<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Morning Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: April</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-2/#comment-297329</link>
		<dc:creator>April</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-297329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m getting a good laugh reading these posts!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting a good laugh reading these posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shorter #47</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-2/#comment-297318</link>
		<dc:creator>shorter #47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-297318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m, like, in fact, a really, really sensitive man.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m, like, in fact, a really, really sensitive man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feminazi poll-watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-2/#comment-297310</link>
		<dc:creator>feminazi poll-watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-297310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That does it! The silly thing voted 200 times!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That does it! The silly thing voted 200 times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-2/#comment-297142</link>
		<dc:creator>Windy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-297142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, another female here, 65 and absolutely not your stereotypical older woman.  Been interested in politics most of my adult life, been libertarian ever since my first memory -- always straining against the chains with which authority tried to bind me, regardless the nature of that authority (parents, teachers, bosses, government).  Never have voted for a Democrat nor a Republican (until Ron Paul).  I visit a lot of libertarian sites, Lew, FFF, here are merely three.  Also visit a lot of Dem sites and GOP sites, mainly to test their mettle and yank their chains, tho I do find some sympathy on Dem sites (for drug law reform), and some on the GOP sites (for limited government, privacy and property rights).  Figure I need to know my enemies, also good to know who can be counted on to help on a particular issue even if we don&#039;t agree on much else.  My #1 issue is the so called &quot;war on drugs&quot;, what I call Prohibition 2.0, but it is not, by no means, the only issue on which I &quot;agitate&quot;.  It is my opinion that we wouldn&#039;t be suffering under the early stages of a police state if there had never been a Harry Anslinger and W.R. Hearst to create the idea that some drugs should be banned from use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, another female here, 65 and absolutely not your stereotypical older woman.  Been interested in politics most of my adult life, been libertarian ever since my first memory &#8212; always straining against the chains with which authority tried to bind me, regardless the nature of that authority (parents, teachers, bosses, government).  Never have voted for a Democrat nor a Republican (until Ron Paul).  I visit a lot of libertarian sites, Lew, FFF, here are merely three.  Also visit a lot of Dem sites and GOP sites, mainly to test their mettle and yank their chains, tho I do find some sympathy on Dem sites (for drug law reform), and some on the GOP sites (for limited government, privacy and property rights).  Figure I need to know my enemies, also good to know who can be counted on to help on a particular issue even if we don&#8217;t agree on much else.  My #1 issue is the so called &#8220;war on drugs&#8221;, what I call Prohibition 2.0, but it is not, by no means, the only issue on which I &#8220;agitate&#8221;.  It is my opinion that we wouldn&#8217;t be suffering under the early stages of a police state if there had never been a Harry Anslinger and W.R. Hearst to create the idea that some drugs should be banned from use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296986</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@#47 &#124;   Dave Krueger:

At the risk of tooting my own horn, I guess I would agree that I am not stereotypical.  (Funny, I always translated that to being a freak of nature...)

With degrees in math and science, I would say your assessment of under-representation of women in engineering (and their participation here) is probably accurate, which is why I prefer having meaty discussions with men.  Even bright women, with really happening jobs, just don&#039;t seem interested in this kind of stuff. 

I just hope Radley doesn&#039;t do anything different to try to change the ratio.  Keep on keepin&#039; on!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#47 |   Dave Krueger:</p>
<p>At the risk of tooting my own horn, I guess I would agree that I am not stereotypical.  (Funny, I always translated that to being a freak of nature&#8230;)</p>
<p>With degrees in math and science, I would say your assessment of under-representation of women in engineering (and their participation here) is probably accurate, which is why I prefer having meaty discussions with men.  Even bright women, with really happening jobs, just don&#8217;t seem interested in this kind of stuff. </p>
<p>I just hope Radley doesn&#8217;t do anything different to try to change the ratio.  Keep on keepin&#8217; on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296968</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#15 April: Call me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#15 April: Call me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NAB</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296954</link>
		<dc:creator>NAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[maybe most women are like me, they get their news (including agitator articles) from an rss reader and don&#039;t have the time or inclinaton to answer random web polls. of course we could all be mindless, boob-having eye candy but honestly, suggesting things like that doesn&#039;t help you attract those of us who aren&#039;t.

and to #14 - as a chick, if you&#039;re attractive and read blogs like this you don&#039;t stay single for long so you&#039;d have to be very quick to catch one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe most women are like me, they get their news (including agitator articles) from an rss reader and don&#8217;t have the time or inclinaton to answer random web polls. of course we could all be mindless, boob-having eye candy but honestly, suggesting things like that doesn&#8217;t help you attract those of us who aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>and to #14 &#8211; as a chick, if you&#8217;re attractive and read blogs like this you don&#8217;t stay single for long so you&#8217;d have to be very quick to catch one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296950</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;#46    Mary 

@Dave Krueger:

I’m not overly fond of men in uniform or puppies. Next guess?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I was purposely and facetiously invoking the the calamity of stereotyping.  Actually, the part about the velcro was related to me by a young Asian women who really did have a thing for cops.  I thought adding it it was a nice touch. :)

In all honesty, I suspect women who frequent this site are anything but stereotypical.  I&#039;m disappointed by the ratio, but am clueless as to the actual cause.  I&#039;m an engineer and I find that women are unfortunately underrepresented in that area as well.  Maybe the reasons, whatever they may be, are similar.  Whether they&#039;re cultural or something else, I don&#039;t know.  Do you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#46    Mary </p>
<p>@Dave Krueger:</p>
<p>I’m not overly fond of men in uniform or puppies. Next guess?</p></blockquote>
<p>I was purposely and facetiously invoking the the calamity of stereotyping.  Actually, the part about the velcro was related to me by a young Asian women who really did have a thing for cops.  I thought adding it it was a nice touch. :)</p>
<p>In all honesty, I suspect women who frequent this site are anything but stereotypical.  I&#8217;m disappointed by the ratio, but am clueless as to the actual cause.  I&#8217;m an engineer and I find that women are unfortunately underrepresented in that area as well.  Maybe the reasons, whatever they may be, are similar.  Whether they&#8217;re cultural or something else, I don&#8217;t know.  Do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296905</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Dave Krueger:

I&#039;m not overly fond of men in uniform or puppies.  Next guess? :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave Krueger:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not overly fond of men in uniform or puppies.  Next guess? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296855</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, I guess I assumed that men would be in the majority, but I didn&#039;t expect it to be quite so skewed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I guess I assumed that men would be in the majority, but I didn&#8217;t expect it to be quite so skewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RogerX</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296770</link>
		<dc:creator>RogerX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I was told there are no girls on the interwebs&quot;

They are all over at myspace or the Twilight forums.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I was told there are no girls on the interwebs&#8221;</p>
<p>They are all over at myspace or the Twilight forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296750</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;#40    Angie 

Wow! Radley, perhaps you turn women off?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Radley posts a lot of bad stuff about cops and we all know how women love big strong guys in uniform and the crisp staticky sound of the velcro being peeled off as they remove their body armor in the shadowy half light of the partially open drapes.......

On the other hand, Radley posts pictures of puppies.  How can anyone not like someone who posts pictures of puppies?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#40    Angie </p>
<p>Wow! Radley, perhaps you turn women off?</p></blockquote>
<p>Radley posts a lot of bad stuff about cops and we all know how women love big strong guys in uniform and the crisp staticky sound of the velcro being peeled off as they remove their body armor in the shadowy half light of the partially open drapes&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Radley posts pictures of puppies.  How can anyone not like someone who posts pictures of puppies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bumbleshea</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296748</link>
		<dc:creator>Bumbleshea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with Hannah! #25

Where - Oh where - Are our reparations already? ;)

I&#039;m female, relatively young (32), &amp; single - do I get a specially trained monkey butler?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Hannah! #25</p>
<p>Where &#8211; Oh where &#8211; Are our reparations already? ;)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m female, relatively young (32), &amp; single &#8211; do I get a specially trained monkey butler?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bee</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296747</link>
		<dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is my (wholly anecdotal!) experience that younger folks, girls included, lean left, and distrust &quot;liberty&quot;.

And then when they have kids, women are often crushingly busy.  And tired.  And may find the threshold of male-dominated political sites to be too difficult to cross.

This site - and its comments - is pretty darn fair and balanced.  But a thoughtful, busy woman might see the comment boards at some of the popular libertarian-leaning sites and never come back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my (wholly anecdotal!) experience that younger folks, girls included, lean left, and distrust &#8220;liberty&#8221;.</p>
<p>And then when they have kids, women are often crushingly busy.  And tired.  And may find the threshold of male-dominated political sites to be too difficult to cross.</p>
<p>This site &#8211; and its comments &#8211; is pretty darn fair and balanced.  But a thoughtful, busy woman might see the comment boards at some of the popular libertarian-leaning sites and never come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296726</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow!  Radley, perhaps you turn women off?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  Radley, perhaps you turn women off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gonzo</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296714</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, down to 91/6. The market research into your libertarian dating service is looking pretty grim, Balko. What you need is a gimmick!

&quot;Tuesday is Ladies&#039; Night! Ladies Agitated Free!&quot;

You&#039;re welcome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, down to 91/6. The market research into your libertarian dating service is looking pretty grim, Balko. What you need is a gimmick!</p>
<p>&#8220;Tuesday is Ladies&#8217; Night! Ladies Agitated Free!&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in AL</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296690</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe any real study would show that large breasts are responsible for lowering the intelligence of the men looking at them more so than the women sporting them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe any real study would show that large breasts are responsible for lowering the intelligence of the men looking at them more so than the women sporting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 16 Shells from a 30.06</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296678</link>
		<dc:creator>16 Shells from a 30.06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sausagefest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sausagefest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296674</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#15  And if I didn&#039;t already have a ring in my nose B-) I might take you up on it.

90/10 after 492 votes (including my Y chromosome)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#15  And if I didn&#8217;t already have a ring in my nose B-) I might take you up on it.</p>
<p>90/10 after 492 votes (including my Y chromosome)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/06/15/monday-morning-poll-21/comment-page-1/#comment-296660</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=13481#comment-296660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think women are &quot;predisposed&quot; or &quot;hard-wired&quot; toward any political stance.  Cultural pressures may tend to push different genders in different directions, but I&#039;m going to be pretty skeptical of any statement where a man claims, with no evidence, that women are &quot;hard-wired&quot; toward a position that he thinks is wrong.

Also, most celebrity gossip sites are read overwhelmingly by men.  I assume PerezHilton fits this model, but I&#039;m not 100% certain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think women are &#8220;predisposed&#8221; or &#8220;hard-wired&#8221; toward any political stance.  Cultural pressures may tend to push different genders in different directions, but I&#8217;m going to be pretty skeptical of any statement where a man claims, with no evidence, that women are &#8220;hard-wired&#8221; toward a position that he thinks is wrong.</p>
<p>Also, most celebrity gossip sites are read overwhelmingly by men.  I assume PerezHilton fits this model, but I&#8217;m not 100% certain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
