<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HackWatch:  Our First Installment!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Twas the Night Before Christmas &#8230; at Deceiver.com</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/comment-page-1/#comment-221949</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Twas the Night Before Christmas &#8230; at Deceiver.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11401#comment-221949</guid>
		<description>[...] The Agitator&#8217;s &#8220;HackWatch&#8221; is blasting U.S. Senator John Kyl, who used to be against using the filibuster to block Supreme Court nominees. Of course, that was before a new president got ready to take over.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Agitator&#8217;s &#8220;HackWatch&#8221; is blasting U.S. Senator John Kyl, who used to be against using the filibuster to block Supreme Court nominees. Of course, that was before a new president got ready to take over.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven O'Dell</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/comment-page-1/#comment-216866</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven O'Dell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11401#comment-216866</guid>
		<description>The filibuster was named after a senator with the same moniker and he should have been gagged and told to sit down. When hours may be taken up with reading poetry, Dr. Seuss books and just plain gibberish to waste time and keep anyone from offering rational thought, it is time to question the &quot;whiz-dumb&quot; of such a practice. And if your mouth gets dry while spewing drivel, all you need is a good assistant to bring you water so you may keep vomiting your trash to the halls of &quot;government&quot;. No wonder many of our representatives fall asleep (or come drunk--&quot;back in your bottle, Ted&quot;) by the time anything important is brought up to vote on--perhaps this was the intent all along? I say fire them all and start fresh with the most UN-qualified men available. At least they will be too timid to cause trouble for a long time.

&quot;Vote for Gridlock!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The filibuster was named after a senator with the same moniker and he should have been gagged and told to sit down. When hours may be taken up with reading poetry, Dr. Seuss books and just plain gibberish to waste time and keep anyone from offering rational thought, it is time to question the &#8220;whiz-dumb&#8221; of such a practice. And if your mouth gets dry while spewing drivel, all you need is a good assistant to bring you water so you may keep vomiting your trash to the halls of &#8220;government&#8221;. No wonder many of our representatives fall asleep (or come drunk&#8211;&#8221;back in your bottle, Ted&#8221;) by the time anything important is brought up to vote on&#8211;perhaps this was the intent all along? I say fire them all and start fresh with the most UN-qualified men available. At least they will be too timid to cause trouble for a long time.</p>
<p>&#8220;Vote for Gridlock!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edintally</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/comment-page-1/#comment-216249</link>
		<dc:creator>Edintally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11401#comment-216249</guid>
		<description>....to pile onto JWH&#039;s faulty memory.  Repubs threatened the Dems with changing the rules and getting rid of the Filibuster if the Dems didn&#039;t play ball with the Supreme Court nominees for Bush.  

Who would have thought they would access the same rule when they were out of power?!

I understand their first goal is to get re-elected, but DAMN can we get a dash of personal integrity here?  I honestly don&#039;t know how some people sleep at night knowing how full of shit they are.  All the Ex-Lax in the world wouldn&#039;t unclog some of these people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.to pile onto JWH&#8217;s faulty memory.  Repubs threatened the Dems with changing the rules and getting rid of the Filibuster if the Dems didn&#8217;t play ball with the Supreme Court nominees for Bush.  </p>
<p>Who would have thought they would access the same rule when they were out of power?!</p>
<p>I understand their first goal is to get re-elected, but DAMN can we get a dash of personal integrity here?  I honestly don&#8217;t know how some people sleep at night knowing how full of shit they are.  All the Ex-Lax in the world wouldn&#8217;t unclog some of these people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/comment-page-1/#comment-216194</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11401#comment-216194</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;And I’m almost always right!&lt;/I&gt;

there&#039;s only one explanation for this: Radley has psychic powers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And I’m almost always right!</i></p>
<p>there&#8217;s only one explanation for this: Radley has psychic powers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radley Balko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/comment-page-1/#comment-216064</link>
		<dc:creator>Radley Balko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11401#comment-216064</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Democrats filibustered W’s judicial nominations. BO shouldn’t be surprised now if his picks are shown the same courtesy.&lt;/em&gt;

True of lower-level appointees, though not many.

But Kyl was specifically referring to potential Obama Supreme Court nominations.  Jog my memory--which of W.&#039;s Supreme Court nominations did the Dems filibuster?

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I wish they &lt;em&gt;had&lt;/em&gt;.  Both Alito and Roberts.  But they didn&#039;t.

Also, the point of the post is that Kyl &lt;em&gt;specifically promised&lt;/em&gt; not to use the filibuster, even if a Democrat took over the White House.  This, I guess, was evidence of his good faith, a sign that we should take his argument seriously.

What&#039;s it say about his integrity that three years later, and &lt;em&gt;less than a week&lt;/em&gt; after the election, he&#039;d already &lt;em&gt;personally&lt;/em&gt; promised to filibuster any ObamaS.C. nominee he doesn&#039;t like?

And to answer your question, I don&#039;t expect Republicans to play by any rules, or adhere to any principles.  I expect them to be rudderless, spineless politicians whose main interest is getting reelected.  I expect the same of the Democrats.  

And I&#039;m almost always right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Democrats filibustered W’s judicial nominations. BO shouldn’t be surprised now if his picks are shown the same courtesy.</em></p>
<p>True of lower-level appointees, though not many.</p>
<p>But Kyl was specifically referring to potential Obama Supreme Court nominations.  Jog my memory&#8211;which of W.&#8217;s Supreme Court nominations did the Dems filibuster?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I wish they <em>had</em>.  Both Alito and Roberts.  But they didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Also, the point of the post is that Kyl <em>specifically promised</em> not to use the filibuster, even if a Democrat took over the White House.  This, I guess, was evidence of his good faith, a sign that we should take his argument seriously.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s it say about his integrity that three years later, and <em>less than a week</em> after the election, he&#8217;d already <em>personally</em> promised to filibuster any ObamaS.C. nominee he doesn&#8217;t like?</p>
<p>And to answer your question, I don&#8217;t expect Republicans to play by any rules, or adhere to any principles.  I expect them to be rudderless, spineless politicians whose main interest is getting reelected.  I expect the same of the Democrats.  </p>
<p>And I&#8217;m almost always right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwh</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/comment-page-1/#comment-216062</link>
		<dc:creator>jwh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11401#comment-216062</guid>
		<description>So I guess you expect Republicans to play by different rules then Democrats, eh?  Dems broke the &quot;tradition&quot;.  It&#039;s not the Republicans role to play by the &quot;historical&quot; rules of the Senate, while the libs get to change the rules when it suits them.

Democrats filibustered W&#039;s judicial nominations.  BO shouldn&#039;t be surprised now if his picks are shown the same courtesy.

I give this one a 3, on your very arbitrary scale......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I guess you expect Republicans to play by different rules then Democrats, eh?  Dems broke the &#8220;tradition&#8221;.  It&#8217;s not the Republicans role to play by the &#8220;historical&#8221; rules of the Senate, while the libs get to change the rules when it suits them.</p>
<p>Democrats filibustered W&#8217;s judicial nominations.  BO shouldn&#8217;t be surprised now if his picks are shown the same courtesy.</p>
<p>I give this one a 3, on your very arbitrary scale&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/comment-page-1/#comment-216036</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11401#comment-216036</guid>
		<description>Although I appreciate the service, Radley, I&#039;m afraid of this HackWatch business taking over your site. I suspect the material available might far exceed the time you have to post it, and I&#039;m certain plenty more is generated daily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I appreciate the service, Radley, I&#8217;m afraid of this HackWatch business taking over your site. I suspect the material available might far exceed the time you have to post it, and I&#8217;m certain plenty more is generated daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perlhaqr</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/comment-page-1/#comment-216021</link>
		<dc:creator>perlhaqr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11401#comment-216021</guid>
		<description>I think you might want to make that a 100 point scale...  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you might want to make that a 100 point scale&#8230;  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeL</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/comment-page-1/#comment-216016</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11401#comment-216016</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not really a 180.  It&#039;s Kyl saying whatever he needs to say to get his way.  If he thought the best way to get his picks on the Supreme Court was to claim the moon was made of green cheese, he&#039;d be going on at length about how the liberals hate the Lunar Farmers for the quality of this year&#039;s lunar fromage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not really a 180.  It&#8217;s Kyl saying whatever he needs to say to get his way.  If he thought the best way to get his picks on the Supreme Court was to claim the moon was made of green cheese, he&#8217;d be going on at length about how the liberals hate the Lunar Farmers for the quality of this year&#8217;s lunar fromage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/comment-page-1/#comment-216014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11401#comment-216014</guid>
		<description>This is a 180 I can live with.
http://rightklik.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a 180 I can live with.<br />
<a href="http://rightklik.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://rightklik.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/12/09/hackwatch-our-first-installment/comment-page-1/#comment-216012</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=11401#comment-216012</guid>
		<description>Is this John Kyl related at all to the republican senator Jon Kyl from Arizona?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this John Kyl related at all to the republican senator Jon Kyl from Arizona?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

