<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Medical Marijuana: The Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:55:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard P Steeb</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198796</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard P Steeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198796</guid>
		<description>What a lying sack.  The parasite [and his entourage] flies &quot;home&quot; on the taxpayers&#039; dime to violate the Hatch Act with gross propaganda in support of his unconscionable meal-ticket.  Despicable.

Cannabis prohibition is abomination in the first place.  To withhold its medical benefits from the ill is atrocity.

This Ann Arbor native hopes to fly home, secure in the knowledge that Michigan retroactively respects physician-certification from California, in the very near future!

Yes on 1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a lying sack.  The parasite [and his entourage] flies &#8220;home&#8221; on the taxpayers&#8217; dime to violate the Hatch Act with gross propaganda in support of his unconscionable meal-ticket.  Despicable.</p>
<p>Cannabis prohibition is abomination in the first place.  To withhold its medical benefits from the ill is atrocity.</p>
<p>This Ann Arbor native hopes to fly home, secure in the knowledge that Michigan retroactively respects physician-certification from California, in the very near future!</p>
<p>Yes on 1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 16th Class &#171; Maspik Teruzim</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198760</link>
		<dc:creator>The 16th Class &#171; Maspik Teruzim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198760</guid>
		<description>[...] the actual night of or possibly the morning after. I like following the ballot initiatives such as prop 1 in Michigan since we don&#8217;t have those in Canada. I am also enjoying seeing some of my students vote for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the actual night of or possibly the morning after. I like following the ballot initiatives such as prop 1 in Michigan since we don&#8217;t have those in Canada. I am also enjoying seeing some of my students vote for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198557</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198557</guid>
		<description>The very concept that I cannot grow a plant in my backyard, dry it out and smoke it is the most ridiculous idea ever concocted.

Let&#039;s see.. they care that we don&#039;t get: &quot;Carcinogens, pollutants, fungus,  pesticides,&quot; etc.  But these are perfectly okay when someone smokes a cigarette:

http://www.tobacco.org/Resources/599ingredients.html

For every reason he gives, alcohol and tobacco should be outlawed.  There is no logic behind them, so I must conclude that these people are simply insane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very concept that I cannot grow a plant in my backyard, dry it out and smoke it is the most ridiculous idea ever concocted.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see.. they care that we don&#8217;t get: &#8220;Carcinogens, pollutants, fungus,  pesticides,&#8221; etc.  But these are perfectly okay when someone smokes a cigarette:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tobacco.org/Resources/599ingredients.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tobacco.org/Resources/599ingredients.html</a></p>
<p>For every reason he gives, alcohol and tobacco should be outlawed.  There is no logic behind them, so I must conclude that these people are simply insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198542</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198542</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Weird. I live in Michigan and wasn’t aware of what Prop. 1 was, or that there was a proposal about medical marijuana. Pretty much all the attention on ballot proposals has been on Prop. 2 which deals would allow and support stem cell research.

There is a pretty big effort to block it, and the reasoning they are using is that it will cost the state money. I get the strange feeling that the people who don’t want it don’t actually care about the money and are just religious wingnuts.&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;d be more or less right on that one, Ross.  While ads opposing Prop 2 focus on lack of oversight and cost to the state, there&#039;s nothing actually in the proposal (ballot language or otherwise) that would allocate government funds to stem cell research.  The &quot;2 Goes 2 Far&quot; campaign is spearheaded by the chair of the MI Taxpayer&#039;s Alliance, who&#039;s a small-government guy until embryos are involved.  Of course, the pro-2 side is headed by the same woman who tried to push the Reform MI Government Now through.

(Sorry for the threadjack!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Weird. I live in Michigan and wasn’t aware of what Prop. 1 was, or that there was a proposal about medical marijuana. Pretty much all the attention on ballot proposals has been on Prop. 2 which deals would allow and support stem cell research.</p>
<p>There is a pretty big effort to block it, and the reasoning they are using is that it will cost the state money. I get the strange feeling that the people who don’t want it don’t actually care about the money and are just religious wingnuts.</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;d be more or less right on that one, Ross.  While ads opposing Prop 2 focus on lack of oversight and cost to the state, there&#8217;s nothing actually in the proposal (ballot language or otherwise) that would allocate government funds to stem cell research.  The &#8220;2 Goes 2 Far&#8221; campaign is spearheaded by the chair of the MI Taxpayer&#8217;s Alliance, who&#8217;s a small-government guy until embryos are involved.  Of course, the pro-2 side is headed by the same woman who tried to push the Reform MI Government Now through.</p>
<p>(Sorry for the threadjack!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Green</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198508</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198508</guid>
		<description>Just ignore the lying hypocrite.These are the last sqweaks from a wheel that will get no more grease, hopefully. Johnny Pee is off to his well paid reward ,soon. The ONDCP charter exception to Hatch ,could be rectified by letting the ONDCP charter renewal expire in 2010...but if it could be flushed sooner...the better. Out with the bad old,and in with no replacement at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just ignore the lying hypocrite.These are the last sqweaks from a wheel that will get no more grease, hopefully. Johnny Pee is off to his well paid reward ,soon. The ONDCP charter exception to Hatch ,could be rectified by letting the ONDCP charter renewal expire in 2010&#8230;but if it could be flushed sooner&#8230;the better. Out with the bad old,and in with no replacement at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198479</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198479</guid>
		<description>I support medical MJ*, but I struggle with needing to classify the &quot;medical&quot; part.  I&#039;d like to, as one post put it, kick John Walters in the balls and say &quot;Not only will I smoke medical MJ to help me with life-stealing cancer in what may be the last few months of my existence, but I will smoke MJ because I damn well feel like it.  MY body!  Mine!&quot;

I believe I know how this usually turns out.  Some very high profile politician gets cancer and has to change his mind on MMJ.  No laws get changed, but we get to see nature&#039;s irony as he vomits his stomache lining up while in handcuffs.

With that out of the way, can anyone really explain to me what the real (I mean REAL) reason is why the US Government doesn&#039;t want to allow medical MJ?

Quote that comes to mind &quot;...it&#039;s like outlawing steak because babies can&#039;t chew it.&quot;


*No, MJ is not Michael Jordan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I support medical MJ*, but I struggle with needing to classify the &#8220;medical&#8221; part.  I&#8217;d like to, as one post put it, kick John Walters in the balls and say &#8220;Not only will I smoke medical MJ to help me with life-stealing cancer in what may be the last few months of my existence, but I will smoke MJ because I damn well feel like it.  MY body!  Mine!&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe I know how this usually turns out.  Some very high profile politician gets cancer and has to change his mind on MMJ.  No laws get changed, but we get to see nature&#8217;s irony as he vomits his stomache lining up while in handcuffs.</p>
<p>With that out of the way, can anyone really explain to me what the real (I mean REAL) reason is why the US Government doesn&#8217;t want to allow medical MJ?</p>
<p>Quote that comes to mind &#8220;&#8230;it&#8217;s like outlawing steak because babies can&#8217;t chew it.&#8221;</p>
<p>*No, MJ is not Michael Jordan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick T</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198457</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198457</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have a hard time believing that a parent is going to take their child to the doctor to get a prescription for marijuana just so their kid can get high.&quot;

Would that even be a problem? That&#039;s how bad their arguments are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have a hard time believing that a parent is going to take their child to the doctor to get a prescription for marijuana just so their kid can get high.&#8221;</p>
<p>Would that even be a problem? That&#8217;s how bad their arguments are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lil'B</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198448</link>
		<dc:creator>Lil'B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198448</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t understand how legalizing medical marijuana is going to make it more available to children?  As far as my understanding is that you need a doctor prescription to get it, it&#039;s not going to be OTC is it?  I have a hard time believing that a parent is going to take their child to the doctor to get a prescription for marijuana just so their kid can get high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t understand how legalizing medical marijuana is going to make it more available to children?  As far as my understanding is that you need a doctor prescription to get it, it&#8217;s not going to be OTC is it?  I have a hard time believing that a parent is going to take their child to the doctor to get a prescription for marijuana just so their kid can get high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198444</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198444</guid>
		<description>Massachusetts has Question 2 on the ballot to change the penalties for marijuana possession (under an ounce) to a civil fine. Not going far enough of course, but it certainly is a step in the right direction. It isn&#039;t getting a huge amount of attention up here, because it&#039;s overshadowed by Question 1, which would get rid of the state income tax in it&#039;s entirety, which of course is opposed loudly by all the public employees and politicians. Let&#039;s hope that both questions pass by overwhelming margins!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massachusetts has Question 2 on the ballot to change the penalties for marijuana possession (under an ounce) to a civil fine. Not going far enough of course, but it certainly is a step in the right direction. It isn&#8217;t getting a huge amount of attention up here, because it&#8217;s overshadowed by Question 1, which would get rid of the state income tax in it&#8217;s entirety, which of course is opposed loudly by all the public employees and politicians. Let&#8217;s hope that both questions pass by overwhelming margins!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198434</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198434</guid>
		<description>And on the subject of cops who should be monitored 24/7:

http://www.aclupa.org/downloads/HerbSettlementRelease.pdf

Too bad that 19 grand didn&#039;t come out of the assets of the arresting officer.  Someone who definitely should be fired and spend a week in the stocks getting pelted with rotten food.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And on the subject of cops who should be monitored 24/7:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aclupa.org/downloads/HerbSettlementRelease.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.aclupa.org/downloads/HerbSettlementRelease.pdf</a></p>
<p>Too bad that 19 grand didn&#8217;t come out of the assets of the arresting officer.  Someone who definitely should be fired and spend a week in the stocks getting pelted with rotten food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaptinemo</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198427</link>
		<dc:creator>kaptinemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198427</guid>
		<description>Frank said:

&lt;i&gt;The first thing that needs to be done is to repeal that law allowing federal agents to interfere in local elections.&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, it there is no law that &lt;i&gt;allows&lt;/i&gt; it; in fact, the Hatch Act at both Federal and State levels is supposed to prevent precisely that kind of thing from happening.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2007/10/09/theDrugCzarIsRequiredByLaw.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;But it is &lt;i&gt;explicitly written into the ONDCP&#039;s charter that they may act to try to counter &#039;legalization&#039; oriented legislation and referenda&lt;/a&gt;. 

Obviously, that is an &lt;i&gt;indirect&lt;/i&gt; violation of the Hatch act, as Ron Paul made plain in his correspondence with both the GAO and the ONDCP, but (IMHO) because of the overly politicized nature of the present Administration, the GAO begged off from its&#039; duties as a government &#039;watchdog&#039; and lamely stated that the ONDCP was acting within its&#039; charter. 

Keep in mind &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mpp.org/assets/pdfs/general/LETTER-TO-JOHN-WALTERS.PDF&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ONDCP was used extensively by Karl Rove&#039;s operatives in the White House as a vehicle for assisting Republicans in States where the election prospects for them were poor&lt;/a&gt;. 

If anything was a Hatch Act violation, that was. Hence my statement that they were overly politicized. Walters has become so much of a party hack that he&#039;s sticking his nose in foreign affairs (of which he is anything but an expert) such as the tiff between Venezuela and the US. 

There&#039;s not even the vestige of supposed bureaucratic neutrality as befits a civil servant; he&#039;s pimped himself to the Republican apparatus, body and soul. If Karl Rove had told him to get on all fours and bark like a dog, ol&#039; Johnny would probably have gone a step further, and bought his own leash. He&#039;s owned, as simple as that.

And he&#039;s supposed to be a &#039;public servant&#039;. Looks like the only part of the public he&#039;s serving is the part drawing paychecks for carrying out this execrable DrugWar...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank said:</p>
<p><i>The first thing that needs to be done is to repeal that law allowing federal agents to interfere in local elections.</i></p>
<p>Actually, it there is no law that <i>allows</i> it; in fact, the Hatch Act at both Federal and State levels is supposed to prevent precisely that kind of thing from happening.  <a href="http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2007/10/09/theDrugCzarIsRequiredByLaw.html" rel="nofollow">But it is <i>explicitly written into the ONDCP&#8217;s charter that they may act to try to counter &#8216;legalization&#8217; oriented legislation and referenda</i></a>. </p>
<p>Obviously, that is an <i>indirect</i> violation of the Hatch act, as Ron Paul made plain in his correspondence with both the GAO and the ONDCP, but (IMHO) because of the overly politicized nature of the present Administration, the GAO begged off from its&#8217; duties as a government &#8216;watchdog&#8217; and lamely stated that the ONDCP was acting within its&#8217; charter. </p>
<p>Keep in mind <a href="http://www.mpp.org/assets/pdfs/general/LETTER-TO-JOHN-WALTERS.PDF" rel="nofollow">ONDCP was used extensively by Karl Rove&#8217;s operatives in the White House as a vehicle for assisting Republicans in States where the election prospects for them were poor</a>. </p>
<p>If anything was a Hatch Act violation, that was. Hence my statement that they were overly politicized. Walters has become so much of a party hack that he&#8217;s sticking his nose in foreign affairs (of which he is anything but an expert) such as the tiff between Venezuela and the US. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s not even the vestige of supposed bureaucratic neutrality as befits a civil servant; he&#8217;s pimped himself to the Republican apparatus, body and soul. If Karl Rove had told him to get on all fours and bark like a dog, ol&#8217; Johnny would probably have gone a step further, and bought his own leash. He&#8217;s owned, as simple as that.</p>
<p>And he&#8217;s supposed to be a &#8216;public servant&#8217;. Looks like the only part of the public he&#8217;s serving is the part drawing paychecks for carrying out this execrable DrugWar&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg C</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198319</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198319</guid>
		<description># 19 Nick T,

The campaign commercials around here make the choices easy. The FOP runs ads for/against several issues and several of the AG and judicial candidates tout their endorsements by police groups.

When the people running around shooting kids are making political statements &quot;for the children,&quot; I know which way I&#039;m voting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 19 Nick T,</p>
<p>The campaign commercials around here make the choices easy. The FOP runs ads for/against several issues and several of the AG and judicial candidates tout their endorsements by police groups.</p>
<p>When the people running around shooting kids are making political statements &#8220;for the children,&#8221; I know which way I&#8217;m voting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsmallwood</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198294</link>
		<dc:creator>dsmallwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198294</guid>
		<description>ha!  sorry about the typo.  
we have to make drugs illegal to protect kids</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha!  sorry about the typo.<br />
we have to make drugs illegal to protect kids</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsmallwood</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198293</link>
		<dc:creator>dsmallwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198293</guid>
		<description>drug warrior thoughts:
drugs are bad for kids
we have to make kids illegal to protect kids
once its illegal, then we can throw the kids in jail for possession
jail.  y&#039;know, for the kids

don&#039;t they ever wonder wth their doing?  if they cared about kids so much, why did they seek out jobs with guns?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drug warrior thoughts:<br />
drugs are bad for kids<br />
we have to make kids illegal to protect kids<br />
once its illegal, then we can throw the kids in jail for possession<br />
jail.  y&#8217;know, for the kids</p>
<p>don&#8217;t they ever wonder wth their doing?  if they cared about kids so much, why did they seek out jobs with guns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198232</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198232</guid>
		<description>Ross: &quot;I get the strange feeling that the people who don’t want it don’t actually care about the money and are just religious wingnuts.&quot;

I just read this today in our local newspaper:

&quot;Father James Edward O&#039;C***** and Michael D***** were arrested in South Charleston on Sunday, Sept. 29, about 10:35 p.m. after a police officer traveling behind them smelled the drug wafting from their vehicle.&quot;
I starred out the names to protect the innocent.

This guy is a local priest in the Catholic Church

WTF is wafting anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross: &#8220;I get the strange feeling that the people who don’t want it don’t actually care about the money and are just religious wingnuts.&#8221;</p>
<p>I just read this today in our local newspaper:</p>
<p>&#8220;Father James Edward O&#8217;C***** and Michael D***** were arrested in South Charleston on Sunday, Sept. 29, about 10:35 p.m. after a police officer traveling behind them smelled the drug wafting from their vehicle.&#8221;<br />
I starred out the names to protect the innocent.</p>
<p>This guy is a local priest in the Catholic Church</p>
<p>WTF is wafting anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198216</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198216</guid>
		<description>Weird. I live in Michigan and wasn&#039;t aware of what Prop. 1 was, or that there was a proposal about medical marijuana. Pretty much all the attention on ballot proposals has been on Prop. 2 which deals would allow and support stem cell research.

There is a pretty big effort to block it, and the reasoning they are using is that it will cost the state money. I get the strange feeling that the people who don&#039;t want it don&#039;t actually care about the money and are just religious wingnuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird. I live in Michigan and wasn&#8217;t aware of what Prop. 1 was, or that there was a proposal about medical marijuana. Pretty much all the attention on ballot proposals has been on Prop. 2 which deals would allow and support stem cell research.</p>
<p>There is a pretty big effort to block it, and the reasoning they are using is that it will cost the state money. I get the strange feeling that the people who don&#8217;t want it don&#8217;t actually care about the money and are just religious wingnuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chaney</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198215</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198215</guid>
		<description>So, George Soros doesn&#039;t care about my kids and therefore chronic pain sufferers can..... wait, I missed something.  Anyway, it&#039;s for the kids, so please vote against this, Michigan.  I&#039;m just 8 hours away from you, so do it for my kids, too.  I mean, we might be close enough for them to be harmed by George Soros in a wheelchair with fungus.  Or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, George Soros doesn&#8217;t care about my kids and therefore chronic pain sufferers can&#8230;.. wait, I missed something.  Anyway, it&#8217;s for the kids, so please vote against this, Michigan.  I&#8217;m just 8 hours away from you, so do it for my kids, too.  I mean, we might be close enough for them to be harmed by George Soros in a wheelchair with fungus.  Or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198205</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198205</guid>
		<description>The first thing that needs to be done is to repeal that law allowing federal agents to interfere in local elections.  This should be prosecuted as a criminal act, with the perpetrators banned from any office of trust or profit under the United States.  Jail time would not be out of the question, either.

Next, repeal Biden&#039;s anti-Rave law that is deliberately used to disrupt 1st Amendment activities related to the War on Drugs/America.  We need to bring back stocks in the public square specifically for law enforcement that choose to violate civil rights based on subject matter, and that&#039;s after losing their badges with a lifetime ban on any career related to law enforcement.  Pull this crap, forget about being a PI or a security guard, or a prison guard, forget about being eligible for sheriff or dogcatcher -- lifetime ban means exactly that.

Next, rewrite the laws to ensure that all civil forfeiture proceeds regardless of venue go to public hospitals, public literacy programs, anywhere but back to the pockets of cops.  &quot;Conflict of Interest&quot; doesn&#039;t even begin to describe the incest occurring here.

And make it clear to all law enforcement, all levels, all agencies, if you want to be a cop, expect 24/7 tracking and surveillance of their persons.  Undercover?  Tough shit.  You are public servants, not slave overseers.  Get over it.

Finally, get rid of government propaganda organizations like DARE and the Partnership For A Truth-Free America.  The kids already know you&#039;re lying, so stop wasting time and money on this crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first thing that needs to be done is to repeal that law allowing federal agents to interfere in local elections.  This should be prosecuted as a criminal act, with the perpetrators banned from any office of trust or profit under the United States.  Jail time would not be out of the question, either.</p>
<p>Next, repeal Biden&#8217;s anti-Rave law that is deliberately used to disrupt 1st Amendment activities related to the War on Drugs/America.  We need to bring back stocks in the public square specifically for law enforcement that choose to violate civil rights based on subject matter, and that&#8217;s after losing their badges with a lifetime ban on any career related to law enforcement.  Pull this crap, forget about being a PI or a security guard, or a prison guard, forget about being eligible for sheriff or dogcatcher &#8212; lifetime ban means exactly that.</p>
<p>Next, rewrite the laws to ensure that all civil forfeiture proceeds regardless of venue go to public hospitals, public literacy programs, anywhere but back to the pockets of cops.  &#8220;Conflict of Interest&#8221; doesn&#8217;t even begin to describe the incest occurring here.</p>
<p>And make it clear to all law enforcement, all levels, all agencies, if you want to be a cop, expect 24/7 tracking and surveillance of their persons.  Undercover?  Tough shit.  You are public servants, not slave overseers.  Get over it.</p>
<p>Finally, get rid of government propaganda organizations like DARE and the Partnership For A Truth-Free America.  The kids already know you&#8217;re lying, so stop wasting time and money on this crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick T</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198203</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198203</guid>
		<description>In honor of this, I am going to call my local police lobbying group and ask them for their stance on every issue and candidate.  I will then vote exactly the opposite on every question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In honor of this, I am going to call my local police lobbying group and ask them for their stance on every issue and candidate.  I will then vote exactly the opposite on every question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick T</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/30/medical-marijuana-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-198202</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10893#comment-198202</guid>
		<description>&quot;What is this sold as? &#039;That the best thing we can do for sick people is to get them high&#039;&quot; 

How sick a scumbag do you have to be to say something like that out loud? Effing asshole.  

Shorter John Waters: People should (painfully) die, so that others can&#039;t - maybe - get high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What is this sold as? &#8216;That the best thing we can do for sick people is to get them high&#8217;&#8221; </p>
<p>How sick a scumbag do you have to be to say something like that out loud? Effing asshole.  </p>
<p>Shorter John Waters: People should (painfully) die, so that others can&#8217;t &#8211; maybe &#8211; get high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

