Monday, November 17th, 2008
…offers yet more unsolicited advice for Barack Obama.
This entry was posted
on Monday, November 17th, 2008 at 6:31 pm by Radley Balko
and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
“Security from terror attacks should be a federal jobs program.”
Should “not” be a federal jobs program?
Security from terror attacks shouldn’t be a federal jobs program.
I hope that was a typo.
It’s not a typo. “federal jobs program” = “federal program whose primary purpose is to make work so that the unemployed can have jobs”. The top 100 priorities of our security apparatus should be security related. Having the security apparatus be a place were someone can get a cushy government job defeats the point of security.
Of course, in general, cushy government jobs defeat the point of providing services to citizens. But I’m less worried about a collection of do nothing assholes in the DMV than a collection of the same set of useless fools in the TSA.
Yeah, that’s obviously a typo.
It should say “should not be a federal jobs program.”
Sent Fox an email asking them to fix it.
Obama’s whole political life is built on lies and obscuring his personal history.
Does anyone believe his is going to be any different? Please, don’t engage in wishful thinking.
Obviously I need to work on my reading comprehension skills.
Fighting corruption a priority? From a guy who lives next door to Rezko in Chicago?
Is that a joke?
reasoned advice that didn’t sound like it was coming from a partisan hack. issues were highlighted and solutions offered. good job.
Good list. I’m surprised about one absence: rolling back the War on Some Drugs. There’s no cause whatsoever for federal raids on California-licensed medical marijuana facilities or for the outrageous persection (as you’ve documented) of pain management MDs.
Good. They fixed it.
One more: Reducing the amount of regulations dealing with taxes. That alone would “reduce” the taxes we pay. Reduce the complexity, eliminate the AMT, eliminate the death tax, etc.
Nah, makes too much sense. It’ll never happen!
Good column, Radley. Thanks for resisting the temptation to “appeal with him to compromise with the Republicans on the issues where I agree with them.” That would have been lame.
I wonder, though, about your final suggestion, that Pres. Obama use the pardon power to right wrongful or unjust prosecutions. Isn’t the problem of prosecutorial misconduct primarily at the state level, where the president has no power to pardon?
Isn’t the problem of prosecutorial misconduct primarily at the state level, where the president has no power to pardon?
That’s certainly where most of it is. But there’s no shortage of problems at the federal level, either. See the federal prosecutions of pain doctors, for example. Or the Colomb case I wrote about for reason. Or U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan.
“People everywhere have to bear some responsibility for what those among them are doing.”
Gee, isn’t that just what Osama bin Laden believes? Isn’t that the whole rationale behind a 9/11 style attack?
FYI: Bruce doesn’t want the job:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/11/schneier_for_ts.html
It’s been suggested. For the record, I don’t want the job.