<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morning Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JThompson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-319510</link>
		<dc:creator>JThompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-319510</guid>
		<description>@Dave Krueger #22:
Yeah, it always cracks me up when people laugh at those backward &quot;other people&quot; too.
After all, it&#039;s not as if anyone&#039;s ever sued &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_ex_rel._Gerald_Mayo_v._Satan_and_His_Staff&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Satan&lt;/a&gt;.

They&#039;ve never had to take a gun and badge away from a crazy cop that saw &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,504090,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;demons everywhere&lt;/a&gt; either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave Krueger #22:<br />
Yeah, it always cracks me up when people laugh at those backward &#8220;other people&#8221; too.<br />
After all, it&#8217;s not as if anyone&#8217;s ever sued <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_ex_rel._Gerald_Mayo_v._Satan_and_His_Staff" rel="nofollow">Satan</a>.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve never had to take a gun and badge away from a crazy cop that saw <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,504090,00.html" rel="nofollow">demons everywhere</a> either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-319488</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-319488</guid>
		<description>Finally a story that involves a police attack/intimidation/snooping justifier dog that has a happy ending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally a story that involves a police attack/intimidation/snooping justifier dog that has a happy ending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneByTheCee</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-319370</link>
		<dc:creator>OneByTheCee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-319370</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Animal Cruelty .....

We now go to Tucumcari, New Mexico:

http://www.qcsunonline.com/news/cruelty-7347-apodaca-mayor.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Animal Cruelty &#8230;..</p>
<p>We now go to Tucumcari, New Mexico:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.qcsunonline.com/news/cruelty-7347-apodaca-mayor.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.qcsunonline.com/news/cruelty-7347-apodaca-mayor.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aspasia</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-319342</link>
		<dc:creator>Aspasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-319342</guid>
		<description>Re: The Genie

Hmm...so will that same court allow my case, Bonasera v. Fairy Godmother to go forward? Cuz, that broad OWES ME! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: The Genie</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230;so will that same court allow my case, Bonasera v. Fairy Godmother to go forward? Cuz, that broad OWES ME! :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-319151</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-319151</guid>
		<description>$100,000 police dog left in hot car. Saudis suing genies. Anti-terrorist comic book squads. You could never make this stuff up and sell it in a novel because it just isn&#039;t believable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$100,000 police dog left in hot car. Saudis suing genies. Anti-terrorist comic book squads. You could never make this stuff up and sell it in a novel because it just isn&#8217;t believable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob42</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-319150</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-319150</guid>
		<description>{off topic, but this really chaps my butt.}

On the bright side, when drug warriors stoop so low as to jack with peoples First  Amendment rights, it&#039;s a possible sign that their getting worried about the lie. But still, this is most disturbing.

Bob Newland is (or was) the director of the South Dakota chapter of NORML and a long time politically outspoken activist for reform of that state&#039;s restrictive stance on medical cannabis. He was caught with 4 ounces of the &lt;i&gt;prohibited plant&lt;/i&gt; that was destined for consumption by sick people. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2009/07/08/news/local/doc4a528132b9e9f476288923.txt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The judge&lt;/a&gt; thinks he let him off easy.

&lt;blockquote&gt;[Judge] Delaney also told Newland that he is not to take a public role in efforts to legalize marijuana for the next year.

Delaney suspended all but 45 days of the sentence however, any violation of the terms of his sentence will send Newland to jail for the full year. &quot;You are not going to take a position as a public figure who got a light sentence,&quot; Delaney warned Newland.

Delaney said Newland case was not a typical possession case.

&quot;I have an entire segment of society that will take note of this case,&quot; Delaney said. Several of Newland&#039;s friends and supporters were in the courtroom.

Delaney said Newland&#039;s advocacy was not an issue, what was an issue was the idea of an adult doing anything that would encourage kids to drink or do drugs. Juvenile courts are packed with kids who have drug problems, Delaney said.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Gee Judge Delany, how many of your doper juvies were influenced by Newland? Chances are, they don&#039;t even know who he is. It&#039;s ironic that the judge would attempt to rip away a person&#039;s first amendment rights based on such insane logic. 

What&#039;s next Delany? Total disregard of 4th amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure just because a well trained dog licks his balls? Asset forfeiture run amok? (Oops! Those are already common occurrences.)

But still, this new innovation in sacrificing liberties in support of an insane and ineffective drug policy should not go without recognition.  Congratulations Judge Delany. You are Bob42&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Drug Warrior DumbA$$™&lt;/i&gt; of the week. You haven&#039;t heard the last of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>{off topic, but this really chaps my butt.}</p>
<p>On the bright side, when drug warriors stoop so low as to jack with peoples First  Amendment rights, it&#8217;s a possible sign that their getting worried about the lie. But still, this is most disturbing.</p>
<p>Bob Newland is (or was) the director of the South Dakota chapter of NORML and a long time politically outspoken activist for reform of that state&#8217;s restrictive stance on medical cannabis. He was caught with 4 ounces of the <i>prohibited plant</i> that was destined for consumption by sick people. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2009/07/08/news/local/doc4a528132b9e9f476288923.txt" rel="nofollow">The judge</a> thinks he let him off easy.</p>
<blockquote><p>[Judge] Delaney also told Newland that he is not to take a public role in efforts to legalize marijuana for the next year.</p>
<p>Delaney suspended all but 45 days of the sentence however, any violation of the terms of his sentence will send Newland to jail for the full year. &#8220;You are not going to take a position as a public figure who got a light sentence,&#8221; Delaney warned Newland.</p>
<p>Delaney said Newland case was not a typical possession case.</p>
<p>&#8220;I have an entire segment of society that will take note of this case,&#8221; Delaney said. Several of Newland&#8217;s friends and supporters were in the courtroom.</p>
<p>Delaney said Newland&#8217;s advocacy was not an issue, what was an issue was the idea of an adult doing anything that would encourage kids to drink or do drugs. Juvenile courts are packed with kids who have drug problems, Delaney said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gee Judge Delany, how many of your doper juvies were influenced by Newland? Chances are, they don&#8217;t even know who he is. It&#8217;s ironic that the judge would attempt to rip away a person&#8217;s first amendment rights based on such insane logic. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s next Delany? Total disregard of 4th amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure just because a well trained dog licks his balls? Asset forfeiture run amok? (Oops! Those are already common occurrences.)</p>
<p>But still, this new innovation in sacrificing liberties in support of an insane and ineffective drug policy should not go without recognition.  Congratulations Judge Delany. You are Bob42&#8242;s <i>Drug Warrior DumbA$$™</i> of the week. You haven&#8217;t heard the last of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-319125</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-319125</guid>
		<description>This last weekend I was about 30 seconds away from busting out a car window because a dog was inside and in direct sunlight, but the &quot;owner&quot; (a tourist) came out of the store and took the dog out of the car before I&#039;d finished counting to 60.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This last weekend I was about 30 seconds away from busting out a car window because a dog was inside and in direct sunlight, but the &#8220;owner&#8221; (a tourist) came out of the store and took the dog out of the car before I&#8217;d finished counting to 60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-319119</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-319119</guid>
		<description>I think we can safely say that no major official is going to be prosecuted over the torture issue and I don&#039;t think they have scapegoats in this case like they did in the Abu Ghraib case.  No pictures are available (at least that we know of) that can be used as a catalyst to focus public attention on minor players.

In the end, this is some kind of grandstanding and/or application of pressure for reasons that probably don&#039;t even have anything to do with torture but are more about backroom political maneuvers.  Eventually it will drop of the MSM radar and we&#039;ll find ourselves wondering, &quot;Hey, whatever happened that torture investigation&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can safely say that no major official is going to be prosecuted over the torture issue and I don&#8217;t think they have scapegoats in this case like they did in the Abu Ghraib case.  No pictures are available (at least that we know of) that can be used as a catalyst to focus public attention on minor players.</p>
<p>In the end, this is some kind of grandstanding and/or application of pressure for reasons that probably don&#8217;t even have anything to do with torture but are more about backroom political maneuvers.  Eventually it will drop of the MSM radar and we&#8217;ll find ourselves wondering, &#8220;Hey, whatever happened that torture investigation&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-319053</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-319053</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;#31    Mike Leatherwood 

For about $5000 I can get you a dog that will “indicate” or “alert” on anything you want: Bombs, drugs, illegal aliens, booze, you name it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How about easy women?  Of course, they might deny it, but if the dog says they&#039;re easy, who the hell are they to argue, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#31    Mike Leatherwood </p>
<p>For about $5000 I can get you a dog that will “indicate” or “alert” on anything you want: Bombs, drugs, illegal aliens, booze, you name it.</p></blockquote>
<p>How about easy women?  Of course, they might deny it, but if the dog says they&#8217;re easy, who the hell are they to argue, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJE</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-319050</link>
		<dc:creator>SJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-319050</guid>
		<description>Re: $100K dog, including vehicle.  Just another sign of bad journalism by the MSM.  By that logic, a dog on an aircraft carrier is worth several billion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: $100K dog, including vehicle.  Just another sign of bad journalism by the MSM.  By that logic, a dog on an aircraft carrier is worth several billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Leatherwood</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-319043</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Leatherwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-319043</guid>
		<description>For about $5000 I can get you a dog that will &quot;indicate&quot; or &quot;alert&quot; on anything you want: Bombs, drugs, illegal aliens, booze, you name it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For about $5000 I can get you a dog that will &#8220;indicate&#8221; or &#8220;alert&#8221; on anything you want: Bombs, drugs, illegal aliens, booze, you name it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spleen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-318973</link>
		<dc:creator>Spleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-318973</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you add in the $50-60,000 cost of a ’specialized’ vehicle along with that, you can get up to 100 grand. It’s pretty specious, tho, since you wouldn’t think they’d have to buy a whole new vehicle for the next dog. &lt;/blockquote&gt;The cars come equipped with a noseprint validation ignition switch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you add in the $50-60,000 cost of a ’specialized’ vehicle along with that, you can get up to 100 grand. It’s pretty specious, tho, since you wouldn’t think they’d have to buy a whole new vehicle for the next dog. </p></blockquote>
<p>The cars come equipped with a noseprint validation ignition switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-318908</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-318908</guid>
		<description>It appears that the actual cost to train an explosive sniffing dog is about 35K. 

You can also get dual purpose dogs... trained in their specialty (Like finding bombs, drugs, or cell phones) AND are trained to be merciless defenders of justice as well. Something you absolutely need while doing traffic patrol.

Huh. I wonder how much a cell phone sniffing dog goes for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that the actual cost to train an explosive sniffing dog is about 35K. </p>
<p>You can also get dual purpose dogs&#8230; trained in their specialty (Like finding bombs, drugs, or cell phones) AND are trained to be merciless defenders of justice as well. Something you absolutely need while doing traffic patrol.</p>
<p>Huh. I wonder how much a cell phone sniffing dog goes for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highway</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-318813</link>
		<dc:creator>Highway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-318813</guid>
		<description>ALowe,

If you add in the $50-60,000 cost of a &#039;specialized&#039; vehicle along with that, you can get up to 100 grand.  It&#039;s pretty specious, tho, since you wouldn&#039;t think they&#039;d have to buy a whole new vehicle for the next dog.  

Just bad reporting, writing down whatever the cops wanted them to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALowe,</p>
<p>If you add in the $50-60,000 cost of a &#8216;specialized&#8217; vehicle along with that, you can get up to 100 grand.  It&#8217;s pretty specious, tho, since you wouldn&#8217;t think they&#8217;d have to buy a whole new vehicle for the next dog.  </p>
<p>Just bad reporting, writing down whatever the cops wanted them to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALowe</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-318781</link>
		<dc:creator>ALowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-318781</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one shocked by the $100,00 value placed on the dog in that article?

Are those real dollars or cop dollars (you know, the million-dollar brick of weed dollars)? If those are actual US Dollars, I think that&#039;s deserving of at least a little bit of outrage. A hundred grand for a dog? Seriously?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one shocked by the $100,00 value placed on the dog in that article?</p>
<p>Are those real dollars or cop dollars (you know, the million-dollar brick of weed dollars)? If those are actual US Dollars, I think that&#8217;s deserving of at least a little bit of outrage. A hundred grand for a dog? Seriously?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-318779</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-318779</guid>
		<description>Huh, it turns out cops kill their dogs all the time with their inherent stupidity.

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/95043

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Lovejoy had returned home at 9:15 a.m. Saturday after completing a three-hour parking enforcement detail in downtown Chandler. Lovejoy took Bandit in case he was called out to help in the investigation of the serial rapist.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which makes perfect sense... when you consider that the dog, Bandit, was trained to detect explosives. Wait, no it doesn&#039;t.

What, is there a government agency going around passing out explosive sniffing dogs or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, it turns out cops kill their dogs all the time with their inherent stupidity.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/95043" rel="nofollow">http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/95043</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
Lovejoy had returned home at 9:15 a.m. Saturday after completing a three-hour parking enforcement detail in downtown Chandler. Lovejoy took Bandit in case he was called out to help in the investigation of the serial rapist.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Which makes perfect sense&#8230; when you consider that the dog, Bandit, was trained to detect explosives. Wait, no it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>What, is there a government agency going around passing out explosive sniffing dogs or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roho</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-318708</link>
		<dc:creator>Roho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-318708</guid>
		<description>Officer kills Civilian&#039;s dog = &quot;It was just a dog.&quot;
Civilian kills Officer&#039;s dog = &quot;It was an officer of the force,&quot;  felony charges, etc.
My prediction:
Officer kills Officer&#039;s dog = Dog mysteriously reverts back to &quot;It was just a dog,&quot; only with more flowery prose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Officer kills Civilian&#8217;s dog = &#8220;It was just a dog.&#8221;<br />
Civilian kills Officer&#8217;s dog = &#8220;It was an officer of the force,&#8221;  felony charges, etc.<br />
My prediction:<br />
Officer kills Officer&#8217;s dog = Dog mysteriously reverts back to &#8220;It was just a dog,&#8221; only with more flowery prose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-318703</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-318703</guid>
		<description>The U.S. isn&#039;t going to have the same problem India has and here&#039;s why:  If anti-terrorism laws could be used as a means to oppress non-terrorists, Congress would have included proper safeguards against such abuses right in the laws.  The fact that there is very little in the laws to prevent that kind of abuse is proof that the abuse can&#039;t happen.

We need to start learning to trust our government.  Just imagine how much less stress you would have if you just stopped worrying about government this and government that.  Hell, I&#039;m probably going to out-live all you mofos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. isn&#8217;t going to have the same problem India has and here&#8217;s why:  If anti-terrorism laws could be used as a means to oppress non-terrorists, Congress would have included proper safeguards against such abuses right in the laws.  The fact that there is very little in the laws to prevent that kind of abuse is proof that the abuse can&#8217;t happen.</p>
<p>We need to start learning to trust our government.  Just imagine how much less stress you would have if you just stopped worrying about government this and government that.  Hell, I&#8217;m probably going to out-live all you mofos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-318698</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-318698</guid>
		<description>People are starting to see through the ruse of the &quot;____ sniffing dog&quot;, but I think they are going to soon be a thing of the past anyway.  They were just a convenient interim step between the days when the Fourth Amendment meant something and its being completely abandoned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are starting to see through the ruse of the &#8220;____ sniffing dog&#8221;, but I think they are going to soon be a thing of the past anyway.  They were just a convenient interim step between the days when the Fourth Amendment meant something and its being completely abandoned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/13/morning-links-216/comment-page-1/#comment-318692</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13847#comment-318692</guid>
		<description>I always get a kick out of western reaction to stories about the seemingly silly beliefs of those who subscribe to different religions or superstitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always get a kick out of western reaction to stories about the seemingly silly beliefs of those who subscribe to different religions or superstitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

