<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the GOP Needs to Lose.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:07:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: supercat</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-194030</link>
		<dc:creator>supercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-194030</guid>
		<description>JWeidner: The media to whom Obama is indebted for his support have worked hard to trash Mr. Wurzelbacher.  I wouldn&#039;t care less if some guy who happened to support Obama were engaging in such tactics, but when there is a coordinated effort by those who represent a major portion of Obama&#039;s support, I see that as cause for concern.

As for the notion that McCain dragged Mr. Wurzelbacher into this, Joe the Plumber&#039;s original question was stated as a hypothetical, and McCain&#039;s discussions regarding &quot;Joe the Plumber&quot; are related to the hypothetical question he raised.  If McCain were seeking to have the government hire Joe to repair the Capitol rest rooms, Joe&#039;s plumbing credentials would be a valid concern.  But in the actual situation!?  Whether or not Joe is personally in a position to take over a business with revenue over $250K (note that Obama himself used the term &quot;revenue&quot;) there are many other people who are in such a position.  His own personal credentials have nothing to do with the reasonableness of his hypothetical question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JWeidner: The media to whom Obama is indebted for his support have worked hard to trash Mr. Wurzelbacher.  I wouldn&#8217;t care less if some guy who happened to support Obama were engaging in such tactics, but when there is a coordinated effort by those who represent a major portion of Obama&#8217;s support, I see that as cause for concern.</p>
<p>As for the notion that McCain dragged Mr. Wurzelbacher into this, Joe the Plumber&#8217;s original question was stated as a hypothetical, and McCain&#8217;s discussions regarding &#8220;Joe the Plumber&#8221; are related to the hypothetical question he raised.  If McCain were seeking to have the government hire Joe to repair the Capitol rest rooms, Joe&#8217;s plumbing credentials would be a valid concern.  But in the actual situation!?  Whether or not Joe is personally in a position to take over a business with revenue over $250K (note that Obama himself used the term &#8220;revenue&#8221;) there are many other people who are in such a position.  His own personal credentials have nothing to do with the reasonableness of his hypothetical question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albatross</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193991</link>
		<dc:creator>albatross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193991</guid>
		<description>TJA:  Yeah, the Jose Padilla case sure convinced *me* of the closeness in spirit of Republicans and libertarians.  So did the secret prisons in which we tortured people abducted off the streets of friendly cities.  So did the overt violation of the written law w.r.t. FISA court approval of domestic wiretapping for national security.   So did the unending increase in the size of government and the deficit.  

Look, the Republicans had complete control of the government for six years.  So we don&#039;t just need to listen to their ads to find out what they believe--we can look at what they did.  Those guys aren&#039;t libertarian.  Not even the ones who haven&#039;t been taking part nationalizing half the financial industry, and handing the other half blank checks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TJA:  Yeah, the Jose Padilla case sure convinced *me* of the closeness in spirit of Republicans and libertarians.  So did the secret prisons in which we tortured people abducted off the streets of friendly cities.  So did the overt violation of the written law w.r.t. FISA court approval of domestic wiretapping for national security.   So did the unending increase in the size of government and the deficit.  </p>
<p>Look, the Republicans had complete control of the government for six years.  So we don&#8217;t just need to listen to their ads to find out what they believe&#8211;we can look at what they did.  Those guys aren&#8217;t libertarian.  Not even the ones who haven&#8217;t been taking part nationalizing half the financial industry, and handing the other half blank checks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kwix</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193953</link>
		<dc:creator>Kwix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193953</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I consider myself a Libertarian spirit, though I’d prefer that the party itself emphasize something other than the right to smoke dope.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well, there is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lp.org/platform&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;entirety of the LP platform&lt;/a&gt;, of which the &quot;right to smoke dope&quot; is expressed in only one location. To wit:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;1.2    Personal Privacy&lt;/b&gt;

We support the protections provided by the Fourth Amendment to be secure in our persons, homes, and property. Only actions that infringe on the rights of others can properly be termed crimes. We favor the repeal of all laws creating &quot;crimes&quot; without victims, such as the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
But really, why focus on the positive aspects of the libertarian philosophy when you can focus on the one aspect you dislike?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I consider myself a Libertarian spirit, though I’d prefer that the party itself emphasize something other than the right to smoke dope.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, there is the <a href="http://www.lp.org/platform" rel="nofollow">entirety of the LP platform</a>, of which the &#8220;right to smoke dope&#8221; is expressed in only one location. To wit:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>1.2    Personal Privacy</b></p>
<p>We support the protections provided by the Fourth Amendment to be secure in our persons, homes, and property. Only actions that infringe on the rights of others can properly be termed crimes. We favor the repeal of all laws creating &#8220;crimes&#8221; without victims, such as the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes.</p></blockquote>
<p>But really, why focus on the positive aspects of the libertarian philosophy when you can focus on the one aspect you dislike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193934</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193934</guid>
		<description>&quot;Unfortunately there is no box for “none of the above.”&quot;

So true.

I also wish this was an option.  if it won, then we could ban those who lost to this option from running again and keep going until someone actually beats &quot;none of the above&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unfortunately there is no box for “none of the above.”&#8221;</p>
<p>So true.</p>
<p>I also wish this was an option.  if it won, then we could ban those who lost to this option from running again and keep going until someone actually beats &#8220;none of the above&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owl Creek Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193680</link>
		<dc:creator>Owl Creek Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193680</guid>
		<description>There is a sadness to this election that I&#039;ve never before experienced, at least not to this depth.  The Democrat party continues its accelerating slide to the left and the Republican party, once being dragged along, is now happily sliding along with them.

In my six decades, I have often heard it said there is not a dime&#039;s worth of difference between the two major parties.  I would amend that to say it&#039;s now less than one cent&#039;s worth.

Bush has accepted every bloated funding initiative that the Democrats have larded together and, not to be outdone, has larded up his own.  His motto seems to have been, &quot;Veto?  What&#039;s a veto?  We&#039;re just trying to get along here.&quot;

I consider myself a Libertarian spirit, though I&#039;d prefer that the party itself emphasize something other than the right to smoke dope.  In truth, I have given up expecting anyone in Washington to behave reasonably.  It may be something in the air there.

So all I&#039;m left with is voting against candidates.  This year I have the rare pleasure of voting against both of my senators:  Durbin and Obama.  If I&#039;m still alive four years from now, perhaps there will be someone on the national ticket whom I can actually endorse.

Yes, Republicans deserve to lose but so do Democrats.  Unfortunately there is no box for &quot;none of the above.&quot;

OCO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a sadness to this election that I&#8217;ve never before experienced, at least not to this depth.  The Democrat party continues its accelerating slide to the left and the Republican party, once being dragged along, is now happily sliding along with them.</p>
<p>In my six decades, I have often heard it said there is not a dime&#8217;s worth of difference between the two major parties.  I would amend that to say it&#8217;s now less than one cent&#8217;s worth.</p>
<p>Bush has accepted every bloated funding initiative that the Democrats have larded together and, not to be outdone, has larded up his own.  His motto seems to have been, &#8220;Veto?  What&#8217;s a veto?  We&#8217;re just trying to get along here.&#8221;</p>
<p>I consider myself a Libertarian spirit, though I&#8217;d prefer that the party itself emphasize something other than the right to smoke dope.  In truth, I have given up expecting anyone in Washington to behave reasonably.  It may be something in the air there.</p>
<p>So all I&#8217;m left with is voting against candidates.  This year I have the rare pleasure of voting against both of my senators:  Durbin and Obama.  If I&#8217;m still alive four years from now, perhaps there will be someone on the national ticket whom I can actually endorse.</p>
<p>Yes, Republicans deserve to lose but so do Democrats.  Unfortunately there is no box for &#8220;none of the above.&#8221;</p>
<p>OCO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWeidner</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193567</link>
		<dc:creator>JWeidner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193567</guid>
		<description>&quot;Given the lengths to which Obama and his supporters will go, today, to attack Joe the Plumber, what do you think they’d do to any opposition if Obama were President?&quot;

Supercat, please feel free to detail the lengths that Obama has gone to discredit and/or attack Joe.  I don&#039;t think you can come up with even one.

As for the media investigation into Joe&#039;s background, frankly, McCain is the one to blame for that.  McCain is the one who has thrust Joe into the spotlight - he&#039;s the one who made Joe a central theme to the third debate, and he&#039;s the one who continues to invoke Joe&#039;s name at rallies around the country.  If the press have taken an interest in Joe and his background, it&#039;s only because McCain has held Joe up as some sort of example - and that&#039;s an action that&#039;s sure to invite media investigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Given the lengths to which Obama and his supporters will go, today, to attack Joe the Plumber, what do you think they’d do to any opposition if Obama were President?&#8221;</p>
<p>Supercat, please feel free to detail the lengths that Obama has gone to discredit and/or attack Joe.  I don&#8217;t think you can come up with even one.</p>
<p>As for the media investigation into Joe&#8217;s background, frankly, McCain is the one to blame for that.  McCain is the one who has thrust Joe into the spotlight &#8211; he&#8217;s the one who made Joe a central theme to the third debate, and he&#8217;s the one who continues to invoke Joe&#8217;s name at rallies around the country.  If the press have taken an interest in Joe and his background, it&#8217;s only because McCain has held Joe up as some sort of example &#8211; and that&#8217;s an action that&#8217;s sure to invite media investigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caro Parto</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193552</link>
		<dc:creator>Caro Parto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193552</guid>
		<description>Not all libertarians are fake, just Balko.  If he really stuck to his guns about limited government and low taxes all his DC buddies wouldn&#039;t hang out with him (Andrew Sullivan).  I bring up AS because he writes books about being a conservative but there isn&#039;t one conservative about him.  Why would he do that?  Because he&#039;s a one issue man, he wants to walk down the aisle with Bruce Valanch.  Same thing with Balko, claims to be a libertarian but his deal is he wants to smoke pot without getting in trouble.  That&#039;s it!  That&#039;s all he really cares about and by pretending to be a libertarian he might be able to bring a few folks with him.
By the way John McCain is starting to gain some ground by talking about Socialism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all libertarians are fake, just Balko.  If he really stuck to his guns about limited government and low taxes all his DC buddies wouldn&#8217;t hang out with him (Andrew Sullivan).  I bring up AS because he writes books about being a conservative but there isn&#8217;t one conservative about him.  Why would he do that?  Because he&#8217;s a one issue man, he wants to walk down the aisle with Bruce Valanch.  Same thing with Balko, claims to be a libertarian but his deal is he wants to smoke pot without getting in trouble.  That&#8217;s it!  That&#8217;s all he really cares about and by pretending to be a libertarian he might be able to bring a few folks with him.<br />
By the way John McCain is starting to gain some ground by talking about Socialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193432</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193432</guid>
		<description>Hey #30. SnowflakesinHell?  He voluntarily dis-armed  at the NRA Convention so he could breath McTraitors&#039; air,in the same room.

Yes he did. NRA Convention.No guns? Jeebus we&#039;re so screwed..

Now I see him at gun shows pushing GOP flyers.

Let&#039;s start with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey #30. SnowflakesinHell?  He voluntarily dis-armed  at the NRA Convention so he could breath McTraitors&#8217; air,in the same room.</p>
<p>Yes he did. NRA Convention.No guns? Jeebus we&#8217;re so screwed..</p>
<p>Now I see him at gun shows pushing GOP flyers.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktc2</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193423</link>
		<dc:creator>ktc2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193423</guid>
		<description>I saw McCain last night. 

I had no idea he had a cameo in the last few minutes of Quarantine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw McCain last night. </p>
<p>I had no idea he had a cameo in the last few minutes of Quarantine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supercat</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193413</link>
		<dc:creator>supercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193413</guid>
		<description>Barack Obama is supported by the media in a fashion which is beyond anything I&#039;ve seen before.  The efforts to destroy Joe the Plumber(*) are truly astonishing.  Joe&#039;s only &quot;crime&quot; was to ask Obama a hypothetical question, which he clearly identified as such.  Joe didn&#039;t sneak into an Obama rally to disrupt it.  He was in front of his own house.  Given the lengths to which Obama and his supporters will go, today, to attack Joe the Plumber, what do you think they&#039;d do to any opposition if Obama were President?

(*) Joe&#039;s his middle name, state licensing procedures require someone to work as an unlicensed apprentice for a few years becoming an independent plumber, etc.  But why should any of that be newsworthy?

McCain and many other Republicans deserve to lose.  I&#039;ll grant you that 100%.  I&#039;d even grant that they probably deserve to live under King Obama&#039;s thumb.  The rest of the country, however, does not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama is supported by the media in a fashion which is beyond anything I&#8217;ve seen before.  The efforts to destroy Joe the Plumber(*) are truly astonishing.  Joe&#8217;s only &#8220;crime&#8221; was to ask Obama a hypothetical question, which he clearly identified as such.  Joe didn&#8217;t sneak into an Obama rally to disrupt it.  He was in front of his own house.  Given the lengths to which Obama and his supporters will go, today, to attack Joe the Plumber, what do you think they&#8217;d do to any opposition if Obama were President?</p>
<p>(*) Joe&#8217;s his middle name, state licensing procedures require someone to work as an unlicensed apprentice for a few years becoming an independent plumber, etc.  But why should any of that be newsworthy?</p>
<p>McCain and many other Republicans deserve to lose.  I&#8217;ll grant you that 100%.  I&#8217;d even grant that they probably deserve to live under King Obama&#8217;s thumb.  The rest of the country, however, does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jefferson</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193378</link>
		<dc:creator>Jefferson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193378</guid>
		<description>Vote for Barr. Anything else is a waste. 

Obama is going to make things worse. McCain is going to make things worse AND start a new war. 

3rd Party votes are only wasted as long as people think that way. Times of turmoil have led to the growth of 3rd party status. If both parties move left on fiscal issues fiscally conservative voters may get more serious about a 3rd option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote for Barr. Anything else is a waste. </p>
<p>Obama is going to make things worse. McCain is going to make things worse AND start a new war. </p>
<p>3rd Party votes are only wasted as long as people think that way. Times of turmoil have led to the growth of 3rd party status. If both parties move left on fiscal issues fiscally conservative voters may get more serious about a 3rd option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClubMedSux</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193365</link>
		<dc:creator>ClubMedSux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193365</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My point is Republican beliefs, at some level (and clearly not in the current administration), are more aligned to core Libertatian beliefs than Democrats who are outwardly hostile toward Libertarian beliefs.&lt;/i&gt;

Economically speaking, yes.  Socially speaking?  Um... I&#039;m gonna have to disagree with you on that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My point is Republican beliefs, at some level (and clearly not in the current administration), are more aligned to core Libertatian beliefs than Democrats who are outwardly hostile toward Libertarian beliefs.</i></p>
<p>Economically speaking, yes.  Socially speaking?  Um&#8230; I&#8217;m gonna have to disagree with you on that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193343</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193343</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;When the only two parties who have a chance at winning both have a track record of expanding the size and scope of government, every election is likely to be interpreted as a win for big government — only the brand changes.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

...and a loss for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;When the only two parties who have a chance at winning both have a track record of expanding the size and scope of government, every election is likely to be interpreted as a win for big government — only the brand changes.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>&#8230;and a loss for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193324</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193324</guid>
		<description>Barr&#039;s change of heart can also be ascribed to &quot;get paid to take over the opposition, any opposition&quot;.  It happens all of the time with organizations on any subject and at most sizes.  Think subterfuge, same as cops masquerading as protesters, start some junk to give the police an excuse to &quot;shut down the protest&quot;, and the plant takes one for the team on the street, but is never charged once taken to the station.  Remember what happened in Quebec with the pictures of the sole of the shoes of some protesters being the EXACT SAME as the cops, and the cops at first denied it, then later confessed to the plant, but tried to spin it as &quot;it was for safety&quot;?

Barr has a LOT of penance to do before he should be believed.  Control the opposition, any opposition; make people believe they have a choice; direct energy away from activities that could change things to activities that can be controlled and therefore silenced.  These things happen all of the time, there is such a huge incentive to not let people wake up and get MAD AS HELL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barr&#8217;s change of heart can also be ascribed to &#8220;get paid to take over the opposition, any opposition&#8221;.  It happens all of the time with organizations on any subject and at most sizes.  Think subterfuge, same as cops masquerading as protesters, start some junk to give the police an excuse to &#8220;shut down the protest&#8221;, and the plant takes one for the team on the street, but is never charged once taken to the station.  Remember what happened in Quebec with the pictures of the sole of the shoes of some protesters being the EXACT SAME as the cops, and the cops at first denied it, then later confessed to the plant, but tried to spin it as &#8220;it was for safety&#8221;?</p>
<p>Barr has a LOT of penance to do before he should be believed.  Control the opposition, any opposition; make people believe they have a choice; direct energy away from activities that could change things to activities that can be controlled and therefore silenced.  These things happen all of the time, there is such a huge incentive to not let people wake up and get MAD AS HELL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJA</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193316</link>
		<dc:creator>TJA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193316</guid>
		<description>&quot;So your position is that Republicans meant to guard against the expansion of state power, but accidentally gave us war, the Unitary Executive, warrantless wiretapping, an assault on habeus corpus, torture, bank nationalization, ethanol subsidies, the farm bill, the biggest expansion of entitlements since Lyndon Johnson, and a trillion-dollar increase in federal spending?&quot;

Russell,

My point is Republican beliefs, at some level (and clearly not in the current administration), are more aligned to core Libertatian beliefs than Democrats who are outwardly hostile toward Libertarian beliefs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So your position is that Republicans meant to guard against the expansion of state power, but accidentally gave us war, the Unitary Executive, warrantless wiretapping, an assault on habeus corpus, torture, bank nationalization, ethanol subsidies, the farm bill, the biggest expansion of entitlements since Lyndon Johnson, and a trillion-dollar increase in federal spending?&#8221;</p>
<p>Russell,</p>
<p>My point is Republican beliefs, at some level (and clearly not in the current administration), are more aligned to core Libertatian beliefs than Democrats who are outwardly hostile toward Libertarian beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott in phx</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193314</link>
		<dc:creator>scott in phx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193314</guid>
		<description>McCain did pledge in his acceptence speech and elsewhere that he would VETO spending bills.

Obama couldn&#039;t even discuss a hypothetical question about cutting spending.

Also, in practical ways, Obama&#039;s assault on individual freedoms is almost certain to exceed that of the Bush administration (or McCain) -

gun control - despite what Heller says, you bet!

national service - you think he&#039;s not going to push that?  think about the Feds paying millions MORE to groups like ACORN.  remember his desire for a civilian corps as large as the military?  just imagine, millions of little &quot;community organizers&quot;.  pretty  soon they&#039;ll be gathering and sharing (ref: Lord of the Rings), but mostly gathering.

how about the &quot;fairness doctrine&quot;?  What&#039;s that you say?  You&#039;ll find out when Pelosi and company bring it back and APPLY IT TO THE INTERNET.

The following sums it up pretty nicely (from www.snowflakesinhell.com/page/2/)

Libertarians/Conservatives like “Jay” and myself underestimate liberals/progressives — and what we’re guilty of is projection. But when we’re drunk and honest, we have to admit: We’re effing pikers. To restate more plainly: We don’t want power, and don’t know how to wield it. We’re pikers.

Progressives have no such qualms. Given power, they’ll take more and they’ll exercise it ruthlessly. Look at the Democrats in Congress these last two years. In not even 24 months, they’ve sunk to depths it took the Republican Congress six or more years to sink to. Their unpopularity levels are even worse than the Republicans’ in 2006. And what will happen in November? The Democrats will win seats — because they know how to wield their power to deliver the goods to please their corrupt, greedy, grabby, needy base.

----------------
Obama and the Democrats may never give up power after this election.  I for one would rather take the chance that a McCain administration could hold the line while a real conservative movement comes back.

I&#039;ll say it again.  I&#039;m not certain America will survive an Obama presidency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain did pledge in his acceptence speech and elsewhere that he would VETO spending bills.</p>
<p>Obama couldn&#8217;t even discuss a hypothetical question about cutting spending.</p>
<p>Also, in practical ways, Obama&#8217;s assault on individual freedoms is almost certain to exceed that of the Bush administration (or McCain) -</p>
<p>gun control &#8211; despite what Heller says, you bet!</p>
<p>national service &#8211; you think he&#8217;s not going to push that?  think about the Feds paying millions MORE to groups like ACORN.  remember his desire for a civilian corps as large as the military?  just imagine, millions of little &#8220;community organizers&#8221;.  pretty  soon they&#8217;ll be gathering and sharing (ref: Lord of the Rings), but mostly gathering.</p>
<p>how about the &#8220;fairness doctrine&#8221;?  What&#8217;s that you say?  You&#8217;ll find out when Pelosi and company bring it back and APPLY IT TO THE INTERNET.</p>
<p>The following sums it up pretty nicely (from <a href="http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/page/2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/page/2/</a>)</p>
<p>Libertarians/Conservatives like “Jay” and myself underestimate liberals/progressives — and what we’re guilty of is projection. But when we’re drunk and honest, we have to admit: We’re effing pikers. To restate more plainly: We don’t want power, and don’t know how to wield it. We’re pikers.</p>
<p>Progressives have no such qualms. Given power, they’ll take more and they’ll exercise it ruthlessly. Look at the Democrats in Congress these last two years. In not even 24 months, they’ve sunk to depths it took the Republican Congress six or more years to sink to. Their unpopularity levels are even worse than the Republicans’ in 2006. And what will happen in November? The Democrats will win seats — because they know how to wield their power to deliver the goods to please their corrupt, greedy, grabby, needy base.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Obama and the Democrats may never give up power after this election.  I for one would rather take the chance that a McCain administration could hold the line while a real conservative movement comes back.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say it again.  I&#8217;m not certain America will survive an Obama presidency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Leatherwood</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193309</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Leatherwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193309</guid>
		<description>Radley- For someone who has made his name FOR the War on Drugs, FOR federal government meddling with marriage, FOR limiting differing religious views in the military, and voted FOR the Patriot Act, it is hard to believe he just changed is mind. It seems to me that his gig as a medical marijuana lobbyist is what changed his mind, not personal enlightenment. So, yes, I believe money IS involved.

If he truly and honestly believe what he did for 8 years in Congress and as a DA was all wrong, good for him. And he will probably receive my vote this year anyway (hell, I voted for Badnarik). He just has A LOT of pennance to do before he is &quot;believeable&quot;. A lot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radley- For someone who has made his name FOR the War on Drugs, FOR federal government meddling with marriage, FOR limiting differing religious views in the military, and voted FOR the Patriot Act, it is hard to believe he just changed is mind. It seems to me that his gig as a medical marijuana lobbyist is what changed his mind, not personal enlightenment. So, yes, I believe money IS involved.</p>
<p>If he truly and honestly believe what he did for 8 years in Congress and as a DA was all wrong, good for him. And he will probably receive my vote this year anyway (hell, I voted for Badnarik). He just has A LOT of pennance to do before he is &#8220;believeable&#8221;. A lot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j.d.</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193308</link>
		<dc:creator>j.d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193308</guid>
		<description>this was picked up over at fark. going to be a long thread there. perhaps you could show up, Radley, and set the record straight? I&#039;d be great for your publicity. 

I think right now, libertarians should be reaching out to the disenfranchised conservative voters who, with all due respect, probably aren&#039;t conservative in any shape or form, aside from calling themselves such a name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this was picked up over at fark. going to be a long thread there. perhaps you could show up, Radley, and set the record straight? I&#8217;d be great for your publicity. </p>
<p>I think right now, libertarians should be reaching out to the disenfranchised conservative voters who, with all due respect, probably aren&#8217;t conservative in any shape or form, aside from calling themselves such a name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeb</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193299</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193299</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not too scared of Obama.  In two years people will be so fed up with Democrats that congress will change again and we will transition back to a lovely gridlock.  And I have to believe that Obama is full of crap and wont even try to do half of the things he is talking about.  That&#039;s what has happened with every other new president I can remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not too scared of Obama.  In two years people will be so fed up with Democrats that congress will change again and we will transition back to a lovely gridlock.  And I have to believe that Obama is full of crap and wont even try to do half of the things he is talking about.  That&#8217;s what has happened with every other new president I can remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClubMedSux</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/20/why-the-gop-needs-to-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-193296</link>
		<dc:creator>ClubMedSux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10834#comment-193296</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;As bad as the Republicans deserve their spanking does anybody seriously think that enduring 4 years (minimum) of Obama makes sense?&lt;/i&gt;

While I agree with your concern about four years of Obama, my problem is most of my fears regarding Obama are equally applicable to McCain.  Increased federal spending, government intervention abroad, government intervention in our economy (including trade restrictions), a further erosion of civil liberties...  McCain hasn&#039;t done anything to make me think he&#039;ll be better in any of these areas than Obama.  Frankly, if he did I think you&#039;d see way more McCain love from Agitator commentors, myself included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As bad as the Republicans deserve their spanking does anybody seriously think that enduring 4 years (minimum) of Obama makes sense?</i></p>
<p>While I agree with your concern about four years of Obama, my problem is most of my fears regarding Obama are equally applicable to McCain.  Increased federal spending, government intervention abroad, government intervention in our economy (including trade restrictions), a further erosion of civil liberties&#8230;  McCain hasn&#8217;t done anything to make me think he&#8217;ll be better in any of these areas than Obama.  Frankly, if he did I think you&#8217;d see way more McCain love from Agitator commentors, myself included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

