Comments on: “That’s My Penis”

By: TJIC

TJIC — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:23:04 +0000

Oh, come on.

We already knew that 3/4 of the guys on the force are there because they confuse pistols with peckers.

By: dispatches from TJICistan » Blog Archive » Freudianism with a badge

dispatches from TJICistan » Blog Archive » Freudianism with a badge — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:22:00 +0000

[...] http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/04/th… [...]

By: Helmut O' Hooligan

Helmut O' Hooligan — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:51:46 +0000

#17: Joel Rosenberg

True. If there was a reason for the frisk, then it had to be thorough. It was just rather embarassing for the officer and citizen alike.

#11 Jeremy: “I’m sure there are really respectful, polite, and tender ways to do a cavity search, too.”

Really???? Wow, Jeremy. Thanks for demonstrating a classic example of an apples v. organges argument. A patdown of the clothing versus a close-up search of the nether regions. Sure, no difference at all.

By: Joel Rosenberg

Joel Rosenberg — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:29:58 +0000

Funny video, but given that some folks do carry in Thunderwear (raising hand), if a frisk is proper, frisking the, err, usual area for t-wear is.

By: jahigginbotham

jahigginbotham — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:13:39 +0000

#10 Chris,
you are so right

I think video would have been better without the title giving it away. It’s annoying (but more understandable) when a newspaper article’s twist is revealed by the title added to the story.

PS Would that be “copping a feel” ?

By: John Jenkins

John Jenkins — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:47:31 +0000

Sen. Larry Craig might have given the officer a tip (money, I mean, you sick bastards).

By: parse

parse — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:01:02 +0000

This is my rifle, this is my gun. . .

By: RL imitates cinema

RL imitates cinema — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:12:53 +0000

I think I saw this already in “To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything – Julie Newmar”.

By: Mikestermike

Mikestermike — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:07:14 +0000

I am wondering if I wouldn’t mind if my penis was confused with a Glock.
**Insert “concealed weapon joke ” here **

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:31:27 +0000

Assuming there was a good reason to frisk him, this seems like a responsible and courteous search

I’m sure there are really respectful, polite, and tender ways to do a cavity search, too.

By: Chris Berez

Chris Berez — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:50:15 +0000

When I watched that video, I thought, “Well, that’s definitely a blow to my self-esteem.”

There’s no way in hell I’m the only one of us who thought that.

By: Marty

Marty — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:56:43 +0000

this will inspire bunches of break kids to duct tape sausages to their stomachs!

By: bk

bk — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:42:49 +0000

That seems like an uncomfortable place to keep your penis.

By: Robin

Robin — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:55:59 +0000

How was that his penis? That guy needs to learn how to wear pants.

By: Mr. Peepers

Mr. Peepers — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:37:36 +0000

When a cop can get away with grabbing the penises of strangers on the street but when I do it I get arrested and put on the Sex Offenders registry. Fascism.

By: scott clark

scott clark — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:30:12 +0000

see, Justice Scalia’s got a point

By: Jonathan Hohensee

Jonathan Hohensee — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:20:10 +0000

“Assuming there was a good reason to frisk him, this seems like a responsible and courteous search”
I agree, but that doesn’t mean that it wasn’t awwwwwwwkward.

By: PolyTick

PolyTick — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:53:44 +0000

So why is the face of the uniformed thug blotted out, but not the victim (er….) suspect?

By: Dermanus

Dermanus — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:37:41 +0000

They make holsters to go on your crotch since it’s not a popular place to frisk. Still a funny video though.

By: qwints

qwints — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:31:24 +0000

??
Assuming there was a good reason to frisk him, this seems like a responsible and courteous search.