<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morning Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:40:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cynical In CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-228273</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical In CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-228273</guid>
		<description>It was a good guess, Bob.

Loved your rebuttal.  Guess you forfeit.

Quitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a good guess, Bob.</p>
<p>Loved your rebuttal.  Guess you forfeit.</p>
<p>Quitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-228210</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-228210</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hey Bob, you in your car doing exactly the speed limit (Not one bit over, and me in my little broke ass Civic doing 7 over every posted limit. Physics says I get to the destination faster.&quot;

I&#039;m curious as to why your &quot;Broke ass Civic&quot; Is somehow superior to whatever I drive. If it wasn&#039;t. you wouldn&#039;t have pointed it out, hmm?

As for &quot;Cynical in CA&quot;

&quot;First, it’s ok that you have a small penis.&quot;

I actually do have a fairly small penis. I have no idea how you know that, but it really doesn&#039;t matter.

The rest of your crap is just stupid. How about driving more safely instead? Hmm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hey Bob, you in your car doing exactly the speed limit (Not one bit over, and me in my little broke ass Civic doing 7 over every posted limit. Physics says I get to the destination faster.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious as to why your &#8220;Broke ass Civic&#8221; Is somehow superior to whatever I drive. If it wasn&#8217;t. you wouldn&#8217;t have pointed it out, hmm?</p>
<p>As for &#8220;Cynical in CA&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;First, it’s ok that you have a small penis.&#8221;</p>
<p>I actually do have a fairly small penis. I have no idea how you know that, but it really doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>The rest of your crap is just stupid. How about driving more safely instead? Hmm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SusanK</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-228010</link>
		<dc:creator>SusanK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-228010</guid>
		<description>About red light/speed cameras:  they&#039;re talking about them in my neck of the woods (sometimes it&#039;s good to be behind the times in Nebraska).  It usually involves a change in the law to state that there is a presumption that the registered owner was driving.   They can also change the way these have to be served, such as mailing to last registered address is sufficient service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About red light/speed cameras:  they&#8217;re talking about them in my neck of the woods (sometimes it&#8217;s good to be behind the times in Nebraska).  It usually involves a change in the law to state that there is a presumption that the registered owner was driving.   They can also change the way these have to be served, such as mailing to last registered address is sufficient service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claude</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227975</link>
		<dc:creator>claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227975</guid>
		<description>Ever notice how claims like the one in colorado r always in states where they actually have a winter? See folks, back over 20 years ago there was a study done in colorado. That study also dealt with heart attack rates based on admissions to the hospital. Had nothing to do with smoking tho. The study was comparing heart attack rates in colorado winter vs summer. Turns out admissions to the hospital were far higher in the winter as opposed to the summer. The study concluded that shoveling snow in the morning when males r more susceptible to heart attacks (something to do with higher testosterone levels in the morning) was the reason for the drastic differences. How does this relate to smoking bans? Well, in colorado the study they were using compared those rates in an 18 month period b4 and 18 month period after the ban. Yeah, the 18 month pre-ban data included 2 winters and 1 summer. The post ban data included 2 summers and 1 winter. In other words, youre not likely to see the same study in Hawaii. Those antismokers sure r sneaky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever notice how claims like the one in colorado r always in states where they actually have a winter? See folks, back over 20 years ago there was a study done in colorado. That study also dealt with heart attack rates based on admissions to the hospital. Had nothing to do with smoking tho. The study was comparing heart attack rates in colorado winter vs summer. Turns out admissions to the hospital were far higher in the winter as opposed to the summer. The study concluded that shoveling snow in the morning when males r more susceptible to heart attacks (something to do with higher testosterone levels in the morning) was the reason for the drastic differences. How does this relate to smoking bans? Well, in colorado the study they were using compared those rates in an 18 month period b4 and 18 month period after the ban. Yeah, the 18 month pre-ban data included 2 winters and 1 summer. The post ban data included 2 summers and 1 winter. In other words, youre not likely to see the same study in Hawaii. Those antismokers sure r sneaky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical In CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227974</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical In CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227974</guid>
		<description>#67 &#124;  Bob &#124;  January 7th, 2009 at 1:17 am 

&quot;Let me get this straight. When you BLOW THROUGH A RED LIGHT you put your hand over your face so the camera can’t nab you? For the love of god, I hope I don’t ever have to drive anywhere near you.  You guys crack me up.&quot; 

First, it&#039;s ok that you have a small penis.

Second, it has been proved that many municipalities contract with private red-light camera companies working under a profit motive, so there is incentive to generate as much revenue as possible.  This leads to nasty little tactics like 3-second yellow lights and camera &quot;malfunctions&quot; where a picture is taken even if you weren&#039;t in the intersection.

Nowhere in my post did I admit that I run red lights.  If a yellow light is only 3 seconds in duration, it is practically impossible to stop in time.  Stopping short can be just as dangerous as running the light, as you might get rear-ended.  Very dangerous if you&#039;re driving a Ford Pinto.

And in one of the classic examples of perverse incentives, drivers are now being trained to slam on their brakes when the light turns yellow, causing more accidents than if they proceeded through the red light.

BTW, going through a red light is not dangerous per se -- it depends on how long the light has been red.  Less than one second, no big deal.  The other light isn&#039;t even green yet.  No oncoming traffic, no big deal.

Just to bring it on home to libertarianism, Bob, red-light and speeding cameras remove individual judgment from the equation.  No matter how f&#039;ed up people may be, taking away their judgment can only make it worse.

Please do a better job of thinking next time, Bob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#67 |  Bob |  January 7th, 2009 at 1:17 am </p>
<p>&#8220;Let me get this straight. When you BLOW THROUGH A RED LIGHT you put your hand over your face so the camera can’t nab you? For the love of god, I hope I don’t ever have to drive anywhere near you.  You guys crack me up.&#8221; </p>
<p>First, it&#8217;s ok that you have a small penis.</p>
<p>Second, it has been proved that many municipalities contract with private red-light camera companies working under a profit motive, so there is incentive to generate as much revenue as possible.  This leads to nasty little tactics like 3-second yellow lights and camera &#8220;malfunctions&#8221; where a picture is taken even if you weren&#8217;t in the intersection.</p>
<p>Nowhere in my post did I admit that I run red lights.  If a yellow light is only 3 seconds in duration, it is practically impossible to stop in time.  Stopping short can be just as dangerous as running the light, as you might get rear-ended.  Very dangerous if you&#8217;re driving a Ford Pinto.</p>
<p>And in one of the classic examples of perverse incentives, drivers are now being trained to slam on their brakes when the light turns yellow, causing more accidents than if they proceeded through the red light.</p>
<p>BTW, going through a red light is not dangerous per se &#8212; it depends on how long the light has been red.  Less than one second, no big deal.  The other light isn&#8217;t even green yet.  No oncoming traffic, no big deal.</p>
<p>Just to bring it on home to libertarianism, Bob, red-light and speeding cameras remove individual judgment from the equation.  No matter how f&#8217;ed up people may be, taking away their judgment can only make it worse.</p>
<p>Please do a better job of thinking next time, Bob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomasblair</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227972</link>
		<dc:creator>thomasblair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227972</guid>
		<description>Bob,

&lt;blockquote&gt;Let me get this straight. When you BLOW THROUGH A RED LIGHT you put your hand over your face so the camera can’t nab you?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Fuck! Can you read or are you willfully obtuse?

Try again:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I leave a little gap between my fingers &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;so I can still see&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Fail &gt; Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<blockquote><p>Let me get this straight. When you BLOW THROUGH A RED LIGHT you put your hand over your face so the camera can’t nab you?</p></blockquote>
<p>Fuck! Can you read or are you willfully obtuse?</p>
<p>Try again:</p>
<blockquote><p>I leave a little gap between my fingers <i><b>so I can still see</b></i>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Fail &gt; Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris K</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227967</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227967</guid>
		<description>The thing about 3rd hand smoke exposure is that the dangers of 2nd hand smoke have never been proven; the &quot;statistical evidence&quot; is just that: numbers jerryrigged to scare and sell smoking cessation products. Seriously, they claim what? Second hand smoke increases the risk of cancers by 20%. OK, but what&#039;re the risks of a non-smoker getting cancer to beging with? Average. And a 20% chance + average is still more or less average. Take a look at who funds these studies and wild claims - Robert Wood Johnson is one huge purse in the anti-smoking campaign. Their non-profit is funded primarily with Johnson &amp; Johnson dividends, which they receive at 1% tax as a NPO. Who makes Nicorette? Johnson &amp; Johnson. 

I don&#039;t dispute the adverse health effects of smoking, but it&#039;s a person&#039;s choice to do that to themselves. I completely dispute anyone&#039;s claims to protect someone from their self. 

Finally, by way of analogy, the National Cancer Institute published a study that women using Listerine (and other mouthwashes with 25%+ ABV) had a 90% higher risk of cancer than those who did not, and men a 60% risk. But what did the institute conclude? They said the findings &quot;do not firmly establish the risk.&quot; Cf. the second hand smokescreen. 

&gt; http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE6DC133EF930A15757C0A967958260

It&#039;s a nuisance, but tough shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about 3rd hand smoke exposure is that the dangers of 2nd hand smoke have never been proven; the &#8220;statistical evidence&#8221; is just that: numbers jerryrigged to scare and sell smoking cessation products. Seriously, they claim what? Second hand smoke increases the risk of cancers by 20%. OK, but what&#8217;re the risks of a non-smoker getting cancer to beging with? Average. And a 20% chance + average is still more or less average. Take a look at who funds these studies and wild claims &#8211; Robert Wood Johnson is one huge purse in the anti-smoking campaign. Their non-profit is funded primarily with Johnson &amp; Johnson dividends, which they receive at 1% tax as a NPO. Who makes Nicorette? Johnson &amp; Johnson. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t dispute the adverse health effects of smoking, but it&#8217;s a person&#8217;s choice to do that to themselves. I completely dispute anyone&#8217;s claims to protect someone from their self. </p>
<p>Finally, by way of analogy, the National Cancer Institute published a study that women using Listerine (and other mouthwashes with 25%+ ABV) had a 90% higher risk of cancer than those who did not, and men a 60% risk. But what did the institute conclude? They said the findings &#8220;do not firmly establish the risk.&#8221; Cf. the second hand smokescreen. </p>
<p>&gt; <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE6DC133EF930A15757C0A967958260" rel="nofollow">http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE6DC133EF930A15757C0A967958260</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a nuisance, but tough shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve S</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227918</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227918</guid>
		<description>Red light story appears to be an urban legend: http://www.snopes.com/autos/law/snaptrap.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red light story appears to be an urban legend: <a href="http://www.snopes.com/autos/law/snaptrap.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/autos/law/snaptrap.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy-jay</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227917</link>
		<dc:creator>billy-jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227917</guid>
		<description>Bob, I was with you until you tried to turn your post into a smear of libertarians.

Screw you. Get the hell out of here and don&#039;t come back until you have two braincells to rub together. You and your collectivist hive mind need to evolve to the point where you are capable of rational thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, I was with you until you tried to turn your post into a smear of libertarians.</p>
<p>Screw you. Get the hell out of here and don&#8217;t come back until you have two braincells to rub together. You and your collectivist hive mind need to evolve to the point where you are capable of rational thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Chef</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227844</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Chef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227844</guid>
		<description>Hey Bob, you in your car doing &lt;i&gt;exactly&lt;/i&gt; the speed limit (Not one bit over, and me in my little broke ass Civic doing 7 over every posted limit.  Physics says I get to the destination faster. 

Your final point is so full of shit that only select members of congress could shovel it all.

Physics &gt; Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bob, you in your car doing <i>exactly</i> the speed limit (Not one bit over, and me in my little broke ass Civic doing 7 over every posted limit.  Physics says I get to the destination faster. </p>
<p>Your final point is so full of shit that only select members of congress could shovel it all.</p>
<p>Physics &gt; Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227836</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227836</guid>
		<description>&quot;When I drive through a camera intersection, I put my hand in front of my face, including my eyes. I leave a little gap between my fingers so I can still see.&quot;

Let me get this straight. When you BLOW THROUGH A RED LIGHT you put your hand over your face so the camera can&#039;t nab you? For the love of god, I hope I don&#039;t ever have to drive anywhere near you.

You guys crack me up. 

Why don&#039;t you... Oh, I don&#039;t know... just not speed or run red lights?

Oh wait, that would be safe. And that, apparently, isn&#039;t the libertarian way.

Personally?  I haven&#039;t gotten a speeding ticket in 30 years. Here in Fairfax, we have Camera Intersections all over... and yet! I fail to get tickets.

Why is that? Oh! It&#039;s because I don&#039;t speed or run red lights.

And yet... I still get to my destination no slower than you. Hmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When I drive through a camera intersection, I put my hand in front of my face, including my eyes. I leave a little gap between my fingers so I can still see.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let me get this straight. When you BLOW THROUGH A RED LIGHT you put your hand over your face so the camera can&#8217;t nab you? For the love of god, I hope I don&#8217;t ever have to drive anywhere near you.</p>
<p>You guys crack me up. </p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you&#8230; Oh, I don&#8217;t know&#8230; just not speed or run red lights?</p>
<p>Oh wait, that would be safe. And that, apparently, isn&#8217;t the libertarian way.</p>
<p>Personally?  I haven&#8217;t gotten a speeding ticket in 30 years. Here in Fairfax, we have Camera Intersections all over&#8230; and yet! I fail to get tickets.</p>
<p>Why is that? Oh! It&#8217;s because I don&#8217;t speed or run red lights.</p>
<p>And yet&#8230; I still get to my destination no slower than you. Hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crack</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227835</link>
		<dc:creator>crack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227835</guid>
		<description>You might appreciate Radley, another problem with &#039;obesity&#039; related deaths.

http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2009/01/05/chemo_dosage_obese_women/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might appreciate Radley, another problem with &#8216;obesity&#8217; related deaths.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2009/01/05/chemo_dosage_obese_women/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2009/01/05/chemo_dosage_obese_women/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Werner Patels</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227831</link>
		<dc:creator>Werner Patels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227831</guid>
		<description>Third-hand smoke, is it now, eh? I can picture it now: the entire anti-smoking lobby dies of cancer ... of the brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Third-hand smoke, is it now, eh? I can picture it now: the entire anti-smoking lobby dies of cancer &#8230; of the brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James D</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227771</link>
		<dc:creator>James D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227771</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in PHX area too Balloon, it sucks .... rumor is the new Governor might get rid of the damn things ..... crossing my fingers ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in PHX area too Balloon, it sucks &#8230;. rumor is the new Governor might get rid of the damn things &#8230;.. crossing my fingers &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supercat</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227747</link>
		<dc:creator>supercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227747</guid>
		<description>//Man dies 50 years after contact with 5th hand smoke, confirming scientific studies.//

The joys of statistical homeopathy (the more remote the causality, the more powerful the presumed causitive agent)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>//Man dies 50 years after contact with 5th hand smoke, confirming scientific studies.//</p>
<p>The joys of statistical homeopathy (the more remote the causality, the more powerful the presumed causitive agent)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical in CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227742</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical in CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227742</guid>
		<description>I drive without a front license plate (never been pulled over for it in 5 years, the one time I was pulled over was for not having a light over my rear license plate).

When I drive through a camera intersection, I put my hand in front of my face, including my eyes.  I leave a little gap between my fingers so I can still see.

A while back, I even sprayed a reflective substance on my rear plate, but that fades too quickly and leaves ugly yellow stains.

There could be no end to the various methods one can use to thwart cameras, yet the State is raking in the dough.

Sheeple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I drive without a front license plate (never been pulled over for it in 5 years, the one time I was pulled over was for not having a light over my rear license plate).</p>
<p>When I drive through a camera intersection, I put my hand in front of my face, including my eyes.  I leave a little gap between my fingers so I can still see.</p>
<p>A while back, I even sprayed a reflective substance on my rear plate, but that fades too quickly and leaves ugly yellow stains.</p>
<p>There could be no end to the various methods one can use to thwart cameras, yet the State is raking in the dough.</p>
<p>Sheeple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balloon Maker</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227738</link>
		<dc:creator>Balloon Maker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227738</guid>
		<description>note on beating camera tickets. I live in PHX, which is blanketed with the f&#039;in things. If my wife and I are in a hurry, i drive her car. ticket comes in her name with a picture of me. Mail it in. Done and done.

Or just wear a mask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>note on beating camera tickets. I live in PHX, which is blanketed with the f&#8217;in things. If my wife and I are in a hurry, i drive her car. ticket comes in her name with a picture of me. Mail it in. Done and done.</p>
<p>Or just wear a mask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Greenwald thinks Obama&#8217;s latest appointments are good at Klintron&#8217;s Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227721</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Greenwald thinks Obama&#8217;s latest appointments are good at Klintron&#8217;s Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227721</guid>
		<description>[...] (via The Agitator) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via The Agitator) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacGregory</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227709</link>
		<dc:creator>MacGregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227709</guid>
		<description>And what of the effects of second and third hand perfume/cologne? Anyone who has every worked in an office knows WTF I&#039;m talking about.

But I guess thats better than being around someone who just needs to take a fucking bath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what of the effects of second and third hand perfume/cologne? Anyone who has every worked in an office knows WTF I&#8217;m talking about.</p>
<p>But I guess thats better than being around someone who just needs to take a fucking bath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/06/morning-links-128/comment-page-2/#comment-227701</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11647#comment-227701</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait for the UT legislature to get their hands on that article, they will for sure be the first theocracy to implement more bans on smoking.  

I wish some asswipe group would do a study on the harmful effects of breathing in the stench from a deep fat fryer that permeates everything in the entire building!  

No that crap stinks!  Sends my brain into full retreat mode it does!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait for the UT legislature to get their hands on that article, they will for sure be the first theocracy to implement more bans on smoking.  </p>
<p>I wish some asswipe group would do a study on the harmful effects of breathing in the stench from a deep fat fryer that permeates everything in the entire building!  </p>
<p>No that crap stinks!  Sends my brain into full retreat mode it does!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
