Andrew Sullivan makes a very important point about Bush, McCain and the subject of torture. Two points, actually. The first is that Bush doesn’t think McCain was tortured:
The torture that was deployed against McCain emerges in all the various accounts. It involved sleep deprivation, the withholding of medical treatment, stress positions, long-time standing, and beating. Sound familiar?
According to the Bush administration’s definition of torture, McCain was therefore not tortured.
Yep. He’s right. Here’s more:
Cheney denies that McCain was tortured; as does Bush. So do John Yoo and David Addington and George Tenet. In the one indisputably authentic version of the story of a Vietnamese guard showing compassion, McCain talks of the agony of long-time standing. A quarter century later, Don Rumsfeld was putting his signature to memos lengthening the agony of “long-time standing” that victims of Bush’s torture regime would have to endure. These torture techniques are, according to the president of the United States, merely “enhanced interrogation.”
No war crimes were committed against McCain. And the techniques used are, according to the president, tools to extract accurate information. And so the false confessions that McCain was forced to make were, according to the logic of the Bush administration, as accurate as the “intelligence” we have procured from “interrogating” terror suspects. Feel safer?
The cross-in-the-dirt story – although deeply fishy to any fair observer – is in the realm of the unprovable. But the actual techniques used on McCain, and the lies they were designed to legitimize, are a matter of historical record. And the government of the United States now practices the very same techniques that the Communist government of North Vietnam once proudly used against American soldiers. When they are used against future John McCains, the victims will know, in a way McCain didn’t, that their own government has no moral standing to complain.
And the second point, about McCain himself:
Now the kicker: in the Military Commissions Act, McCain acquiesced to the use of these techniques against terror suspects by the CIA. And so the tortured became the enabler of torture. Someone somewhere cried out in pain for the same reasons McCain once did. And McCain let it continue.
Andrew ends his post by saying, “These are the prices people pay for power.” I’d say that’s a good point as well. McCain has spent most of his post-Vietnam left as a voice of morality on the right, speaking out strongly against torture in many circumstances. But he knew that there was no way he could get the nomination if he voted against the Military Commissions Act and appeared in any way to be “soft” on terrorism. So he compromised, and he did so on one of the issues that had long defined him. He took a position that violated his personal beliefs because his personal beliefs were not politically convenient. Just like Obama did on the FISA bill, by the way.