20 Responses to ““That’s My Penis””

1. #1 |  qwints |  January 4th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

   ??
   Assuming there was a good reason to frisk him, this seems like a responsible and courteous search.

      +8
2. #2 |  Dermanus |  January 4th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

   They make holsters to go on your crotch since it’s not a popular place to frisk. Still a funny video though.

      +0
3. #3 |  PolyTick |  January 4th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

   So why is the face of the uniformed thug blotted out, but not the victim (er….) suspect?

      +11
4. #4 |  Jonathan Hohensee |  January 4th, 2009 at 3:20 pm

   “Assuming there was a good reason to frisk him, this seems like a responsible and courteous search”
   I agree, but that doesn’t mean that it wasn’t awwwwwwwkward.

      +6
5. #5 |  scott clark |  January 4th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

   see, Justice Scalia’s got a point

      +2
6. #6 |  Mr. Peepers |  January 4th, 2009 at 3:37 pm

   When a cop can get away with grabbing the penises of strangers on the street but when I do it I get arrested and put on the Sex Offenders registry. Fascism.

      +19
7. #7 |  Robin |  January 4th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

   How was that his penis? That guy needs to learn how to wear pants.

      +13
8. #8 |  bk |  January 4th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

   That seems like an uncomfortable place to keep your penis.

      +9
9. #9 |  Marty |  January 4th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

   this will inspire bunches of break kids to duct tape sausages to their stomachs!

      +3
10. #10 |  Chris Berez |  January 4th, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    When I watched that video, I thought, “Well, that’s definitely a blow to my self-esteem.”

    There’s no way in hell I’m the only one of us who thought that.

       +7
11. #11 |  Jeremy |  January 4th, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    Assuming there was a good reason to frisk him, this seems like a responsible and courteous search

    I’m sure there are really respectful, polite, and tender ways to do a cavity search, too.

       +6
12. #12 |  Mikestermike |  January 5th, 2009 at 3:07 am

    I am wondering if I wouldn’t mind if my penis was confused with a Glock.
    **Insert “concealed weapon joke ” here **

       +3
13. #13 |  RL imitates cinema |  January 5th, 2009 at 3:12 am

    I think I saw this already in “To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything – Julie Newmar”.

       +0
14. #14 |  parse |  January 5th, 2009 at 9:01 am

    This is my rifle, this is my gun. . .

       +4
15. #15 |  John Jenkins |  January 5th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    Sen. Larry Craig might have given the officer a tip (money, I mean, you sick bastards).

       +0
16. #16 |  jahigginbotham |  January 5th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    #10 Chris,
    you are so right

    I think video would have been better without the title giving it away. It’s annoying (but more understandable) when a newspaper article’s twist is revealed by the title added to the story.

    PS Would that be “copping a feel” ?

       +1
17. #17 |  Joel Rosenberg |  January 5th, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    Funny video, but given that some folks do carry in Thunderwear (raising hand), if a frisk is proper, frisking the, err, usual area for t-wear is.

       +1
18. #18 |  Helmut O' Hooligan |  January 5th, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    #17: Joel Rosenberg

    True. If there was a reason for the frisk, then it had to be thorough. It was just rather embarassing for the officer and citizen alike.

    #11 Jeremy: “I’m sure there are really respectful, polite, and tender ways to do a cavity search, too.”

    Really???? Wow, Jeremy. Thanks for demonstrating a classic example of an apples v. organges argument. A patdown of the clothing versus a close-up search of the nether regions. Sure, no difference at all.

       +0
19. #19 |  dispatches from TJICistan » Blog Archive » Freudianism with a badge |  January 6th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    [...] http://www.theagitator.com/2009/01/04/th…; [...]

       +0
20. #20 |  TJIC |  January 6th, 2009 at 10:23 am

    Oh, come on.

    We already knew that 3/4 of the guys on the force are there because they confuse pistols with peckers.

       +0

---