<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morning Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg C</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373918</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373918</guid>
		<description>Why nitpick the facebook status story? I figure anything that will get charges dropped is a positive, and it&#039;s very unlikely this kid did anything deceptive. Of course someone could fake the status change, but why so deferential to the state?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why nitpick the facebook status story? I figure anything that will get charges dropped is a positive, and it&#8217;s very unlikely this kid did anything deceptive. Of course someone could fake the status change, but why so deferential to the state?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibCop</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373799</link>
		<dc:creator>LibCop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373799</guid>
		<description>&quot;I like to educate people that police officer isn’t in the top 20 of most dangerous jobs.&quot;

Before you try to &quot;educate&quot; people, you might want to educate yourself and use some current info in the right context.

http://www.boston.com/bostonworks/galleries/dangerous_jobs_2007?pg=2

http://www.classesandcareers.com/education/2009/09/25/2009s-10-most-dangerous-jobs/

#10. Police Officer.

Everytime someone trys to pull the &quot;oh, it&#039;s not that dangerous&quot; stuff I educate them to the truth (with numbers to back it up, unlike Bam).  The Bureau of Labor Statistics tracks 9000 jobs.  The top 10 are 10 out of 9000.  It&#039;s a bit idiotic to say that a job is not dangerous because it&#039;s statisticalyl less dangerous than NINE other jobs when it&#039;s STATISTICALLY MORE DANGEROUS THAN THE OTHER 8,989 JOBS.....

As an aside...

&quot;I spend a lot of time pointing out bad cops on this site, not because they’re indicative of the profession, but to point out the improper incentives we’ve set for police, and how poorly the criminal justice system deals with its own bad actors&quot;-Radley Balko

I really appreciated reading that, this is why what you&#039;re doing here is a good thing Mr. Balko. Real reform of anything (like Law Enforcement and things like ending prohibition) comes for real good faith effort, varifiable facts and discourse based on good information, not ideologically driven prejudice and ignorance as displayed by some who like to reply here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I like to educate people that police officer isn’t in the top 20 of most dangerous jobs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Before you try to &#8220;educate&#8221; people, you might want to educate yourself and use some current info in the right context.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonworks/galleries/dangerous_jobs_2007?pg=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/bostonworks/galleries/dangerous_jobs_2007?pg=2</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.classesandcareers.com/education/2009/09/25/2009s-10-most-dangerous-jobs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.classesandcareers.com/education/2009/09/25/2009s-10-most-dangerous-jobs/</a></p>
<p>#10. Police Officer.</p>
<p>Everytime someone trys to pull the &#8220;oh, it&#8217;s not that dangerous&#8221; stuff I educate them to the truth (with numbers to back it up, unlike Bam).  The Bureau of Labor Statistics tracks 9000 jobs.  The top 10 are 10 out of 9000.  It&#8217;s a bit idiotic to say that a job is not dangerous because it&#8217;s statisticalyl less dangerous than NINE other jobs when it&#8217;s STATISTICALLY MORE DANGEROUS THAN THE OTHER 8,989 JOBS&#8230;..</p>
<p>As an aside&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I spend a lot of time pointing out bad cops on this site, not because they’re indicative of the profession, but to point out the improper incentives we’ve set for police, and how poorly the criminal justice system deals with its own bad actors&#8221;-Radley Balko</p>
<p>I really appreciated reading that, this is why what you&#8217;re doing here is a good thing Mr. Balko. Real reform of anything (like Law Enforcement and things like ending prohibition) comes for real good faith effort, varifiable facts and discourse based on good information, not ideologically driven prejudice and ignorance as displayed by some who like to reply here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joev</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373798</link>
		<dc:creator>joev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373798</guid>
		<description>@ oatwhore

i&#039;ll eat a catfish poboy at markeys for ya tonite. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ oatwhore</p>
<p>i&#8217;ll eat a catfish poboy at markeys for ya tonite. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joev</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373797</link>
		<dc:creator>joev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373797</guid>
		<description>i love it when NOLA makes the news in a GOOD way. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love it when NOLA makes the news in a GOOD way. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktc2</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373788</link>
		<dc:creator>ktc2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373788</guid>
		<description>#18

You&#039;re right of course about the US Army being responsible. I can&#039;t tell you how many times I pulled guard duty with no ammunition. The dont&#039; let soldiers carry ammunition even when they are armed guards! 

Armed guards with no ammunition, only the army could find logic in that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#18</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right of course about the US Army being responsible. I can&#8217;t tell you how many times I pulled guard duty with no ammunition. The dont&#8217; let soldiers carry ammunition even when they are armed guards! </p>
<p>Armed guards with no ammunition, only the army could find logic in that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott clark</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373778</link>
		<dc:creator>scott clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373778</guid>
		<description>BamBam, 

I think their bullshit is intentional, I just can&#039;t figure out why they want to lie every time.  At some point, only the dumbest and most gullible will believe them.  Why wouldn&#039;t you at least sometimes tell the truth about the small things so that the big lies have more of a chance to be believed?  I guess they really don&#039;t have to worry about it since most everybody does believe the big lie that it is sweet and fitting to die for the State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BamBam, </p>
<p>I think their bullshit is intentional, I just can&#8217;t figure out why they want to lie every time.  At some point, only the dumbest and most gullible will believe them.  Why wouldn&#8217;t you at least sometimes tell the truth about the small things so that the big lies have more of a chance to be believed?  I guess they really don&#8217;t have to worry about it since most everybody does believe the big lie that it is sweet and fitting to die for the State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BamBam</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373770</link>
		<dc:creator>BamBam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373770</guid>
		<description>#29, do you think it&#039;s accidental every time that a bullshit story is crafted or exaggerated?  I submit that it&#039;s intentional, just like most things government, and people want to keep believing that people aren&#039;t so evil as to perpetrate the various acts that they do and that it&#039;s all just a series of slapstick comedy errors that are leading us to doom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#29, do you think it&#8217;s accidental every time that a bullshit story is crafted or exaggerated?  I submit that it&#8217;s intentional, just like most things government, and people want to keep believing that people aren&#8217;t so evil as to perpetrate the various acts that they do and that it&#8217;s all just a series of slapstick comedy errors that are leading us to doom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott clark</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373767</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373767</guid>
		<description>I know what you are saying about the lady cop and all, but my question is why the military wanted to advance the story of the 5&#039;2&quot; little lady hero over her more massive male partner.  The base was on lockdown for hours after the shootings. The army had time to talk to both those officers and others at the scene.  Why did they say let&#039;s go with mulneny as the hero and we&#039;ll just not mention your part in it big guy?  Why did they release the story of Jessica lynch being a lady rambo in 2003?  Why &#039;d they feel the need to tell a story about pat tillman.  It&#039;s like they don&#039;t want anyone to believe them ever.  Like they are carefully crafting a facade of always spewing bullshit around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you are saying about the lady cop and all, but my question is why the military wanted to advance the story of the 5&#8217;2&#8243; little lady hero over her more massive male partner.  The base was on lockdown for hours after the shootings. The army had time to talk to both those officers and others at the scene.  Why did they say let&#8217;s go with mulneny as the hero and we&#8217;ll just not mention your part in it big guy?  Why did they release the story of Jessica lynch being a lady rambo in 2003?  Why &#8216;d they feel the need to tell a story about pat tillman.  It&#8217;s like they don&#8217;t want anyone to believe them ever.  Like they are carefully crafting a facade of always spewing bullshit around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oatwhore</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373759</link>
		<dc:creator>Oatwhore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373759</guid>
		<description>I miss real po-boys. 

You just can&#039;t get that bread anywhere else. You can find loaves of bread that are close, but it&#039;s just not the same. Crispy, yet not very crunchy on the outside, but gooey and creamy on the inside. And then where are you going to find a fried catfish po-boy? Not around here. 

At least sometimes you might be able to find something resembling a decent muffaletta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss real po-boys. </p>
<p>You just can&#8217;t get that bread anywhere else. You can find loaves of bread that are close, but it&#8217;s just not the same. Crispy, yet not very crunchy on the outside, but gooey and creamy on the inside. And then where are you going to find a fried catfish po-boy? Not around here. </p>
<p>At least sometimes you might be able to find something resembling a decent muffaletta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aresen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373740</link>
		<dc:creator>Aresen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373740</guid>
		<description>BamBam

I know what you mean.

Unfortunately, the gun control crowd would say &lt;i&gt;&quot;But he was off duty! He shouldn&#039;t have had a gun at that time.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

To which I would like to reply &lt;i&gt;&quot;He&#039;s a fumble-fingered idiot and shouldn&#039;t have a gun in his hand&lt;/i&gt; at any time&lt;i&gt;. Yet you think he&#039;ll be safe with a gun just because he&#039;s punched the time clock?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BamBam</p>
<p>I know what you mean.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the gun control crowd would say <i>&#8220;But he was off duty! He shouldn&#8217;t have had a gun at that time.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>To which I would like to reply <i>&#8220;He&#8217;s a fumble-fingered idiot and shouldn&#8217;t have a gun in his hand</i> at any time<i>. Yet you think he&#8217;ll be safe with a gun just because he&#8217;s punched the time clock?&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BamBam</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373737</link>
		<dc:creator>BamBam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373737</guid>
		<description>Off-duty cop has to show off new pistol to friend, shoots other passenger in throat and kills him, given paid vacation while investigation ensues.  And some say that cops are the only ones who should have firearms (erroneous thinking for many reasons and on many levels).

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/42766.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off-duty cop has to show off new pistol to friend, shoots other passenger in throat and kills him, given paid vacation while investigation ensues.  And some say that cops are the only ones who should have firearms (erroneous thinking for many reasons and on many levels).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/42766.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/42766.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BamBam</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373729</link>
		<dc:creator>BamBam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373729</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I agree, I don’t care who shot him last. I’m glad she did her job. I just don’t like the narrative that was forwarded immediately after the incident without the full facts.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Fast food America demands real-time data so that conclusions can be jumped to without all of the facts.  MUST ... MAKE ... JUDGMENT ... WITHOUT ... ALL ... INFORMATION!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I agree, I don’t care who shot him last. I’m glad she did her job. I just don’t like the narrative that was forwarded immediately after the incident without the full facts.</p></blockquote>
<p>Fast food America demands real-time data so that conclusions can be jumped to without all of the facts.  MUST &#8230; MAKE &#8230; JUDGMENT &#8230; WITHOUT &#8230; ALL &#8230; INFORMATION!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BamBam</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373727</link>
		<dc:creator>BamBam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373727</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Cops say they put their lives on the line everyday, when that is blatantly not true. When they do, we (even some who know better) heap so much godliness upon them that it spills over to all wearing a clown suit.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I like to educate people that police officer isn&#039;t in the top 20 of most dangerous jobs.  Labor Dept. has statistics on most dangerous jobs.  Being data from a government agency, I prefer a second opinion from a non-government agency, but my research has shown that the rankings are accurate.  So next time you eat a tuna fish sandwich, a crab wonton, or throw a log in the fire, or fill up your garbage can, please heap hero praises on the tuna/crab fishermen, loggers, and garbage collectors, who have jobs that are in the top 10 most dangerous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Cops say they put their lives on the line everyday, when that is blatantly not true. When they do, we (even some who know better) heap so much godliness upon them that it spills over to all wearing a clown suit.</p></blockquote>
<p>I like to educate people that police officer isn&#8217;t in the top 20 of most dangerous jobs.  Labor Dept. has statistics on most dangerous jobs.  Being data from a government agency, I prefer a second opinion from a non-government agency, but my research has shown that the rankings are accurate.  So next time you eat a tuna fish sandwich, a crab wonton, or throw a log in the fire, or fill up your garbage can, please heap hero praises on the tuna/crab fishermen, loggers, and garbage collectors, who have jobs that are in the top 10 most dangerous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nando</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373718</link>
		<dc:creator>Nando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373718</guid>
		<description>@ #22

The thought of what you posted had come to mind.

The problem with it is that if the cops subpoena your ISP records it will show that you were VPNing or otherwise connected to your PC from another location at that very moment in time when your status was updated, thus casting doubt on where it came from.  The &quot;cleanest&quot; way to do it is to have an accomplice perform the action so that there is no question that someone phisically did it from that machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #22</p>
<p>The thought of what you posted had come to mind.</p>
<p>The problem with it is that if the cops subpoena your ISP records it will show that you were VPNing or otherwise connected to your PC from another location at that very moment in time when your status was updated, thus casting doubt on where it came from.  The &#8220;cleanest&#8221; way to do it is to have an accomplice perform the action so that there is no question that someone phisically did it from that machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wavemancali</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373716</link>
		<dc:creator>Wavemancali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373716</guid>
		<description>#14 Nando

I don&#039;t even need an accomplice. I can remotely control my home computer from any internet connection in the world. Anything I do while in control of it will come via my home IP address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#14 Nando</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even need an accomplice. I can remotely control my home computer from any internet connection in the world. Anything I do while in control of it will come via my home IP address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RWW</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373700</link>
		<dc:creator>RWW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373700</guid>
		<description>Oh man, nevermind. I read that over and over again, and only just now did I see that it says &quot;reputation,&quot; not &quot;refutation.&quot; The mind plays tricks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, nevermind. I read that over and over again, and only just now did I see that it says &#8220;reputation,&#8221; not &#8220;refutation.&#8221; The mind plays tricks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RWW</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373699</link>
		<dc:creator>RWW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373699</guid>
		<description>&quot;Basically explains the reputation of capitalism!&quot; - From the &quot;Harming intentionally, helping incidentally&quot; link.

What the hell are they talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Basically explains the reputation of capitalism!&#8221; &#8211; From the &#8220;Harming intentionally, helping incidentally&#8221; link.</p>
<p>What the hell are they talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perlhaqr</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373698</link>
		<dc:creator>perlhaqr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373698</guid>
		<description>Enyap: &lt;i&gt;In Cuba, the richest 1% does not own more than the poorest 90%.&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s ironically true.  In Cuba, the richest .0001% owns more than the poorest 99.9999%.  See, context is everything!  *headdesk*

&lt;i&gt;It has not bombed and shot hundreds of thousands of unarmed civilians.&lt;/i&gt;

Again, ironically true.  They didn&#039;t use bombs.  And the hundreds of thousands of unarmed civilians they shot were their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enyap: <i>In Cuba, the richest 1% does not own more than the poorest 90%.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s ironically true.  In Cuba, the richest .0001% owns more than the poorest 99.9999%.  See, context is everything!  *headdesk*</p>
<p><i>It has not bombed and shot hundreds of thousands of unarmed civilians.</i></p>
<p>Again, ironically true.  They didn&#8217;t use bombs.  And the hundreds of thousands of unarmed civilians they shot were their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris K.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373696</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373696</guid>
		<description>Radley, I agree, I don&#039;t care who shot him last. I&#039;m glad she did her job. I just don&#039;t like the narrative that was forwarded immediately after the incident without the full facts.
Now knowing more facts doesn&#039;t diminish her heroism.

But keep in mind the ARMY is what killed those soldiers by not allowing them to protect themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radley, I agree, I don&#8217;t care who shot him last. I&#8217;m glad she did her job. I just don&#8217;t like the narrative that was forwarded immediately after the incident without the full facts.<br />
Now knowing more facts doesn&#8217;t diminish her heroism.</p>
<p>But keep in mind the ARMY is what killed those soldiers by not allowing them to protect themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zargon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/11/12/morning-links-270/comment-page-1/#comment-373695</link>
		<dc:creator>Zargon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15139#comment-373695</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;#11
My question is…. Do the officers deserve praise for going above, and beyond the call of duty, or for simply doing the job for which they are employed?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The job for which they are employed is collecting revenue and putting people in prisons.  The end.

They deserve praise not as cops, but as human beings for the act of good they risked themselves to accomplish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#11<br />
My question is…. Do the officers deserve praise for going above, and beyond the call of duty, or for simply doing the job for which they are employed?</p></blockquote>
<p>The job for which they are employed is collecting revenue and putting people in prisons.  The end.</p>
<p>They deserve praise not as cops, but as human beings for the act of good they risked themselves to accomplish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

