<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Fox column&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:00:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-225546</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 08:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-225546</guid>
		<description>Great article.  Will be sharing a link on my blog
http://www.rightklik.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  Will be sharing a link on my blog<br />
<a href="http://www.rightklik.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rightklik.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical In CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-225523</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical In CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-225523</guid>
		<description>Radley wrote: &quot;My Fox column…this week is a year-end roundup of good news.&quot;

Must be the shortest fucking column in history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radley wrote: &#8220;My Fox column…this week is a year-end roundup of good news.&#8221;</p>
<p>Must be the shortest fucking column in history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical In CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-225522</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical In CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-225522</guid>
		<description>Damn, Helmut.  You sure you haven&#039;t turned anarchist on us?  Your #12 sounds like something I might have written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, Helmut.  You sure you haven&#8217;t turned anarchist on us?  Your #12 sounds like something I might have written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick T</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224741</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224741</guid>
		<description>#12 I think it&#039;s less simple than that. I think it&#039;s actual devious.  I would compare arguments against sexualized popular culture to arguments against &quot;teh gays.&quot;  At the core level, opponents just don&#039;t like it. I mean, it REALLY bothers there senses of decency and appropriateness and non-grossness.  And so, not being naturally inclined to care about the rights of others, or to pontificate on the complexities of a free society, they lash out at it politically.  Then, in the political arena, when met with the obvious retort of &quot;so what? where&#039;s the harm?&quot;  They desperately and dishonestly come up with crap about increased incidence of sexual violence and destroying the sanctity of marriage, based purely on conjecture.  It&#039;s grasping at straws by people stupid enough to hold the opinion, but not so stupid as to not be able to lie to your face about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#12 I think it&#8217;s less simple than that. I think it&#8217;s actual devious.  I would compare arguments against sexualized popular culture to arguments against &#8220;teh gays.&#8221;  At the core level, opponents just don&#8217;t like it. I mean, it REALLY bothers there senses of decency and appropriateness and non-grossness.  And so, not being naturally inclined to care about the rights of others, or to pontificate on the complexities of a free society, they lash out at it politically.  Then, in the political arena, when met with the obvious retort of &#8220;so what? where&#8217;s the harm?&#8221;  They desperately and dishonestly come up with crap about increased incidence of sexual violence and destroying the sanctity of marriage, based purely on conjecture.  It&#8217;s grasping at straws by people stupid enough to hold the opinion, but not so stupid as to not be able to lie to your face about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helmut O' Hooligan</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224647</link>
		<dc:creator>Helmut O' Hooligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224647</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many conservatives and some leftist feminists often argue that the widespread availability of pornography and the &quot;mainstreaming&quot; of sex may effect an epidemic of sexual violence.&quot;

Ah yes, that old argument. These folks are opposite sides of the same authoritarian coin.  Former Police Chief Anthony Bouza was once asked about the possibility of holding porn mag/film producers liable for sex crimes if offenders were known to view this material.  He responded by calling the idea &quot;fascist rubbish&quot; (see his book &quot;Police Unbound&quot;).  I concur.  I don&#039;t think there is a solid link between porn and sex crimes.  It&#039;s a lot more complicated than that, which is why statists of the Left and Right need to look for simple answers.  Simple people, after all, require simple explanations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many conservatives and some leftist feminists often argue that the widespread availability of pornography and the &#8220;mainstreaming&#8221; of sex may effect an epidemic of sexual violence.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah yes, that old argument. These folks are opposite sides of the same authoritarian coin.  Former Police Chief Anthony Bouza was once asked about the possibility of holding porn mag/film producers liable for sex crimes if offenders were known to view this material.  He responded by calling the idea &#8220;fascist rubbish&#8221; (see his book &#8220;Police Unbound&#8221;).  I concur.  I don&#8217;t think there is a solid link between porn and sex crimes.  It&#8217;s a lot more complicated than that, which is why statists of the Left and Right need to look for simple answers.  Simple people, after all, require simple explanations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224609</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224609</guid>
		<description>#6 &amp; #7

Just be aware that &quot;Hope and Change&quot; can become &quot;To Serve Man&quot; without prior notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#6 &amp; #7</p>
<p>Just be aware that &#8220;Hope and Change&#8221; can become &#8220;To Serve Man&#8221; without prior notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank N</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224563</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224563</guid>
		<description>No Radley, that&#039;s just your 2003 Agity Comments Section Lifetime Achievement Award Winner being a smart ass...been awhile.

I&#039;m just poking at the all bad things are Bush&#039;s fault...just wondering if all good things will be bestowed upon us by Obama....I mean it couldn&#039;t be the evolving of the US populace...could it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Radley, that&#8217;s just your 2003 Agity Comments Section Lifetime Achievement Award Winner being a smart ass&#8230;been awhile.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just poking at the all bad things are Bush&#8217;s fault&#8230;just wondering if all good things will be bestowed upon us by Obama&#8230;.I mean it couldn&#8217;t be the evolving of the US populace&#8230;could it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob S</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224558</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224558</guid>
		<description>Hi Radley,

Thanks for another fantastic year of blogging goodness!  If I may, there were two other worthy items that occurred this year.  I thought the Doe v Mukasey verdict was worth cheering as well was the recently signed Chinese-Taiwan free trade agreement.  Just my $.02...  Anyway, Happy New Year Radily, I look forward to another year of Agitation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Radley,</p>
<p>Thanks for another fantastic year of blogging goodness!  If I may, there were two other worthy items that occurred this year.  I thought the Doe v Mukasey verdict was worth cheering as well was the recently signed Chinese-Taiwan free trade agreement.  Just my $.02&#8230;  Anyway, Happy New Year Radily, I look forward to another year of Agitation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick T</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224470</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224470</guid>
		<description>So what you&#039;re saying Radley is that the drug war is working!? Yaaaaaay! More drug war please!

/satire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what you&#8217;re saying Radley is that the drug war is working!? Yaaaaaay! More drug war please!</p>
<p>/satire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radley Balko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224397</link>
		<dc:creator>Radley Balko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224397</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Wait if its good news, do I still blame Bush? Anyone see my leftwing playbook? Is this were I just chant “hope and change” while looking around clueless wearing an Vote for Obama shirt?&lt;/em&gt;

I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s a swipe at me or not.  But my general feeling is that while politicians can cause a lot of harm, when good things happen, it&#039;s general in spite of politicians, not because of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Wait if its good news, do I still blame Bush? Anyone see my leftwing playbook? Is this were I just chant “hope and change” while looking around clueless wearing an Vote for Obama shirt?</em></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s a swipe at me or not.  But my general feeling is that while politicians can cause a lot of harm, when good things happen, it&#8217;s general in spite of politicians, not because of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank N</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224382</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224382</guid>
		<description>Wait if its good news, do I still blame Bush? Anyone see my leftwing playbook? Is this were I just chant &quot;hope and change&quot; while looking around clueless wearing an Vote for Obama shirt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait if its good news, do I still blame Bush? Anyone see my leftwing playbook? Is this were I just chant &#8220;hope and change&#8221; while looking around clueless wearing an Vote for Obama shirt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank N</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224375</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224375</guid>
		<description>You flipping happy go lucky libertarian...don&#039;t you know the world is coming to an end! :)

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You flipping happy go lucky libertarian&#8230;don&#8217;t you know the world is coming to an end! :)</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224321</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224321</guid>
		<description>When do we get your &quot;Predictions of what&#039;s to come in 2009 that&#039;s really a depressing look back at all the government excesses of 2008&quot; article? That one&#039;s always good for a downer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When do we get your &#8220;Predictions of what&#8217;s to come in 2009 that&#8217;s really a depressing look back at all the government excesses of 2008&#8243; article? That one&#8217;s always good for a downer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radley Balko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224313</link>
		<dc:creator>Radley Balko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224313</guid>
		<description>Brock --

Yep.  Thanks for picking up the error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brock &#8211;</p>
<p>Yep.  Thanks for picking up the error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224312</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224312</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused by this paragraph of your column.

&lt;i&gt;Beginning in 1994, juvenile crime dropped dramatically for a decade. By 2004, juvenile crime was at its lowest point in a quarter century. The numbers edged up slightly in 2005 and 2006, but juvenile violent crime is still 40 percent lower than it was in 1994. The juvenile murder rate is a whopping 73 percent below its high in 2003.&lt;/i&gt;

Should that last sentence read, &quot;73 percent below its high in &lt;b&gt;1993&lt;/b&gt;&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused by this paragraph of your column.</p>
<p><i>Beginning in 1994, juvenile crime dropped dramatically for a decade. By 2004, juvenile crime was at its lowest point in a quarter century. The numbers edged up slightly in 2005 and 2006, but juvenile violent crime is still 40 percent lower than it was in 1994. The juvenile murder rate is a whopping 73 percent below its high in 2003.</i></p>
<p>Should that last sentence read, &#8220;73 percent below its high in <b>1993</b>&#8220;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/30/my-fox-column-32/comment-page-1/#comment-224311</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11580#comment-224311</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m outraged, radley! How dare you not predict a doom and gloom future with lots and lots of sturm und drang? Next thing you&#039;ll be saying is that temperature fluctuations worldwide are more likely the result of changes in solar cycles driving meterological patterns than human-created global warming? When will it end, folks? When will it end?

OOH.. my first time being first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m outraged, radley! How dare you not predict a doom and gloom future with lots and lots of sturm und drang? Next thing you&#8217;ll be saying is that temperature fluctuations worldwide are more likely the result of changes in solar cycles driving meterological patterns than human-created global warming? When will it end, folks? When will it end?</p>
<p>OOH.. my first time being first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

