Cato Forum on No-Knock Raids Featuring Berwyn Heights Mayor Cheye Calvo, LEAP’s Peter Christ, and Your Humble Agitator

Friday, August 29th, 2008

Here are the details, from Cato’s website:

Should No-Knock Police Raids be Rare-or Routine?

POLICY FORUM
Thursday, September 11, 2008
4:00 PM (Reception To Follow)

Featuring Cheye Calvo, Mayor, Berwyn Heights, Maryland, Radley Balko, Senior Writer, Reason and author of Overkill: The Rise of Paramilitary Police Raids in America, Peter Christ, Co-founder, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition. Moderated by Tim Lynch, Director, Project on Criminal Justice, Cato Institute.

The Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001

The Prince George’s County police department is under fire for a recent drug raid on the home of Berwyn Heights mayor Cheye Calvo. Unbeknownst to Calvo, a box containing marijuana was delivered to his home. Shortly thereafter, police officers kicked in the front door and shot both of Calvo’s pet Labrador retrievers. The police have subsequently cleared Calvo of any wrongdoing but are unapologetic about their raid tactics. Are no-knock, paramilitary raids an appropriate tactic for drug investigations? Or do sudden, unannounced entries bring unnecessary violence to police investigations? Join us for a discussion of the Prince George’s incident and, more broadly, the militarization of police work in America.

Cato events, unless otherwise noted, are free of charge. To register for this event, please fill out the form below and click submit or email events@cato.org, fax (202) 371-0841, or call (202) 789-5229 by 4:00 PM, Wednesday, September 10, 2008. Please arrive early. Seating is limited and not guaranteed. News media inquiries only (no registrations), please call (202) 789-5200.

If you can’t make it to the Cato Institute, watch this forum live online.

Digg it |  reddit |  del.icio.us |  Fark

14 Responses to “Cato Forum on No-Knock Raids Featuring Berwyn Heights Mayor Cheye Calvo, LEAP’s Peter Christ, and Your Humble Agitator”

  1. #1 |  dsmallwood | 

    um, shouldn’t there be someone from law enforcement?

    Add karma Subtract karma  --2
  2. #2 |  Vlad Drac | 

    “um, shouldn’t there be someone from law enforcement?”

    No.

    These bastards have had generations, now, to fix the rot from within. Instead they grow more insular and aggressive by the day, while their sycophants in the media continue in their miserable failure to afflict the comfort these bastards enjoy. There may really be only “a few bad apples”, but every individual in the so-called profession who lets the mountain of crap pile ever higher is equally rotten.

    Hell, the very idea of “law enforcement” is half of what got us this far down the slippery slope in the first place. Because if it’s “the law”, you know, then it MUST be enforced.

    Intercourse that, sideways, good and hard.

    Until these crumbs clean house, they don’t deserve the back of my hand, let alone any manner of podium from which to blather their self-serving drivel.

    Add karma Subtract karma  +8
  3. #3 |  Chris | 

    I agree with Vlad. No. They don’t need any representation at this event. They seem to have all the power right now, so the heck with them.

    I was reading about a six artists/independent news reporters in town to cover the RNC convention being detained and having their equipment confiscated. For what? “Suspicion of Trespassing on railroad property”.

    http://tiny.cc/xhnxa

    I had a couple of police officers give me a hard time a few days ago while I was downtown snapping some photos of the Excel Energy Center and the surrounding area (Nothing sinister planned, and I do live less than three blocks from this area!) - Seems that the police are telling people to not take photos “because of heightened security”. What a bunch of bravo sierra.

    Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  4. #4 |  z | 

    Are no-knock, paramilitary raids an appropriate tactic for drug investigations? Or do sudden, unannounced entries bring unnecessary violence to police investigations?

    Since it seems everyone on the panel already agrees with the answers being “no” and “yes”, I can’t see there being much of a debate. I agree with smallwood, it would be better to have someone representing an opposing viewpoint.

    Add karma Subtract karma  +1
  5. #5 |  Radley Balko | 

    When I put together the first forum in 2006, I invited several law enforcement groups and defenders using SWAT tactics for drug raids to participate. They all either declined or didn’t respond.

    Cato tells me the same thing happened this time.

    Add karma Subtract karma  +11
  6. #6 |  claude | 

    “When I put together the first forum in 2006, I invited several law enforcement groups and defenders using SWAT tactics for drug raids to participate. They all either declined or didn’t respond.

    Cato tells me the same thing happened this time.”

    Gee i wonder y?

    Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  7. #7 |  SusanK | 

    They know it’s not defensible. If I were in “law enforcement”, I wouldn’t go, either.

    Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  8. #8 |  Pete Guither | 

    Peter Christ is from Law Enforcement.

    Add karma Subtract karma  +1
  9. #9 |  Thomas Blair | 

    For those wishing for a two-sided debate, I’m inclined to think the host couldn’t get anyone to publicly defend this horseshit in a non-controlled setting.

    Add karma Subtract karma  +1
  10. #10 |  The Johnny Appleseed Of Crack | 

    Perhaps the SWAT team will show up as “uninvited guests”?

    Add karma Subtract karma  +4
  11. #11 |  nemo | 

    Quite frankly, I seriously doubt it would make much difference if they did show up.

    The reason is obvious. In almost every single instance where police and agents hold press conferences, the formulaic nature of it becomes evident.

    I cannot say with any accuracy that there is a ‘playbook’ by which police, drug agents, prosecutors, etc. have a limited set of statements to make to the press in such instances, but it certainly seems to be the case, with the same phrases being uttered time and again with suspicious regularity.

    I do know for certain the DEA has been using taxpayer’s dollars to publish ‘manuals’ intended to be used in any debate with drug law reformers..

    So…what diff would it make if they showed up? They would never stray outside the safe boundaries of their scripts; they wouldn’t dare engage in an actual debate, as they’d be rhetorical roadkill within minutes. And that kind of loss of ‘face’ has political consequences. Ones that they don’t want to experience under any circumstances.

    Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  12. #12 |  This Is State Control » Boztopia.com | 

    [...] frequency and with almost no justification again and again in this country. It’s what got Cheye Calvo’s home raided and his dogs killed, and it’s what gets dozens of often young, black, and poor people tossed into jail or killed [...]

    Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  13. #13 |  Madison Katzenbaum | 

    SWAT teams nowadays deliberately kill the dogs, not because the dogs are really a threat to an entire group of cops armed with automatic weapons,scatterguns and body armor, but they kill the dogs in order to terrorize the civilians(a type of shock and awe tactic)… the obvious implication being …{we just blasted your dogs guts all over the place and we would just as easily blast your guts all over the place]…now, this might be acceptable SOP during wartime against a known clear enemy but it is hardly proportional when trying to bust nonviolent civilian home residents who have no criminal record, over a small box of marihjhuana. I cant imagine how hard the politicians,lawyers, and talking heads are going to sweet talk the FBI and justice department out of calling for the firing and criminal negligence prosecution of these cops. But, I would be willing to bet good money that the politically correct Prince George’s County politicians and their fellow travellers in Maryland and Washington D.C. will “find a way” to absolve the police chief and his cronies. Just watch, the report will likely come out on the day of the election or at some other “convenient” time and they will likely use a “who’s on first” (chinese firedrill) parade of excuses. Just watch!

    Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  14. #14 |  Red Green | 

    The tactics and appearance of these American swatzi goons indicates that they are far more afraid of “us”. Maybe your next book should be titled “Killcrazy” or “Why We Kill Them ,Before They Kill Us”.

    Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Leave a Reply