<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Obama Birthers Are Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:07:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-2/#comment-330180</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-330180</guid>
		<description>Why would Hawaii keep records of people who &lt;i&gt;weren&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; born there? There&#039;s no such thing as a Health Department record that would &quot;indicate otherwise.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Hawaii keep records of people who <i>weren&#8217;t</i> born there? There&#8217;s no such thing as a Health Department record that would &#8220;indicate otherwise.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supercat</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-2/#comment-330095</link>
		<dc:creator>supercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-330095</guid>
		<description>Has any Hawaiian official made a clear and unequivocal statement, under penalty of perjury, that:

-1- They have access to all applicable official records which would show whether or not Obama was born in Hawaii.

-2- They have personally examined such records.

-3- Such records do in fact show that Obama was born in Hawaii, and there are no unexamined official records (including sealed ones) that might indicate otherwise.

I don&#039;t care about seeing a certificate which may or may not be genuine--I want a clear and unequivocal official statement.  The only statements I&#039;ve seen equivocated.  Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has any Hawaiian official made a clear and unequivocal statement, under penalty of perjury, that:</p>
<p>-1- They have access to all applicable official records which would show whether or not Obama was born in Hawaii.</p>
<p>-2- They have personally examined such records.</p>
<p>-3- Such records do in fact show that Obama was born in Hawaii, and there are no unexamined official records (including sealed ones) that might indicate otherwise.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care about seeing a certificate which may or may not be genuine&#8211;I want a clear and unequivocal official statement.  The only statements I&#8217;ve seen equivocated.  Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinandpuller</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329642</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinandpuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329642</guid>
		<description>I like what Michael Savage said the other night, along the lines of I don&#039;t care where Obama was born-he&#039;s the least &quot;American&quot; president we&#039;ve ever had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like what Michael Savage said the other night, along the lines of I don&#8217;t care where Obama was born-he&#8217;s the least &#8220;American&#8221; president we&#8217;ve ever had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinandpuller</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329641</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinandpuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329641</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m applying for another job and I have before me a Form I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification from Homland Security US Citizenship and Immigration Services.  Do presidents, congressmen, supreme court justices etc have to fill one out?  I also have a W-2 here-same question.

I suppose that Obama could check the box that denotes an alien authorized to work in the US.  I mean, he won right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m applying for another job and I have before me a Form I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification from Homland Security US Citizenship and Immigration Services.  Do presidents, congressmen, supreme court justices etc have to fill one out?  I also have a W-2 here-same question.</p>
<p>I suppose that Obama could check the box that denotes an alien authorized to work in the US.  I mean, he won right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329583</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329583</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;A “certificate” of live birth has been proffered, along with some blurry newspaper announcements, but every attempt to get a public copy of the actual birth certificate–

Is stone-walled every single time.&lt;/i&gt;

Because &lt;I&gt;Hawaii&#039;s Department of Health has no paper records.&lt;/I&gt; The certificate of live birth &lt;I&gt;is&lt;/I&gt; the actual birth certificate, now; there are no paper copies of any original record. There&#039;s nothing to make a copy &lt;I&gt;of.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A “certificate” of live birth has been proffered, along with some blurry newspaper announcements, but every attempt to get a public copy of the actual birth certificate–</p>
<p>Is stone-walled every single time.</i></p>
<p>Because <i>Hawaii&#8217;s Department of Health has no paper records.</i> The certificate of live birth <i>is</i> the actual birth certificate, now; there are no paper copies of any original record. There&#8217;s nothing to make a copy <i>of.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329505</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329505</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I have never given a crap where Obama was born, nor did I care where McCain was born.  I don&#039;t care which crook is claiming to be president; the matter is completely irrelevant, just like the Constitution these clowns claim to rule us by (while completely ignoring anything in it that would prevent them from doing what they want.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I have never given a crap where Obama was born, nor did I care where McCain was born.  I don&#8217;t care which crook is claiming to be president; the matter is completely irrelevant, just like the Constitution these clowns claim to rule us by (while completely ignoring anything in it that would prevent them from doing what they want.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jb</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329499</link>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329499</guid>
		<description>Notice . . .

A &quot;certificate&quot; of live birth has been proffered, along with some blurry newspaper announcements, but every attempt to get a public copy of the actual birth certificate--

Is stone-walled every single time.

Wanna kill the Birthers&#039; movement?  Produce a &quot;for public viewing&quot; copy of Obama&#039;s actual birth certificate.  Then the critics will be silenced.

End of subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice . . .</p>
<p>A &#8220;certificate&#8221; of live birth has been proffered, along with some blurry newspaper announcements, but every attempt to get a public copy of the actual birth certificate&#8211;</p>
<p>Is stone-walled every single time.</p>
<p>Wanna kill the Birthers&#8217; movement?  Produce a &#8220;for public viewing&#8221; copy of Obama&#8217;s actual birth certificate.  Then the critics will be silenced.</p>
<p>End of subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329475</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329475</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;When I do, I scan the original document and store it on a disk. I don’t re-type it into a new format and then destroy the original.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, great. You&#039;re not the Hawaii Health Department, which (again) went completely paperless in 2001.

&lt;i&gt;If birth announcements in newspapers are sufficient proof of identity, then we should all be outraged.&lt;/i&gt;

Right, I mean, it&#039;s totally reasonable to expect that the parents of a young Kenyan boy would infiltrate Hawaiian newspapers so that their son could become president of another country, someday.

&lt;i&gt;why let some guy run an entire country based on that?&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s similar to the fact that it takes a dermatologist a week to determine if it&#039;s a blackhead or a melanoma, but anybody with no training can instantly determine whether or not you&#039;ve died - even though the second test is a lot more important than the first.

And, yes, you&#039;re a crank. You&#039;re literally an insane person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>When I do, I scan the original document and store it on a disk. I don’t re-type it into a new format and then destroy the original.</i></p>
<p>Well, great. You&#8217;re not the Hawaii Health Department, which (again) went completely paperless in 2001.</p>
<p><i>If birth announcements in newspapers are sufficient proof of identity, then we should all be outraged.</i></p>
<p>Right, I mean, it&#8217;s totally reasonable to expect that the parents of a young Kenyan boy would infiltrate Hawaiian newspapers so that their son could become president of another country, someday.</p>
<p><i>why let some guy run an entire country based on that?</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s similar to the fact that it takes a dermatologist a week to determine if it&#8217;s a blackhead or a melanoma, but anybody with no training can instantly determine whether or not you&#8217;ve died &#8211; even though the second test is a lot more important than the first.</p>
<p>And, yes, you&#8217;re a crank. You&#8217;re literally an insane person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329472</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329472</guid>
		<description>No, I don&#039;t get it &quot;yet,&quot; and thanks for dismissing me and everyone who doesn&#039;t take the gubmint&#039;s word as gospel as &quot;cranks.&quot;

In my line of work, I have to archive everything, things that are seemingly way less important than a senator&#039;s birth record for what seems like forever.  When I do, I scan the original document and store it on a disk.  I don&#039;t re-type it into a new format and then destroy the original.  So I have what amounts to the original document as a PDF (older stuff on microfiche) and it looks a lot like the original document.  If I saw the scanned copy of the long form, I personally would not nit pick over its validity -- I&#039;m sure others would, though.  I&#039;m not sure I would jump on board without hearing the evidence for why it was deemed fake.

If birth announcements in newspapers are sufficient proof of identity, then we should all be outraged.  I can&#039;t show up at an airport security checkpoint or even renew my driver&#039;s license with 45 year old newspaper clippings, why let some guy run an entire country based on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t get it &#8220;yet,&#8221; and thanks for dismissing me and everyone who doesn&#8217;t take the gubmint&#8217;s word as gospel as &#8220;cranks.&#8221;</p>
<p>In my line of work, I have to archive everything, things that are seemingly way less important than a senator&#8217;s birth record for what seems like forever.  When I do, I scan the original document and store it on a disk.  I don&#8217;t re-type it into a new format and then destroy the original.  So I have what amounts to the original document as a PDF (older stuff on microfiche) and it looks a lot like the original document.  If I saw the scanned copy of the long form, I personally would not nit pick over its validity &#8212; I&#8217;m sure others would, though.  I&#8217;m not sure I would jump on board without hearing the evidence for why it was deemed fake.</p>
<p>If birth announcements in newspapers are sufficient proof of identity, then we should all be outraged.  I can&#8217;t show up at an airport security checkpoint or even renew my driver&#8217;s license with 45 year old newspaper clippings, why let some guy run an entire country based on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghjost</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329438</link>
		<dc:creator>ghjost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329438</guid>
		<description>woah, according to cognitive relativism, Marijuana is completely legal. I also have monstrously large genitalia, and no debt whatsoever. This is fantastic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woah, according to cognitive relativism, Marijuana is completely legal. I also have monstrously large genitalia, and no debt whatsoever. This is fantastic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329437</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329437</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; I don’t think that’s true.&lt;/i&gt;

Ok, I guess, but it&#039;s a matter of public record that Hawaii&#039;s Health Department went completely paperless in 2001. But, you don&#039;t think it&#039;s true.

Which is kind of my point - no evidence could convince you. If you can&#039;t handwave it away with &quot;laser printer&quot; nonsense, you&#039;ll just &lt;I&gt;disbelieve&lt;/i&gt; it. I imagine the Governor of Hawaii could come here and confirm that, yes, Hawaii&#039;s Health Department went paperless in 2001 and discarded all paper records, and it wouldn&#039;t matter - you still wouldn&#039;t &quot;think that&#039;s true.&quot; Whatever, you&#039;re a crank.

&lt;i&gt;I can print up a pretty convincing COLB on my laser printer saying I was born in Hawaii, doesn’t mean I actually was.&lt;/i&gt;

Why, and I&#039;m sure your laser printer could print two birth announcements in two different Hawaii newspapers, all the way back in 1969, too!

&lt;I&gt;would it be too much trouble for him to produce the typed-out long form to prove them wrong?&lt;/i&gt;

Since it no longer exists? Yes, it would be a bit of trouble, I suspect.

&lt;i&gt;States just destroy paper records and convert to electronic forms? &lt;/I&gt;

Yes!

&lt;I&gt;They don’t archive anything under Iron Mountain anymore?&lt;/i&gt;

No!

Do you get it, yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> I don’t think that’s true.</i></p>
<p>Ok, I guess, but it&#8217;s a matter of public record that Hawaii&#8217;s Health Department went completely paperless in 2001. But, you don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>Which is kind of my point &#8211; no evidence could convince you. If you can&#8217;t handwave it away with &#8220;laser printer&#8221; nonsense, you&#8217;ll just <i>disbelieve</i> it. I imagine the Governor of Hawaii could come here and confirm that, yes, Hawaii&#8217;s Health Department went paperless in 2001 and discarded all paper records, and it wouldn&#8217;t matter &#8211; you still wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;think that&#8217;s true.&#8221; Whatever, you&#8217;re a crank.</p>
<p><i>I can print up a pretty convincing COLB on my laser printer saying I was born in Hawaii, doesn’t mean I actually was.</i></p>
<p>Why, and I&#8217;m sure your laser printer could print two birth announcements in two different Hawaii newspapers, all the way back in 1969, too!</p>
<p><i>would it be too much trouble for him to produce the typed-out long form to prove them wrong?</i></p>
<p>Since it no longer exists? Yes, it would be a bit of trouble, I suspect.</p>
<p><i>States just destroy paper records and convert to electronic forms? </i></p>
<p>Yes!</p>
<p><i>They don’t archive anything under Iron Mountain anymore?</i></p>
<p>No!</p>
<p>Do you get it, yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329425</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329425</guid>
		<description>My last post came after your second.

States just destroy paper records and convert to electronic forms?  They don&#039;t archive anything under Iron Mountain anymore?

I just take everything the government says through its mouthpiece (the MSM) with a grain of salt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My last post came after your second.</p>
<p>States just destroy paper records and convert to electronic forms?  They don&#8217;t archive anything under Iron Mountain anymore?</p>
<p>I just take everything the government says through its mouthpiece (the MSM) with a grain of salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329420</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329420</guid>
		<description>You said, &quot;Hawaii only has electronic birth certificate records.&quot;  I don&#039;t think that&#039;s true.  I think someone at some time typed out a whole lot more information than is shown on the COLB put forth by the state of Hawaii.  If it exists for other people, why does it not exist for Obama?  I can print up a pretty convincing COLB on my laser printer saying I was born in Hawaii, doesn&#039;t mean I actually was.  Given that people in his family purport to have seen him born in Kenya, would it be too much trouble for him to produce the typed-out long form to prove them wrong? 

I&#039;m not sure why the government lying to the public is considered incomprehensible nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said, &#8220;Hawaii only has electronic birth certificate records.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s true.  I think someone at some time typed out a whole lot more information than is shown on the COLB put forth by the state of Hawaii.  If it exists for other people, why does it not exist for Obama?  I can print up a pretty convincing COLB on my laser printer saying I was born in Hawaii, doesn&#8217;t mean I actually was.  Given that people in his family purport to have seen him born in Kenya, would it be too much trouble for him to produce the typed-out long form to prove them wrong? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure why the government lying to the public is considered incomprehensible nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329415</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329415</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;simple explaination as to why it isn’t available&lt;/i&gt;

I thought we covered this. The simple explanation is that Hawaii has only electronic records now. Additionally, Barack Obama has been affirmed to be a citizen of the US, born in Hawaii, by the governor of Hawaii, that state&#039;s attorney general, multiple federal courts, the Federal Election Commission, the United States Senate, the United States House of Representatives, and former President Bush.

The &quot;simple explanation&quot; is that no amount of evidence will every suffice for the birther claims, because they can always handwave it away with &quot;kerning&quot; and &quot;laser printer&quot; and a ton of other nonsense that has no meaning except as conservative shibboleths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>simple explaination as to why it isn’t available</i></p>
<p>I thought we covered this. The simple explanation is that Hawaii has only electronic records now. Additionally, Barack Obama has been affirmed to be a citizen of the US, born in Hawaii, by the governor of Hawaii, that state&#8217;s attorney general, multiple federal courts, the Federal Election Commission, the United States Senate, the United States House of Representatives, and former President Bush.</p>
<p>The &#8220;simple explanation&#8221; is that no amount of evidence will every suffice for the birther claims, because they can always handwave it away with &#8220;kerning&#8221; and &#8220;laser printer&#8221; and a ton of other nonsense that has no meaning except as conservative shibboleths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329411</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329411</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I’m pretty sure the State of Hawaii didn’t have laser printers in 1961.&lt;/i&gt;

WTF?

Truly you birthers are wrapped up in incomprehensible nonsense. Do you really think your comment has any meaning to anyone who isn&#039;t steeped in your lame conspiracy theory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’m pretty sure the State of Hawaii didn’t have laser printers in 1961.</i></p>
<p>WTF?</p>
<p>Truly you birthers are wrapped up in incomprehensible nonsense. Do you really think your comment has any meaning to anyone who isn&#8217;t steeped in your lame conspiracy theory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike T</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329368</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329368</guid>
		<description>The State Department &lt;a href=&quot;http://travel.state.gov/law/info/info_609.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;has a list&lt;/a&gt; of some of the applicable requirements for people in Obama&#039;s situation. There is a scenario in which Obama might not have been born as a citizen: if his mother had not been in the United States for at least 5 years before giving birth to him. 

The law is very complicated, and most of you seem oblivious to the fact that there are technicalities in it which could theoretically bite Obama in the ass regarding his citizenship.

It&#039;s not just a matter of whether or not he is a US citizen, but also the nature of the citizenship he gained through his mother. The State Department&#039;s website seems to imply that if his mother hadn&#039;t been residing in the US for at least 5 years before giving birth to him that he would have been classified as a **naturalized** citizen.

IANAL, but I doubt there are any lawyers here who specialize in immigration law either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The State Department <a href="http://travel.state.gov/law/info/info_609.html" rel="nofollow">has a list</a> of some of the applicable requirements for people in Obama&#8217;s situation. There is a scenario in which Obama might not have been born as a citizen: if his mother had not been in the United States for at least 5 years before giving birth to him. </p>
<p>The law is very complicated, and most of you seem oblivious to the fact that there are technicalities in it which could theoretically bite Obama in the ass regarding his citizenship.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just a matter of whether or not he is a US citizen, but also the nature of the citizenship he gained through his mother. The State Department&#8217;s website seems to imply that if his mother hadn&#8217;t been residing in the US for at least 5 years before giving birth to him that he would have been classified as a **naturalized** citizen.</p>
<p>IANAL, but I doubt there are any lawyers here who specialize in immigration law either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hendry</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329359</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hendry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329359</guid>
		<description>&quot;If a copy of the original long-form would settle the matter&quot;

The COLB as produced by the relevant Hawaiian agency is sufficient legal proof. That&#039;s all that is required, for any purpose. Anyone demanding an &quot;original long-form&quot; birth certificate is just moving the goalposts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If a copy of the original long-form would settle the matter&#8221;</p>
<p>The COLB as produced by the relevant Hawaiian agency is sufficient legal proof. That&#8217;s all that is required, for any purpose. Anyone demanding an &#8220;original long-form&#8221; birth certificate is just moving the goalposts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinandpuller</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329104</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinandpuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329104</guid>
		<description>@25
 
I think Obama&#039;s birth was recorded in his dad&#039;s copy of &quot;Das Kapital&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@25</p>
<p>I think Obama&#8217;s birth was recorded in his dad&#8217;s copy of &#8220;Das Kapital&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Bowman</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329042</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329042</guid>
		<description>Very funny, Radley; your comments make it clear that, at heart, you are a simpleton. The so-called birthers have, of course, proved absolutely nothing. Of course, neither has Obama: he hasn&#039;t even tried.

We don&#039;t know about Obama, but actually we do know that McCain was ineligible, as well. So much for our Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very funny, Radley; your comments make it clear that, at heart, you are a simpleton. The so-called birthers have, of course, proved absolutely nothing. Of course, neither has Obama: he hasn&#8217;t even tried.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t know about Obama, but actually we do know that McCain was ineligible, as well. So much for our Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/27/why-the-obama-birthers-are-right/comment-page-1/#comment-329031</link>
		<dc:creator>Chance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13984#comment-329031</guid>
		<description>My birth certificate is full of typos and it looks like the typewriter was offset by a few millimeters.  Obviously a poor forgery.  The seal is hard as heck to see or feel.  Probably etched in later.  And I only have &lt;b&gt;one&lt;/b&gt; newspaper announcement.  Gosh, maybe I&#039;m not actually a citizen either?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My birth certificate is full of typos and it looks like the typewriter was offset by a few millimeters.  Obviously a poor forgery.  The seal is hard as heck to see or feel.  Probably etched in later.  And I only have <b>one</b> newspaper announcement.  Gosh, maybe I&#8217;m not actually a citizen either?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

