Story here.

adding vindictive cops to the mix would make things ugly, indeed.

… do a little time and be done …

I seriously doubt Mr. Foster’s troubles will be over when he completes his sentence.

I would not be the least bit surprised to hear in the future, that his probation/parole officer in cohoots with the police, will fuck with him at every opportunity and try to get him back into the slammer or worse, set him up and kill him.

And that’s only if he survives prison.

The transparent (finally police transparency!) but blatant witness intimidation speaks for itself as to how far the police will go to get what they want and quite frankly, I think they want blood.

The economics of justice.

Or

He who has the gold makes the rules.

Maybe BamBam is on to something though …

I agree with what you’re saying, but I really don’t know what I’d do. To me, it looks like being sued- even though you know it’s bullshit, it might make a lot more sense to settle vs. spend more than the settlement to prove you were right.

He may have settled because he’d rather do a little time and be done vs having a long trial (in which he may remain locked up) and walk away with a clear name, but spend more in money and time fighting it.

I’ve thought about this lots of times – about breaking laws I disagree with and fighting them through the courts to protests them.

This is breaking laws because you disagree with them. This thread, and what I refer to, is being accused of a crime/s that you know you didn’t commit, e.g. false accusations. In a case like that, you should NEVER plea to a deal. I know I’d rather die than admit to something I didn’t do, and then be punished for it.

I reiterate:

A police officer acting in official capacity and not for direct personal gain and without malintent has license to kill.

Foster is lucky to be alive.

We citizens are all Foster.

We are all lucky to be alive.

There is a war on. Get it?

My guess is an OSU grad wrote this.