<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lunch Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:59:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-372180</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-372180</guid>
		<description>I think the really sad thing that most of these comments lack is any compassion.  Unless you have a family member with special needs you don&#039;t seem to get where the hurt is coming from.  If you live with an Intellectual Disability (okay, mental retardation for those of you who hate PC words) you just can&#039;t defend yourself against the hatred.  It&#039;s up to us to try and make the word a little better for those being mocked.  Seeing someone here try to be clever by inserting the word retarded really makes me ill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the really sad thing that most of these comments lack is any compassion.  Unless you have a family member with special needs you don&#8217;t seem to get where the hurt is coming from.  If you live with an Intellectual Disability (okay, mental retardation for those of you who hate PC words) you just can&#8217;t defend yourself against the hatred.  It&#8217;s up to us to try and make the word a little better for those being mocked.  Seeing someone here try to be clever by inserting the word retarded really makes me ill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megs</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371813</link>
		<dc:creator>megs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371813</guid>
		<description>I do think &quot;ableism&quot; is one of those forgotten &quot;isms&quot;, or when it is handled, is handled terribly. Think of how many awesome people we&#039;ve had in real life who&#039;ve been missing limbs or in a wheelchair and then think of that one kid in the wheelchair stuck into an ad that reeks of artificial inclusion. The fictional portrayal lags WAY behind reality. And even when you get a good portrayal, the character only gets &quot;spotlight&quot; episodes that deal with their disability, not with any other problems/adventures.
However, I do disagree with the arguments against 30 Rock. I don&#039;t think a show where most of the cast members are unfeeling jerks and most of the temporary characters wildly extreme and often one-note and bizarre that disabled characters being portrayed in the same way is ableism. I think the show is consistent, but that does not mean it is above criticism on that front.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think &#8220;ableism&#8221; is one of those forgotten &#8220;isms&#8221;, or when it is handled, is handled terribly. Think of how many awesome people we&#8217;ve had in real life who&#8217;ve been missing limbs or in a wheelchair and then think of that one kid in the wheelchair stuck into an ad that reeks of artificial inclusion. The fictional portrayal lags WAY behind reality. And even when you get a good portrayal, the character only gets &#8220;spotlight&#8221; episodes that deal with their disability, not with any other problems/adventures.<br />
However, I do disagree with the arguments against 30 Rock. I don&#8217;t think a show where most of the cast members are unfeeling jerks and most of the temporary characters wildly extreme and often one-note and bizarre that disabled characters being portrayed in the same way is ableism. I think the show is consistent, but that does not mean it is above criticism on that front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: random guy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371807</link>
		<dc:creator>random guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371807</guid>
		<description>#41 I here you man. 

Being short I too have felt the iron boot of oppression. But I think we will fair better than you imagine, every crowded bar will be our sanctuary. And one should never underestimate a desperate man with a low center of gravity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#41 I here you man. </p>
<p>Being short I too have felt the iron boot of oppression. But I think we will fair better than you imagine, every crowded bar will be our sanctuary. And one should never underestimate a desperate man with a low center of gravity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371803</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371803</guid>
		<description>Ableism-a word you make up when you can&#039;t call someone a racist but you really really want to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ableism-a word you make up when you can&#8217;t call someone a racist but you really really want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371789</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371789</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;#40    colson

@ClassAction

uncool – lame – disabled people? Your argument is gay. In the overly dramatic, flaming, drag queen kinda way, not in a derogatory manner of speaking.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Apparently you haven&#039;t heard the Hillary Duff PSA about using the term &quot;gay&quot;.

The real challenge in this world comes with being short. If they ever need a victim for the next holocaust, it should be remembered short people are even easier to identify than Jews.  And while not trying to fuel the coming hysteria, I might point out that we are already being singled out for blatantly discriminatory exclusion.  If you think I&#039;m kidding, just check out the high speed rides next time you go to an amusement park.  There is always a sign that says &quot;You must be this tall to ride this attraction.&quot;  That&#039;s like having a sign at the airport that says &quot;If you look Arab, please report directly to the TSA baggage search table.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#40    colson</p>
<p>@ClassAction</p>
<p>uncool – lame – disabled people? Your argument is gay. In the overly dramatic, flaming, drag queen kinda way, not in a derogatory manner of speaking.</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently you haven&#8217;t heard the Hillary Duff PSA about using the term &#8220;gay&#8221;.</p>
<p>The real challenge in this world comes with being short. If they ever need a victim for the next holocaust, it should be remembered short people are even easier to identify than Jews.  And while not trying to fuel the coming hysteria, I might point out that we are already being singled out for blatantly discriminatory exclusion.  If you think I&#8217;m kidding, just check out the high speed rides next time you go to an amusement park.  There is always a sign that says &#8220;You must be this tall to ride this attraction.&#8221;  That&#8217;s like having a sign at the airport that says &#8220;If you look Arab, please report directly to the TSA baggage search table.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371785</link>
		<dc:creator>colson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371785</guid>
		<description>@ClassAction

uncool - lame - disabled people? Your argument is gay. In the overly dramatic, flaming, drag queen kinda way, not in a derogatory manner of  speaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ClassAction</p>
<p>uncool &#8211; lame &#8211; disabled people? Your argument is gay. In the overly dramatic, flaming, drag queen kinda way, not in a derogatory manner of  speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371781</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371781</guid>
		<description>Speaking of the new professionalism, here&#039;s the latest from our wild, wacky LEO&#039;s in Georgia.

www.ajc.com/news/atlanta-man-shot-in-175565.html

I guess there&#039;s good and bad here. He was actually indicted which is rare. And suspended without pay, believe it or not. On the other hand, GA law allows a cop to be present and address the grand jury considering whether to indict, a privilege not available to us peasants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of the new professionalism, here&#8217;s the latest from our wild, wacky LEO&#8217;s in Georgia.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta-man-shot-in-175565.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta-man-shot-in-175565.html</a></p>
<p>I guess there&#8217;s good and bad here. He was actually indicted which is rare. And suspended without pay, believe it or not. On the other hand, GA law allows a cop to be present and address the grand jury considering whether to indict, a privilege not available to us peasants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371780</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371780</guid>
		<description>The problem with sacred cows is that they travel in infinite herds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with sacred cows is that they travel in infinite herds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CC</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371774</link>
		<dc:creator>CC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371774</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s illegal anywhere to say &quot;I managed to jew him down and he sold me the car at a big discount.&quot;

But people will think you&#039;re tacky if you say that.  If you don&#039;t care if people think you&#039;re tacky, say whatever you want.  Using &quot;you&#039;re retarded&quot; to mean &quot;I don&#039;t like what you just wrote on the internet&quot; is similar. 

Similarly, I didn&#039;t say, and I don&#039;t think anyone else said, that 30 Rock shouldn&#039;t be allowed to make fun of the mentally disabled or anyone else that they want to.  I just don&#039;t think doing so is funny.  It&#039;s kinda shooting fish in a barrel, for one thing, and it seems kind of weird and desperate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s illegal anywhere to say &#8220;I managed to jew him down and he sold me the car at a big discount.&#8221;</p>
<p>But people will think you&#8217;re tacky if you say that.  If you don&#8217;t care if people think you&#8217;re tacky, say whatever you want.  Using &#8220;you&#8217;re retarded&#8221; to mean &#8220;I don&#8217;t like what you just wrote on the internet&#8221; is similar. </p>
<p>Similarly, I didn&#8217;t say, and I don&#8217;t think anyone else said, that 30 Rock shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to make fun of the mentally disabled or anyone else that they want to.  I just don&#8217;t think doing so is funny.  It&#8217;s kinda shooting fish in a barrel, for one thing, and it seems kind of weird and desperate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371762</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371762</guid>
		<description>Ableism is why we must not make fun of Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ableism is why we must not make fun of Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hate away, Gonzo #20</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371734</link>
		<dc:creator>Hate away, Gonzo #20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371734</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I hate it when people tell me what words I can’t say. The most infuriating thing is that that sort of censorship lacks a basic understanding of the nature of language. To whit...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Gonzo, you can&#039;t say &quot;whit&quot; (and reasonably expect your opinions on usage to be understood and respected) when you mean &quot;wit&quot; - an archaic synonym for &quot;know.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I hate it when people tell me what words I can’t say. The most infuriating thing is that that sort of censorship lacks a basic understanding of the nature of language. To whit&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Gonzo, you can&#8217;t say &#8220;whit&#8221; (and reasonably expect your opinions on usage to be understood and respected) when you mean &#8220;wit&#8221; &#8211; an archaic synonym for &#8220;know.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassAction</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371733</link>
		<dc:creator>ClassAction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371733</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with the direction the conversation has taken with regards to the blog about ableism. First, there&#039;s nothing totalitarian about objecting on your blog to the way that people with disabilities are being portrayed on a television show. You may be upset, angry, confused, or bemused by someone&#039;s argument that a term you are using is hurtful to others or misguided, but that doesn&#039;t make the practice of attempting to persuade you &quot;totalitarian.&quot; 

Second, while it&#039;s true that language changes, it&#039;s wrong to suggest that linguistic drift is merely conventional in the sense that the manner in which words drift is unrelated to their original meanings. Words have both definitions (denotations), and a cluster of &quot;feelings&quot; that surround them (connotations). When the denotation of a word changes, it&#039;s often in a manner that&#039;s related to its connotation. 

It&#039;s not by mere happenstance that one of the definitions of lame is &quot;uncool&quot; - that is in fact one of the most basic connotations about disabled (lame) people - that they are in fact uncool, unhip, and unworthy of attention. Similarly, it&#039;s not by accident that kids use &quot;gay&quot; now to mean stupid, ridiculous, or uncool. That is, in fact, the recent historical connotation of homosexual persons. 

Now, you may think this is no big deal, but it&#039;s pretty meager comfort to a disabled person for you to explain that no, you don&#039;t mean &quot;lame as in disabled&quot; you just mean it as &quot;uncool, the way disabled people have historically been viewed.&quot; That&#039;s probably why linguistic drift seems to happen so often for derogatory terms that describe people in minority situations; it&#039;s clearly &quot;no big deal&quot; to everybody else, who can&#039;t possibly imagine why others would be so &quot;sensitive.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with the direction the conversation has taken with regards to the blog about ableism. First, there&#8217;s nothing totalitarian about objecting on your blog to the way that people with disabilities are being portrayed on a television show. You may be upset, angry, confused, or bemused by someone&#8217;s argument that a term you are using is hurtful to others or misguided, but that doesn&#8217;t make the practice of attempting to persuade you &#8220;totalitarian.&#8221; </p>
<p>Second, while it&#8217;s true that language changes, it&#8217;s wrong to suggest that linguistic drift is merely conventional in the sense that the manner in which words drift is unrelated to their original meanings. Words have both definitions (denotations), and a cluster of &#8220;feelings&#8221; that surround them (connotations). When the denotation of a word changes, it&#8217;s often in a manner that&#8217;s related to its connotation. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not by mere happenstance that one of the definitions of lame is &#8220;uncool&#8221; &#8211; that is in fact one of the most basic connotations about disabled (lame) people &#8211; that they are in fact uncool, unhip, and unworthy of attention. Similarly, it&#8217;s not by accident that kids use &#8220;gay&#8221; now to mean stupid, ridiculous, or uncool. That is, in fact, the recent historical connotation of homosexual persons. </p>
<p>Now, you may think this is no big deal, but it&#8217;s pretty meager comfort to a disabled person for you to explain that no, you don&#8217;t mean &#8220;lame as in disabled&#8221; you just mean it as &#8220;uncool, the way disabled people have historically been viewed.&#8221; That&#8217;s probably why linguistic drift seems to happen so often for derogatory terms that describe people in minority situations; it&#8217;s clearly &#8220;no big deal&#8221; to everybody else, who can&#8217;t possibly imagine why others would be so &#8220;sensitive.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371731</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371731</guid>
		<description>Fuck.  Sex hysteria has infected the UK.  It&#039;s like cancer.  The way people talk about it, you&#039;d think unwelcome sex was some kind of contagious deadly pathogen that invades your body when you&#039;re merely walking down the street.

We have the sex trafficking hoopla here, too.  To hear the stories, you&#039;d think there that van loads of kids were being abducted from the nation&#039;s high schools on a daily basis and sold to rich republican business executives as disposable sex slaves.  In fact, every time I see a kid nowadays, I think to myself, &quot;Hey, they missed one!&quot;  

The flu kills thousands of people each year and it barely rates a second thought in most people&#039;s lives.  But the mere suggestion that kids are at risk of being snatched up and sold into sex slavery is probably responsible for the sale of more cell phones than all other reasons combined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck.  Sex hysteria has infected the UK.  It&#8217;s like cancer.  The way people talk about it, you&#8217;d think unwelcome sex was some kind of contagious deadly pathogen that invades your body when you&#8217;re merely walking down the street.</p>
<p>We have the sex trafficking hoopla here, too.  To hear the stories, you&#8217;d think there that van loads of kids were being abducted from the nation&#8217;s high schools on a daily basis and sold to rich republican business executives as disposable sex slaves.  In fact, every time I see a kid nowadays, I think to myself, &#8220;Hey, they missed one!&#8221;  </p>
<p>The flu kills thousands of people each year and it barely rates a second thought in most people&#8217;s lives.  But the mere suggestion that kids are at risk of being snatched up and sold into sex slavery is probably responsible for the sale of more cell phones than all other reasons combined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BamBam</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371728</link>
		<dc:creator>BamBam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371728</guid>
		<description>The Canadian thing is old news to me, but I&#039;m glad you found it.  The boot soles of the arrested protester give serious pause, but the accompanying video prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt.  It was sadly comical how the police originally denied it (what a surprise), but admitted the truth a few weeks later with the caveat that it was for Reason XYZ and for the children etc.  I would bet my life that this sort of thing happens a lot.  There is another video of a protest in New York where you can see a thug looking white guy marching with protesters, but he looks very much out of place, and is on the outside of the marchers, and when he approaches police he randomly shoves another protester, which was the &quot;signal&quot; for cops to break up the protest and arrest people, under the guise of &quot;those protesters are causing havoc&quot;.  One cop practically body checks a person on a bicycle, picks up the bike, then throws it on the downed protester.

All for the children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Canadian thing is old news to me, but I&#8217;m glad you found it.  The boot soles of the arrested protester give serious pause, but the accompanying video prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt.  It was sadly comical how the police originally denied it (what a surprise), but admitted the truth a few weeks later with the caveat that it was for Reason XYZ and for the children etc.  I would bet my life that this sort of thing happens a lot.  There is another video of a protest in New York where you can see a thug looking white guy marching with protesters, but he looks very much out of place, and is on the outside of the marchers, and when he approaches police he randomly shoves another protester, which was the &#8220;signal&#8221; for cops to break up the protest and arrest people, under the guise of &#8220;those protesters are causing havoc&#8221;.  One cop practically body checks a person on a bicycle, picks up the bike, then throws it on the downed protester.</p>
<p>All for the children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsmallwood</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371727</link>
		<dc:creator>dsmallwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371727</guid>
		<description>did anybody notice that the feminist blogger lists 
&quot;stuff white people do&quot; 
in her &quot;I READ THESE&quot; list?  

i thought her site was really spot-on, i mean, she nailed 30 Rock.    but as someone ably underprivileged i am deeply disappointed in her listing the &quot;stuff white people do&quot; site.     what about my site, &quot;stuff white people can&#039;t do&quot;?    why does she only help the able white people who are doing stuff?   c&#039;mon person, a little non-judgmental affection here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did anybody notice that the feminist blogger lists<br />
&#8220;stuff white people do&#8221;<br />
in her &#8220;I READ THESE&#8221; list?  </p>
<p>i thought her site was really spot-on, i mean, she nailed 30 Rock.    but as someone ably underprivileged i am deeply disappointed in her listing the &#8220;stuff white people do&#8221; site.     what about my site, &#8220;stuff white people can&#8217;t do&#8221;?    why does she only help the able white people who are doing stuff?   c&#8217;mon person, a little non-judgmental affection here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical in CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371724</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical in CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371724</guid>
		<description>#19 &#124;  seeker6079 -- &quot;Re dude and coffee and 0530.  He says it was 0530. She says it was 0830.&quot;

The d*** was on Pacific time and the c*** was on Eastern time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#19 |  seeker6079 &#8212; &#8220;Re dude and coffee and 0530.  He says it was 0530. She says it was 0830.&#8221;</p>
<p>The d*** was on Pacific time and the c*** was on Eastern time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in AL</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371709</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371709</guid>
		<description>&quot;The definition of ‘lame’ that connects to actual disability is more or less obsolete at this point, but we need to stop using it because of what it USED to mean?&quot;


Yeah, that&#039;s so retarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The definition of ‘lame’ that connects to actual disability is more or less obsolete at this point, but we need to stop using it because of what it USED to mean?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s so retarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tokin42</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371708</link>
		<dc:creator>Tokin42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371708</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;#15 &#124;   tb &#124;  October 27th, 2009 at 1:33 pm &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Citation anyone?

&lt;blockquote&gt;#16 &#124;   CC &#124;  October 27th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

I have to say that I agree that making fun of the mentally disabled isn’t funny. I’ve heard good things about how funny 30 Rock is. I’m surprised they felt they had to go there. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

//Know how I know you&#039;re retarded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#15 |   tb |  October 27th, 2009 at 1:33 pm </p></blockquote>
<p>Citation anyone?</p>
<blockquote><p>#16 |   CC |  October 27th, 2009 at 1:49 pm</p>
<p>I have to say that I agree that making fun of the mentally disabled isn’t funny. I’ve heard good things about how funny 30 Rock is. I’m surprised they felt they had to go there. </p></blockquote>
<p>//Know how I know you&#8217;re retarded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371701</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371701</guid>
		<description>The story about the Canadian police is pretty old. The police weren&#039;t just accused, they admitted to it (it was so obvious, they really had no choice).

Here is the CBC coverage from 2007:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAfzUOx53Rg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story about the Canadian police is pretty old. The police weren&#8217;t just accused, they admitted to it (it was so obvious, they really had no choice).</p>
<p>Here is the CBC coverage from 2007:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAfzUOx53Rg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAfzUOx53Rg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/10/27/lunch-links-51/comment-page-1/#comment-371700</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=15030#comment-371700</guid>
		<description>30 Rock makes fun of EVERYBODY. Rednecks, rich people, all the races, women, men, pretty people, ugly people. I&#039;d say it was &quot;ableism&quot; if they failed to make fun of the disabled now and again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30 Rock makes fun of EVERYBODY. Rednecks, rich people, all the races, women, men, pretty people, ugly people. I&#8217;d say it was &#8220;ableism&#8221; if they failed to make fun of the disabled now and again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

