<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Make the Call!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: seeker6079</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-188024</link>
		<dc:creator>seeker6079</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 04:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-188024</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s one other possibility for this ad which hasn&#039;t been mentioned here.

McCain staffer has quote, but not the source of the quote.  The ad is ginned up with the former whilst (s)he seeks the latter; the ad goes out without the completion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s one other possibility for this ad which hasn&#8217;t been mentioned here.</p>
<p>McCain staffer has quote, but not the source of the quote.  The ad is ginned up with the former whilst (s)he seeks the latter; the ad goes out without the completion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seeker6079</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-188023</link>
		<dc:creator>seeker6079</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 04:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-188023</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;but Noonan is hardly that much of a hack. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Incorrect.  She is that much of a hack.  She has a well-deserved reputation for touting the GOP every chance she gets, then being more honest in private exchanges (one of which was revealed on TV some weeks back.

Hack.  Total hack.   A shill.  A fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>but Noonan is hardly that much of a hack. </p></blockquote>
<p>Incorrect.  She is that much of a hack.  She has a well-deserved reputation for touting the GOP every chance she gets, then being more honest in private exchanges (one of which was revealed on TV some weeks back.</p>
<p>Hack.  Total hack.   A shill.  A fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-188005</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-188005</guid>
		<description>I like to think Noonan is not capable of such a thing. I was a huge fan. But after hearing her trash Palin (justifiably) off-camera during the convention, and watching her since overcompensate with awkward, forced admiration for Palin in order to make it up to the angry republican base, I&#039;m not so sure. That write-up of Palin&#039;s performance did not strike me as totally honest. I believe Noonan, a smart and accomplished woman, cannot truly respect a dimweed like Palin. But she cannot afford to lose all her readers by telling the total truth either.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to think Noonan is not capable of such a thing. I was a huge fan. But after hearing her trash Palin (justifiably) off-camera during the convention, and watching her since overcompensate with awkward, forced admiration for Palin in order to make it up to the angry republican base, I&#8217;m not so sure. That write-up of Palin&#8217;s performance did not strike me as totally honest. I believe Noonan, a smart and accomplished woman, cannot truly respect a dimweed like Palin. But she cannot afford to lose all her readers by telling the total truth either&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWeidner</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187965</link>
		<dc:creator>JWeidner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187965</guid>
		<description>I should clarify - when I said it isn&#039;t that hard to believe McCain&#039;s camp could have done something like this, I was referring to the possibility that someone basically gave Noonan those lines to use when she provided commentary on the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should clarify &#8211; when I said it isn&#8217;t that hard to believe McCain&#8217;s camp could have done something like this, I was referring to the possibility that someone basically gave Noonan those lines to use when she provided commentary on the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWeidner</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187963</link>
		<dc:creator>JWeidner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187963</guid>
		<description>Hey Radley.  New to posting here, but I&#039;ve stopped by on and off for a while now.

Not much to add, other than the problem that McCain faces is that it&#039;s not that difficult to believe they would have done something like this, considering their earlier screwup with the debate.

Plus, although this certainly COULD have been a template error, I&#039;d say it was mighty convenient that Noonan supplied a quote that neatly fit into the template&#039;s copy-space.  The quote wound up just long enough to be meaty, yet not so long that the font size had to be shrunk to a too-small size.  Not to mention the absolute incompetence of whoever would have updated the template - they put in the quote and the date of the quote, but not the name of the person who made the quote?  Frankly, this is where I start to have a problem with anyone claiming it&#039;s an error in the template.

Regardless, there&#039;s no way we&#039;ll ever know for sure.  Noonan certainly would never admit to it, and neither would anyone in McCain&#039;s camp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Radley.  New to posting here, but I&#8217;ve stopped by on and off for a while now.</p>
<p>Not much to add, other than the problem that McCain faces is that it&#8217;s not that difficult to believe they would have done something like this, considering their earlier screwup with the debate.</p>
<p>Plus, although this certainly COULD have been a template error, I&#8217;d say it was mighty convenient that Noonan supplied a quote that neatly fit into the template&#8217;s copy-space.  The quote wound up just long enough to be meaty, yet not so long that the font size had to be shrunk to a too-small size.  Not to mention the absolute incompetence of whoever would have updated the template &#8211; they put in the quote and the date of the quote, but not the name of the person who made the quote?  Frankly, this is where I start to have a problem with anyone claiming it&#8217;s an error in the template.</p>
<p>Regardless, there&#8217;s no way we&#8217;ll ever know for sure.  Noonan certainly would never admit to it, and neither would anyone in McCain&#8217;s camp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Scarborough</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187956</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Scarborough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187956</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I doubt it because of Noonan&#039;s integrity, not McCain&#039;s. McCain&#039;s campaign absolutely would do something like this, but Noonan is hardly that much of a hack. She&#039;s already annoyed the McCain campaign for her leaked comments on Palin, and she&#039;s written columns that don&#039;t toe the party line. Now if it was Hewitt or Savage or one of those shills, I&#039;d believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I doubt it because of Noonan&#8217;s integrity, not McCain&#8217;s. McCain&#8217;s campaign absolutely would do something like this, but Noonan is hardly that much of a hack. She&#8217;s already annoyed the McCain campaign for her leaked comments on Palin, and she&#8217;s written columns that don&#8217;t toe the party line. Now if it was Hewitt or Savage or one of those shills, I&#8217;d believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GB FL</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187951</link>
		<dc:creator>GB FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187951</guid>
		<description>Pre-written quotes from a campaign manager are completely different than a columnist being given the lead to an article. Again, it points to a certain lack of political maturity to equate the two.

I don&#039;t know much about Peggy Noonan, but I suspect she&#039;s an egotistical enough writer that she wouldn&#039;t use someone else&#039;s words as hers. And, while the WSJ might be in the tank for McCain, I doubt they&#039;d take the credibility hit of letting the McCain campaign write their articles (Noonan&#039;s words in the youtube video are used almost verbatim in her WSJ column: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122300786229301597.html).

It simply doesn&#039;t pass the basic credibility test that this ad is evidence of pre-written quotes being fed to journalists.

All that said, I like reading this blog, mainly for its niche of pointing out police abuses. When it strays into other political commentary, I find it less insightful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pre-written quotes from a campaign manager are completely different than a columnist being given the lead to an article. Again, it points to a certain lack of political maturity to equate the two.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know much about Peggy Noonan, but I suspect she&#8217;s an egotistical enough writer that she wouldn&#8217;t use someone else&#8217;s words as hers. And, while the WSJ might be in the tank for McCain, I doubt they&#8217;d take the credibility hit of letting the McCain campaign write their articles (Noonan&#8217;s words in the youtube video are used almost verbatim in her WSJ column: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122300786229301597.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122300786229301597.html</a>).</p>
<p>It simply doesn&#8217;t pass the basic credibility test that this ad is evidence of pre-written quotes being fed to journalists.</p>
<p>All that said, I like reading this blog, mainly for its niche of pointing out police abuses. When it strays into other political commentary, I find it less insightful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radley Balko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187942</link>
		<dc:creator>Radley Balko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187942</guid>
		<description>#19 and #21 -- If you think I have no integrity, go elsewhere.

No one is forcing you to read this site.  

As I explained in the update, the McCain campaign had no problem sending out pre-written quotes from its own campaign manager declaring victory before the first debate even started.

There&#039;s plenty of reason to question if this was more than merely forgetting to an attribution to the ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#19 and #21 &#8212; If you think I have no integrity, go elsewhere.</p>
<p>No one is forcing you to read this site.  </p>
<p>As I explained in the update, the McCain campaign had no problem sending out pre-written quotes from its own campaign manager declaring victory before the first debate even started.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s plenty of reason to question if this was more than merely forgetting to an attribution to the ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honeyko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187940</link>
		<dc:creator>Honeyko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187940</guid>
		<description>GB FL is absolutely correct -- it&#039;s a &lt;i&gt;freaking TEMPLATE&lt;/i&gt;.

But will The Agitator correct the &quot;white lie&quot; that it&#039;s not?

Experience leads me to conclude no -- and that&#039;s a shame, because it&#039;s just another step down the road to debasement of integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GB FL is absolutely correct &#8212; it&#8217;s a <i>freaking TEMPLATE</i>.</p>
<p>But will The Agitator correct the &#8220;white lie&#8221; that it&#8217;s not?</p>
<p>Experience leads me to conclude no &#8212; and that&#8217;s a shame, because it&#8217;s just another step down the road to debasement of integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Confabulum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I Hope This Isn&#8217;t True</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187919</link>
		<dc:creator>The Confabulum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I Hope This Isn&#8217;t True</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187919</guid>
		<description>[...] But I feel naive doubting it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But I feel naive doubting it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GB FL</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187906</link>
		<dc:creator>GB FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 16:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187906</guid>
		<description>This is yet another post that makes me question Radley Balko&#039;s political maturity. For a journalist at a magazine, this should be obvious for what it is - a template for an ad where one of the template text items (the name of the famous person) was not updated when the ad was submitted. To turn that into a political attack questioning if the McCain campaign is writing columnists&#039; leads is ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is yet another post that makes me question Radley Balko&#8217;s political maturity. For a journalist at a magazine, this should be obvious for what it is &#8211; a template for an ad where one of the template text items (the name of the famous person) was not updated when the ad was submitted. To turn that into a political attack questioning if the McCain campaign is writing columnists&#8217; leads is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McCain Ad slip-up: Palin praised by "famous person"</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187901</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain Ad slip-up: Palin praised by "famous person"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 16:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187901</guid>
		<description>[...] Radley Balko, who wonders&#8230; &#8220;was this a harmless error by a McCain campaign techie? Or did the McCain camp send out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Radley Balko, who wonders&#8230; &#8220;was this a harmless error by a McCain campaign techie? Or did the McCain camp send out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mars</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187884</link>
		<dc:creator>Mars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 12:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187884</guid>
		<description>It always amazes me how intellectual honesty and integrity go out the door when election time rolls around.  We all know what a template is, and &quot;She Killed, It was her evening. She was the star.&quot; likely had &quot;Really great quote about how well she did.&quot; shortly before it was sent out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always amazes me how intellectual honesty and integrity go out the door when election time rolls around.  We all know what a template is, and &#8220;She Killed, It was her evening. She was the star.&#8221; likely had &#8220;Really great quote about how well she did.&#8221; shortly before it was sent out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktc2</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187857</link>
		<dc:creator>ktc2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 08:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187857</guid>
		<description>Best bit about 2:20 in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best bit about 2:20 in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktc2</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187856</link>
		<dc:creator>ktc2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 08:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187856</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcyNWwpZWe4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;McCain as Gollum&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcyNWwpZWe4" rel="nofollow">McCain as Gollum</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187826</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 06:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187826</guid>
		<description>Radley,

I can appreciate your disdain for Palin and McCain.  They do deserve all the criticism they are getting.  But I have noticed in the past several months that you&#039;re running about 98% against them, and maybe 2% against Obama and Biden.

I&#039;ll put good money up to wager that two years from now, when Obama&#039;s administration is trashing your own liberties more than you thought possible in such a short time period, you&#039;ll look back at all these postings and wonder why you had next to nothing to say about them.

I just don&#039;t get you on this.  You recognize so many outrages against individual rights, but you&#039;ve got a huge blind spot once there is an election, I think.

Just resolve to stay home every election day (as a matter of respecting your neighbors&#039; rights, i.e., not giving any politician the permission to violate said rights).  After a couple of elections have passed, you&#039;ll learn to ignore the hype and see them as as the rotten bastards they are.  And, you&#039;ll lose any desire to pick sides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radley,</p>
<p>I can appreciate your disdain for Palin and McCain.  They do deserve all the criticism they are getting.  But I have noticed in the past several months that you&#8217;re running about 98% against them, and maybe 2% against Obama and Biden.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll put good money up to wager that two years from now, when Obama&#8217;s administration is trashing your own liberties more than you thought possible in such a short time period, you&#8217;ll look back at all these postings and wonder why you had next to nothing to say about them.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t get you on this.  You recognize so many outrages against individual rights, but you&#8217;ve got a huge blind spot once there is an election, I think.</p>
<p>Just resolve to stay home every election day (as a matter of respecting your neighbors&#8217; rights, i.e., not giving any politician the permission to violate said rights).  After a couple of elections have passed, you&#8217;ll learn to ignore the hype and see them as as the rotten bastards they are.  And, you&#8217;ll lose any desire to pick sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aland</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187822</link>
		<dc:creator>aland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 05:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187822</guid>
		<description>Radley,

This is pretty standard marketing stuff. I imagine that nearly every campaign works that way for efficiency&#039;s sake with ads. You have six words to work with; it&#039;s not like re-writing the Federalist papers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radley,</p>
<p>This is pretty standard marketing stuff. I imagine that nearly every campaign works that way for efficiency&#8217;s sake with ads. You have six words to work with; it&#8217;s not like re-writing the Federalist papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chsw</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187761</link>
		<dc:creator>chsw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 23:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187761</guid>
		<description>Distribution of talking points has been around for a couple of decades, Mr. Balko.  The Clintons made an art of using faxes and e-mails to most US and foreign news outlets.  I&#039;m surprised that you are surprised.

chsw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Distribution of talking points has been around for a couple of decades, Mr. Balko.  The Clintons made an art of using faxes and e-mails to most US and foreign news outlets.  I&#8217;m surprised that you are surprised.</p>
<p>chsw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honeyko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187727</link>
		<dc:creator>Honeyko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187727</guid>
		<description>(Thanks, Tanks, Tahnks....what&#039;s the difference?  Feh....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Thanks, Tanks, Tahnks&#8230;.what&#8217;s the difference?  Feh&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honeyko</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/10/04/you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-187726</link>
		<dc:creator>Honeyko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10757#comment-187726</guid>
		<description>* McCain, as the candidate of the Stupid Party, deserves to lose for voting $700,000,000,000 to China.

* Obama, as the candidate of the Evil Party, deserves to President when the socialist-welfare state goes bankrupt thoroughly and completely as the $54 trillion dollar credit-default-swap derivatives debt monster eats the world alive &amp; screaming, ushering in Great Depression II.

Not even the combined forces of the Justice League and the Powerpuff Girls can stop it now.

* Congress? &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/599-Thanks-Jackoffs.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tahnks, Jackoffs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;. It deserves to burn to the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* McCain, as the candidate of the Stupid Party, deserves to lose for voting $700,000,000,000 to China.</p>
<p>* Obama, as the candidate of the Evil Party, deserves to President when the socialist-welfare state goes bankrupt thoroughly and completely as the $54 trillion dollar credit-default-swap derivatives debt monster eats the world alive &amp; screaming, ushering in Great Depression II.</p>
<p>Not even the combined forces of the Justice League and the Powerpuff Girls can stop it now.</p>
<p>* Congress? <b><a href="http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/599-Thanks-Jackoffs.html" rel="nofollow">Tahnks, Jackoffs</a></b>. It deserves to burn to the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

