<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The More Things Change&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/27/the-more-things-change-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/27/the-more-things-change-4/</link>
	<description>It rankles me when somebody tries to tell somebody what to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: llamas</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.com/2008/07/27/the-more-things-change-4/comment-page-1/#comment-160188</link>
		<dc:creator>llamas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.com/?p=10365#comment-160188</guid>
		<description>Just a minute. It&#039;s an awfully long leap to state without equivocation that Crippen was &#039;wrongfully convicted&#039; of murdering his wife, or that Sir Bernard Spilsbury was &#039;corrupt and/or incompetent&#039;, or that there was &#039;suppression of evidence&#039;.

The entire theory of Crippen&#039;s innocence is being put forward by his surviving family, and is based on some very tenuous evidence plus a very large dollop of pure speculation. Let&#039;s have a little more evidence, shall we, before we simply state all these things as though they were proven beyond doubt?

llater,

llamas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a minute. It&#8217;s an awfully long leap to state without equivocation that Crippen was &#8216;wrongfully convicted&#8217; of murdering his wife, or that Sir Bernard Spilsbury was &#8216;corrupt and/or incompetent&#8217;, or that there was &#8216;suppression of evidence&#8217;.</p>
<p>The entire theory of Crippen&#8217;s innocence is being put forward by his surviving family, and is based on some very tenuous evidence plus a very large dollop of pure speculation. Let&#8217;s have a little more evidence, shall we, before we simply state all these things as though they were proven beyond doubt?</p>
<p>llater,</p>
<p>llamas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

