<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quotable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:28:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty or Bust &#124; rights &#124; liberty &#124; privacy &#124; politics &#124; technology &#124; economics &#124; limited government</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-382292</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberty or Bust &#124; rights &#124; liberty &#124; privacy &#124; politics &#124; technology &#124; economics &#124; limited government</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-382292</guid>
		<description>[...] piece &#8211; here are some links related my ideas. http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6599 http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/ http://www.theagitator.com/2007/12/24/howley-on-guest-workers/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] piece &#8211; here are some links related my ideas. <a href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6599" rel="nofollow">http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6599</a> <a href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/</a> <a href="http://www.theagitator.com/2007/12/24/howley-on-guest-workers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theagitator.com/2007/12/24/howley-on-guest-workers/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe from Lowell</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264476</link>
		<dc:creator>joe from Lowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264476</guid>
		<description>My opposition to the drug war doesn&#039;t require me to romanticize the operations of drug cartels, and my opposition to immigration restrictions doesn&#039;t require me to romanticize what happens in the black market for immigrant labor, or the effect that exploitation has on the overall labor market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opposition to the drug war doesn&#8217;t require me to romanticize the operations of drug cartels, and my opposition to immigration restrictions doesn&#8217;t require me to romanticize what happens in the black market for immigrant labor, or the effect that exploitation has on the overall labor market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264287</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264287</guid>
		<description>&quot;providing jobs and pay to impoverished people who come to the U.S. to work is now...evil?&quot; No offense Radley but the guys &quot;providing jobs and pay&quot; are not kind hearted souls who hope to make life better for the downtrodden. They are cold blooded businessmen who understand that you can either hire an American for 10 bucks an hour, pay taxes and the like, and adhere to the 40 hour work week rule or you could hire illegals for 4 bucks an hour, pay under the table, work them like mules and deprive them (and their families) of any sense of normalcy, belonging and legal protections in the bargain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;providing jobs and pay to impoverished people who come to the U.S. to work is now&#8230;evil?&#8221; No offense Radley but the guys &#8220;providing jobs and pay&#8221; are not kind hearted souls who hope to make life better for the downtrodden. They are cold blooded businessmen who understand that you can either hire an American for 10 bucks an hour, pay taxes and the like, and adhere to the 40 hour work week rule or you could hire illegals for 4 bucks an hour, pay under the table, work them like mules and deprive them (and their families) of any sense of normalcy, belonging and legal protections in the bargain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perlhaqr</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264262</link>
		<dc:creator>perlhaqr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264262</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true, ya got me Omar, I hate them damned beaners.  Like my dad, Manuel.  Can&#039;t stand him.  *eyeroll*

I don&#039;t have any idea what the welfare rates in your &quot;Deep South&quot; are, there, buddy, but my wife works are the ER here in Albuquerque, and yeah, a healthy portion of her patients are &quot;No Fixed Address&quot; and &quot;Spanish Language Only&quot;.  

Her sister was working at a school where 90% of the students speak no English at all, and they don&#039;t even bother trying to teach them anymore, per school district policy.

ER services and schools cost money.  And as for your SSN example, I know people who&#039;ve been on the other side of that coin, and it&#039;s not all wine and roses when the IRS comes and audits you for never reporting your income from the chicken processing plant that&#039;s 7 states away.

So let me again state that the answer is to get rid of all the government crap that infests our lives, but point out that since that&#039;s not real bloody likely, it is correct to note that there are &quot;societal&quot; costs that the employers get to foist off on the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true, ya got me Omar, I hate them damned beaners.  Like my dad, Manuel.  Can&#8217;t stand him.  *eyeroll*</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any idea what the welfare rates in your &#8220;Deep South&#8221; are, there, buddy, but my wife works are the ER here in Albuquerque, and yeah, a healthy portion of her patients are &#8220;No Fixed Address&#8221; and &#8220;Spanish Language Only&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Her sister was working at a school where 90% of the students speak no English at all, and they don&#8217;t even bother trying to teach them anymore, per school district policy.</p>
<p>ER services and schools cost money.  And as for your SSN example, I know people who&#8217;ve been on the other side of that coin, and it&#8217;s not all wine and roses when the IRS comes and audits you for never reporting your income from the chicken processing plant that&#8217;s 7 states away.</p>
<p>So let me again state that the answer is to get rid of all the government crap that infests our lives, but point out that since that&#8217;s not real bloody likely, it is correct to note that there are &#8220;societal&#8221; costs that the employers get to foist off on the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264218</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264218</guid>
		<description>a great exercise- act like a 22 yo mexican guy and see if you can legally enter this country. THEN, after you finally make it, LEGALLY bring your wife/daughter/mother etc over. Prepare for a very frustrating ten to twelve years out of your life. unless you&#039;re wealthy, then it might only take three to five years.

I&#039;ve hired illegals, knowingly and unknowingly. I&#039;ve rented to people here illegally. I&#039;ve seen families torn apart by daddy being deported. 

I&#039;m with Thomas Paine- good people should be able to go where they want, when they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a great exercise- act like a 22 yo mexican guy and see if you can legally enter this country. THEN, after you finally make it, LEGALLY bring your wife/daughter/mother etc over. Prepare for a very frustrating ten to twelve years out of your life. unless you&#8217;re wealthy, then it might only take three to five years.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve hired illegals, knowingly and unknowingly. I&#8217;ve rented to people here illegally. I&#8217;ve seen families torn apart by daddy being deported. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Thomas Paine- good people should be able to go where they want, when they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264186</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264186</guid>
		<description>again #27 &#124; Dave Krueger

BTW, have you read Ed Anger?  He&#039;s a better writer than dobbs.

http://weeklyworldnews.com/author/wwnedanger/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>again #27 | Dave Krueger</p>
<p>BTW, have you read Ed Anger?  He&#8217;s a better writer than dobbs.</p>
<p><a href="http://weeklyworldnews.com/author/wwnedanger/" rel="nofollow">http://weeklyworldnews.com/author/wwnedanger/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264185</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264185</guid>
		<description>@#27 &#124;  Dave Krueger 

Dobbs&#039; articles belong page 6 of The National Enquirer right above Lindsay Lohan&#039;s recent rehab photos and below the Kim Kardashian nip slip.  No more, no less.  Dobbs is tabloids for grownups.  And there are people reading his books and voting!

What a mood I&#039;m in today.  You&#039;d think it&#039;s Monday.  Sorry agitator commentators...A socialist country run by a communist party has again delayed my flight pending paperwork.  I&#039;m getting it out of my system before I show up there knowing it&#039;s in my best interest to keep my freedom-oriented mouth shut the hell up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#27 |  Dave Krueger </p>
<p>Dobbs&#8217; articles belong page 6 of The National Enquirer right above Lindsay Lohan&#8217;s recent rehab photos and below the Kim Kardashian nip slip.  No more, no less.  Dobbs is tabloids for grownups.  And there are people reading his books and voting!</p>
<p>What a mood I&#8217;m in today.  You&#8217;d think it&#8217;s Monday.  Sorry agitator commentators&#8230;A socialist country run by a communist party has again delayed my flight pending paperwork.  I&#8217;m getting it out of my system before I show up there knowing it&#8217;s in my best interest to keep my freedom-oriented mouth shut the hell up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264181</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264181</guid>
		<description>#4 omar, you may very well be right, but if walks like a duck...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 omar, you may very well be right, but if walks like a duck&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dakota</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264179</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264179</guid>
		<description>Responding to economic incentives the government inadvertently creates is evil. Pick a problem the government is going to try to fix and 8 times of 10 you&#039;ll just find people responding to incentives.

They put money in drugs then blame the dealers. Force down the price of money for housing then blame lenders, make it impossible to immigrate and create then blame &quot;Illegals&quot; ecetera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responding to economic incentives the government inadvertently creates is evil. Pick a problem the government is going to try to fix and 8 times of 10 you&#8217;ll just find people responding to incentives.</p>
<p>They put money in drugs then blame the dealers. Force down the price of money for housing then blame lenders, make it impossible to immigrate and create then blame &#8220;Illegals&#8221; ecetera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264176</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264176</guid>
		<description>A company&#039;s mission is to make a profit.  Companies have to deal with the realities of world competition, so finding cheap labor is part of their mission.  Hiring cheap labor has nothing to do with shifting costs to taxpayers.  Keeping labor costs artificially high is an attempt by government to defy economic rules and someone else (taxpayers, consumers, exporters, importers, etc) will always have to pay for it.  Trying to rig the system in a way that defies the free market is always an attempt to shift costs to someone else.  Always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A company&#8217;s mission is to make a profit.  Companies have to deal with the realities of world competition, so finding cheap labor is part of their mission.  Hiring cheap labor has nothing to do with shifting costs to taxpayers.  Keeping labor costs artificially high is an attempt by government to defy economic rules and someone else (taxpayers, consumers, exporters, importers, etc) will always have to pay for it.  Trying to rig the system in a way that defies the free market is always an attempt to shift costs to someone else.  Always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt D</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264173</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264173</guid>
		<description>Full context:

&lt;i&gt;NAPOLITANO: Well, you know, Sheriff Joe, he is being very political in that statement, because he knows that there aren&#039;t enough law enforcement officers, courtrooms or jail cells in the world to do what he is saying.

What we have to do is target the real evil-doers in this business, the employers who consistently hire illegal labor, the human traffickers who are exploiting human misery.

And yes, when we find illegal workers, yes, appropriate action, some of which is criminal, most of that is civil, because crossing the border is not a crime per se. It is civil. But anyway, going after those as well.

But the notion that you&#039;re going to fill every prosecutor&#039;s time, every law enforcement official&#039;s time, and that&#039;s literally what he&#039;s talking about, on immigration, he doesn&#039;t answer the other question, which he has been criticized for, by the way, in Maricopa County, because he is not going after murders, armed robberies, other more serious crimes, because he is so focused on this one.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full context:</p>
<p><i>NAPOLITANO: Well, you know, Sheriff Joe, he is being very political in that statement, because he knows that there aren&#8217;t enough law enforcement officers, courtrooms or jail cells in the world to do what he is saying.</p>
<p>What we have to do is target the real evil-doers in this business, the employers who consistently hire illegal labor, the human traffickers who are exploiting human misery.</p>
<p>And yes, when we find illegal workers, yes, appropriate action, some of which is criminal, most of that is civil, because crossing the border is not a crime per se. It is civil. But anyway, going after those as well.</p>
<p>But the notion that you&#8217;re going to fill every prosecutor&#8217;s time, every law enforcement official&#8217;s time, and that&#8217;s literally what he&#8217;s talking about, on immigration, he doesn&#8217;t answer the other question, which he has been criticized for, by the way, in Maricopa County, because he is not going after murders, armed robberies, other more serious crimes, because he is so focused on this one.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264170</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264170</guid>
		<description> well, to re-iterate a statement above (but in this case as something I do believe) I think it&#039;s pretty rational for a state to control immigration and its borders.  The philosophy behind that shouldn&#039;t be too hard to grasp...and yes, part of it is to protect American jobs.  The immigrants picking produce (like I used to) and cleaning floors (like I used to) aren&#039;t taking jobs from the &quot;evil union workers making forty bucks an hour to sit on their ass&quot; (which, by the way, is a pretty good description of the only union job I ever worked).

Also, a note about high school economics.  Maybe I should have failed high school economics but my perfect grade in college macro remembers the first rule of economics: Resources are limited.  So yessir there is a fixed amount of wealth in the world at any given moment.  You may suggest that exploitation of those fixed resources generates wealth...it does, but it doesn&#039;t do it quickly, and for any given decade you can assume a fixed quantity of wealth that I sure as hell hope *someone* is trying to manage so I can work my ass off, make some money, and not suddenly find it all meaning nothing.  Well, short of buying a bunch of gold bricks, growing a beard, and hiding in an old shack in the mountains until I die from the smell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, to re-iterate a statement above (but in this case as something I do believe) I think it&#8217;s pretty rational for a state to control immigration and its borders.  The philosophy behind that shouldn&#8217;t be too hard to grasp&#8230;and yes, part of it is to protect American jobs.  The immigrants picking produce (like I used to) and cleaning floors (like I used to) aren&#8217;t taking jobs from the &#8220;evil union workers making forty bucks an hour to sit on their ass&#8221; (which, by the way, is a pretty good description of the only union job I ever worked).</p>
<p>Also, a note about high school economics.  Maybe I should have failed high school economics but my perfect grade in college macro remembers the first rule of economics: Resources are limited.  So yessir there is a fixed amount of wealth in the world at any given moment.  You may suggest that exploitation of those fixed resources generates wealth&#8230;it does, but it doesn&#8217;t do it quickly, and for any given decade you can assume a fixed quantity of wealth that I sure as hell hope *someone* is trying to manage so I can work my ass off, make some money, and not suddenly find it all meaning nothing.  Well, short of buying a bunch of gold bricks, growing a beard, and hiding in an old shack in the mountains until I die from the smell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pegr</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264168</link>
		<dc:creator>pegr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264168</guid>
		<description>Wow, great thread today!  Usually, we don&#039;t get one like this!

OK, I&#039;ll throw my hat into the ring.  Companies that hire illegals do so to cut costs, or more accurately, shift costs to taxpayers.  The circumstances that allow this may be illogical and should be changed, but I find companies that do this to be evil as well.

//Throw rotten fruit as needed...  (but be aware of who picked it for you.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, great thread today!  Usually, we don&#8217;t get one like this!</p>
<p>OK, I&#8217;ll throw my hat into the ring.  Companies that hire illegals do so to cut costs, or more accurately, shift costs to taxpayers.  The circumstances that allow this may be illogical and should be changed, but I find companies that do this to be evil as well.</p>
<p>//Throw rotten fruit as needed&#8230;  (but be aware of who picked it for you.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danno49</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264166</link>
		<dc:creator>Danno49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264166</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why anyone is surprised that the word evildoer is being associated with people and companies that hire illegal aliens.  We&#039;re led to believe that pot smokers and other drug users are evil.  Gay marriage is so evil, we have to pass laws that define what a &#039;proper&#039; marriage is.  Evilness and evildoers are so rife on the streets of America we have to equip our civil police forces with tanks and other weapons that could be used in a full frontal assault in a war zone.

It&#039;s a smokescreen.  It&#039;s the old bait and switch.  It&#039;s a case of them not wanting us to look at the man behind the curtain.  They consciously and subconsciously alike label what they want to as evil to get you to look at that instead of all the evil they are perpetrating.  It&#039;s not THE problem but is a symptom of the much greater problem that is a corrupted at it&#039;s core government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why anyone is surprised that the word evildoer is being associated with people and companies that hire illegal aliens.  We&#8217;re led to believe that pot smokers and other drug users are evil.  Gay marriage is so evil, we have to pass laws that define what a &#8216;proper&#8217; marriage is.  Evilness and evildoers are so rife on the streets of America we have to equip our civil police forces with tanks and other weapons that could be used in a full frontal assault in a war zone.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a smokescreen.  It&#8217;s the old bait and switch.  It&#8217;s a case of them not wanting us to look at the man behind the curtain.  They consciously and subconsciously alike label what they want to as evil to get you to look at that instead of all the evil they are perpetrating.  It&#8217;s not THE problem but is a symptom of the much greater problem that is a corrupted at it&#8217;s core government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264162</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264162</guid>
		<description>Omar, 
Because &quot;deh tek our jebs!&quot;, the solution is for us all to have gay sex...hopefully with Lou Dobbs!

I&#039;m as much a fan of South Park as anyone, but I&#039;m not sure the face of illegal immigration is as you described for most people.  For me, I just think of the syrup-chuggin Canadiens coming down and being all nice while slipping you a bogus quarter (which is the same size as ours!).  Go to NYC or Boston and Mexican &quot;illegals&quot; don&#039;t make the top 10 for most people.  As you travel across the USA, you notice that each region has a dominant ethnic hotel maid...that usually matches the local illegal immigration &quot;problem&quot; (just observing here) and there are many variations.

But I will grant you that if the only illegal immigration was from Ireland (and mostly the ginger-kind that Cartman hates), we wouldn&#039;t have the immigration venom we have today.  Besides, talk to Spike Lee about the hipocracy of a US crack down on illegal immigration.  40 acres and a mule!  Not that I agree, but worth noting.

As a person of size, and grandson of a celebrity (Big Daddy Don Durkin was a competitive eating champ in Central Canada), I&#039;ve had to withstand prejudice.  I&#039;ve been kicked out of buffets and moved to the middle seat on small planes.  I validate your pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omar,<br />
Because &#8220;deh tek our jebs!&#8221;, the solution is for us all to have gay sex&#8230;hopefully with Lou Dobbs!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m as much a fan of South Park as anyone, but I&#8217;m not sure the face of illegal immigration is as you described for most people.  For me, I just think of the syrup-chuggin Canadiens coming down and being all nice while slipping you a bogus quarter (which is the same size as ours!).  Go to NYC or Boston and Mexican &#8220;illegals&#8221; don&#8217;t make the top 10 for most people.  As you travel across the USA, you notice that each region has a dominant ethnic hotel maid&#8230;that usually matches the local illegal immigration &#8220;problem&#8221; (just observing here) and there are many variations.</p>
<p>But I will grant you that if the only illegal immigration was from Ireland (and mostly the ginger-kind that Cartman hates), we wouldn&#8217;t have the immigration venom we have today.  Besides, talk to Spike Lee about the hipocracy of a US crack down on illegal immigration.  40 acres and a mule!  Not that I agree, but worth noting.</p>
<p>As a person of size, and grandson of a celebrity (Big Daddy Don Durkin was a competitive eating champ in Central Canada), I&#8217;ve had to withstand prejudice.  I&#8217;ve been kicked out of buffets and moved to the middle seat on small planes.  I validate your pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264161</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264161</guid>
		<description>I still think they screwed up the name.  It shouldn&#039;t have been Homeland Security.  Fatherland Security would have been more fitting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think they screwed up the name.  It shouldn&#8217;t have been Homeland Security.  Fatherland Security would have been more fitting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264155</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264155</guid>
		<description>In the same interview link...
Sen. Ensign: &quot;I believe that marriage should be defined as that between one man and one woman. You want to do what is ideal for children...&quot;

&quot;And the government should strive for the ideal, for children especially.&quot;

Ha!  It really is &quot;for the chillren!&quot;  JUST NOT CHILDREN FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS IMAGINARY LINE CALLED A BORDER!  Hence the limits of the morality of socialism as practiced by every country in the world.

They also cover how Obama won&#039;t prosecute &quot;front line&quot; CIA (the working man) agents for torture.  Oh, he won&#039;t prosecute their bosses or anyone else, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the same interview link&#8230;<br />
Sen. Ensign: &#8220;I believe that marriage should be defined as that between one man and one woman. You want to do what is ideal for children&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;And the government should strive for the ideal, for children especially.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ha!  It really is &#8220;for the chillren!&#8221;  JUST NOT CHILDREN FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS IMAGINARY LINE CALLED A BORDER!  Hence the limits of the morality of socialism as practiced by every country in the world.</p>
<p>They also cover how Obama won&#8217;t prosecute &#8220;front line&#8221; CIA (the working man) agents for torture.  Oh, he won&#8217;t prosecute their bosses or anyone else, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264153</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264153</guid>
		<description>Yea, I didn&#039;t get it.  Jumped the gun defending Radley against someone who didn&#039;t get it either (I think).

What can I say?  I&#039;m of a younger generation.

@#14 &#124;  Boyd Durkin

&lt;i&gt;“Beaners”. Really?&lt;/i&gt;
Just putting it out there, you know, so we all know what we are actually talking about.  Janet is not talking just about illegals.  She&#039;s taking about dirty filthy brown people &quot;takin&#039; er&#039; jerbs&quot; and the evil cigar smoking industrialist fatcats squeezing the poor white people.

I mean, WTF do I know about barely-spoken and back-door racist fear-mongering used by our government officials exploit emotions to get a dumb policy enacted?  I&#039;m just a simple fucking arab-e&#039;merican from the deep south.  It&#039;s pretty common for the PC (yes, PC) conservative &quot;terrorism-hating&quot; folks to tiptoe around their flat-out disgust with my skin.

When dobbs says &quot;illegal immigrants are evil&quot;, and janet says &quot;employers who hire illegals are evil&quot;, what&#039;s the first thing popping into your head?  Mexicans.  Hoards of fucking mexicans rolling across the Rio Grande like an unstoppable flood of white-chick sex having brown people and their welfare children.

While that image is obviously bullshit, if you to ask a 10 year old white kid to &quot;draw an illegal alien&quot;, I have 10-1 odds the alien would wear a sombrairo.

When we talk about illegal immigration, we are ALWAYS talking about brown people in terms of them vs. us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I didn&#8217;t get it.  Jumped the gun defending Radley against someone who didn&#8217;t get it either (I think).</p>
<p>What can I say?  I&#8217;m of a younger generation.</p>
<p>@#14 |  Boyd Durkin</p>
<p><i>“Beaners”. Really?</i><br />
Just putting it out there, you know, so we all know what we are actually talking about.  Janet is not talking just about illegals.  She&#8217;s taking about dirty filthy brown people &#8220;takin&#8217; er&#8217; jerbs&#8221; and the evil cigar smoking industrialist fatcats squeezing the poor white people.</p>
<p>I mean, WTF do I know about barely-spoken and back-door racist fear-mongering used by our government officials exploit emotions to get a dumb policy enacted?  I&#8217;m just a simple fucking arab-e&#8217;merican from the deep south.  It&#8217;s pretty common for the PC (yes, PC) conservative &#8220;terrorism-hating&#8221; folks to tiptoe around their flat-out disgust with my skin.</p>
<p>When dobbs says &#8220;illegal immigrants are evil&#8221;, and janet says &#8220;employers who hire illegals are evil&#8221;, what&#8217;s the first thing popping into your head?  Mexicans.  Hoards of fucking mexicans rolling across the Rio Grande like an unstoppable flood of white-chick sex having brown people and their welfare children.</p>
<p>While that image is obviously bullshit, if you to ask a 10 year old white kid to &#8220;draw an illegal alien&#8221;, I have 10-1 odds the alien would wear a sombrairo.</p>
<p>When we talk about illegal immigration, we are ALWAYS talking about brown people in terms of them vs. us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264152</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264152</guid>
		<description>Most people hate illegal immigrants for the same reason they hate Nike&#039;s overseas &quot;sweatshops&quot;.  It&#039;s not out of any concern that anyone is getting exploited.  They couldn&#039;t care less about foreign workers welfare and certainly don&#039;t give a shit whether they or their families starve to death or have a job.  All that matters to these people is that these jobs are filled by &#039;Mer&#039;cans at their inflated pay rates.

That&#039;s why, even if I had to start biking to work everyday, seeing the UAW in dire straights would be worth it.  The one thing I&#039;m most thankful for in my whole life is that I lived long enough to see that happen.  The rust belt industries, governments, and unions reveled in their arrogant greed for 75 years and now Adam Smith&#039;s &quot;invisible hand&quot; is coming around and smacking them right in the nuts as hard as it can over and over delivering a dose of the very reality that they thought only applied to other people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people hate illegal immigrants for the same reason they hate Nike&#8217;s overseas &#8220;sweatshops&#8221;.  It&#8217;s not out of any concern that anyone is getting exploited.  They couldn&#8217;t care less about foreign workers welfare and certainly don&#8217;t give a shit whether they or their families starve to death or have a job.  All that matters to these people is that these jobs are filled by &#8216;Mer&#8217;cans at their inflated pay rates.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why, even if I had to start biking to work everyday, seeing the UAW in dire straights would be worth it.  The one thing I&#8217;m most thankful for in my whole life is that I lived long enough to see that happen.  The rust belt industries, governments, and unions reveled in their arrogant greed for 75 years and now Adam Smith&#8217;s &#8220;invisible hand&#8221; is coming around and smacking them right in the nuts as hard as it can over and over delivering a dose of the very reality that they thought only applied to other people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/04/20/quotable-16/comment-page-1/#comment-264149</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12852#comment-264149</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I think Napolitiano needs to go back to singing sad songs about her alcoholic boyfriend.&quot;

&quot;What kind of comment is that to talk about the alcoholic boyfriend? What does that have to do with immigration?&quot;

&quot;I find it fair-play to ask old Janet to get her house in order before passing judgment over the rest of us.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Apparently that was too subtle for a Monday morning, Radley...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;I think Napolitiano needs to go back to singing sad songs about her alcoholic boyfriend.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;What kind of comment is that to talk about the alcoholic boyfriend? What does that have to do with immigration?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I find it fair-play to ask old Janet to get her house in order before passing judgment over the rest of us.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Apparently that was too subtle for a Monday morning, Radley&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

