<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morning Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberty Papers &#187;Blog Archive &#187; Wisconsin Police Woman Endangers Family</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-239467</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberty Papers &#187;Blog Archive &#187; Wisconsin Police Woman Endangers Family</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-239467</guid>
		<description>[...] Hat Tip: The Agitator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hat Tip: The Agitator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supercat</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238536</link>
		<dc:creator>supercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 06:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238536</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;They haven’t made the time to develop the discipline and self-control needed to be a REAL Police, and they screw up.&lt;/i&gt;

I wish more people would recognize this.  Many cops seem to think that the purpose of &quot;announcing&quot; themselves before a raid is to earn the approval of judges.  They don&#039;t really want the target of their raid to hear them (lest he have the audacity to open the door before they can bash it down).  They just want to be able to claim they &quot;announced&quot;.

IMHO, the world would be a much better and safer place for all honest people--including honest cops--if it were expected that that cops who bash down people&#039;s doors without either making a REAL effort to announce themselves IN SUCH FASHION AS TO BE HEARD, or having a darned good reason not to make such effort, would be shot dead on the spot.  Of course, policing might not be as much &quot;fun&quot;, but that sort of &quot;fun&quot; is something I&#039;d rather the cops not have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>They haven’t made the time to develop the discipline and self-control needed to be a REAL Police, and they screw up.</i></p>
<p>I wish more people would recognize this.  Many cops seem to think that the purpose of &#8220;announcing&#8221; themselves before a raid is to earn the approval of judges.  They don&#8217;t really want the target of their raid to hear them (lest he have the audacity to open the door before they can bash it down).  They just want to be able to claim they &#8220;announced&#8221;.</p>
<p>IMHO, the world would be a much better and safer place for all honest people&#8211;including honest cops&#8211;if it were expected that that cops who bash down people&#8217;s doors without either making a REAL effort to announce themselves IN SUCH FASHION AS TO BE HEARD, or having a darned good reason not to make such effort, would be shot dead on the spot.  Of course, policing might not be as much &#8220;fun&#8221;, but that sort of &#8220;fun&#8221; is something I&#8217;d rather the cops not have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helmut O' Hooligan</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238450</link>
		<dc:creator>Helmut O' Hooligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238450</guid>
		<description>#2 Mike Leatherwood:
&quot;Please, wake up, smell the coffee, and realize 90% of you are traffic enforcement officers and beat cops. Your vocation will never be heroic nor exciting. Cope, and leave us folks alone.&quot;

That&#039;s a good point, Mike.  A bit snarkier than I would have worded it, but basically true.  The late Carl Klockars (Criminal Justice Professor, U of Delaware) discussed this problem.  

Policing has been sold to people, including potential recruits like me, as something it is not.  My generation has been exposed to COPS and other shows that make it look like the job is wall to wall car chases and foot pursuits.  I should note that I stopped watching COPS and similar shows not long after I graduated from college (Crim. Justice major) and started working in healthcare security.  I couldn&#039;t take the bullshit anymore.  If you are constantly getting involved in chases and fights, you are working in a war zone or you are fucking up and making things worse than they need to be.  This is not why I became interested in policing.  Sadly for me, however, this is the image that is being conveyed to the public.

Some potential recurits, however, react differently from me.  They yearn for constant action.  When they get on the job and realize that they have been lied to, they burn out, or they gravitate toward action jobs (SWAT, Narcotics, etc.). &quot;Fuck this paperwork!&quot;  &quot;I&#039;m not a social worker!&quot; These are a couple of the phrases you will hear from the &quot;action cop.&quot; They haven&#039;t made the time to develop the discipline and self-control needed to be a REAL POlice, and they screw up.  Here&#039;s a good rule of thumb:  If a police applicant tells you he&#039;s in it for the action, he is going to be trouble!  Encourage him to be a fitness trainer or a stunt man.  Just keep him away from your local P.D..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2 Mike Leatherwood:<br />
&#8220;Please, wake up, smell the coffee, and realize 90% of you are traffic enforcement officers and beat cops. Your vocation will never be heroic nor exciting. Cope, and leave us folks alone.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good point, Mike.  A bit snarkier than I would have worded it, but basically true.  The late Carl Klockars (Criminal Justice Professor, U of Delaware) discussed this problem.  </p>
<p>Policing has been sold to people, including potential recruits like me, as something it is not.  My generation has been exposed to COPS and other shows that make it look like the job is wall to wall car chases and foot pursuits.  I should note that I stopped watching COPS and similar shows not long after I graduated from college (Crim. Justice major) and started working in healthcare security.  I couldn&#8217;t take the bullshit anymore.  If you are constantly getting involved in chases and fights, you are working in a war zone or you are fucking up and making things worse than they need to be.  This is not why I became interested in policing.  Sadly for me, however, this is the image that is being conveyed to the public.</p>
<p>Some potential recurits, however, react differently from me.  They yearn for constant action.  When they get on the job and realize that they have been lied to, they burn out, or they gravitate toward action jobs (SWAT, Narcotics, etc.). &#8220;Fuck this paperwork!&#8221;  &#8220;I&#8217;m not a social worker!&#8221; These are a couple of the phrases you will hear from the &#8220;action cop.&#8221; They haven&#8217;t made the time to develop the discipline and self-control needed to be a REAL POlice, and they screw up.  Here&#8217;s a good rule of thumb:  If a police applicant tells you he&#8217;s in it for the action, he is going to be trouble!  Encourage him to be a fitness trainer or a stunt man.  Just keep him away from your local P.D..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdinTally</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238364</link>
		<dc:creator>EdinTally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238364</guid>
		<description>#30 John...Your interpretation of the case is wrong as is your application of it to this incident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#30 John&#8230;Your interpretation of the case is wrong as is your application of it to this incident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical In CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238316</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical In CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238316</guid>
		<description>Excellent revision to the thought experiment, Zargon.  I&#039;m with you there.  But my wife would definitely not be chuckling.  She gets uptight about such things.  Probably blame me for having weed around for the kids to find.  OK, I&#039;m done with thinking for today ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent revision to the thought experiment, Zargon.  I&#8217;m with you there.  But my wife would definitely not be chuckling.  She gets uptight about such things.  Probably blame me for having weed around for the kids to find.  OK, I&#8217;m done with thinking for today &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238288</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238288</guid>
		<description>@ #22 &#124;  MassHole:  If the Supreme Court said it was not excessive arrest a woman for an &quot;offense,&quot; for which incarceration was *not* a penalty, I think it&#039;s an easy analogy to ramming someone whom the officer says she believes was trying to evade her not being excessive either.

As I said, it&#039;s a &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; deferential standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #22 |  MassHole:  If the Supreme Court said it was not excessive arrest a woman for an &#8220;offense,&#8221; for which incarceration was *not* a penalty, I think it&#8217;s an easy analogy to ramming someone whom the officer says she believes was trying to evade her not being excessive either.</p>
<p>As I said, it&#8217;s a <em>very</em> deferential standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wind Chime Alarm Clock &#124; Outdoor Wind Chimes Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238284</link>
		<dc:creator>Wind Chime Alarm Clock &#124; Outdoor Wind Chimes Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238284</guid>
		<description>[...] The Agitator » Blog Archive » Morning Links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Agitator » Blog Archive » Morning Links [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zargon</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238277</link>
		<dc:creator>Zargon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238277</guid>
		<description>Well, that thought experiment is a little cheaty.  Presumably, the kid didn&#039;t get the legal anesthesia for the purpose of entertaining the father.  I cringe at the thought of giving a kid any mind altering drugs for the purpose of the adult&#039;s personal amusement, whether they were legal or not.

If the kid decided himself to smoke a joint for his enjoyment, or was using one for some medical reason, I think I&#039;d be okay chuckling at the effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that thought experiment is a little cheaty.  Presumably, the kid didn&#8217;t get the legal anesthesia for the purpose of entertaining the father.  I cringe at the thought of giving a kid any mind altering drugs for the purpose of the adult&#8217;s personal amusement, whether they were legal or not.</p>
<p>If the kid decided himself to smoke a joint for his enjoyment, or was using one for some medical reason, I think I&#8217;d be okay chuckling at the effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical In CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238273</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical In CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238273</guid>
		<description>&quot;The free market was about to put those losers out of a job and the government prevented that.&quot;

Billy-Jay, what&#039;s the &quot;free market?&quot;  I think I read about that in an economics textbook one time a long time ago, but I&#039;ve never seen it in real life.  Have you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The free market was about to put those losers out of a job and the government prevented that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Billy-Jay, what&#8217;s the &#8220;free market?&#8221;  I think I read about that in an economics textbook one time a long time ago, but I&#8217;ve never seen it in real life.  Have you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidstvz</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238271</link>
		<dc:creator>davidstvz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238271</guid>
		<description>&quot;And right on the cue th epolice chief says &#039;the officer followed procedures perfectly and acted in a totally frickin&#039; sweet manner. yay!&#039;  Assholes.&quot;

They don&#039;t want to hang a cop out to dry publicly, but I&#039;m really hopeful that in most such cases the chief chews the guy out good once they&#039;re behind closed doors (which isn&#039;t perfect, but it&#039;s better than nothing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And right on the cue th epolice chief says &#8216;the officer followed procedures perfectly and acted in a totally frickin&#8217; sweet manner. yay!&#8217;  Assholes.&#8221;</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t want to hang a cop out to dry publicly, but I&#8217;m really hopeful that in most such cases the chief chews the guy out good once they&#8217;re behind closed doors (which isn&#8217;t perfect, but it&#8217;s better than nothing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical In CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238270</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical In CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238270</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dad records son on the way home from a trip to the dentist. Cute. And very funny. “Is this real life?”&quot;

Michael kinda beat me to it above, but I am interested in a little thought experiment.

The dentist is licensed to adminster mind-altering drugs to children.  It matters not whether that drug is legal or illegal from the child&#039;s standpoint, his mind has been altered.

Why are we amused at the child coming out from the effects of legal anaesthesia, but even the most diehard classical liberals among us would cringe if the father had given his son a joint and recorded the effects?  Or am I wrong -- would any of us cringe?

Honestly, and you know how I feel about things, I cringed just performing the thought experiment.  I could never give my kids a joint.  

I have been successfully conditioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dad records son on the way home from a trip to the dentist. Cute. And very funny. “Is this real life?”&#8221;</p>
<p>Michael kinda beat me to it above, but I am interested in a little thought experiment.</p>
<p>The dentist is licensed to adminster mind-altering drugs to children.  It matters not whether that drug is legal or illegal from the child&#8217;s standpoint, his mind has been altered.</p>
<p>Why are we amused at the child coming out from the effects of legal anaesthesia, but even the most diehard classical liberals among us would cringe if the father had given his son a joint and recorded the effects?  Or am I wrong &#8212; would any of us cringe?</p>
<p>Honestly, and you know how I feel about things, I cringed just performing the thought experiment.  I could never give my kids a joint.  </p>
<p>I have been successfully conditioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aresen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238255</link>
		<dc:creator>Aresen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238255</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
#23 &#124;  ChrisD &#124;  February 5th, 2009 at 2:46 pm 
Wouldn’t it be cheaper and safer to create a police Winter X-Games, fly them all out to Breckenridge, lodge them for a week and let them work off their testosterone there? Then maybe they can come back and be good police w/o trying to ramp up their adrenaline levels at the citizens’ expense.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, but where would they find volunteers for the &quot;Another Isolated Incident Event&quot;? 

And PETA might get upset about the &quot;Shoot the Dog&quot; event.

On the bright side, the big 3 automakers probably have lots of unsold vehicles that could be donated for the &quot;Ram the Car&quot; event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
#23 |  ChrisD |  February 5th, 2009 at 2:46 pm<br />
Wouldn’t it be cheaper and safer to create a police Winter X-Games, fly them all out to Breckenridge, lodge them for a week and let them work off their testosterone there? Then maybe they can come back and be good police w/o trying to ramp up their adrenaline levels at the citizens’ expense.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, but where would they find volunteers for the &#8220;Another Isolated Incident Event&#8221;? </p>
<p>And PETA might get upset about the &#8220;Shoot the Dog&#8221; event.</p>
<p>On the bright side, the big 3 automakers probably have lots of unsold vehicles that could be donated for the &#8220;Ram the Car&#8221; event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisD</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238244</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238244</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it be cheaper and safer to create a police Winter X-Games, fly them all out to Breckenridge, lodge them for a week and let them work off their testosterone there? Then maybe they can come back and be good police w/o trying to ramp up their adrenaline levels at the citizens&#039; expense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be cheaper and safer to create a police Winter X-Games, fly them all out to Breckenridge, lodge them for a week and let them work off their testosterone there? Then maybe they can come back and be good police w/o trying to ramp up their adrenaline levels at the citizens&#8217; expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MassHole</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238240</link>
		<dc:creator>MassHole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238240</guid>
		<description>John Jenkins:  I looked at the case and fail to see how it is applicable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Jenkins:  I looked at the case and fail to see how it is applicable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aresen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238237</link>
		<dc:creator>Aresen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238237</guid>
		<description>@Marty # 18

One mile at 10 to 30 mph: Between 2 to 6 mins. Obviously the chase was going on too long and she felt she had to end it before things got dangerous. :)

/snark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marty # 18</p>
<p>One mile at 10 to 30 mph: Between 2 to 6 mins. Obviously the chase was going on too long and she felt she had to end it before things got dangerous. :)</p>
<p>/snark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claude</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238234</link>
		<dc:creator>claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238234</guid>
		<description>Regarding the &quot;Cop rams family van full of kids&quot;, which comes from my neck of the woods.... one thing that i always look for on the strib site is the number of people who are agreeing with the comments that take issue with the officer. It tells me that people are starting to wake up and take notice. This is a good thing. Seeing comments on strib site that criticize the cops and noting the 230 of 349 people agree with that statement and then seeing 34 of 287 people agreeing with statements saying &quot;the officer was just doing her job&quot;, makes me smile. People are starting to take notice. Is the tide turning? I sure hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the &#8220;Cop rams family van full of kids&#8221;, which comes from my neck of the woods&#8230;. one thing that i always look for on the strib site is the number of people who are agreeing with the comments that take issue with the officer. It tells me that people are starting to wake up and take notice. This is a good thing. Seeing comments on strib site that criticize the cops and noting the 230 of 349 people agree with that statement and then seeing 34 of 287 people agreeing with statements saying &#8220;the officer was just doing her job&#8221;, makes me smile. People are starting to take notice. Is the tide turning? I sure hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238215</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238215</guid>
		<description>about the cop ramming the family- &#039; A one-mile pursuit that ended on a side street off I-94&#039; that&#039;s what, about a minute?!!!

all pretense of protecting the public is gone. they need a new uniform- maybe they should dress like the tax collectors in Hagar the Horrible.

SCREW the police.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about the cop ramming the family- &#8216; A one-mile pursuit that ended on a side street off I-94&#8242; that&#8217;s what, about a minute?!!!</p>
<p>all pretense of protecting the public is gone. they need a new uniform- maybe they should dress like the tax collectors in Hagar the Horrible.</p>
<p>SCREW the police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238209</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238209</guid>
		<description>Dad says,&quot;Kinda felt good?&quot;!  Now that is child abuse?!!  Encouraging the kid to like it when he gets high!  I wonder if dad will get mad, later on, when the kid decides to smoke a &quot;little weed&quot;! What are we telling the kids?!  I hope , seriously, this video does not get him in trouble, from the nanny state.

I refuse to read anymore Michael Phelps trash.  But maybe it will be good fro legalization.  Maybe we can get it up over 51%!

Cop behavior...more of the same.  It did not result in a death, but I feel it relates, very closely, to the other type of cop behavior we have all been discussing, on this blog.  Did you see the ratings on the responses? The rating scales at the bottom were really revealing.  Anyone who came on acting like the cops behavior was correct was voted down at a 90% rate!  One commenter talked about a friend&#039;s dad, (cop) being killed when standing on the side of the road, at a traffic stop.  Apparently, that is what they teach in driver&#039;s ed classes. Go to a safe place!

I know how that red light camera is getting so many!  When driving in a city where there were stop lines, I noted, daily, that NO ONE was stopping behind the stop lines, as the law states. The rules of the road say, in Indiana, in an instance where you can&#039;t see, you come to a complete stop first, then pull up.  Simple, the people were breaking the law, that most of us have done all the time.  The cameras just catch it.  But, it does not improve safety, at all.  It does add to the cities&#039; funds, though!  People will learn!  The bad guy, they thought they were going to catch, was us!  I thought bringing in jury trials were great!  They would have been a complete waste of time and money for the city!  Most all would be &quot;proven&quot; guilty.  But, they had extra revenue from these lights, did they not?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dad says,&#8221;Kinda felt good?&#8221;!  Now that is child abuse?!!  Encouraging the kid to like it when he gets high!  I wonder if dad will get mad, later on, when the kid decides to smoke a &#8220;little weed&#8221;! What are we telling the kids?!  I hope , seriously, this video does not get him in trouble, from the nanny state.</p>
<p>I refuse to read anymore Michael Phelps trash.  But maybe it will be good fro legalization.  Maybe we can get it up over 51%!</p>
<p>Cop behavior&#8230;more of the same.  It did not result in a death, but I feel it relates, very closely, to the other type of cop behavior we have all been discussing, on this blog.  Did you see the ratings on the responses? The rating scales at the bottom were really revealing.  Anyone who came on acting like the cops behavior was correct was voted down at a 90% rate!  One commenter talked about a friend&#8217;s dad, (cop) being killed when standing on the side of the road, at a traffic stop.  Apparently, that is what they teach in driver&#8217;s ed classes. Go to a safe place!</p>
<p>I know how that red light camera is getting so many!  When driving in a city where there were stop lines, I noted, daily, that NO ONE was stopping behind the stop lines, as the law states. The rules of the road say, in Indiana, in an instance where you can&#8217;t see, you come to a complete stop first, then pull up.  Simple, the people were breaking the law, that most of us have done all the time.  The cameras just catch it.  But, it does not improve safety, at all.  It does add to the cities&#8217; funds, though!  People will learn!  The bad guy, they thought they were going to catch, was us!  I thought bringing in jury trials were great!  They would have been a complete waste of time and money for the city!  Most all would be &#8220;proven&#8221; guilty.  But, they had extra revenue from these lights, did they not?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heretic</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238207</link>
		<dc:creator>heretic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238207</guid>
		<description>I do not think Miron can favor a carbon tax and still claim to be a libertarian.  Can we get a new spokesman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think Miron can favor a carbon tax and still claim to be a libertarian.  Can we get a new spokesman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thalience</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/02/05/morning-links-142/comment-page-1/#comment-238201</link>
		<dc:creator>Thalience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11967#comment-238201</guid>
		<description>Mosquito assault? Maybe if the mosquitoes released were actually infected with malaria....

But, realistically, where are you gonna get a box of mosquitoes from? My guess is a bio-science supply company that breeds them in clean conditions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mosquito assault? Maybe if the mosquitoes released were actually infected with malaria&#8230;.</p>
<p>But, realistically, where are you gonna get a box of mosquitoes from? My guess is a bio-science supply company that breeds them in clean conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

