<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legalization Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: newageblues</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-258984</link>
		<dc:creator>newageblues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 22:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-258984</guid>
		<description>Dr. Adamski, you wouldn&#039;t by any chance now enjoy drinking that really dangerous drug, would you? Gee what a flaming hypocrite that would make you if you do. Sorry if I&#039;m beating a dead horse, but isolated as he is here, his ilk are still ruling the roost, so his joker ideas aren&#039;t nearly as dead as they need to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Adamski, you wouldn&#8217;t by any chance now enjoy drinking that really dangerous drug, would you? Gee what a flaming hypocrite that would make you if you do. Sorry if I&#8217;m beating a dead horse, but isolated as he is here, his ilk are still ruling the roost, so his joker ideas aren&#8217;t nearly as dead as they need to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren Unruh</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-258910</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Unruh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-258910</guid>
		<description>It seems to me the prohibition has been based on a &#039;moral&#039; argument, meaning it was really all about religion.    

I started a religious freedom movement to legalize pot because I thought it needed a solution other people were not addressing.  Namely that it was motivated by religious prejudice.

I was wrong, that was the cover story for a deadly criminal cartel operating right out of our own Capital Hill.  Scary!  So, to end the Drug War, fearless Sister Lauren from the THC Ministry blogs on AlterNet,

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/134771/new_york_lightens_up_on_some_of_the_harshest_drug_laws_in_the_country/?cID=1179243#c1179243&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New York Lightens Up on Some of the Harshest Drug Laws in the Country&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me the prohibition has been based on a &#8216;moral&#8217; argument, meaning it was really all about religion.    </p>
<p>I started a religious freedom movement to legalize pot because I thought it needed a solution other people were not addressing.  Namely that it was motivated by religious prejudice.</p>
<p>I was wrong, that was the cover story for a deadly criminal cartel operating right out of our own Capital Hill.  Scary!  So, to end the Drug War, fearless Sister Lauren from the THC Ministry blogs on AlterNet,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/134771/new_york_lightens_up_on_some_of_the_harshest_drug_laws_in_the_country/?cID=1179243#c1179243" rel="nofollow">New York Lightens Up on Some of the Harshest Drug Laws in the Country</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legalize</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-258161</link>
		<dc:creator>Legalize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-258161</guid>
		<description>Former DEA chief Asa Hutchinson says keeping marijuana illegal would save teens lives... Last time i checked drug dealers dont check ID&#039;s when they are selling the drugs!!!! Legalize and tax and regulate all drugs!!!!! That includes cocaine, crack, Herion, and methamphetamine.. Bottom line is if people wana do these drugs they are goin to do them regardless... Lets start saving tax money on fighting them and start making money and regulating them..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former DEA chief Asa Hutchinson says keeping marijuana illegal would save teens lives&#8230; Last time i checked drug dealers dont check ID&#8217;s when they are selling the drugs!!!! Legalize and tax and regulate all drugs!!!!! That includes cocaine, crack, Herion, and methamphetamine.. Bottom line is if people wana do these drugs they are goin to do them regardless&#8230; Lets start saving tax money on fighting them and start making money and regulating them..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-257726</link>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-257726</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t watch the clip until just now, and I&#039;m surprised that Mr. Kampia didn&#039;t simply eviscerate Mr. Hutchinson on his statements about drug law reform forces not being able to get more States onboard the reform bandwagon. 

A major part of the reason for that is the fact that the federal government has been spending the taxpayer&#039;s dollars in propagandizing the various State legislatures where drug law reform measures were being proposed, on our dime and our time, in effect violating the Hatch Act, which prohibits such politically self-serving actions. 

Because of the politicization of the Justice department under Bush 2, these violations were winked at, and even the GAO refused to take them on, stating for example that the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2007/10/09/theDrugCzarIsRequiredByLaw.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; had embedded in it&#039;s charter a license to lie&lt;/a&gt;. 

ONDCP became so brazen about it, it began sending its&#039; agents to those States attempting to pass referenda and legislation for reform and assisted Republican office contenders while saying they were only there to carry out their jobs. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20070717103043.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Representative Henry Waxman called the ONDCP out on this&lt;/a&gt;, but nothing was done at the time, presumably because he and his supporters in this endeavor were waiting for a Democrat to take control of the Executive Branch. It remains to be seen if anything comes of this, for it should be answered in order to prevent this kind of democracy-destroying practice from continuing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t watch the clip until just now, and I&#8217;m surprised that Mr. Kampia didn&#8217;t simply eviscerate Mr. Hutchinson on his statements about drug law reform forces not being able to get more States onboard the reform bandwagon. </p>
<p>A major part of the reason for that is the fact that the federal government has been spending the taxpayer&#8217;s dollars in propagandizing the various State legislatures where drug law reform measures were being proposed, on our dime and our time, in effect violating the Hatch Act, which prohibits such politically self-serving actions. </p>
<p>Because of the politicization of the Justice department under Bush 2, these violations were winked at, and even the GAO refused to take them on, stating for example that the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) <a href="http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2007/10/09/theDrugCzarIsRequiredByLaw.html" rel="nofollow"> had embedded in it&#8217;s charter a license to lie</a>. </p>
<p>ONDCP became so brazen about it, it began sending its&#8217; agents to those States attempting to pass referenda and legislation for reform and assisted Republican office contenders while saying they were only there to carry out their jobs. </p>
<p><a href="http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20070717103043.pdf" rel="nofollow">Representative Henry Waxman called the ONDCP out on this</a>, but nothing was done at the time, presumably because he and his supporters in this endeavor were waiting for a Democrat to take control of the Executive Branch. It remains to be seen if anything comes of this, for it should be answered in order to prevent this kind of democracy-destroying practice from continuing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BCeezee</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-257414</link>
		<dc:creator>BCeezee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-257414</guid>
		<description>My favorite quote from Asa (which I don&#039;t believe has been mentioned above) was his misguided counter argument regarding the populous&#039; respect for the rule of law: &quot;If people disagree with it in our democracy, they can change the law&quot;.  It seems as if that is what people have been successful in doing in many states across the country.  I don&#039;t demand that marijuana (medical or not) be legalized by states; I only ask for the federal government to end their puritanical encroachment on states&#039; rights that they&#039;ve so carelessly usurped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite quote from Asa (which I don&#8217;t believe has been mentioned above) was his misguided counter argument regarding the populous&#8217; respect for the rule of law: &#8220;If people disagree with it in our democracy, they can change the law&#8221;.  It seems as if that is what people have been successful in doing in many states across the country.  I don&#8217;t demand that marijuana (medical or not) be legalized by states; I only ask for the federal government to end their puritanical encroachment on states&#8217; rights that they&#8217;ve so carelessly usurped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-257328</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-257328</guid>
		<description>When Hutchinson said the goal was to reduce the amount of harmful drugs, I was hoping someone would counter: &quot;Why not rather to reduce the amount of harm from drugs?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Hutchinson said the goal was to reduce the amount of harmful drugs, I was hoping someone would counter: &#8220;Why not rather to reduce the amount of harm from drugs?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1%'er</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-257249</link>
		<dc:creator>1%'er</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-257249</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been smoking pot for over 45 years ... when is all the gubbmint warning bad stuff supposed to start happening to me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been smoking pot for over 45 years &#8230; when is all the gubbmint warning bad stuff supposed to start happening to me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Beat</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-257189</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Beat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-257189</guid>
		<description>It was way easier for me to get pot than alcohol when I was a teenager. Legalizing it won&#039;t actually make it easier to get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was way easier for me to get pot than alcohol when I was a teenager. Legalizing it won&#8217;t actually make it easier to get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-257182</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-257182</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t trust anyone who smiles perpetually whenever he talks.  Hutchinson would be smiling when he told you he ran over your puppy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t trust anyone who smiles perpetually whenever he talks.  Hutchinson would be smiling when he told you he ran over your puppy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-257171</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-257171</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen Rob speak before on some other talking heads programs and he is a great representative for this cause.  He keeps his cool much better than most in the face of such idiotic logic and scare tactics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen Rob speak before on some other talking heads programs and he is a great representative for this cause.  He keeps his cool much better than most in the face of such idiotic logic and scare tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghjost</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-257165</link>
		<dc:creator>ghjost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-257165</guid>
		<description>&quot;...illegal simply due to inertia&quot; 

so true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;illegal simply due to inertia&#8221; </p>
<p>so true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim C</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-257104</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-257104</guid>
		<description>#26 &quot;Don’t forget the pharmaceutical companies and the prison lobbyists.&quot;  Ohhhh yeah, many other vested interests too:

Drug testing companies (i.e, places you pee, not companies using same)

Insurance companies (can charge companies that don&#039;t DT higher insurance)

Of course, the gov&#039;t, look at all the extra power to snoop/run people&#039;s lives/get free &quot;forfeited&quot; shit, etc

So, you&#039;re right, I only hit a couple of &#039;em...how many others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#26 &#8220;Don’t forget the pharmaceutical companies and the prison lobbyists.&#8221;  Ohhhh yeah, many other vested interests too:</p>
<p>Drug testing companies (i.e, places you pee, not companies using same)</p>
<p>Insurance companies (can charge companies that don&#8217;t DT higher insurance)</p>
<p>Of course, the gov&#8217;t, look at all the extra power to snoop/run people&#8217;s lives/get free &#8220;forfeited&#8221; shit, etc</p>
<p>So, you&#8217;re right, I only hit a couple of &#8216;em&#8230;how many others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-257013</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-257013</guid>
		<description>Nick T-&quot;Holy fucking shit, did someone just compare Marijuana to Nuclear Weapons?!??!?&quot;

He&#039;s &quot;taking the piss&quot; as they say in England. He&#039;s not serious, its just a wind up to get an angry and passionate response from everyone. He&#039;s doing a good job of it too and often riles up some of you to write some of your best stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick T-&#8221;Holy fucking shit, did someone just compare Marijuana to Nuclear Weapons?!??!?&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s &#8220;taking the piss&#8221; as they say in England. He&#8217;s not serious, its just a wind up to get an angry and passionate response from everyone. He&#8217;s doing a good job of it too and often riles up some of you to write some of your best stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-257003</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-257003</guid>
		<description>Obama Admin has dropped the word &quot;WAR&quot; from the War on Terrorisim....

Must deem anything so name as totally unwinable!  

Accurate though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama Admin has dropped the word &#8220;WAR&#8221; from the War on Terrorisim&#8230;.</p>
<p>Must deem anything so name as totally unwinable!  </p>
<p>Accurate though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fascist Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-256984</link>
		<dc:creator>Fascist Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-256984</guid>
		<description>That is because:

1.  Now they want to tax it.

2.  Asa is a lobbyist for the drug cartels.  He is not getting the job done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is because:</p>
<p>1.  Now they want to tax it.</p>
<p>2.  Asa is a lobbyist for the drug cartels.  He is not getting the job done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dakota</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-256983</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-256983</guid>
		<description>Another thing to keep in mind when talking about the residual damage of keeping MJ illegal is the loss of industrial hemp production. Because it&#039;s like, you know, hard for the DEA to tell the difference

Its one of the most &quot;eco-friendly&quot; plants to grow in terms of pesticide/fertilizer use, as well as down stream processing. There are tons of uses. Hemp can grow well in marginal soil and doesn&#039;t need much water, it could also help in certain crop rotations to maximize efficiency and limit energy use. We&#039;re pissing billions more down the drain by banning industrial hemp growing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing to keep in mind when talking about the residual damage of keeping MJ illegal is the loss of industrial hemp production. Because it&#8217;s like, you know, hard for the DEA to tell the difference</p>
<p>Its one of the most &#8220;eco-friendly&#8221; plants to grow in terms of pesticide/fertilizer use, as well as down stream processing. There are tons of uses. Hemp can grow well in marginal soil and doesn&#8217;t need much water, it could also help in certain crop rotations to maximize efficiency and limit energy use. We&#8217;re pissing billions more down the drain by banning industrial hemp growing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paranoiastrksdp</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-256981</link>
		<dc:creator>paranoiastrksdp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-256981</guid>
		<description>Notice how hutchinson keeps saying METHAMPHETAMINE AND COCAINE after every point of the debate...METHAMPHETAMINE AND COCAINE

&quot;But how do you feel about...&quot;

METHAMPHETAMINE AND COCAINE METHAMPHETAMINE AND COCAINE BWAAAGGGHHPKAGEjsd&#039;jsf&#039;vdskhffas DANGEROUS DRUGS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice how hutchinson keeps saying METHAMPHETAMINE AND COCAINE after every point of the debate&#8230;METHAMPHETAMINE AND COCAINE</p>
<p>&#8220;But how do you feel about&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>METHAMPHETAMINE AND COCAINE METHAMPHETAMINE AND COCAINE BWAAAGGGHHPKAGEjsd&#8217;jsf&#8217;vdskhffas DANGEROUS DRUGS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-256970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-256970</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;@ Dr Adamski Post #10:&lt;/b&gt;

I had a long post typed up about being an adult child of an alcoholic and how it affected me as I grew up and as an adult. 

Assuming you&#039;re not a troll, I&#039;l sum up what I had to say. Chronic alcohol use effects the brain in ways that chroic marijuana usage does not. Alcoholics, in my opinion, lose themself in the drink. Stoners tend, in my observations, to have a strong sense of self in spite of the smoke. 

Call it what you will but here&#039;s a fact: We can not have an intelligent discussion of marijuana policy without solid data on it&#039;s short- and long-term side effects. This study is precluded due to it&#039;s classification by the government. 

Put that in your pipe and smoke it. At least the government allows the study of nuclear bombs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@ Dr Adamski Post #10:</b></p>
<p>I had a long post typed up about being an adult child of an alcoholic and how it affected me as I grew up and as an adult. </p>
<p>Assuming you&#8217;re not a troll, I&#8217;l sum up what I had to say. Chronic alcohol use effects the brain in ways that chroic marijuana usage does not. Alcoholics, in my opinion, lose themself in the drink. Stoners tend, in my observations, to have a strong sense of self in spite of the smoke. </p>
<p>Call it what you will but here&#8217;s a fact: We can not have an intelligent discussion of marijuana policy without solid data on it&#8217;s short- and long-term side effects. This study is precluded due to it&#8217;s classification by the government. </p>
<p>Put that in your pipe and smoke it. At least the government allows the study of nuclear bombs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helmut O' Hooligan</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-256938</link>
		<dc:creator>Helmut O' Hooligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-256938</guid>
		<description>That was a pretty damn good video, Radley. Thanks a lot.  I kind of felt the same way as Colson (#1).  Another dimension indeed.  

I understand why some commenters are hesitant to get too excited, and I am always prepared for the worst myself.  But think about it this way.  Asa Hutchinson is probably the most sober (no pun intended) and rational drug warrior the anti-drug crowd had to offer for this interview.  That&#039;s all they have left.  The &quot;morality&quot; argument and the &quot;save the children&quot; argument.  And as one of the panelists noted, people aren&#039;t really buying it anymore.  When marijuana is discussed like other products (beer, tobacco, corn, wheat, etc.) the drug warrior&#039;s argument falls apart.  

I tell you what, between this video, and Jim Webb&#039;s article in PARADE MAGAZINE (a known radical periodical, of course) this weekend, I have been feeling pretty optimistic.  This kind of thing is enough to give me a big civil libertarian chubby!  Ok, that was an exaggeration, sorry about that.  But I was still really pleased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a pretty damn good video, Radley. Thanks a lot.  I kind of felt the same way as Colson (#1).  Another dimension indeed.  </p>
<p>I understand why some commenters are hesitant to get too excited, and I am always prepared for the worst myself.  But think about it this way.  Asa Hutchinson is probably the most sober (no pun intended) and rational drug warrior the anti-drug crowd had to offer for this interview.  That&#8217;s all they have left.  The &#8220;morality&#8221; argument and the &#8220;save the children&#8221; argument.  And as one of the panelists noted, people aren&#8217;t really buying it anymore.  When marijuana is discussed like other products (beer, tobacco, corn, wheat, etc.) the drug warrior&#8217;s argument falls apart.  </p>
<p>I tell you what, between this video, and Jim Webb&#8217;s article in PARADE MAGAZINE (a known radical periodical, of course) this weekend, I have been feeling pretty optimistic.  This kind of thing is enough to give me a big civil libertarian chubby!  Ok, that was an exaggeration, sorry about that.  But I was still really pleased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T13</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/legalization-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-256932</link>
		<dc:creator>T13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12647#comment-256932</guid>
		<description>How can the former DEA guy get away with, the comment about health care professionals opposing legalization. I&#039;m a &quot;health care professional&quot; and I think it should be legalized.  I&#039;ve met lots of others who are of the same mind or even smoke it.  I can see where our local community may not like it since we have a large state owned drug rehab. boot camp, who is a big employer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can the former DEA guy get away with, the comment about health care professionals opposing legalization. I&#8217;m a &#8220;health care professional&#8221; and I think it should be legalized.  I&#8217;ve met lots of others who are of the same mind or even smoke it.  I can see where our local community may not like it since we have a large state owned drug rehab. boot camp, who is a big employer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

