Monday Morning Poll

Monday, June 15th, 2009

Just curious to see how lopsided the breakdown actually is, here.

I’m going to predict 70-30, men.

Digg it |  reddit | |  Fark

54 Responses to “Monday Morning Poll”

  1. #1 |  Cowboy Dan | 

    I think 70-30 is wishful thinking . . . more like 90-10.

  2. #2 |  Dave Krueger | 

    I’m guessing more like 80/20.

  3. #3 |  B | 

    I’d say 95/5.

  4. #4 |  billy-jay | 

    I was the 42nd to vote. As of now, it is 90/10, which would’ve been my guess.

  5. #5 |  Tokin42 | 

    I was told there are no girls on the interwebs

  6. #6 |  Mary | 

    No fair! You peeked.

    I recommend this site to everyone I have serious discussions with elsewhere. Yup, they are all men. A lot of them say their wives/GFs aren’t interested in politics, current events, reasoning/critical thinking, etc.

    If I were still dating, I could have a field day out there.

  7. #7 |  Donna | 

    Wow. I’m a 57 year old retired female and I check in every day! After years of corporate brainwashing I’m finally free to let my inner hippie free.

  8. #8 |  jet | 

    I’m another of the apparently rare breed of woman who reads this site. Sorry fellas, I’m taken.

  9. #9 |  Chris in AL | 

    Ugh! This place is a sausage-fest.

  10. #10 |  ChrisD | 

    Jeez, I guess I’ll go to my fantasy baseball web site to meet some girls then or maybe hang out at the local physics department.

  11. #11 |  paul | 

    where was “none of the above”?

  12. #12 |  Dave Krueger | 

    Cowboy Dan hit the nail on the head. One week’s free admission to the Agitator for Cowboy Dan.

    I have to be honest, though. If the name isn’t obviously female, I’m inclined to think the poster is male. It’s nice to know that the statistics bear me out and that I’m not just the shallow sexist pig.

  13. #13 |  Tokin42 | 

    #12 Dave,

    Just because your inclination is correct doesn’t mean you aren’t a sexist pig, just saying…

  14. #14 |  Hamburgler007 | 

    I think the real question is what percentage of the woman who visit here are single and attractive?

  15. #15 |  April | 

    Hey, I’m single , attractive & a rocket scientist!

  16. #16 |  Judi | 

    It’s okay ladies…the ‘numbers’ don’t tell the real story. Just because we are a ‘minority’ doesn’t mean we aren’t as powerful…we are just more compact and concetrated! LOL

  17. #17 |  Judi | 

    Oops! “Concentrated”

  18. #18 |  Erin | 

    I’m a mid-20s yuppie chick and this is the only political blog to have an honored place on my blog feed.

  19. #19 |  Dave Krueger | 

    #13 Tokin42

    #12 Dave,

    Just because your inclination is correct doesn’t mean you aren’t a sexist pig, just saying…

    You’re absolutely right. In fact, I’m keeping my eye on this thread hoping it degenerates into a discussion about whether big boobs is an indicator of intelligence. My wife told me “no”, punctuating her opinion with a lightning-speed face slap.

  20. #20 |  Leah | 

    Here and female, but already married (to another agitator reader, at least!). We do have a little girl we’re trying to raise with a healthy skepticism of authority though, maybe she’ll be reading in 10 years…

  21. #21 |  SusanK | 

    I was the 50th female to vote. Do I get a prize for that?
    I had no idea this was such a male-dominated area. I actually assumed posters without obvious gender references in their names were woman. I am the Anti Dave Krueger.

  22. #22 |  Dave Krueger | 

    #21 SusanK

    I am the Anti Dave Krueger.


  23. #23 |  Psion | 

    I refuse to be pigeon-holed like this.

  24. #24 |  Bronwyn | 

    Add my voice to the 10% chorus.

    Big boobs, check. But only because I’m nursing a Li’l Agitator.
    And yes, I’m taken.

    /waves to Leah, who’s nursing another Li’l Agitator :)

  25. #25 |  Hannah | 

    WooHoo! I’m in a minority, do we get reparations here? ^-^

  26. #26 |  Dan | 

    My opinion is that most women are hard wired toward collectivism and don’t really care about individual liberty. My wife couldn’t understand my “government activity is to be looked upon with skepticism” stance until she recently was pulled over by a rude cop and accused of behavior she was not engaged in. Plus the Agitator logo looks like the site is for 13 year old skaters, that may drive a few to other news and commentary. ( I met tag because there’s not font for sarcasm.)

  27. #27 |  Cynical in CA | 

    So what we’re finding out is that the Agitator is the blogging equivalent of Alaska.

    Congrats, ladies.

  28. #28 |  Aspasia | 

    I think my name is a pretty good indicator.

    Question: will the next poll be on race? Just askin’.

  29. #29 |  Franklin | 

    Rumor has it that Mr. Agitator himself is single again. Looks like he won’t be dipping his toe in any groupie pool.

  30. #30 |  Bob | 

    This is clear and convincing evidence that The Agitator discriminates against women. I will immediately get a judge to order that readers of be bussed in immediately.

  31. #31 |  Dave Krueger | 

    #26 Dan

    My opinion is that most women are hard wired toward collectivism and don’t really care about individual liberty.

    Thanks for diverting attention away from my remark about boob size. :)

    I believe you’re right. I would just add that I feel most men are hard wired toward collectivism, too. They talk big, but most have their hand out.

  32. #32 |  Chance | 

    “Rumor has it that Mr. Agitator himself is single again. Looks like he won’t be dipping his toe in any groupie pool.”

    If that’s true, then I can finally say the agitatrix was smoking hot, at least in than one pic he posted a while back. If it’s not true, I suspect this comment will not last long. :)

  33. #33 |  Leah | 

    Hi Bronwyn!

    Regarding women being predisposed towards collectivism – I think that is only true to the extent that they agree wit the party in charge. Getting them to see that power given to their party will be abused by the other party as well is the problem. But it does happen now and then – the CPSIA issue was a biggie, also homeschooling laws, etc. Things like that tend to raise awareness among women who typically lean Democrat.

  34. #34 |  Athena | 

    90/10. Ouch.

    Seriously, though – I was at a party Saturday evening and was amazed by how quickly the mere mention of politics reminded the women there dressed like hookers and cussing like sailors of *manners*. I was barely through a sentence bemoaning the socialist tendencies of the Seattle City Council before I was cut off by a broad who had been chewing gum with her mouth open all evening who reminded me that, “politics doesn’t make for polite conversation.”

    I was too amused by the irony of the situation to offer a dissenting opinion.

  35. #35 |  Nate | 

    I don’t think women are “predisposed” or “hard-wired” toward any political stance. Cultural pressures may tend to push different genders in different directions, but I’m going to be pretty skeptical of any statement where a man claims, with no evidence, that women are “hard-wired” toward a position that he thinks is wrong.

    Also, most celebrity gossip sites are read overwhelmingly by men. I assume PerezHilton fits this model, but I’m not 100% certain.

  36. #36 |  Frank | 

    #15 And if I didn’t already have a ring in my nose B-) I might take you up on it.

    90/10 after 492 votes (including my Y chromosome)

  37. #37 |  16 Shells from a 30.06 | 


  38. #38 |  Chris in AL | 

    I believe any real study would show that large breasts are responsible for lowering the intelligence of the men looking at them more so than the women sporting them.

  39. #39 |  Gonzo | 

    Wow, down to 91/6. The market research into your libertarian dating service is looking pretty grim, Balko. What you need is a gimmick!

    “Tuesday is Ladies’ Night! Ladies Agitated Free!”

    You’re welcome.

  40. #40 |  Angie | 

    Wow! Radley, perhaps you turn women off?

  41. #41 |  Bee | 

    It is my (wholly anecdotal!) experience that younger folks, girls included, lean left, and distrust “liberty”.

    And then when they have kids, women are often crushingly busy. And tired. And may find the threshold of male-dominated political sites to be too difficult to cross.

    This site – and its comments – is pretty darn fair and balanced. But a thoughtful, busy woman might see the comment boards at some of the popular libertarian-leaning sites and never come back.

  42. #42 |  Bumbleshea | 

    I’m with Hannah! #25

    Where – Oh where – Are our reparations already? ;)

    I’m female, relatively young (32), & single – do I get a specially trained monkey butler?

  43. #43 |  Dave Krueger | 

    #40 Angie

    Wow! Radley, perhaps you turn women off?

    Radley posts a lot of bad stuff about cops and we all know how women love big strong guys in uniform and the crisp staticky sound of the velcro being peeled off as they remove their body armor in the shadowy half light of the partially open drapes…….

    On the other hand, Radley posts pictures of puppies. How can anyone not like someone who posts pictures of puppies?

  44. #44 |  RogerX | 

    “I was told there are no girls on the interwebs”

    They are all over at myspace or the Twilight forums.

  45. #45 |  Lucy | 

    Wow, I guess I assumed that men would be in the majority, but I didn’t expect it to be quite so skewed.

  46. #46 |  Mary | 

    @Dave Krueger:

    I’m not overly fond of men in uniform or puppies. Next guess? :)

  47. #47 |  Dave Krueger | 

    #46 Mary

    @Dave Krueger:

    I’m not overly fond of men in uniform or puppies. Next guess?

    I was purposely and facetiously invoking the the calamity of stereotyping. Actually, the part about the velcro was related to me by a young Asian women who really did have a thing for cops. I thought adding it it was a nice touch. :)

    In all honesty, I suspect women who frequent this site are anything but stereotypical. I’m disappointed by the ratio, but am clueless as to the actual cause. I’m an engineer and I find that women are unfortunately underrepresented in that area as well. Maybe the reasons, whatever they may be, are similar. Whether they’re cultural or something else, I don’t know. Do you?

  48. #48 |  NAB | 

    maybe most women are like me, they get their news (including agitator articles) from an rss reader and don’t have the time or inclinaton to answer random web polls. of course we could all be mindless, boob-having eye candy but honestly, suggesting things like that doesn’t help you attract those of us who aren’t.

    and to #14 – as a chick, if you’re attractive and read blogs like this you don’t stay single for long so you’d have to be very quick to catch one.

  49. #49 |  Brian | 

    #15 April: Call me.

  50. #50 |  Mary | 

    @#47 | Dave Krueger:

    At the risk of tooting my own horn, I guess I would agree that I am not stereotypical. (Funny, I always translated that to being a freak of nature…)

    With degrees in math and science, I would say your assessment of under-representation of women in engineering (and their participation here) is probably accurate, which is why I prefer having meaty discussions with men. Even bright women, with really happening jobs, just don’t seem interested in this kind of stuff.

    I just hope Radley doesn’t do anything different to try to change the ratio. Keep on keepin’ on!

  51. #51 |  Windy | 

    Yep, another female here, 65 and absolutely not your stereotypical older woman. Been interested in politics most of my adult life, been libertarian ever since my first memory — always straining against the chains with which authority tried to bind me, regardless the nature of that authority (parents, teachers, bosses, government). Never have voted for a Democrat nor a Republican (until Ron Paul). I visit a lot of libertarian sites, Lew, FFF, here are merely three. Also visit a lot of Dem sites and GOP sites, mainly to test their mettle and yank their chains, tho I do find some sympathy on Dem sites (for drug law reform), and some on the GOP sites (for limited government, privacy and property rights). Figure I need to know my enemies, also good to know who can be counted on to help on a particular issue even if we don’t agree on much else. My #1 issue is the so called “war on drugs”, what I call Prohibition 2.0, but it is not, by no means, the only issue on which I “agitate”. It is my opinion that we wouldn’t be suffering under the early stages of a police state if there had never been a Harry Anslinger and W.R. Hearst to create the idea that some drugs should be banned from use.

  52. #52 |  feminazi poll-watcher | 

    That does it! The silly thing voted 200 times!

  53. #53 |  shorter #47 | 

    I’m, like, in fact, a really, really sensitive man.

  54. #54 |  April | 

    I’m getting a good laugh reading these posts!