On the other hand I wouldn&#8217;t be adverse to paying reasonable rates directly to the NYTimes for online access, but the content has to fit the media.   I probably wouldn&#8217;t pay for reprints of their print stories.  With the internet the possibilites are so much greater than that.  Something more interactive though and ad free would be interesting.   Even the simple embedded linking to sources is something that adds a lot of value for little effort.  I&#8217;d be willing to pay if they uploaded thier full data/interview notes as well as the analysis they ended up writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if a blog gets all of their information from published sources, the blog can still add value through analysis, linking to older/related stories, and providing follow up.

Plus the value of driving people to the original story (if linked).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if a blog gets all of their information from published sources, the blog can still add value through analysis, linking to older/related stories, and providing follow up.</p>
<p>Plus the value of driving people to the original story (if linked).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judas Peckerwood</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376113</link>
		<dc:creator>Judas Peckerwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuck the whining dead tree papers that failed to evolve and now blame everybody else for their failure. And fuck the once-great but now pathetic WaPo doubly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck the whining dead tree papers that failed to evolve and now blame everybody else for their failure. And fuck the once-great but now pathetic WaPo doubly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dakota</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376079</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Radley hits on one key point everyone fails to mention. 

Investigating got simpler and cheaper with the advent of digital technology, then the internet connected eveyone to much of that information. Can I get an amen from anyone who remembers pouring over microfiche?

Anyone with a little money, and some spare hours can make a competent attempt at it. Quality will very but hasn&#039;t it always?Consumers always have to sort the wheat from the chaff. 

Gerson can whine all he wants but he can&#039;t wish away the work that some &quot;blog&quot; reporters have done and reputations they&#039;ve earned.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radley hits on one key point everyone fails to mention. </p>
<p>Investigating got simpler and cheaper with the advent of digital technology, then the internet connected eveyone to much of that information. Can I get an amen from anyone who remembers pouring over microfiche?</p>
<p>Anyone with a little money, and some spare hours can make a competent attempt at it. Quality will very but hasn&#8217;t it always?Consumers always have to sort the wheat from the chaff. </p>
<p>Gerson can whine all he wants but he can&#8217;t wish away the work that some &#8220;blog&#8221; reporters have done and reputations they&#8217;ve earned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danimal</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376070</link>
		<dc:creator>Danimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, Mr. Gearson, but dead tree is just not a viable distribution method any more. I&#039;m sure the guys who mashed together papyrus thought paper was an unfair game changer too, but eventually they got the message.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Mr. Gearson, but dead tree is just not a viable distribution method any more. I&#8217;m sure the guys who mashed together papyrus thought paper was an unfair game changer too, but eventually they got the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Longtorso</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376067</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Longtorso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...like when the MSN scooped all the blogs on Climategate, or Monica, or.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;like when the MSN scooped all the blogs on Climategate, or Monica, or&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuchundra</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376063</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuchundra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m tired of all the MSM whining about blogs eating their lunch. It&#039;s all bullshit. 

It&#039;s not the blogs who are killing the dead tree news, it&#039;s websites like Craigslist, Monster, Autotrader, etc. Newspapers&#039; big moneymaker has traditionally been the classified ad. Newspaper display ads had to compete with TV, radio, etc, but there was no real competition for the classified.  Many metropolitan areas have only one big daily, so the newspapers could charge monopoly rents and make out like a bandits. 

Newspapers were slow to catch on to this and held off on doing their own online classifieds so as not to cannibalize their dead tree classified ad profits. Now, of course, it&#039;s probably too late to do anything about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m tired of all the MSM whining about blogs eating their lunch. It&#8217;s all bullshit. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the blogs who are killing the dead tree news, it&#8217;s websites like Craigslist, Monster, Autotrader, etc. Newspapers&#8217; big moneymaker has traditionally been the classified ad. Newspaper display ads had to compete with TV, radio, etc, but there was no real competition for the classified.  Many metropolitan areas have only one big daily, so the newspapers could charge monopoly rents and make out like a bandits. </p>
<p>Newspapers were slow to catch on to this and held off on doing their own online classifieds so as not to cannibalize their dead tree classified ad profits. Now, of course, it&#8217;s probably too late to do anything about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376062</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the sum total of major papers and blogs is the best thing that could happen. Blogs seem to speed the flow of information. 

Why should I read all of every paper to get the stuff I want? Much better to go to an &quot;aggregator&quot; and quickly link to the stories I find of interest.

I certainly feel better informed about what is happening in the world than I did 20 yrs ago. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s just me turning into an old fart. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the sum total of major papers and blogs is the best thing that could happen. Blogs seem to speed the flow of information. </p>
<p>Why should I read all of every paper to get the stuff I want? Much better to go to an &#8220;aggregator&#8221; and quickly link to the stories I find of interest.</p>
<p>I certainly feel better informed about what is happening in the world than I did 20 yrs ago. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s just me turning into an old fart. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/30/dem-thievin-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-376061</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15355#comment-376061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good post, Radley.  I hate it when people on one side of the aisle or the other in this debate (I&#039;m not talking liberal/conservative aisle, I&#039;m talking bloggers/MSM here) think that the solution to their problems is the eradication of the other side.  Alternative media sources (see: blogs) often thrive because the mainstream media provide them with content to provide insightful commentary about.  Newspapers don&#039;t have unlimited print spaces, but blogs do.  TV news has a limited amount of time (or in the case of the cable news networks, a limited number of IQ points they can assume their audience has), but blogs can keep hammering an issue.  They can compliment each other very nicely if everyone isn&#039;t talking about how the other side must surrender.

That being said, not every blog is run by people who are doing investigative journalism.  Big, established press organizations rip off the little guys because they can get away with it, and as long as everyone thinks that there are sides to being on an effective media it is the general public who looks to the investigators for information who lose.  When Radley isn&#039;t cited for work that he has done, his site doesn&#039;t generate the revenue that supports his ability to keep reporting.  Without his reporting, the news orgs that steal his stories lose a great source for solid reporting because he can&#039;t afford to do as much of it anymore.  We all suffer while the finger-pointing goes, but at least there are more sides to this debate than TV versus newspapers now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Radley.  I hate it when people on one side of the aisle or the other in this debate (I&#8217;m not talking liberal/conservative aisle, I&#8217;m talking bloggers/MSM here) think that the solution to their problems is the eradication of the other side.  Alternative media sources (see: blogs) often thrive because the mainstream media provide them with content to provide insightful commentary about.  Newspapers don&#8217;t have unlimited print spaces, but blogs do.  TV news has a limited amount of time (or in the case of the cable news networks, a limited number of IQ points they can assume their audience has), but blogs can keep hammering an issue.  They can compliment each other very nicely if everyone isn&#8217;t talking about how the other side must surrender.</p>
<p>That being said, not every blog is run by people who are doing investigative journalism.  Big, established press organizations rip off the little guys because they can get away with it, and as long as everyone thinks that there are sides to being on an effective media it is the general public who looks to the investigators for information who lose.  When Radley isn&#8217;t cited for work that he has done, his site doesn&#8217;t generate the revenue that supports his ability to keep reporting.  Without his reporting, the news orgs that steal his stories lose a great source for solid reporting because he can&#8217;t afford to do as much of it anymore.  We all suffer while the finger-pointing goes, but at least there are more sides to this debate than TV versus newspapers now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
