<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Professionalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 01:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy-jay</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219628</link>
		<dc:creator>billy-jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reposted from a previous thread:

Aside to Jason: I imagine that most of the negative comment karma you’re getting is the result of you including the link to your blog in every comment. Protip: that’s spamming. Your name is already a link, man. The best way to get people to your site is to make insightful comments so that they’re interested in hearing more from you. Dropping throwaway one-liners with a link to your place at the bottom just turns people off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reposted from a previous thread:</p>
<p>Aside to Jason: I imagine that most of the negative comment karma you’re getting is the result of you including the link to your blog in every comment. Protip: that’s spamming. Your name is already a link, man. The best way to get people to your site is to make insightful comments so that they’re interested in hearing more from you. Dropping throwaway one-liners with a link to your place at the bottom just turns people off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219591</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This could have happened just about anywhere.
http://rightklik.blogspot.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could have happened just about anywhere.<br />
<a href="http://rightklik.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://rightklik.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livingpre911still</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219557</link>
		<dc:creator>livingpre911still</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real crimes are the blatant lie the States Attorney told when he said&lt; &quot;There has been no special treatment because he is a police officer&quot; and ofcourse no special treatment from within saying that the notice for court was sent on saturday for a monday court date... riiiiiggghhhht....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real crimes are the blatant lie the States Attorney told when he said&lt; &#8220;There has been no special treatment because he is a police officer&#8221; and ofcourse no special treatment from within saying that the notice for court was sent on saturday for a monday court date&#8230; riiiiiggghhhht&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneByTheCee</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219535</link>
		<dc:creator>OneByTheCee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHP Officer is convicted of stealing 64 kilograms of cocaine from evidence locker and sentenced to 5 years!

So there is SOME good news out there.

http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/ci_11252480

Same pathetic excuses were used tho - marital troubles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHP Officer is convicted of stealing 64 kilograms of cocaine from evidence locker and sentenced to 5 years!</p>
<p>So there is SOME good news out there.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/ci_11252480" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/ci_11252480</a></p>
<p>Same pathetic excuses were used tho &#8211; marital troubles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219518</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is wrong with Sara and Todd, they have to start another troopergate incident in MD too!?!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is wrong with Sara and Todd, they have to start another troopergate incident in MD too!?!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219451</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a disgrace that cops in the same country have made the news so often this year for the wrong reasons.

These reporters should know better than to harass our valiant network of made men when they&#039;re trying to go about the business of bullying and stealing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a disgrace that cops in the same country have made the news so often this year for the wrong reasons.</p>
<p>These reporters should know better than to harass our valiant network of made men when they&#8217;re trying to go about the business of bullying and stealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aw2pp</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219449</link>
		<dc:creator>aw2pp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a loser, I guessed Cook County, IL.

Not paying close enough attention, I reckon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a loser, I guessed Cook County, IL.</p>
<p>Not paying close enough attention, I reckon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kwix</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219424</link>
		<dc:creator>Kwix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cynical,
For me, it&#039;s the &quot;driving&quot; part that is the problem.  Though a BAC test is not necessarily an indicator of drunkenness and I&#039;d want to see proof, say an in car video, of reckless driving before I&#039;d even think of convicting.  But then, what we should have is a reckless driving charge instead of the meaningless DUI.

By meaningless, I mean a charge that doesn&#039;t really say you were a danger to anyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynical,<br />
For me, it&#8217;s the &#8220;driving&#8221; part that is the problem.  Though a BAC test is not necessarily an indicator of drunkenness and I&#8217;d want to see proof, say an in car video, of reckless driving before I&#8217;d even think of convicting.  But then, what we should have is a reckless driving charge instead of the meaningless DUI.</p>
<p>By meaningless, I mean a charge that doesn&#8217;t really say you were a danger to anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SusanK</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219418</link>
		<dc:creator>SusanK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have liked to have seen a quote from MADD in the article.  Something that would be nice to refer back to next year when they give him an award for &quot;outstanding service&quot; or something like that for pulling over lots of drunk drivers (since when he gets back on the force, which he inevitably will, he will know how all the drunk drivers do it).
Plus, I highly doubt his drinking was caused by the breakup of his marriage.  It is usually the other way around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have liked to have seen a quote from MADD in the article.  Something that would be nice to refer back to next year when they give him an award for &#8220;outstanding service&#8221; or something like that for pulling over lots of drunk drivers (since when he gets back on the force, which he inevitably will, he will know how all the drunk drivers do it).<br />
Plus, I highly doubt his drinking was caused by the breakup of his marriage.  It is usually the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical in CA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219416</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical in CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It causes me great pain that, in my existence prior to my conversion to anarchism, I served on a jury and voted to convict in a drunk-driving case.

If I found myself on a jury today (how that would happen I do not know), I would nullify without a second thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It causes me great pain that, in my existence prior to my conversion to anarchism, I served on a jury and voted to convict in a drunk-driving case.</p>
<p>If I found myself on a jury today (how that would happen I do not know), I would nullify without a second thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJE</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219408</link>
		<dc:creator>SJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope Cheye Calvo&#039;s lawyer can use this case as evidence against PG county.  

The county can make all sorts of arguments about how there was no wrong doing in the Calvo case, procedures were followed etc, and that they should be entitled to a presumption that the internal investigation is sufficient.

However, Calvo can say that the county can&#039;t even properly investigate and police a cop with FOUR DUI&#039;s in a year, including a hit and run.  i.e., we should not give PG county any deference.  
Unlike discussion of &quot;procedures,&quot; fourth amendment rights etc, a jury would have NO problems understanding that four DUIs is a clear double standard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Cheye Calvo&#8217;s lawyer can use this case as evidence against PG county.  </p>
<p>The county can make all sorts of arguments about how there was no wrong doing in the Calvo case, procedures were followed etc, and that they should be entitled to a presumption that the internal investigation is sufficient.</p>
<p>However, Calvo can say that the county can&#8217;t even properly investigate and police a cop with FOUR DUI&#8217;s in a year, including a hit and run.  i.e., we should not give PG county any deference.<br />
Unlike discussion of &#8220;procedures,&#8221; fourth amendment rights etc, a jury would have NO problems understanding that four DUIs is a clear double standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219402</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#8- &#039;Is PG County, MD really the most inept, corrupt, abusive, infamous, grisly, conspiring, bumbling, laughed at, hell hole police department in the entire US?&#039;

No, they&#039;re just being scrutinized the way all police departments should be because of a few high profile cases.

Cops are cops, the way Dunkin Doughnuts are Dunkin Doughnuts...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#8- &#8216;Is PG County, MD really the most inept, corrupt, abusive, infamous, grisly, conspiring, bumbling, laughed at, hell hole police department in the entire US?&#8217;</p>
<p>No, they&#8217;re just being scrutinized the way all police departments should be because of a few high profile cases.</p>
<p>Cops are cops, the way Dunkin Doughnuts are Dunkin Doughnuts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s good to be a cop &#171; My Dumb Links</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219387</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s good to be a cop &#171; My Dumb Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] good to be a&#160;cop By joestevens42  More pressure for me to apply to the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] good to be a&nbsp;cop By joestevens42  More pressure for me to apply to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktc2</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219384</link>
		<dc:creator>ktc2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to buy thenewprofessionalism.com but somebody beat me to it.  Would have made a great consolidation site for various police abuse sites.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to buy thenewprofessionalism.com but somebody beat me to it.  Would have made a great consolidation site for various police abuse sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJE</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219382</link>
		<dc:creator>SJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t see how, with a straight face, they could find &quot;no wrong doing.&quot;  The BAC is what it is.  Any other person would be fired based on the BAC alone.  Why is this guy even allowed on the road?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see how, with a straight face, they could find &#8220;no wrong doing.&#8221;  The BAC is what it is.  Any other person would be fired based on the BAC alone.  Why is this guy even allowed on the road?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219379</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me get this straight...

This guy was suspended WITH PAY in february for driving drunk in a PATROL CAR while off duty. Those charges were dropped after the arresting officer &#039;conveniently&#039; didn&#039;t get the mail notification to appear in court.

Go ahead! Get busted DRIVING DRUNK in a COMPANY CAR... much less a Police Cruiser... and see what happens to YOU.

Next!

&quot;On July 27, also in Laurel, Parrish was charged with driving under the influence, driving with a suspended license, reckless driving and other traffic offenses.&quot;

Wait! When did his license get suspended? He wasn&#039;t convicted in the first one... Also, I assume at this point, that he&#039;s STILL on PAID LEAVE. All charges but the driving with a suspended license were dropped by a PLEA BARGAIN. What possible Plea Bargain? Here&#039;s what I think happened:

Police Union: &quot;Let him off with the lightest possible sentence, and we&#039;ll see about getting you reelected.&quot;

Prosecutor: &quot;Ok!&quot;

Next!

&quot;On Sept. 9, also in Laurel, Parrish was charged with driving under the influence and failing to stop after a motor vehicle accident. That case is scheduled to go to trial in February.&quot;

Wait... &quot;.. failing to stop..&quot; The guy was in a HIT AND RUN? And he&#039;s STILL on the force?

Then the most recent one, where he passed out at a gas station at 2:30 in the afternoon with a blood alcohol level of .29 ... apparently he&#039;d been drinking vodka all day. &quot;A half pint&quot; according to him. ...right....

&quot;Parrish is assigned to the 6th District in Beltsville. If the internal investigations into the four incidents find no wrongdoing, Parrish would still have to be cleared by a departmental medical board before he could return to duty.&quot;

WHAT!!! How is that even an option?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this straight&#8230;</p>
<p>This guy was suspended WITH PAY in february for driving drunk in a PATROL CAR while off duty. Those charges were dropped after the arresting officer &#8216;conveniently&#8217; didn&#8217;t get the mail notification to appear in court.</p>
<p>Go ahead! Get busted DRIVING DRUNK in a COMPANY CAR&#8230; much less a Police Cruiser&#8230; and see what happens to YOU.</p>
<p>Next!</p>
<p>&#8220;On July 27, also in Laurel, Parrish was charged with driving under the influence, driving with a suspended license, reckless driving and other traffic offenses.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait! When did his license get suspended? He wasn&#8217;t convicted in the first one&#8230; Also, I assume at this point, that he&#8217;s STILL on PAID LEAVE. All charges but the driving with a suspended license were dropped by a PLEA BARGAIN. What possible Plea Bargain? Here&#8217;s what I think happened:</p>
<p>Police Union: &#8220;Let him off with the lightest possible sentence, and we&#8217;ll see about getting you reelected.&#8221;</p>
<p>Prosecutor: &#8220;Ok!&#8221;</p>
<p>Next!</p>
<p>&#8220;On Sept. 9, also in Laurel, Parrish was charged with driving under the influence and failing to stop after a motor vehicle accident. That case is scheduled to go to trial in February.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait&#8230; &#8220;.. failing to stop..&#8221; The guy was in a HIT AND RUN? And he&#8217;s STILL on the force?</p>
<p>Then the most recent one, where he passed out at a gas station at 2:30 in the afternoon with a blood alcohol level of .29 &#8230; apparently he&#8217;d been drinking vodka all day. &#8220;A half pint&#8221; according to him. &#8230;right&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Parrish is assigned to the 6th District in Beltsville. If the internal investigations into the four incidents find no wrongdoing, Parrish would still have to be cleared by a departmental medical board before he could return to duty.&#8221;</p>
<p>WHAT!!! How is that even an option?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacK</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219376</link>
		<dc:creator>MacK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Police Chief Roberto Hylton said that police officials take Parrish&#039;s conduct seriously and that internal investigations are continuing.&quot;

Is the &quot;we take this seriously&quot; statement mandatory when cops do wrong?  They never say that when investigating a rape, robbery, or murder. Do they not take them seriously?

The article contains a spewing of help being offered to the ass wipe cop, because his mommy died, and his (probably spousal abused) wife left him (poor guy).  I have never heard a cop crying for a civilian DWI suspect, because his wife left him.

This is my favorite part  &quot;If the internal investigations into the four incidents find no wrongdoing, Parrish would still have to be cleared by a departmental medical board before he could return to duty.&quot;.
I guess what happens in his two upcoming trials will have no bearing what so ever. What are they going to be investigating internally? He has already been arrested 4 TIMES over a legal limit of alcohol while driving in less then 1 year. Is it even possible that any non-ass wipe would be free from a 4 wall barred door hotel?

Is PG County, MD really the most inept, corrupt, abusive, infamous, grisly, conspiring, bumbling, laughed at, hell hole police department in the entire US?

Would any Agitator reader consider a move to Prince George&#039;s County, I know I would not even if they would offer me a new job and a house for free.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Police Chief Roberto Hylton said that police officials take Parrish&#8217;s conduct seriously and that internal investigations are continuing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is the &#8220;we take this seriously&#8221; statement mandatory when cops do wrong?  They never say that when investigating a rape, robbery, or murder. Do they not take them seriously?</p>
<p>The article contains a spewing of help being offered to the ass wipe cop, because his mommy died, and his (probably spousal abused) wife left him (poor guy).  I have never heard a cop crying for a civilian DWI suspect, because his wife left him.</p>
<p>This is my favorite part  &#8220;If the internal investigations into the four incidents find no wrongdoing, Parrish would still have to be cleared by a departmental medical board before he could return to duty.&#8221;.<br />
I guess what happens in his two upcoming trials will have no bearing what so ever. What are they going to be investigating internally? He has already been arrested 4 TIMES over a legal limit of alcohol while driving in less then 1 year. Is it even possible that any non-ass wipe would be free from a 4 wall barred door hotel?</p>
<p>Is PG County, MD really the most inept, corrupt, abusive, infamous, grisly, conspiring, bumbling, laughed at, hell hole police department in the entire US?</p>
<p>Would any Agitator reader consider a move to Prince George&#8217;s County, I know I would not even if they would offer me a new job and a house for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ganja Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219373</link>
		<dc:creator>Ganja Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder how many times he wasn&#039;t arrested and simply followed home or allowed to call a ride. The times he was arrested he was probably too drunk to do either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how many times he wasn&#8217;t arrested and simply followed home or allowed to call a ride. The times he was arrested he was probably too drunk to do either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan A</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219370</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;It’s called priorities–or lack thereof.&lt;/i&gt;

Yup.  I know at least two people here in SoCal who still live with their parents (they are mid to late 20s), but one drives an &#039;08 BMW 3-series and the other has an &#039;08 Lexus is350.  I harass them at every opportunity.

That aside, I find it amazing that one police department can so consistently make the news with their fucked-up antics.  You might need a new category specifically for Prince George&#039;s County, Radley.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It’s called priorities–or lack thereof.</i></p>
<p>Yup.  I know at least two people here in SoCal who still live with their parents (they are mid to late 20s), but one drives an &#8217;08 BMW 3-series and the other has an &#8217;08 Lexus is350.  I harass them at every opportunity.</p>
<p>That aside, I find it amazing that one police department can so consistently make the news with their fucked-up antics.  You might need a new category specifically for Prince George&#8217;s County, Radley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrBombay</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/18/the-new-professionalism-13/comment-page-1/#comment-219366</link>
		<dc:creator>DrBombay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11486#comment-219366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got it! On my first guess too.

 High Five.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it! On my first guess too.</p>
<p> High Five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
