<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nat Hentoff Joins Cato</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/nat-hentoff-joins-cato/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/nat-hentoff-joins-cato/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:30:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/nat-hentoff-joins-cato/comment-page-1/#comment-238387</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11971#comment-238387</guid>
		<description>Awe-FUCKING-some. Now if only some syndicate would pick up his column....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awe-FUCKING-some. Now if only some syndicate would pick up his column&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helmut O' Hooligan</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/nat-hentoff-joins-cato/comment-page-1/#comment-238306</link>
		<dc:creator>Helmut O' Hooligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11971#comment-238306</guid>
		<description>Radley:  &quot;He’s no economic libertarian. But there’s been no more eloquent or and consistent defender of free speech and individual liberty over the last 35 years.&quot;

Agreed.  CATO attempted to reach out and form coalitions w/ left-of-center types years ago.  Maybe now is a good time to try it again.  Good for Nat and good for CATO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radley:  &#8220;He’s no economic libertarian. But there’s been no more eloquent or and consistent defender of free speech and individual liberty over the last 35 years.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed.  CATO attempted to reach out and form coalitions w/ left-of-center types years ago.  Maybe now is a good time to try it again.  Good for Nat and good for CATO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/nat-hentoff-joins-cato/comment-page-1/#comment-238294</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11971#comment-238294</guid>
		<description>&quot;...great news for libertarianism.&quot;

How exactly? Not that I have a problem with Mr. Hentoff, but how does Cato adding yet another &quot;senior fellow&quot; really advance libertarianism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;great news for libertarianism.&#8221;</p>
<p>How exactly? Not that I have a problem with Mr. Hentoff, but how does Cato adding yet another &#8220;senior fellow&#8221; really advance libertarianism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/nat-hentoff-joins-cato/comment-page-1/#comment-238281</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11971#comment-238281</guid>
		<description>@ #6 &#124; Windypundit:  Before I went to law school I worked in retail for a long time.  I don&#039;t know if the money Amazon pays varies depending on the kind of item, but I bet the margins on books are a hell of a lot better than the margins on televisions, especially in the current retail environment.  It would make sense if Amazon paid different rates based on the type of item.

No joke, I would make more money selling a $300.00 vacuum cleaner (10% * $300.00 = $30.00) than I would selling a big screen television (1.5% * $1,500.00 = $22.50), and a lot fewer people returned vacuum cleaners after the super bowl :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #6 | Windypundit:  Before I went to law school I worked in retail for a long time.  I don&#8217;t know if the money Amazon pays varies depending on the kind of item, but I bet the margins on books are a hell of a lot better than the margins on televisions, especially in the current retail environment.  It would make sense if Amazon paid different rates based on the type of item.</p>
<p>No joke, I would make more money selling a $300.00 vacuum cleaner (10% * $300.00 = $30.00) than I would selling a big screen television (1.5% * $1,500.00 = $22.50), and a lot fewer people returned vacuum cleaners after the super bowl :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windypundit</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/nat-hentoff-joins-cato/comment-page-1/#comment-238242</link>
		<dc:creator>Windypundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11971#comment-238242</guid>
		<description>@John Jenkins: If you follow any of the Amazon links on the left under &quot;Radley recommends...&quot; he will get credit for whatever you then buy at Amazon, even if it&#039;s not the linked item. So you can support Radley by clicking through and then searching for Hentoff&#039;s book and buying it. You can &lt;i&gt;seriously&lt;/i&gt; support Radley by clicking throuh and then buying a big screen television :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John Jenkins: If you follow any of the Amazon links on the left under &#8220;Radley recommends&#8230;&#8221; he will get credit for whatever you then buy at Amazon, even if it&#8217;s not the linked item. So you can support Radley by clicking through and then searching for Hentoff&#8217;s book and buying it. You can <i>seriously</i> support Radley by clicking throuh and then buying a big screen television :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/nat-hentoff-joins-cato/comment-page-1/#comment-238187</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11971#comment-238187</guid>
		<description>@Radley: Do you have one of those Amazon links where you get a percentage if we buy a book through your link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Radley: Do you have one of those Amazon links where you get a percentage if we buy a book through your link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMcC</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/nat-hentoff-joins-cato/comment-page-1/#comment-238186</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMcC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11971#comment-238186</guid>
		<description>Mr Jenkins got there ahead of me.  I was going to say that the music at CATO would prob&#039;ly be much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Jenkins got there ahead of me.  I was going to say that the music at CATO would prob&#8217;ly be much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radley Balko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/nat-hentoff-joins-cato/comment-page-1/#comment-238174</link>
		<dc:creator>Radley Balko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11971#comment-238174</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d go with the Nat Hentoff Reader for a good introduction:

http://www.amazon.com/Nat-Hentoff-Reader/dp/0306810840/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1233851962&amp;sr=8-1

He&#039;s no economic libertarian.  But there&#039;s been no more eloquent or and consistent defender of free speech and individual liberty over the last 35 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d go with the Nat Hentoff Reader for a good introduction:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0306810840/theagitator-20/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0306810840/theagitator-20/</a></p>
<p>He&#8217;s no economic libertarian.  But there&#8217;s been no more eloquent or and consistent defender of free speech and individual liberty over the last 35 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/nat-hentoff-joins-cato/comment-page-1/#comment-238168</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11971#comment-238168</guid>
		<description>@Radley:  What one book of Hentoff&#039;s political writings (as opposed to his jazz work) would you consider to be the &quot;essential&quot; Hentoff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Radley:  What one book of Hentoff&#8217;s political writings (as opposed to his jazz work) would you consider to be the &#8220;essential&#8221; Hentoff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windypundit</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/nat-hentoff-joins-cato/comment-page-1/#comment-238155</link>
		<dc:creator>Windypundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11971#comment-238155</guid>
		<description>Cool. Hentoff has been a great voice for liberty. One of his books on free speech was an early influence on me. He showed me that free speech absolutism was a completely workable idea, and that there&#039;s no need to compromise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. Hentoff has been a great voice for liberty. One of his books on free speech was an early influence on me. He showed me that free speech absolutism was a completely workable idea, and that there&#8217;s no need to compromise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

