<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The reason Ballot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-198891</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-198891</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;Woodrow Wilson. . . He also enacted the first federal income tax. . .&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, that’s not technically true. Lincoln did it in the Revenue Act of 1861 to help pay for the Civil War. It was repealed ten years later.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, it&#039;s not even &quot;non-technically&quot; true.  Grover Cleveland allowed a second federal income tax, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson-Gorman_Tariff_Act&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act&lt;/a&gt; (no, the &quot;Wilson&quot; in that law wasn&#039;t Woodrow) to become law without his signature in 1894, and the Supreme Court &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollock_v._Farmers%27_Loan_%26_Trust_Co.&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;struck down&lt;/a&gt; in 1895.  It was largely in response to the &lt;i&gt;Pollock&lt;/i&gt; decision that the Sixteenth Amendment was passed (a process that doesn&#039;t involve Presidents).

Wilson may have been a crappy President all around, but to single him out on income tax strikes me as more than a bit odd.  The worst that can be said of Wilson on this front is that he was the third U.S. President to sign a federal income tax into law, and the first to sign a constitutional one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>&#8220;Woodrow Wilson. . . He also enacted the first federal income tax. . .&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Actually, that’s not technically true. Lincoln did it in the Revenue Act of 1861 to help pay for the Civil War. It was repealed ten years later.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, it&#8217;s not even &#8220;non-technically&#8221; true.  Grover Cleveland allowed a second federal income tax, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson-Gorman_Tariff_Act" rel="nofollow">Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act</a> (no, the &#8220;Wilson&#8221; in that law wasn&#8217;t Woodrow) to become law without his signature in 1894, and the Supreme Court <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollock_v._Farmers%27_Loan_%26_Trust_Co." rel="nofollow">struck down</a> in 1895.  It was largely in response to the <i>Pollock</i> decision that the Sixteenth Amendment was passed (a process that doesn&#8217;t involve Presidents).</p>
<p>Wilson may have been a crappy President all around, but to single him out on income tax strikes me as more than a bit odd.  The worst that can be said of Wilson on this front is that he was the third U.S. President to sign a federal income tax into law, and the first to sign a constitutional one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-198716</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-198716</guid>
		<description>I was looking for a reson to be able to blow up about this matter...I think that any Libertarian that is planning on voting for Bob Barr should be ashamed of themselves.  NOBODY goes on that long being a bigitous, Constitution-trampling, douche-bag just to turn their outlook on life around in a matter of a few years.  How convenient that your political positions change after you&#039;ve got no other options but to be a figurehead for a 3rd party.  This is the LP selling their souls to the devil for the sake of a known face and name.  If, when I first joined the LP 11 years ago, you had told me the Bob freakin Barr would ever be a candidate for any office(even dog catcher) with them, I would have never joined.  The day his nomination was announced, I took my LP card out of my wallet and tore it up into little pieces.  Their lack of any progress and unpalleteable approach have bothered me for years, but this was the final straw.  A right-wing looney toon as MY candidate? Hell no!  SCREW YOU LP, YOU SELLOUTS!!  Oh, and thanks for doing your part to make sure I have nobody to vote for as President this year, a$$holes.  Party of Principle????  What a f&#039;ing joke. I will continue to vote for actual LIBERTARIAN candidates, but the LP itself has lost any support I could provide.   Once again for good measure- SCREW YOU LP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking for a reson to be able to blow up about this matter&#8230;I think that any Libertarian that is planning on voting for Bob Barr should be ashamed of themselves.  NOBODY goes on that long being a bigitous, Constitution-trampling, douche-bag just to turn their outlook on life around in a matter of a few years.  How convenient that your political positions change after you&#8217;ve got no other options but to be a figurehead for a 3rd party.  This is the LP selling their souls to the devil for the sake of a known face and name.  If, when I first joined the LP 11 years ago, you had told me the Bob freakin Barr would ever be a candidate for any office(even dog catcher) with them, I would have never joined.  The day his nomination was announced, I took my LP card out of my wallet and tore it up into little pieces.  Their lack of any progress and unpalleteable approach have bothered me for years, but this was the final straw.  A right-wing looney toon as MY candidate? Hell no!  SCREW YOU LP, YOU SELLOUTS!!  Oh, and thanks for doing your part to make sure I have nobody to vote for as President this year, a$$holes.  Party of Principle????  What a f&#8217;ing joke. I will continue to vote for actual LIBERTARIAN candidates, but the LP itself has lost any support I could provide.   Once again for good measure- SCREW YOU LP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PersonFromPOrlock</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-198625</link>
		<dc:creator>PersonFromPOrlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-198625</guid>
		<description>Woodrow Wilson... An all-around loathesome human being.

&lt;i&gt;And&lt;/i&gt; an academic poobah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woodrow Wilson&#8230; An all-around loathesome human being.</p>
<p><i>And</i> an academic poobah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-198292</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-198292</guid>
		<description>1. Who are you voting for in November?

John McCain

2. Who did you vote for in 2004 and 2000?

Bush in 2000, and Bush is 2004.  2004 for Bush only because Kerry pissed me off with his comments against the Vietnam War vets

3. Is this the most important election in your lifetime:

No, 1980 was bigger. But this is damned close. The thought of a Obama Presidency with total Dem control of both houses of congress keep me up at night.

4. What will you miss about the Bush administration?

The Bush Daughters.

5. Leaving George W. Bush out of consideration, what former U.S. president would you most like to have waterboarded and why?

I&#039;ll be even more evil and say John Adams for his signing of the Alien and Sedition Acts. Setting precedent for elimination of Civil Liberties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Who are you voting for in November?</p>
<p>John McCain</p>
<p>2. Who did you vote for in 2004 and 2000?</p>
<p>Bush in 2000, and Bush is 2004.  2004 for Bush only because Kerry pissed me off with his comments against the Vietnam War vets</p>
<p>3. Is this the most important election in your lifetime:</p>
<p>No, 1980 was bigger. But this is damned close. The thought of a Obama Presidency with total Dem control of both houses of congress keep me up at night.</p>
<p>4. What will you miss about the Bush administration?</p>
<p>The Bush Daughters.</p>
<p>5. Leaving George W. Bush out of consideration, what former U.S. president would you most like to have waterboarded and why?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be even more evil and say John Adams for his signing of the Alien and Sedition Acts. Setting precedent for elimination of Civil Liberties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-198239</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-198239</guid>
		<description>Since I&#039;m bored...

1. Who are you voting for in November?

Barr, because he&#039;s the best of what&#039;s out there, even though he&#039;s not perfect.

2. Who did you vote for in 2004 and 2000?

Voted for Browne in 2000 but supported Bush among the major-party candidates. Voted Badnarik in 2004 but supported Kerry simply to have a split party government.

3. Is this the most important election in your lifetime:

No. They&#039;re all &quot;the most important&quot; when they happen, then they fade into obscurity.

4. What will you miss about the Bush administration?

I&#039;m gonna miss the comedy it created. That&#039;s about it.

5. Leaving George W. Bush out of consideration, what former U.S. president would you most like to have waterboarded and why?

I&#039;ll be evil and say Abraham Lincoln, for being the most overrated President ever, especially when it comes to his distaste for civil liberties (i.e. revocation of habeas corpus)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I&#8217;m bored&#8230;</p>
<p>1. Who are you voting for in November?</p>
<p>Barr, because he&#8217;s the best of what&#8217;s out there, even though he&#8217;s not perfect.</p>
<p>2. Who did you vote for in 2004 and 2000?</p>
<p>Voted for Browne in 2000 but supported Bush among the major-party candidates. Voted Badnarik in 2004 but supported Kerry simply to have a split party government.</p>
<p>3. Is this the most important election in your lifetime:</p>
<p>No. They&#8217;re all &#8220;the most important&#8221; when they happen, then they fade into obscurity.</p>
<p>4. What will you miss about the Bush administration?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m gonna miss the comedy it created. That&#8217;s about it.</p>
<p>5. Leaving George W. Bush out of consideration, what former U.S. president would you most like to have waterboarded and why?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be evil and say Abraham Lincoln, for being the most overrated President ever, especially when it comes to his distaste for civil liberties (i.e. revocation of habeas corpus)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-198233</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-198233</guid>
		<description>I admit that I am disappointed by the number of people who answered that they were voting for Obama, however, I still love Reason. Tom, I agree that libertarians SHOULDN&#039;T vote for Obama (and I really wish they wouldn&#039;t), but that doesn&#039;t mean that they are secret liberals if they do.

Plenty of fine Reason writers are not planning to vote for Obama, as you should note. It&#039;s still a great magazine, one of the most worthwhile magazines there is. I would pay for it, if I didn&#039;t just steal my dad&#039;s copies. I also want to write for it someday.

Speaking of my dad, is it weird that I learned of that fact that he didn&#039;t vote the last eight years from Reason.com? Yes it is.

I am surprised he didn&#039;t vote for Harry Browne, though. 

Radley, props for your Wilson pick. I was pleased to read so much support for loathing the man. My anarchist cousin (not anarcho-capitalist, mind you) might be alarmed to agree with all you dirty capitalists; Wilson was always his pick for worst favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit that I am disappointed by the number of people who answered that they were voting for Obama, however, I still love Reason. Tom, I agree that libertarians SHOULDN&#8217;T vote for Obama (and I really wish they wouldn&#8217;t), but that doesn&#8217;t mean that they are secret liberals if they do.</p>
<p>Plenty of fine Reason writers are not planning to vote for Obama, as you should note. It&#8217;s still a great magazine, one of the most worthwhile magazines there is. I would pay for it, if I didn&#8217;t just steal my dad&#8217;s copies. I also want to write for it someday.</p>
<p>Speaking of my dad, is it weird that I learned of that fact that he didn&#8217;t vote the last eight years from Reason.com? Yes it is.</p>
<p>I am surprised he didn&#8217;t vote for Harry Browne, though. </p>
<p>Radley, props for your Wilson pick. I was pleased to read so much support for loathing the man. My anarchist cousin (not anarcho-capitalist, mind you) might be alarmed to agree with all you dirty capitalists; Wilson was always his pick for worst favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-198210</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-198210</guid>
		<description>Mattocracy,

I know that Barr was speaking mostly about the legal technicalities.  But he didn&#039;t just mock the idea of Wilson being a hero, but of being a victim, as well.  He could have added one sentence in that article condemning the law and the state&#039;s prosecution of Wilson, but he didn&#039;t.

Like I said, it&#039;s not so much what Barr is saying now (besides things like admiring Scalia), but what he&#039;s not saying, in terms of taking responsibility for his absolutely horrendous, bigoted, authoritarian behavior in congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mattocracy,</p>
<p>I know that Barr was speaking mostly about the legal technicalities.  But he didn&#8217;t just mock the idea of Wilson being a hero, but of being a victim, as well.  He could have added one sentence in that article condemning the law and the state&#8217;s prosecution of Wilson, but he didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Like I said, it&#8217;s not so much what Barr is saying now (besides things like admiring Scalia), but what he&#8217;s not saying, in terms of taking responsibility for his absolutely horrendous, bigoted, authoritarian behavior in congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-198199</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-198199</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing this out Radley. You made my decision as to whether renew my Reason subscription much much easier. I will not renew.

I&#039;m not saying McCain is the perfect candidate, but compared to Obama&#039;s one party rule, huge entitlements, higher taxes, and stifling of free speech issues, he is a dream.

I could see voting for Barr. That is acceptable. But anyone who calls themselves a Libertarian and votes for Obama is simply a Liberal too ashamed to call themselves one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing this out Radley. You made my decision as to whether renew my Reason subscription much much easier. I will not renew.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying McCain is the perfect candidate, but compared to Obama&#8217;s one party rule, huge entitlements, higher taxes, and stifling of free speech issues, he is a dream.</p>
<p>I could see voting for Barr. That is acceptable. But anyone who calls themselves a Libertarian and votes for Obama is simply a Liberal too ashamed to call themselves one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattocracy</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-198085</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattocracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-198085</guid>
		<description>But...Bob is kind of right in those two quotes you used.  Bob did not say Wilson was a definite child molester, simply that this case is about child molestation and not about civil rights.  To dress it up as civil rights takes away from the fact that this is bad law for everyone.

Wilson wasn&#039;t a hero, simply a victim.  He wasn&#039;t a victim because of his race, he was victim becuase of bad law prohibiting certain actions.

The article is defending the state&#039;s actions...the actions of releasing the videotape to the public that was used to convict him.  The Feds came in and stated that the state of Georgia could not do that becuase it amounted to pornography distribution.  How was Wilson supposed to get a fair retrail if the Justice Department decidedes to trump state law and keep evidence from the public?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But&#8230;Bob is kind of right in those two quotes you used.  Bob did not say Wilson was a definite child molester, simply that this case is about child molestation and not about civil rights.  To dress it up as civil rights takes away from the fact that this is bad law for everyone.</p>
<p>Wilson wasn&#8217;t a hero, simply a victim.  He wasn&#8217;t a victim because of his race, he was victim becuase of bad law prohibiting certain actions.</p>
<p>The article is defending the state&#8217;s actions&#8230;the actions of releasing the videotape to the public that was used to convict him.  The Feds came in and stated that the state of Georgia could not do that becuase it amounted to pornography distribution.  How was Wilson supposed to get a fair retrail if the Justice Department decidedes to trump state law and keep evidence from the public?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-198007</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-198007</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a libertarian who first voted for David Bergland (I met him at my community college while he was running) and has voted for the LP presidential candidate with no apologies ever since. I&#039;m torn about voting for Barr. I wish Ruwart or Kubby had been picked, but that&#039;s water under the bridge. I have read several people&#039;s reasons to vote FOR Barr in spite of all their caveats about the man, but I also have read people I respect give reasons why the LP does NOT deserve the vote this year - partially because of Barr and Root .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a libertarian who first voted for David Bergland (I met him at my community college while he was running) and has voted for the LP presidential candidate with no apologies ever since. I&#8217;m torn about voting for Barr. I wish Ruwart or Kubby had been picked, but that&#8217;s water under the bridge. I have read several people&#8217;s reasons to vote FOR Barr in spite of all their caveats about the man, but I also have read people I respect give reasons why the LP does NOT deserve the vote this year &#8211; partially because of Barr and Root .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-197979</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-197979</guid>
		<description>1. Who are you voting for in November?
Bob Barr.  I don&#039;t really care for Barr that much, for most of the reasons others have already shared, but... he&#039;s not going to win anyway, so who gives a shit?  I&#039;m supporting the LP.  

2. Who did you vote for in 2004 and 2000?
Harry Browne in 2000, and I was in Australia for 2004 and couldn&#039;t be bothered to vote.

3. Is this the most important election in your lifetime:
In MY lifetime? Maybe, but I was born in 1982.

4. What will you miss about the Bush administration?
The fact that I was right from the beginning.  I hated Bush before it was popular.  There&#039;s nothing like being a trendsetter.

5. Leaving George W. Bush out of consideration, what former U.S. president would you most like to have waterboarded and why?
Any of the dead ones will do.  Waterboarding is a horrible thing, but the idea of doing it to a corpse is funny to me somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Who are you voting for in November?<br />
Bob Barr.  I don&#8217;t really care for Barr that much, for most of the reasons others have already shared, but&#8230; he&#8217;s not going to win anyway, so who gives a shit?  I&#8217;m supporting the LP.  </p>
<p>2. Who did you vote for in 2004 and 2000?<br />
Harry Browne in 2000, and I was in Australia for 2004 and couldn&#8217;t be bothered to vote.</p>
<p>3. Is this the most important election in your lifetime:<br />
In MY lifetime? Maybe, but I was born in 1982.</p>
<p>4. What will you miss about the Bush administration?<br />
The fact that I was right from the beginning.  I hated Bush before it was popular.  There&#8217;s nothing like being a trendsetter.</p>
<p>5. Leaving George W. Bush out of consideration, what former U.S. president would you most like to have waterboarded and why?<br />
Any of the dead ones will do.  Waterboarding is a horrible thing, but the idea of doing it to a corpse is funny to me somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-197916</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-197916</guid>
		<description>tom blanton,
while i&#039;d like to have a dead president elected, barr i better than the departed harry browne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tom blanton,<br />
while i&#8217;d like to have a dead president elected, barr i better than the departed harry browne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Durkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-197915</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Durkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-197915</guid>
		<description>harry browne was serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>harry browne was serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Chief</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-197914</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Chief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-197914</guid>
		<description>1. Who are you voting for in November?
Bob Barr - we need to break the two party duopoly.  I don&#039;t think Barr is perfect, but with his flaws he&#039;s FAR BETTER than the major candidates.

2. Who did you vote for in 2004 and 2000?
2000 - Harry Browne (in NC)
2004 - Bush (in Ohio) - truly the most revolting vote I&#039;ve ever made, and I felt that way at the time.  My only solace is that I&#039;m STILL convinced that Kerry would have been worse.  And whenever I start to second guess myself, Kerry says something and I feel better again.  If I were to do it again, I&#039;d vote Cthulhu.

3. Is this the most important election in your lifetime?
NO!! The elections seem to be less and less important as the candidates move closer together.  1980 was the most important I&#039;ve been involved in.  Reagan and his reform of the monetary system have made the subsequent 20+ years of economic success possible.

4. What will you miss about the Bush administration?
Nothing now.  I&#039;m sure in a couple of years I&#039;ll look back at the Bush years as the &quot;good old days&quot; as the federal beast continues to grow.  I honestly believe it&#039;s just going to get worse regardless of which of the morons is elected president.

5. Leaving George W. Bush out of consideration, what former U.S. president would you most like to have waterboarded and why?
While I agree that waterboarding would be overboard, answering in the spirit of the question I&#039;d choose FDR - 4 terms - laid a lasting foundation for an imperial presidency and invasive national bureaucracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Who are you voting for in November?<br />
Bob Barr &#8211; we need to break the two party duopoly.  I don&#8217;t think Barr is perfect, but with his flaws he&#8217;s FAR BETTER than the major candidates.</p>
<p>2. Who did you vote for in 2004 and 2000?<br />
2000 &#8211; Harry Browne (in NC)<br />
2004 &#8211; Bush (in Ohio) &#8211; truly the most revolting vote I&#8217;ve ever made, and I felt that way at the time.  My only solace is that I&#8217;m STILL convinced that Kerry would have been worse.  And whenever I start to second guess myself, Kerry says something and I feel better again.  If I were to do it again, I&#8217;d vote Cthulhu.</p>
<p>3. Is this the most important election in your lifetime?<br />
NO!! The elections seem to be less and less important as the candidates move closer together.  1980 was the most important I&#8217;ve been involved in.  Reagan and his reform of the monetary system have made the subsequent 20+ years of economic success possible.</p>
<p>4. What will you miss about the Bush administration?<br />
Nothing now.  I&#8217;m sure in a couple of years I&#8217;ll look back at the Bush years as the &#8220;good old days&#8221; as the federal beast continues to grow.  I honestly believe it&#8217;s just going to get worse regardless of which of the morons is elected president.</p>
<p>5. Leaving George W. Bush out of consideration, what former U.S. president would you most like to have waterboarded and why?<br />
While I agree that waterboarding would be overboard, answering in the spirit of the question I&#8217;d choose FDR &#8211; 4 terms &#8211; laid a lasting foundation for an imperial presidency and invasive national bureaucracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. S. P. Schofield</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-197905</link>
		<dc:creator>C. S. P. Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-197905</guid>
		<description>About Wilson: Why does he get stuck with the &quot;First modern military draft&quot;? The Civil War era isn&#039;t modern? The WWI draft was objectionable in some way that the Civil War draft wasn&#039;t?

Not that I like or respect Wilson; a miserable twit of a President who got us into WWI as soon as he could - not that the Germans didn&#039;t make it easy for him, what with that business with Mexico. I just don&#039;t believe in dumping blame on people for things they didn&#039;t do, when they&#039;re already going to hell for things they DID do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About Wilson: Why does he get stuck with the &#8220;First modern military draft&#8221;? The Civil War era isn&#8217;t modern? The WWI draft was objectionable in some way that the Civil War draft wasn&#8217;t?</p>
<p>Not that I like or respect Wilson; a miserable twit of a President who got us into WWI as soon as he could &#8211; not that the Germans didn&#8217;t make it easy for him, what with that business with Mexico. I just don&#8217;t believe in dumping blame on people for things they didn&#8217;t do, when they&#8217;re already going to hell for things they DID do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Portocan</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-197900</link>
		<dc:creator>Portocan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-197900</guid>
		<description>1. Who are you voting for in November?
Bob Barr, he isn&#039;t ideal, but we all know there is no way he&#039;s winning.  The only way to send a message to the Republicans is to vote for a Libertarian.  Voting for Obama would just tell them they need to be more liberal.

2. Who did you vote for in 2004 and 2000? 
Couldn&#039;t vote, but I hate to admit I probably would have voted for Bush at the time.

3. Is this the most important election in your lifetime?
No, they&#039;re two sides of the same coin.  I have a feeling we have a very important one coming up in the next 4-8 years.

4. What will you miss about the Bush administration?
No easy target.  Although either one of the major party candidates would probably provide us with plenty of fodder.

5. Leaving George W. Bush out of consideration, what former U.S. president would you most like to have waterboarded and why?
Nixon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Who are you voting for in November?<br />
Bob Barr, he isn&#8217;t ideal, but we all know there is no way he&#8217;s winning.  The only way to send a message to the Republicans is to vote for a Libertarian.  Voting for Obama would just tell them they need to be more liberal.</p>
<p>2. Who did you vote for in 2004 and 2000?<br />
Couldn&#8217;t vote, but I hate to admit I probably would have voted for Bush at the time.</p>
<p>3. Is this the most important election in your lifetime?<br />
No, they&#8217;re two sides of the same coin.  I have a feeling we have a very important one coming up in the next 4-8 years.</p>
<p>4. What will you miss about the Bush administration?<br />
No easy target.  Although either one of the major party candidates would probably provide us with plenty of fodder.</p>
<p>5. Leaving George W. Bush out of consideration, what former U.S. president would you most like to have waterboarded and why?<br />
Nixon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Leaving George W. Bush out of consideration, what former U.S. president would you most like to have waterboarded? Good Entropy: My Basic Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-197888</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Leaving George W. Bush out of consideration, what former U.S. president would you most like to have waterboarded? Good Entropy: My Basic Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-197888</guid>
		<description>[...] Radley Balko [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Radley Balko [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blanton</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-197860</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-197860</guid>
		<description>Hemorrhoids are serious too, but I wouldn&#039;t vote so that Americans would have to put up with them for four years.

I might just vote for Harry Browne again this year - we could all rest in peace for four years if he won. Barr makes me nervous and I don&#039;t trust him. His running mate, Root, has no business being in politics and should be re-selling time-shares somewhere in Mississippi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hemorrhoids are serious too, but I wouldn&#8217;t vote so that Americans would have to put up with them for four years.</p>
<p>I might just vote for Harry Browne again this year &#8211; we could all rest in peace for four years if he won. Barr makes me nervous and I don&#8217;t trust him. His running mate, Root, has no business being in politics and should be re-selling time-shares somewhere in Mississippi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-197858</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-197858</guid>
		<description>People who watch polls should pay more attention to the dancers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who watch polls should pay more attention to the dancers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wallster</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/29/the-reason-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-197806</link>
		<dc:creator>wallster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10886#comment-197806</guid>
		<description>The fact that libertarian influence will never amount to anything is proven by the fact that about 1/2 the Reason employees in that poll flatly stated that they never vote.

Wasn&#039;t it a Reason columnist who wrote an article detailing why it is irrational to vote?  I agreed with the column, but it appears that libertarians are taking the advice too well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that libertarian influence will never amount to anything is proven by the fact that about 1/2 the Reason employees in that poll flatly stated that they never vote.</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t it a Reason columnist who wrote an article detailing why it is irrational to vote?  I agreed with the column, but it appears that libertarians are taking the advice too well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

