<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:04:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnJ</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-2/#comment-320763</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-320763</guid>
		<description>And what do you mean, &quot;you people&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what do you mean, &#8220;you people&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnJ</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-2/#comment-320730</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-320730</guid>
		<description>Why is it so important to you that the rest of us not object to your language? The question is whether or not the language is being used accurately. I&#039;m perfectly free to describe really tall buildings as &quot;small&quot; or to use &quot;blue&quot; to mean &quot;convenient&quot;, and other people are free to tell me that I&#039;m using the word incorrectly. And I&#039;m free to reject their words if I want. 

&quot;`And how exactly like an egg he is!&#039; she said aloud, standing with her hands ready to catch him, for she was every moment expecting him to fall.

`It&#039;s very provoking,&#039; Humpty Dumpty said after a long silence, looking away from Alice as he spoke, `to be called an egg -- very!&#039;

`I said you looked like an egg, Sir,&#039; Alice gently explained. `And some eggs are very pretty, you know,&#039; she added, hoping to turn her remark into a sort of compliment.

`Some people,&#039; said Humpty Dumpty, looking away from her as usual, `have no more sense than a baby!&#039; &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it so important to you that the rest of us not object to your language? The question is whether or not the language is being used accurately. I&#8217;m perfectly free to describe really tall buildings as &#8220;small&#8221; or to use &#8220;blue&#8221; to mean &#8220;convenient&#8221;, and other people are free to tell me that I&#8217;m using the word incorrectly. And I&#8217;m free to reject their words if I want. </p>
<p>&#8220;`And how exactly like an egg he is!&#8217; she said aloud, standing with her hands ready to catch him, for she was every moment expecting him to fall.</p>
<p>`It&#8217;s very provoking,&#8217; Humpty Dumpty said after a long silence, looking away from Alice as he spoke, `to be called an egg &#8212; very!&#8217;</p>
<p>`I said you looked like an egg, Sir,&#8217; Alice gently explained. `And some eggs are very pretty, you know,&#8217; she added, hoping to turn her remark into a sort of compliment.</p>
<p>`Some people,&#8217; said Humpty Dumpty, looking away from her as usual, `have no more sense than a baby!&#8217; &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-2/#comment-320720</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-320720</guid>
		<description>You people have to ask yourselves why it&#039;s so important to you that you can use terms like &quot;ghetto trash&quot; but the rest of us can&#039;t use terms like &quot;racist.&quot; It&#039;s well within your rights, as far as Radley allows, for you to describe all the black people you like as &quot;ghetto trash&quot;, just as its our right to describe you as &quot;racist&quot; for doing so.

Why is it so important to you that the rest of us not object to your disparaging terms for &quot;a subset of the population&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people have to ask yourselves why it&#8217;s so important to you that you can use terms like &#8220;ghetto trash&#8221; but the rest of us can&#8217;t use terms like &#8220;racist.&#8221; It&#8217;s well within your rights, as far as Radley allows, for you to describe all the black people you like as &#8220;ghetto trash&#8221;, just as its our right to describe you as &#8220;racist&#8221; for doing so.</p>
<p>Why is it so important to you that the rest of us not object to your disparaging terms for &#8220;a subset of the population&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supercat</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-2/#comment-320637</link>
		<dc:creator>supercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-320637</guid>
		<description>To some people, any disparaging term for a subset of the population will be construed as racist if the vast majority of the people in that subset happen to belong to a particular race, regardless of whether the definition of the subset would mention race at all.

Further, some people regard as racist any criticism of a cultural traits which happen to be found primarily among people of a particular race, again regardless of whether the definition of those traits would involve race.

The left has been very effective at convincing people that certain subsets of the population or cultural traits must be regarded as beyond reproach, since any criticism of them would be denounced as &#039;racist&#039;.  I see no reason to go along with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To some people, any disparaging term for a subset of the population will be construed as racist if the vast majority of the people in that subset happen to belong to a particular race, regardless of whether the definition of the subset would mention race at all.</p>
<p>Further, some people regard as racist any criticism of a cultural traits which happen to be found primarily among people of a particular race, again regardless of whether the definition of those traits would involve race.</p>
<p>The left has been very effective at convincing people that certain subsets of the population or cultural traits must be regarded as beyond reproach, since any criticism of them would be denounced as &#8216;racist&#8217;.  I see no reason to go along with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnJ</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-2/#comment-320053</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-320053</guid>
		<description>I guess I was wrong. No one seems interested in explaining to me the racial component of &quot;ghetto trash&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I was wrong. No one seems interested in explaining to me the racial component of &#8220;ghetto trash&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy-jay</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-2/#comment-319951</link>
		<dc:creator>billy-jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319951</guid>
		<description>@JohnJ:

ghetto + trash = racist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JohnJ:</p>
<p>ghetto + trash = racist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-319935</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319935</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Is it just me, or is Chet pretty much the liberal Dondero?&lt;/i&gt;

WTF? This is pretty much the definition of &quot;echo chamber&quot; discourse. Conservatives and libertarians really have hit &quot;peak wingnut&quot;, when their conversations, references, and shared identity become completely unintelligable to anyone who isn&#039;t one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Is it just me, or is Chet pretty much the liberal Dondero?</i></p>
<p>WTF? This is pretty much the definition of &#8220;echo chamber&#8221; discourse. Conservatives and libertarians really have hit &#8220;peak wingnut&#8221;, when their conversations, references, and shared identity become completely unintelligable to anyone who isn&#8217;t one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ParatrooperJJ</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-319924</link>
		<dc:creator>ParatrooperJJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319924</guid>
		<description>Byrd was actually a Grand Kleagle, not just a member of the KKK if I remember correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Byrd was actually a Grand Kleagle, not just a member of the KKK if I remember correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tokin42</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-319773</link>
		<dc:creator>Tokin42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319773</guid>
		<description>RE: Free Republic Site

I know this is late, but I&#039;ve been busy and haven&#039;t been paying attention.  
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/07/daily-kos-racist-nutjob-caught-in.html

The reporter who wrote the vancouver newspaper story is the same guy who has repeatedly suggested that folks at the Daily Kos write horrific comments on conservative sites and blame it on &quot;right wingers&quot;.  Just a happy coincidence that he&#039;s the guy who &quot;broke&quot; this story I&#039;m sure.  This is why you shouldn&#039;t take comments on a site at face value and why you probably shouldn&#039;t hold it against the owners of a site that has comments that are outrageous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Free Republic Site</p>
<p>I know this is late, but I&#8217;ve been busy and haven&#8217;t been paying attention.<br />
<a href="http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/07/daily-kos-racist-nutjob-caught-in.html" rel="nofollow">http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/07/daily-kos-racist-nutjob-caught-in.html</a></p>
<p>The reporter who wrote the vancouver newspaper story is the same guy who has repeatedly suggested that folks at the Daily Kos write horrific comments on conservative sites and blame it on &#8220;right wingers&#8221;.  Just a happy coincidence that he&#8217;s the guy who &#8220;broke&#8221; this story I&#8217;m sure.  This is why you shouldn&#8217;t take comments on a site at face value and why you probably shouldn&#8217;t hold it against the owners of a site that has comments that are outrageous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnJ</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-319452</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319452</guid>
		<description>Simple, straightforward questions aren&#039;t allowed on this site? It&#039;s a fair question, and I&#039;d be surprised if most of the commentors wouldn&#039;t be interested in your answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple, straightforward questions aren&#8217;t allowed on this site? It&#8217;s a fair question, and I&#8217;d be surprised if most of the commentors wouldn&#8217;t be interested in your answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-319428</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319428</guid>
		<description>Frank said:

      &quot;A cop dicked over by the system. I call that poetic justice.&quot;

No Frank, that&#039;s not justice, and its not poetic.  You and I know nothing of Mr. Spencer other than that he was wrongly convicted.  Try spending 20 years behind bars for something you didn&#039;t do and get back to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank said:</p>
<p>      &#8220;A cop dicked over by the system. I call that poetic justice.&#8221;</p>
<p>No Frank, that&#8217;s not justice, and its not poetic.  You and I know nothing of Mr. Spencer other than that he was wrongly convicted.  Try spending 20 years behind bars for something you didn&#8217;t do and get back to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-319414</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319414</guid>
		<description>Anybody care to guess how much retired detective Krause (in the phony WA child molestation case is collecting in pension money?

BTW, the whole state of Washington was a hotbed of phony child abuse cases all through the &#039;80s and &#039;90s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody care to guess how much retired detective Krause (in the phony WA child molestation case is collecting in pension money?</p>
<p>BTW, the whole state of Washington was a hotbed of phony child abuse cases all through the &#8217;80s and &#8217;90s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radley Balko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-319401</link>
		<dc:creator>Radley Balko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319401</guid>
		<description>If you have to ask a question like that, you belong on that site, not this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have to ask a question like that, you belong on that site, not this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnJ</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-319371</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319371</guid>
		<description>Which word refers to race, &quot;ghetto&quot; or &quot;trash&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which word refers to race, &#8220;ghetto&#8221; or &#8220;trash&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radley Balko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-319355</link>
		<dc:creator>Radley Balko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319355</guid>
		<description>#41:

I&#039;d say the phrase &quot;ghetto trash&quot; is unambiguously racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#41:</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say the phrase &#8220;ghetto trash&#8221; is unambiguously racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnJ</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-319343</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319343</guid>
		<description>Supercat,

All criticism of Obama or anyone affiliated with his administration or him personally is racist by default. If you disagree, that&#039;s just because you&#039;re racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supercat,</p>
<p>All criticism of Obama or anyone affiliated with his administration or him personally is racist by default. If you disagree, that&#8217;s just because you&#8217;re racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aspasia</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-319327</link>
		<dc:creator>Aspasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319327</guid>
		<description>Re: SCLC and sexuality.

News flash: Homophobia is rampant in the African-American communities that tend to be VERY religious. My cousin, I&#039;ll call him Jeff, was black, openly gay and had AIDS. He died two years ago. His sister, I&#039;ll call her Janet, is one of those Bible-thumping, minister-wife types who thinks Harry Potter is evil. Yeah. Anyway, she and her husband&#039;s congregation was supportive of Jeff but primarily because he too was a Bible-thumper. No, seriously. I doubt that would have been the case if he was anything like me: an unrepentant &quot;heathen&quot; and &quot;atheist&quot;.

People like my cousin Janet are upset whenever the gay community compares their fight for civil rights to the African-American civil rights movement (which wasn&#039;t JUST AA but don&#039;t tell THEM that). So, in short, I was not at all surprised to hear about Rev. Lee&#039;s situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: SCLC and sexuality.</p>
<p>News flash: Homophobia is rampant in the African-American communities that tend to be VERY religious. My cousin, I&#8217;ll call him Jeff, was black, openly gay and had AIDS. He died two years ago. His sister, I&#8217;ll call her Janet, is one of those Bible-thumping, minister-wife types who thinks Harry Potter is evil. Yeah. Anyway, she and her husband&#8217;s congregation was supportive of Jeff but primarily because he too was a Bible-thumper. No, seriously. I doubt that would have been the case if he was anything like me: an unrepentant &#8220;heathen&#8221; and &#8220;atheist&#8221;.</p>
<p>People like my cousin Janet are upset whenever the gay community compares their fight for civil rights to the African-American civil rights movement (which wasn&#8217;t JUST AA but don&#8217;t tell THEM that). So, in short, I was not at all surprised to hear about Rev. Lee&#8217;s situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supercat</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-319268</link>
		<dc:creator>supercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-319268</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t notice on the FR screenshot any posts about monkeys, etc.  Were those on later pages that were not captured?

While there were posts that referred to the girl&#039;s trashy appearance, I&#039;m not clear what was supposedly &quot;racist&quot; about them.  If the daughter were white, but were photographed in similar dress and pose, I see no reason to believe that would have caused her to be treated differently.  Further, anyone who tries to put forth a political message is fair game for criticism; those who do not wish to be subject to criticism should refrain from putting forth political messages.  Why was Malia wearing nuclear disarmament t-shirts, if not to convey a message?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t notice on the FR screenshot any posts about monkeys, etc.  Were those on later pages that were not captured?</p>
<p>While there were posts that referred to the girl&#8217;s trashy appearance, I&#8217;m not clear what was supposedly &#8220;racist&#8221; about them.  If the daughter were white, but were photographed in similar dress and pose, I see no reason to believe that would have caused her to be treated differently.  Further, anyone who tries to put forth a political message is fair game for criticism; those who do not wish to be subject to criticism should refrain from putting forth political messages.  Why was Malia wearing nuclear disarmament t-shirts, if not to convey a message?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-318676</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-318676</guid>
		<description>Regarding the abuse case (top item), not surprising.

&lt;blockquote&gt;He hired Seattle attorney Peter Camiel in the mid-1990s. Camiel and a private investigator uncovered disturbing facts about the investigation — including that prosecutors withheld medical exams that showed no evidence of abuse, despite Krause&#039;s claims that the children had been violently, repeatedly raped. Those discoveries led Gov. Gary Locke to commute Spencer&#039;s sentence in 2004.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Lets see, a full grown man violently rapes a 9 year old and 5 year old and they don&#039;t have any physical signs of abuse?  Huge red flag right there, and that the prosecutors witheld the information speaks of a possible conspiracy to convict this guy.  I&#039;d look to Krause and the supervisor mentioned in the story who was having an affair witht he accused&#039;s wife.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Krause, who declined an interview request from The Columbian in 2005, could not be reached Friday.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Gee, maybe on advice of her attorney because she knows she is about to be sued and may possibly face criminal charges...oh wait, a cop, sorry no charges she was just doing her job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the abuse case (top item), not surprising.</p>
<blockquote><p>He hired Seattle attorney Peter Camiel in the mid-1990s. Camiel and a private investigator uncovered disturbing facts about the investigation — including that prosecutors withheld medical exams that showed no evidence of abuse, despite Krause&#8217;s claims that the children had been violently, repeatedly raped. Those discoveries led Gov. Gary Locke to commute Spencer&#8217;s sentence in 2004.</p></blockquote>
<p>Lets see, a full grown man violently rapes a 9 year old and 5 year old and they don&#8217;t have any physical signs of abuse?  Huge red flag right there, and that the prosecutors witheld the information speaks of a possible conspiracy to convict this guy.  I&#8217;d look to Krause and the supervisor mentioned in the story who was having an affair witht he accused&#8217;s wife.</p>
<blockquote><p>Krause, who declined an interview request from The Columbian in 2005, could not be reached Friday.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gee, maybe on advice of her attorney because she knows she is about to be sued and may possibly face criminal charges&#8230;oh wait, a cop, sorry no charges she was just doing her job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Lebovitz</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/07/12/sunday-links-16/comment-page-1/#comment-318619</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Lebovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13802#comment-318619</guid>
		<description>Oppressed groups have prejudices mostly because oppressed groups are made of people, and prejudice is pretty normal. Also, being oppressed tends to mean having fewer resources for helping third parties. And contrary to what people keep being surprised by, being oppressed doesn&#039;t tend to make people more interested in being kind to everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oppressed groups have prejudices mostly because oppressed groups are made of people, and prejudice is pretty normal. Also, being oppressed tends to mean having fewer resources for helping third parties. And contrary to what people keep being surprised by, being oppressed doesn&#8217;t tend to make people more interested in being kind to everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

