<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Morning Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steam McQueen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239677</link>
		<dc:creator>Steam McQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.kcdx.com  A real radio station in Arizona.

No commercials. No Jocks. No talk at all except station ID and a little prerecorded patter. 

Just great rock from the late 60&#039;s to the mid 80&#039;s, 24 hours a day.

There is a reason to listen to the radio again. 

www.kcdx.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kcdx.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.kcdx.com</a>  A real radio station in Arizona.</p>
<p>No commercials. No Jocks. No talk at all except station ID and a little prerecorded patter. </p>
<p>Just great rock from the late 60&#8242;s to the mid 80&#8242;s, 24 hours a day.</p>
<p>There is a reason to listen to the radio again. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.kcdx.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.kcdx.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239668</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 80&#039;s needs more love from this is a libertarian blog.  Case in point:

DRI - &quot;Give My Taxes Back&quot;
Cro-Mags - &quot;Don&#039;t Tread On Me&quot;
Youth of Today - &quot;Live Free&quot;
Agnostic Front - &quot;Public Assistance&quot;
TSOL - &quot;Abolish Government&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 80&#8242;s needs more love from this is a libertarian blog.  Case in point:</p>
<p>DRI &#8211; &#8220;Give My Taxes Back&#8221;<br />
Cro-Mags &#8211; &#8220;Don&#8217;t Tread On Me&#8221;<br />
Youth of Today &#8211; &#8220;Live Free&#8221;<br />
Agnostic Front &#8211; &#8220;Public Assistance&#8221;<br />
TSOL &#8211; &#8220;Abolish Government&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239575</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The idea that people could choose something other than the 70&#039;s for this means they don&#039;t really know what &quot;rock and roll&quot; means.  MAYBE the 60&#039;s if you are one of those &#039;laying the foundations&#039; type people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that people could choose something other than the 70&#8242;s for this means they don&#8217;t really know what &#8220;rock and roll&#8221; means.  MAYBE the 60&#8242;s if you are one of those &#8216;laying the foundations&#8217; type people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239453</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to think &#039;er over (the Minneapolis troika of the &#039;80s -- Replacements, Husker Du, Soul Asylum -- nearly convinced me), but I ended up going with the &#039;60s. Kinks, Who, Beatles, Stones, Dylan, The Band, Cream, Hendrix.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to think &#8216;er over (the Minneapolis troika of the &#8217;80s &#8212; Replacements, Husker Du, Soul Asylum &#8212; nearly convinced me), but I ended up going with the &#8217;60s. Kinks, Who, Beatles, Stones, Dylan, The Band, Cream, Hendrix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239447</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[60s, easily. Back when Clapton was still playing with Cream.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>60s, easily. Back when Clapton was still playing with Cream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239429</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Beatles, except for Let it Be, released all of their original albums in the 1960&#039;s (and Let it Be was begun in January of 1969).  I really don&#039;t think any more argument than that is necessary.

The only decade in the running after that is the 80&#039;s, and only because The Joshua Tree is such a great album it can carry 10 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Beatles, except for Let it Be, released all of their original albums in the 1960&#8242;s (and Let it Be was begun in January of 1969).  I really don&#8217;t think any more argument than that is necessary.</p>
<p>The only decade in the running after that is the 80&#8242;s, and only because The Joshua Tree is such a great album it can carry 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239410</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the power pop of the late 70s through the 80s- everything from Cheap Trick to Matthew Sweet... I also thought the 80s and 90s alt country movement was pretty spectacular... It seems like there&#039;s a resurgence of great songwriting now- Paul Weller, Hiatt, Perry Keyes... I think I like some of all eras, except for fucking Pink Floyd and Yes. Fuck that prog rock stuff... and disco. and Garth Brooks style country. and those &#039;ride a horse&#039; clowns. like Clubmedsux, &#039;I’ll take the best of ANY decade over that crap, easy.&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the power pop of the late 70s through the 80s- everything from Cheap Trick to Matthew Sweet&#8230; I also thought the 80s and 90s alt country movement was pretty spectacular&#8230; It seems like there&#8217;s a resurgence of great songwriting now- Paul Weller, Hiatt, Perry Keyes&#8230; I think I like some of all eras, except for fucking Pink Floyd and Yes. Fuck that prog rock stuff&#8230; and disco. and Garth Brooks style country. and those &#8216;ride a horse&#8217; clowns. like Clubmedsux, &#8216;I’ll take the best of ANY decade over that crap, easy.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 652059</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239399</link>
		<dc:creator>652059</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would be interesting would be a poll of reader&#039;s ages to see if it corresponds with these results.  I voted 90s because that&#039;s what I came of age listening to - Nirvana, Green Day, NIN, and the grunge scene.

#13 - NIN, Rage, Tool, Alice -- those are all from the 90s man!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would be interesting would be a poll of reader&#8217;s ages to see if it corresponds with these results.  I voted 90s because that&#8217;s what I came of age listening to &#8211; Nirvana, Green Day, NIN, and the grunge scene.</p>
<p>#13 &#8211; NIN, Rage, Tool, Alice &#8212; those are all from the 90s man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClubMedSux</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239398</link>
		<dc:creator>ClubMedSux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, what coyote said.

Second of all, I think it&#039;s funny that many are heralding the &#039;70s for bands that actually sucked in the seventies (or at the very least put out their best stuff in &#039;68-&#039;69).  Floyd, Zeppelin, the Stones, they all but out their best stuff before 1970.  In the &#039;70s they got old and bloated and turned into arena rock crap.  Meanwhile the bands that WERE putting out great music in the &#039;70s were doing so in &#039;78-&#039;79 and are generally associated with the &#039;80s (see MassHole&#039;s comment above, and throw in acts like Elvis Costello and Talking Heads).

Anyway, I think it&#039;s kind of a fool&#039;s errand because every decade had amazing music, and generally that amazing music was overshadowed by the crap we commonly associate with the decade.  The best-selling artist in the &#039;90s wasn&#039;t Nirvana or Radiohead but Whitney Houston.  I&#039;ll take the best of ANY decade over that crap, easy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, what coyote said.</p>
<p>Second of all, I think it&#8217;s funny that many are heralding the &#8217;70s for bands that actually sucked in the seventies (or at the very least put out their best stuff in &#8217;68-&#8217;69).  Floyd, Zeppelin, the Stones, they all but out their best stuff before 1970.  In the &#8217;70s they got old and bloated and turned into arena rock crap.  Meanwhile the bands that WERE putting out great music in the &#8217;70s were doing so in &#8217;78-&#8217;79 and are generally associated with the &#8217;80s (see MassHole&#8217;s comment above, and throw in acts like Elvis Costello and Talking Heads).</p>
<p>Anyway, I think it&#8217;s kind of a fool&#8217;s errand because every decade had amazing music, and generally that amazing music was overshadowed by the crap we commonly associate with the decade.  The best-selling artist in the &#8217;90s wasn&#8217;t Nirvana or Radiohead but Whitney Houston.  I&#8217;ll take the best of ANY decade over that crap, easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbartlog</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239396</link>
		<dc:creator>bbartlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rolling Stone&#039;s list of the greatest 500 albums of all time has a disproportionate number of entries from the 1970s. Which is also how I vote, though like some others I would shift the ten year period a little earlier (1967-1976?) if I could choose any old timespan.
And I went to high school in the 1980s. But that era&#039;s music skews more to &#039;enjoyable&#039; rather than &#039;great&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rolling Stone&#8217;s list of the greatest 500 albums of all time has a disproportionate number of entries from the 1970s. Which is also how I vote, though like some others I would shift the ten year period a little earlier (1967-1976?) if I could choose any old timespan.<br />
And I went to high school in the 1980s. But that era&#8217;s music skews more to &#8216;enjoyable&#8217; rather than &#8216;great&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239390</link>
		<dc:creator>coyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder how closely people&#039;s answer would be correlated to &quot;what decade where you a teenager in&quot; or &quot;in what decade did you go to high school and college?&quot;  My answer to the poll was the same answer as these questions]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how closely people&#8217;s answer would be correlated to &#8220;what decade where you a teenager in&#8221; or &#8220;in what decade did you go to high school and college?&#8221;  My answer to the poll was the same answer as these questions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239389</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why no entry for the &#039;50s? 50,000,000 Elvis fans can&#039;t be counted!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why no entry for the &#8217;50s? 50,000,000 Elvis fans can&#8217;t be counted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balloon Maker</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239386</link>
		<dc:creator>Balloon Maker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great poll. I grew up with grunge/alternative, so I&#039;ll go w/ that.

Add to MacK&#039;s (#5) list: Rage, Tool, NIN, System of a Down, Alice in Chains]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great poll. I grew up with grunge/alternative, so I&#8217;ll go w/ that.</p>
<p>Add to MacK&#8217;s (#5) list: Rage, Tool, NIN, System of a Down, Alice in Chains</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tritone</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239385</link>
		<dc:creator>Tritone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toss up between the 90s and the 00s, for me. Most of the bands I like that started recording in the 90s still put out some good material this decade (ex: Radiohead, Beck, Tortoise, Elliott Smith). The 00s also add Midlake, Queens of the Stone Age, The Protomen, Mogwai, The White Stripes, Dethklok, The American not to mention a lot more interesting blendings of rock and electronic music like Ratatat or 65daysofstatic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toss up between the 90s and the 00s, for me. Most of the bands I like that started recording in the 90s still put out some good material this decade (ex: Radiohead, Beck, Tortoise, Elliott Smith). The 00s also add Midlake, Queens of the Stone Age, The Protomen, Mogwai, The White Stripes, Dethklok, The American not to mention a lot more interesting blendings of rock and electronic music like Ratatat or 65daysofstatic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239384</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Everyone knows that rock achieved perfection in 1974.&quot;  

I&#039;m 31, BTW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Everyone knows that rock achieved perfection in 1974.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m 31, BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomasblair</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239383</link>
		<dc:creator>thomasblair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave,

Nope. I&#039;m 25. I, like Robert, would pick 1965-1975, but that&#039;s not a choice. The 70&#039;s wins out for me, mostly for Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, and The Eagles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>Nope. I&#8217;m 25. I, like Robert, would pick 1965-1975, but that&#8217;s not a choice. The 70&#8242;s wins out for me, mostly for Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, and The Eagles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239382</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember a LOT of people saying in 1980 that the 70&#039;s would be known as the worst decade for music...evah.  If you strip away all the bad music and only looked at the good rock music, I think it clearly would be the 70&#039;s.  

Can I just say that you STILL can&#039;t spell crap without rap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember a LOT of people saying in 1980 that the 70&#8242;s would be known as the worst decade for music&#8230;evah.  If you strip away all the bad music and only looked at the good rock music, I think it clearly would be the 70&#8242;s.  </p>
<p>Can I just say that you STILL can&#8217;t spell crap without rap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MassHole</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239371</link>
		<dc:creator>MassHole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to go with the seventies.  Everything from Zep, Sabbath and Floyd as mentioned by ktc2, but also the beginning of the punk scene.  The Dead Kennedy&#039;s &quot;California Uber Alles&quot; was released in 79 and Fear&#039;s &quot;I Love Livin In The City&quot; came out in 78 as just two examples, not to mention the Sex Pistols.  Van Halen&#039;s first record was 77 or 78 and AC/DC&#039;s was in 75.  Even the metal scene was spawned during the 70&#039;s.  Iron Maiden, Judas Priest, Sabbath, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to go with the seventies.  Everything from Zep, Sabbath and Floyd as mentioned by ktc2, but also the beginning of the punk scene.  The Dead Kennedy&#8217;s &#8220;California Uber Alles&#8221; was released in 79 and Fear&#8217;s &#8220;I Love Livin In The City&#8221; came out in 78 as just two examples, not to mention the Sex Pistols.  Van Halen&#8217;s first record was 77 or 78 and AC/DC&#8217;s was in 75.  Even the metal scene was spawned during the 70&#8242;s.  Iron Maiden, Judas Priest, Sabbath, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacK</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239365</link>
		<dc:creator>MacK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like most so far I chose the 70&#039;s the music, it was great with so many super groups, and stars, but I must say that I listen to new music now.
I may be 50, but I like bands like Slipknot, Korn, Metallica, and the like.
I almost feel sorry for the people that listen to classic rock stations.
Not long ago a friend said &quot;I can&#039;t stand that new music, you can&#039;t understand what they are singing&quot;, and it reminded me of my dad saying that exact same thing in the 70&#039;s LOL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most so far I chose the 70&#8242;s the music, it was great with so many super groups, and stars, but I must say that I listen to new music now.<br />
I may be 50, but I like bands like Slipknot, Korn, Metallica, and the like.<br />
I almost feel sorry for the people that listen to classic rock stations.<br />
Not long ago a friend said &#8220;I can&#8217;t stand that new music, you can&#8217;t understand what they are singing&#8221;, and it reminded me of my dad saying that exact same thing in the 70&#8242;s LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Krueger</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/09/monday-morning-poll-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239364</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=12003#comment-239364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guess we&#039;re such a bunch of friggin&#039; baby boomers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess we&#8217;re such a bunch of friggin&#8217; baby boomers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
